Evaluating Promising Practices in Undergraduate STEM Lecture Courses

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Antepohl, Wolfram, and
   2. Stefan Herzig

   . 1999. “Problem-Based Learning Versus Lecture-Based Learning in a Course of Basic Pharmacology: A Controlled, Randomized Study.” Medical Education 33(2): 106–13.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Aspelmeier, Jeffery E.,
   2. Michael M. Love,
   3. Lauren A. McGill,
   4. Ann N. Elliott, and
   5. Thomas W. Pierce

   . 2012. “Self-Esteem, Locus of Control, College Adjustment, and GPA Among First- and Continuing-Generation Students: A Moderator Model of Generational Status.” Research in Higher Education 53(7): 755–81.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Baillie, Caroline, and
   2. Geraldine Fitzgerald

   . 2010. “Motivation and Attribution in Engineering Students.” European Journal of Engineering Education 25(2): 145–55.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   Black, Paul. 2013. “An Assessment Perezhivanie: Building an Assessment Pedagogy for, with and of Early Childhood Science Learning.” In Valuing Assessment in Science Education: Pedagogy, Curriculum, Policy, edited by Deborah Corrigan, Richard Gunstone, and Alister Jones. New York: Springer.
5. ↵
   1. Brint, Steven,
   2. Allison M. Cantwell, and
   3. Robert A. Hanneman

   . 2008. “The Two Cultures of Undergraduate Academic Engagement.” Research in Higher Education 49(5): 383–402.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. ↵
   Carrell, Scott E., and James E. West. 2008. “Does Professor Quality Matter? Evidence from Random Assignment of Students to Professors.” NBER working paper no. w14081. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Re search.
7. ↵
   1. Chaplin, Susan

   . 2009. “Assessment of the Impact of Case Studies on Student Learning Gains in an Introductory Biology Course.” Journal of College Science Teaching 39(1): 72–79.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   Chen, Xianglei. 2005. First-Generation Students in Postsecondary Education: A Look at Their College Transcripts. NCES 2005–171. Washington: U.S. Department of Education.
9. ↵
   Clotfelter, Charles T., Helen F. Ladd, and Jacob L. Vigdor. 2007. “How and Why Do Teacher Credentials Matter for Student Achievement?” NBER working paper no. 12828. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
10. ↵
    1. Colliver, Jerry A

    . 2000. “Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning Curricular: Research and Theory.” Academic Medicine 75(3): 259–66.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Crouch, Catherine H., and
    2. Eric Mazur

    . 2001. “Peer Instruction: Ten Years of Experience and Results.” American Journal of Physics 69(9): 970–77.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. ↵
    Davis, Jeff. 2012. The First Generation Student Experience: Implications for Campus Practice, and Strategies for Improving persistence and Success. Sterling, Va.: Stylus Publishing.
13. ↵
    1. DeFreitas, Stacie Craft, and
    2. Anne Rinn

    . 2013. “Academic Achievement in First Generation College Students: The Role of Academic Self-Concept.” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 13(1): 57–67.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. DeLuca, V. William, and
    2. Nasim Lari

    . 2013. “Developing Students’ Metacognition Skills in a Data-Rich Environment.” Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research. 14(1): 45–55.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Deslauriers, Louis.
    2. Ellen Schelew, and
    3. Carl Wieman

    . 2011. “Improved Learning in Large-Enrollment Physics Class.” Science 332(6031): 862–64.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. ↵
    1. Dochy, Filip,
    2. Mien Segers,
    3. Piet Van den Bossche, and
    4. David Gijbels

    . 2003. “Effects of Problem-Based Learning: A Meta-Analysis.” Learning and Instruction 13(5): 533–68.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Doughterty, Ralph C.,
    2. Graig W. Bowen,
    3. Terry A. Berger,
    4. William S. Rees,
    5. Edward K. Mellon, and
    6. Elizabeth J. Pulliam

    . 1995. “Cooperative Learning and Enhanced Communication: Effects on Student Performance, Retention, and Attitudes in General Chemistry.” Journal of Chemical Education 72(2): 793–97.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. ↵
    1. Farrior, Donna,
    2. William Hamill,
    3. Leslie Keiser,
    4. Michael Kessler,
    5. Peter LoPresti,
    6. Jerry McCoy,
    7. Shirley Barbara Pomeranz,
    8. William Potter, and
    9. Bryan Tapp

    . 2007. “Interdisciplinary Lively Application Projects in Calculus Courses.” Journal of STEM Education 8(3): 1–13.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Felder, Richard M.,
    2. Gary N. Felder, and
    3. E. Jacquelin Dietz

    . 1998. “A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention v. Comparisons with Traditionally-Taught Students.” Journal of Engineering Education 87(4): 469–80.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. ↵
    1. Freeman, Scott,
    2. Sarah L. Eddy,
    3. Miles McDonough,
    4. Michelle K. Smith,
    5. Nnadozie Okoroafor,
    6. Hannah Jordt, and
    7. Mary Pat Wenderoth

