Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Publications
    • rsf

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Publications
    • rsf
  • Log in
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Advanced Search

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Follow rsf on Twitter
  • Visit rsf on Facebook
  • Follow rsf on Google Plus
Research Article
Open Access

Ethnoracial Transformations? Linking Administrative Data to Explain Changes in Identification

John Anders, Mary E. Campbell, Craig Wesley Carpenter, Luna Chandna
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences January 2025, 11 (1) 65-84; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2025.11.1.04
John Anders
aAssistant professor in the Department of Economics at Trinity University, San Antonio, Texas, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for John Anders
Mary E. Campbell
bProfessor in the Department of Sociology at Texas A&M University and director of the Texas Federal Statistical Research Center, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mary E. Campbell
Craig Wesley Carpenter
cAssistant professor in the Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics at Michigan State University, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Craig Wesley Carpenter
Luna Chandna
dGraduate student in the Department of Sociology at Texas A&M University, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Luna Chandna
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Additional
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Ethnoracial Patterns: All Flows (Counts)

    Source: Authors’ calculations based on U.S. Census Bureau 2010 and American Community Survey, 2010–2019.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Ethnoracial Patterns: All Flows (Percent of 2010 Decennial)

    Source: Authors’ calculations based on U.S. Census Bureau 2010 and American Community Survey, 2010–2019.

    Note: The ethnoracial flows are from the 2010 Census on the left to the 2010–2019 ACS on the right. For respondents with multiple ACS entries, we restrict to the most recent response. There are 196 (14 × 14) ethnoracial pairs between which respondents could change. This figure pools native- and foreign-born respondents. The sample is restricted to cohorts born from 1920 to 1985.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Prominent Racial Flows Within Ethnicity (Pooled)

    Source: Authors’ calculations based on U.S. Census Bureau 2010 and American Community Survey, 2010–2019.

    Note: Ethnoracial flows are from the 2010 Census on the left to the 2010– 2019 ACS on the right. For respondents with multiple ACS entries, we restrict to the most recent response. There are 196 ethnoracial pairs between which respondents could change. This figure restricts to those pairs in which ethnicity remained constant, and for which the percentage of respondents who switched racial responses was at least 18 percent, which is the 95th percentile of the variation in racial change. We call these flow rates above the 95th percentile Prominent Flows. This figure pools native- and foreign-born respondents. The sample is restricted to cohorts born between 1920 and 1985.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Racial Flows: Flows from Asian, Black, White

    Source: Authors’ calculations based on U.S. Census Bureau 2010 and American Community Survey, 2010–2019.

    Note: Ethnoracial flows are from the 2010 Census on the left to the 2010–2019 ACS on the right. For respondents with multiple ACS entries, we restrict to the most recent response. There are 196 ethnoracial pairs between which respondents could change. This figure restricts to those pairs in which initial 2010 identification was non-Hispanic Asian, Black, or White. This figure pools native- and foreign-born respondents. The sample is restricted to cohorts born between 1920 and 1985.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Ethnic Flows

    Source: Authors’ calculations based on U.S. Census Bureau 2010 and American Community Survey, 2010–2019.

    Note: Ethnoracial flows are from the 2010 Census on the left to the 2010–2019 ACS on the right. For respondents with multiple ACS entries, we restrict to the most recent response. There are 196 ethnoracial pairs between which respondents could change. This figure restricts to those pairs in which initial 2010 identification was non-Hispanic, but later identification was non-Hispanic. This figure pools native and foreign-born respondents. The sample is restricted to cohorts born between 1920 and 1985.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Prominent Racial Flows, Within Ethnicity (Native-Born)

    Source: Authors’ calculations based on U.S. Census Bureau 2010 and American Community Survey, 2010–2019.

    Note: Ethnoracial flows are from the 2010 Census on the left to the 2010–2019 ACS on the right. For respondents with multiple ACS entries, we restrict to the most recent response. There are 196 ethnoracial pairs between which respondents could change. This figure restricts to those pairs in which ethnicity remained constant, and for which the percentage of respondents who switched racial responses was at least 18 percent, which is the 95th percentile of the variation in racial change. We call these flow rates above the 95th percentile “Prominent Flows.” This figure pools native- and foreign-born respondents. The sample is restricted to cohorts born between 1920 and 1985. This figure differs from figure 3 in that it is further restricted to native-born U.S. respondents.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Prominent Racial Flows, Within Ethnicity (Foreign-Born)

    Source: Authors’ calculations based on U.S. Census Bureau 2010 and American Community Survey, 2010–2019.

    Note: Ethnoracial flows are from the 2010 Census on the left to the 2010–2019 ACS on the right. For respondents with multiple ACS entries, we restrict to the most recent response. There are 196 ethnoracial pairs between which respondents could change. This figure restricts to those pairs in which ethnicity remained constant, and for which the percentage of respondents who switched racial responses was at least 18 percent, which is the 95th percentile of the variation in racial change. We call these flow rates above the 95th percentile Prominent Flows. This figure pools native- and foreign-born respondents. The sample is restricted to cohorts born between 1920 and 1985. This figure differs from figure 3 in that it is further restricted to foreign-born U.S. respondents.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Trends in Ethnoracial Change by Birth Cohort

    Source: Authors’ calculations based on U.S. Census Bureau 2010 and American Community Survey, 2010–2019.

