Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Publications
    • rsf

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Publications
    • rsf
  • Log in
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Advanced Search

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Follow rsf on Twitter
  • Visit rsf on Facebook
  • Follow rsf on Google Plus
Research ArticleIV. Teaching and Learning: Contexts and Practices
Open Access

Aligning Science Achievement and STEM Expectations for College Success: A Comparative Study of Curricular Standardization

Siqi Han, Claudia Buchmann
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences April 2016, 2 (1) 192-211; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2016.2.1.09
Siqi Han
aPh.D. candidate of sociology at the Ohio State University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claudia Buchmann
bProfessor and chair of sociology at the Ohio State University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Allmendinger, Jutta
    . 1989. “Educational Systems and Labor Market Outcomes.” European Sociological Review 5(3): 231–50.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Areepattamannil, Shaljan, and
    2. Berinderjeet Kaur
    . 2012. “Factors Predicting Science Achievement of Immigrant and Non-Immigrant Students: A Multilevel Analysis.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 11(5): 1183–207. doi:10.1007/s10763–012–9369–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Ayalon, Hanna, and
    2. Adam Gamoran
    . 2000. “Stratification in Academic Secondary Programs and Educational Inequality in Israel and the United States.” Comparative Education Review 44(1): 54–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Ayalon, Hanna, and
    2. Idit Livneh
    . 2013. “Educational Standardization and Gender Differences in Mathematics Achievement: A Comparative Study.” Social Science Research 42(2): 432–45. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.10.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Baker, David P.,
    2. Brian Goesling, and
    3. Gerald K. LeTendre
    . 2002. “Socioeconomic Status, School Quality, and National Economic Development: A Cross-National Analysis of the ‘Heyneman-Loxley Effect’ on Mathematics and Science Achievement.” Comparative Education Review 46(3): 291–312. doi:10.1086/341159.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Bishop, John H
    . 1997. “The Effect of National Standards and Curriculum-Based Exams on Achievement.” American Economic Review 87(2): 260–64.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Bishop, John H. 2006. “Drinking from the Fountain of Knowledge: Student Incentive to Study and Learn—Externalities, Information Problems and Peer Pressure.” In Handbook of the Economics of Education, vol. 2, edited by Eric Hanushek and Finis Welch. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Accessed February 23, 2016. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574069206020150.
  8. ↵
    1. Bol, Thijs,
    2. Jacqueline Witschge,
    3. Herman G. Van de Werfhorst, and
    4. Jaap Dronkers
    . 2014. “Curricular Tracking and Central Examinations: Counterbalancing the Impact of Social Background on Student Achievement in 36 Countries.” Social Forces 92(4): 1545–72. doi:10.1093/sf/sou003.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Charles, Maria, and
    2. Karen Bradley
    . 2009. “Indulging Our Gendered Selves? Sex Segregation by Field of Study in 44 Countries.” American Journal of Sociology 114(4): 924–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Chen, Xianglei, and Matthew Soldner. 2013. STEM Attrition: College Students’ Paths into and out of STEM Fields. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2014–001. Washington: U.S. Department of Education. Accessed February 23, 2016. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED544470.pdf.
  11. ↵
    1. Chiu, Ming Ming, and
    2. Lawrence Khoo
    . 2005. “Effects of Resources, Inequality, and Privilege Bias on Achievement: Country, School, and Student Level Analyses.” American Educational Research Journal 42(4): 575–603. doi:10.3102/00028312042004575.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    Darling-Hammond, Linda. 2010. The Flat World and Education: How America's Commitment to Equity Will Determine Our Future. New York: Teachers College Press.
  13. ↵
    1. Goldhaber, Dan D., and
    2. Dominic J. Brewer
    . 2000. “Does Teacher Certification Matter? High School Teacher Certification Status and Student Achievement.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 22(2): 129–45. doi:10.3102/01623737022002129.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Grossman, Tabitha, Ryan Reyna, and Stephanie Shipton. 2011. Realizing the Potential: How Governors Can Lead Effective Implementation of the Common Core State Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Governors Assocation, Center for Best Practices. Accessed February 23, 2016. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED532524.
  15. ↵
    1. Kjærnsli, Marit, and
    2. Svein Lie
    . 2011. “Students’ Preference for Science Careers: International Comparisons Based on PISA 2006.” International Journal of Science Education 33(1): 121–44. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.518642.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Levels, Mark, and
    2. Jaap Dronkers
    . 2008. “Educational Performance of Native and Immigrant Children from Various Countries of Origin.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 31(8): 1404–25. doi:10.1080/01419870701682238.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    Levels, Mark, Jaap Dronkers, and Christopher Jencks. 2014. “Mind the Gap: Compositional, Cultural and Institutional Explanations for Numeracy Skills Disparities Between Adult Immigrants and Natives in Western Countries.” HKS Faculty Research working paper RWP14-020. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University. Accessed February 23, 2016. https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/getFile.aspx?Id=1048.
  18. ↵
    1. Maple, Sue A., and
    2. Frances K. Stage
    . 1991. “Influences on the Choice of Math/Science Major by Gender and Ethnicity.” American Educational Research Journal 28(1): 37–60. doi:10.3102/00028312028001037.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Marsh, Herbert W.,
    2. Adel Salah Abduljabbar,
    3. Philip D. Parker,
    4. Alexandre J. S. Morin,
    5. Faisal Abdelfattah,
    6. Benjamin Nagengast,
    7. Jens Möller, and
    8. Maher M. Abu-Hilal
    . 2015. “The Internal/External Frame of Reference Model of Self-Concept and Achievement Relations Age-Cohort and Cross-Cultural Differences.” American Educational Research Journal 52(1): 168–202. doi:10.3102/0002831214549453.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Marsh, Herbert W., and