    . 2014. “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(23): 8410–15.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. ↵
    Garcia, Gina A., Josephine A. Gasiewski, and Sylvia Hurtado. 2011. “Principle of Good Practice in Introductory STEM Courses: Listening to the Voices of Faculty and Students.” Association for the Study of Higher Education. Accessed December 17, 2015. http://www.heri.ucla.edu/nih/downloads/ASHE2011GasiewskiIntroClassrooms.pdf.
22. ↵
    1. Gijbels, David,
    2. Filip Dochy,
    3. Piet Van den Bossche, and
    4. Mien Segers

    . 2005. “Effects of Problem-Based Learning: A Meta-Analysis from the Angle of Assessment.” Review of Educational Research 75(1): 27–61.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. ↵
    Goldin, Claudia, and Lawrence Katz. 2009. The Race Between Education and Technology. Boston, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
24. ↵
    Goldman, Alvin I. 1986. Epistemology and Cognition. Boston, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
25. ↵
    Grant, Bruce W. 2008. “Practitioner Research as a Way of Knowing: A Case Study of Teacher Learning in Improving Undergraduates’ Concept Acquisition of Evolution by Natural Selection.” NAS Reviewed Commissioned Paper from the National Research Council Board on Science Education Workshop “Linking Evidence and Promising Practices in STEM Undergraduate Education.” Washington, D.C. (June 30, 2008).
26. ↵
    1. Hake, Richard R

    . 1998. “Interactive-Engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses.” American Journal of Physics 66(1): 64–74.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
27. ↵
    1. Han, Jae Hoon, and
    2. Adam Finkelstein

    . 2013. “Understanding the Effects of Professors’ Pedagogical Development with Clicker Assessment and Feedback Technologies and the Impact on Students’ Engagement and Learning in Higher Education.” Computers & Education 65(1): 64–76.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. ↵
    1. Harlen, Wynne, and
    2. Mary James

    . 1997. “Assessment and Learning: Differences and Relationships Between Formative and Summative Assessment.” Assessment in Education 4(3): 365–79.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Hora, Matthew T., and
    2. Joseph J. Ferrare

    . 2014. “Remeasuring Postsecondary Teaching: How Singular Categories of Instruction Obscure the Multiple Dimensions of Classroom Practice.” Journal of College Science Teaching 43(3): 36–41.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    Hurtado, Sylvia, Kevin Eagen, and Mitchell Chang. 2010. “Degrees of Success: Bachelor's Degree Completion Rates Among Initial STEM Majors.” Research brief. Los Angeles: University of California, Higher Education Research Institute. Accessed December 17, 2015. http://www.heri.ucla.edu/nih/downloads/2010%20-%20Hurtado,%20Eagan,%20Chang%20-%20Degrees%20of%20Success.pdf.
31. ↵
    1. Ishitani, Terry T

    . 2006. “Studying Attrition and Degree Completion Behavior Among First-Generation College Students in the United States.” Journal of Higher Education 77(5): 861–85.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. ↵
    1. Khousmi, Ahmed, and
    2. Brahim Hadjou

    . 2005. “Learning Probabilities in Computer Engineering by Using a Competency and Problem-Based Approach.” Journal of STEM Education 6(3/4): 5–14.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Knight, Jennifer K., and
    2. William B. Wood

    . 2005. “Teaching More by Lecturing Less.” Cell Biology Education 4(4): 298–310.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
34. ↵
    1. Kyle, William C

    . 1997. “The Imperative to Improve Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34(6): 547–49.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Lansiquot, Reneta D.,
    2. Reginald A. Blake,
    3. Janet Liou-Mark, and
    4. A. E. Dreyfuss

    , 2011. “Interdisciplinary Problem-Solving to Advance STEM Success for All Students.” Peer Review: Association of American Colleges and Universities 13(3): 19–22.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    Levy, Frank, and Richard J. Murnane. 2012. The New Division of Labor: How Computers Are Creating the Next Job Market. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
37. ↵
    1. Martinez, Julia A.,
    2. Kenneth J. Sher,
    3. Jennifer L. Krull, and
    4. Phillip K. Wood

    . 2009. “Blue-Collar Scholars?: Mediators and Moderators of University Attrition in First-Generation College Students.” Journal of College Student Development 50(1): 87–103.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
38. ↵
    1. McGinn, Michelle K., and
    2. Wolff-Michael Roth

    . 1999. “Preparing Students for Competent Scientific Practice: Implications of Recent Research in Science and Technology Studies.” Educational Researcher 28(3): 14–24.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
39. ↵
    1. Mervis, Jeffrey

    . 2010. “Better Intro Courses Seen as Key to Reducing Attrition of STEM Majors.” Science 330(6002): 306.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
40. ↵
    1. Michael, Joel

    . 2006. “Where's the Evidence that Active Learning Works?” Advances in Physiology Education 30(4): 159–67.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. ↵
    1. Nasr, Karim J., and
    2. Bassem H. Ramadan

    . 2008. “Impact Assessment of Problem-Based Learning in an Engineering Course.” Journal of STEM Education 9(3/4): 16–24.