    Note: Rates of ethnoracial change are from the 2010 Census to the 2010–2019 ACS. Rates are broken down by birth decade. For respondents with multiple ACS entries, we restrict to the most recent response. There are 196 ethnoracial pairs between which respondents could change. This figure shows rate changes for changes from any designation to any different designation (left axis) as well as the rate change from Black to White or White to Black. (Black-White changes are inclusive of ethnicities. For example, a respondent who changed ethnicity but still identified as Black would not be counted as a Black-White change.) This figure pools native- and foreign-born respondents. The sample is restricted to cohorts born between 1920 and 1985.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Do Birth Year and Birth Place Explain Ethnoracial Change?

    Source: Authors’ calculations based on U.S. Census Bureau 2010 and American Community Survey, 2010–2019.

    Note: The figure displays R2 values from different specifications, each aimed at showing how much of the variation in ethnoracial identity change can be explained by variation in birth year and birth county. Each specification is an OLS regression where the rate of ethnoracial change between any categories is the dependent variable. The first row displays the R2 where the right-hand side features a fixed effect for each birth year (1920 through 1985). The second row displays the R2 where the right-hand side features a fixed effect for each birthplace. (Birthplace is measured by birth county for U.S. native-born respondents and a generic indicator for foreign-born respondents.) The third row displays the R2 where the right-hand side combines both birth-year and birthplace fixed effects. Last, the fourth row displays the R2 where the right-hand side not only features birth-year and birthplace fixed effects but also includes birthplace-specific linear trends. For example, for native-born respondents each birth county is modeled on a separate linear trend across birth years. This figure pools native- and foreign-born respondents. The sample is restricted to cohorts born between 1920 and 1985.

  • Figure 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 10.

    Does Income Predict Ethnoracial Change?

    Source: Authors’ calculations based on U.S. Census Bureau 2010 and American Community Survey, 2010–2019.

    Note: Rates of ethnoracial change are from the 2010 Census to the 2010–2019 ACS. Rates are broken down by (nominal) personal income deciles, as self-reported on the restricted use ACS. Unlike public release versions of the ACS microdata, the restricted use ACS income variable is not top-coded. For respondents with multiple ACS entries, we restrict to the most recent response. There are 196 ethnoracial pairs between which respondents could change. This figure shows change rates for changes from any designation to any different designation (left axis) as well as the rate change from Black to White or White to Black. (Black-White changes are inclusive of ethnicities. For example, a respondent who changed ethnicity but still identified as Black would not be counted as a Black-White change.) This figure pools native- and foreign-born respondents. The sample is restricted to cohorts born between 1920 and 1985.

  • Figure 11.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 11.

    Does Educational Attainment Predict Ethnoracial Change?

    Source: Authors’ calculations based on U.S. Census Bureau 2010 and American Community Survey, 2010–2019.

    Note: Rates of ethnoracial change are from the 2010 Census to the 2010–2019 ACS. Rates are broken down by educational attainment levels, as self-reported on the restricted use ACS. For respondents with multiple ACS entries, we restrict to the most recent response. There are 196 ethnoracial pairs between which respondents could change. This figure shows change rates for changes from any designation to any different designation (left axis) as well as the rate change from Black to White or White to Black. (Black-White changes are inclusive of ethnicities. For example, a respondent who changed ethnicity but still identified as Black would not be counted as a Black-White change.) This figure pools native- and foreign-born respondents. The sample is restricted to cohorts born between 1920 and 1985.

  • Figure 12.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 12.

    Does Household Type Predict Ethnoracial Change?

    Source: Authors’ calculations based on U.S. Census Bureau 2010 and American Community Survey, 2010–2019

    Note: Rates of ethnoracial change are from the 2010 Census to the 2010–2019 ACS. Rates are broken down by household type, as self-reported on the restricted-use ACS. For respondents with multiple ACS entries, we restrict to the most recent response. There are 196 ethnoracial pairs between which respondents could change. This figure shows rate changes for changes from any designation to any different designation (left axis) as well as the rate change from Black to White or White to Black. (Black-White changes are inclusive of ethnicities. For example, a respondent who changed ethnicity but still identified as Black would not be counted as a Black-White change.) This figure pools native- and foreign-born respondents. The sample is restricted to cohorts born between 1920 and 1985.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Appendix

    Appendix

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Adobe PDF - Anders_Online_Appendix.pdf - Appendix
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: 11 (1)
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Vol. 11, Issue 1
1 Jan 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ethnoracial Transformations? Linking Administrative Data to Explain Changes in Identification
(Your Name) has sent you a message from RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Ethnoracial Transformations? Linking Administrative Data to Explain Changes in Identification
John Anders, Mary E. Campbell, Craig Wesley Carpenter, Luna Chandna
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Jan 2025, 11 (1) 65-84; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2025.11.1.04

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Ethnoracial Transformations? Linking Administrative Data to Explain Changes in Identification
John Anders, Mary E. Campbell, Craig Wesley Carpenter, Luna Chandna
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Jan 2025, 11 (1) 65-84; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2025.11.1.04
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ETHNORACIAL CHANGE WITHIN A LIFETIME: LITERATURE REVIEW
    • MEASUREMENT OF ETHNICITY AND RACE
    • RESEARCH QUESTIONS
    • LIMITATIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
    • DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Additional
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • administrative data
  • linked data
  • ethnoracial fluidity
  • racial change
  • immigrant identity

© 2025 RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Powered by HighWire