    2. Kit-Tai Hau
    . 2003. “Big-Fish—Little-Pond Effect on Academic Self-Concept: A Cross-Cultural (26-Country) Test of the Negative Effects of Academically Selective Schools.” American Psychologist 58(5): 364–76. doi:10.1037/0003–066X.58.5.364.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. McDaniel, Anne
    . 2010. “Cross-National Gender Gaps in Educational Expectations: The Influence of National-Level Gender Ideology and Educational Systems.” Comparative Education Review 54(1): 27–50. doi:10.1086/648060.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Montt, Guillermo
    . 2011. “Cross-National Differences in Educational Achievement Inequality.” Sociology of Education 84(1): 49–68. doi:10.1177/0038040710392717.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    1. Nagengast, Benjamin, and
    2. Herbert W. Marsh
    . 2012. “Big Fish in Little Ponds Aspire More: Mediation and Cross-Cultural Generalizability of School-Average Ability Effects on Self-Concept and Career Aspirations in Science.” Journal of Educational Psychology 104(4): 1033–53. doi:10.1037/a0027697.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    National Academy of Sciences. 2007. Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. Accessed February 23, 2016. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11463/rising-above-the-gathering-storm-energizing-and-employing-america-for.
  25. ↵
    National Research Council. 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. Accessed February 23, 2016. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/13165/a-framework-for-k-12-science-education-practices-crosscutting-concepts.
  26. ↵
    OECD. 2007. PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow, vol. 1. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Accessed February 23, 2016. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/book/9789264040014-en.
  27. ↵
    OECD. 2009. PISA Data Analysis Manual: SPSS, 2nd ed. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Accessed February 23, 2016. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/book/9789264056275-en.
  28. ↵
    Olson, Steve, and Donna Gerardi Riordan. 2012. Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, D.C.: Executive Office of the President. Accessed February 23, 2016. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED541511.pdf.
  29. ↵
    1. Park, Hyunjoon
    . 2008. “The Varied Educational Effects of Parent-Child Communication: A Comparative Study of Fourteen Countries.” Comparative Education Review 52(2): 219–43. doi:10.1086/524044.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    1. Sadler, Philip M., and
    2. Robert H. Tai
    . 2007. “The Two High-School Pillars Supporting College.” Science 317(5837): 457–58. doi:10.1126/science.1144214.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Shavit, Yossi, and Walter Muller. 1998. From School to Work. A Comparative Study of Educational Qualifications and Occupational Destinations. New York: Oxford University Press. Accessed February 23, 2016. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED419142.
  32. ↵
    1. Stevenson, David Lee, and
    2. David P. Baker
    . 1991. “State Control of the Curriculum and Classroom Instruction.” Sociology of Education 64(1): 1–10. doi:10.2307/2112887.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    Stinebrickner, Todd R., and Ralph Stinebrickner. 2011. “Math or Science? Using Longitudinal Expectations Data to Examine the Process of Choosing a College Major.” NBER working paper no. 16869. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research. Accessed February 23, 2016. http://www.nber.org/papers/w16869.
  34. ↵
    Subotnik, Rena, Ashley Edmiston, and Kristin Rayhack. 2007. “Developing National Policies in STEM Talent Development: Obstacles and Opportunities.” In Science Education: Models and Networking of Student Research Training, 28–38. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  35. ↵
    1. Tai, Robert H.,
    2. Christine Qi Liu,
    3. Adam V. Maltese, and
    4. Xitao Fan
    . 2006. “Planning Early for Careers in.” Science 312(5777): 1143–44. doi:10.1126/science.1128690.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    UNESCO. 2006. “World Data on Education Sixth Edition, 2006/07.” International Bureau of Education. Accessed December 17, 2015. http://www.ibe.unesco.org/en/services/online-materials/world-data-on-education/sixth-edition-2006-07.html.
  37. ↵
    Vincent-Lancrin, Stéphan. 2008. “The Reversal of Gender Inequalities in Higher Education.” In Higher Education to 2030, vol. 1, Demography, 265–98. Paris: OECD Publishing. Accessed February 23, 2016. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/chapter/9789264040663-11-en.
  38. ↵
    World Bank. 2005. “GDP per Capita in (Constant 2005 US$).” Accessed December 17, 2015. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.KD
  39. ↵
    1. Wößmann, Ludger
    . 2005. “The Effect Heterogeneity of Central Examinations: Evidence from TIMSS, TIMSS-Repeat and PISA.” Education Economics 13(2): 143–69. doi:10.1080/09645290500031165.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. ↵
    Xie, Yu, and Kimberlee A. Shauman. 2006. Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: 2 (1)
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Vol. 2, Issue 1
1 Apr 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Aligning Science Achievement and STEM Expectations for College Success: A Comparative Study of Curricular Standardization
(Your Name) has sent you a message from RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Aligning Science Achievement and STEM Expectations for College Success: A Comparative Study of Curricular Standardization
Siqi Han, Claudia Buchmann
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Apr 2016, 2 (1) 192-211; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2016.2.1.09

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Aligning Science Achievement and STEM Expectations for College Success: A Comparative Study of Curricular Standardization
Siqi Han, Claudia Buchmann
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Apr 2016, 2 (1) 192-211; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2016.2.1.09
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • BACKGROUND
    • DATA AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating Promising Practices in Undergraduate STEM Lecture Courses
Show more IV. Teaching and Learning: Contexts and Practices

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • STEM attrition
  • curriculum
  • standardization
  • science achievement
  • cross-national research

© 2025 RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Powered by HighWire