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    National Academy of Engineering (NAE). 2005. Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
43. ↵
    National Science Board (NSB). 2010. “Projected Growth of Employment in S&E Occupations, Chapter 3 Science and Engineering.” Last modified January 2010. Accessed October 20, 2014. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind10/c3/c3s.htm.
44. ↵
    1. Newman, Mark J

    . 2005. “Problem-Based Learning: An Introduction and Overview of the Key Features of the Approach.” Journal of Veterinary Medical Education 32(1): 12–20.

    OpenUrlPubMed
45. ↵
    Nielsen, Natalie. 2011. Promising Practices in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education: Summary of Two Workshops. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
46. ↵
    Nunez, Anne-Marie, and Stephanie Cuccaro-Alamin. 1998. First-Generation Students: Undergraduates Whose Parents Never Enrolled in Postsecondary Education. NCES 98-082. Washington: U.S. Department of Education. Accessed December 17, 2015. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs98/98082.pdf.
47. ↵
    1. Pace, David, and
    2. Joan Middendorf

    . 2004. “Decoding the Disciplines: Helping Students Learn Disciplinary Ways of Thinking.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning Special Issue 2004(98): 1–12.

    OpenUrl
48. ↵
    1. Sawada, Daiyo,
    2. Michael D. Piburn,
    3. Eugene Judson,
    4. Jeff Turley,
    5. Kathleen Falconer,
    6. Russell Benford, and
    7. Irene Bloom

    . 2002. “Measuring Reform Practices in Science and Mathematics Classrooms: The Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol.” School Science and Mathematics 102(6): 245–53.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
49. ↵
    Singer, Susan R., Natalie R. Nielsen, and Heidi A. Schweingruber. 2012. Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
50. ↵
    1. Stage, Frances K., and
    2. Jillian Kinzie

    . 2009. “Reform in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: The Classroom Context.” Journal of General Education 58(2): 85–105.

    OpenUrl
51. ↵
    1. Strobel, Johannes, and
    2. Angela van Barneveld

    . 2009. “When Is PBL More Effective? A Meta-Synthesis of Meta-Analyses Comparing PBL to Conventional Classroom.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 3(1): 44–58.

    OpenUrl
52. ↵
    1. Tinto, Vincent

    . 2006. “Research and Practice of Student Retention: What Next?” Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice 8(1): 1–19.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
53. University of California, Irvine Office of Institutional Research. 2013. Data provided under IRB# 2012-9277. Accessed December 17, 2015. http://www.oir.uci.edu.
54. ↵
    Upcraft, M. Lee, John N. Gardner, and Betsy O. Barefoot, eds. 2005. Challenge and Support: Creating Climates for First-Year Student Success. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
55. ↵
    Vergara, Claudie E., Mark Urban-Lurain, Cindee Dresen, Tammy Coxen, Taryn MacFarlane, Kysha Frazier, and Thomas F. Wolff. 2009. “Aligning Computing Education with Engineering Workforce Computational Needs: New Curricular Directions to Improve Computational Thinking in Engineering Graduates.” Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education. San Antonio, Tex. (October 21, 2009).
56. ↵
    1. Vuong, Mui,
    2. Sharon Brown-Welty, and
    3. Susan Tracz

    . 2010. “The Effects of Self-Efficacy on Academic Success of First-Generation College Sophomore Students.” Journal of College Student Development 51(1): 50–64.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
57. ↵
    Walkington, Candice, Prerna Arora, Shasta Ihorn, Jessica Gordon, Mary Walker, Larry Abraham, and Mary Marder. 2012. “Development of the UTeach Observation Protocol: A Classroom Observation Instrument to Evaluate Mathematics and Science Teachers from the UTeach Preparation Program.” Unpublished paper. Southern Methodist University.
58. ↵
    1. Wolter, Bjørn H. K.,
    2. Mary A. Lundeberg,
    3. Hosun Kang, and
    4. Clyde F. Herreld

    . 2011. “Students’ Perceptions of Using Personal Response Systems (“Clicker”) with Cases in Science.” Journal of College Science Teaching 40(4): 14–19.

    OpenUrl
59. ↵
    1. Xu, Zeyu,
    2. Jane Hannaway, and
    3. Colin Taylor

    . 2011. “Making a Difference? The Effects of Teach for America in High School.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 30(3): 447–69.

    OpenUrlCrossRef