Administrative Burden in Federal Student Loan Repayment, and Socially Stratified Access to Income-Driven Repayment Plans

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. AccessLex

   . 2021. “The Winding Road of Income Driven Repayment.” Institute Issue Brief. West Chester, Pa.: AccessLex Institute. Accessed September 30, 2021. https://www.accesslex.org/tools-and-resources/issue-brief-winding-road-income-driven-repayment.
2. ↵
   1. Baum, Sandy, and
   2. Matthew Chingos

   . 2017. “Reforming Federal Student Loan Repayment: A Single, Automatic, Income-Driven System.” Washington, D.C. Urban Institute.
3. ↵
   1. Bhargava, Saurabh, and
   2. Dayanand Manoli

   . 2015. “Psychological Frictions and the Incomplete Take-Up of Social Benefits: Evidence from an IRS Field Experiment.” American Economic Review 105(11): 3489–529.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Brodkin, Evelyn Z., and
   2. Malay Majmundar

   . 2010. “Administrative Exclusion: Organizations and the Hidden Costs of Welfare Claiming.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20(4): 827–48.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Cherlin, Andrew J.,
   2. Karen Bogen,
   3. James M. Quane, and
   4. Linda Burton

   . 2002. “Operating Within the Rules: Welfare Recipients’ Experiences with Sanctions and Case Closings.” Social Service Review 76(3): 387–405.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Christensen, Julian,
   2. Lene Aarøe,
   3. Martin Baekgaard,
   4. Pamela Herd, and
   5. Donald P. Moynihan

   . 2020. “Human Capital and Administrative Burden: The Role of Cognitive Resources in Citizen-State Interactions.” Public Administration Review 80(1): 127–36.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Collier, Daniel,
   2. Dan Fitzpatrick, and
   3. Christopher Marsicano

   . 2022. “Exploring the Relationship of Enrollment in IDR to Borrower Demographics and Financial Outcomes.” Journal of Student Financial Aid 51(2): Article 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55504/0884-9153.1740.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Conkling, Thomas S., and
   2. Christa Gibbs

   . 2019. “Borrower Experiences on Income-Driven Repayment.” Research Reports Series no. 19-10. Washington, D.C. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
9. ↵
   1. Consumer Data Industry Association

   . 2020. 2020 Credit Reporting Resource Guide. Washington, D.C.: Consumer Data Industry Association.
10. ↵
    1. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

    . 2015. Student Loan Servicing: Analysis of Public Input and Recommendations for Reform. Washington, D.C. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Accessed December 22, 2022. https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201509_cfpb_student-loan-servicing-report.pdf.
11. ↵
    1. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

    . 2021. Consumer Complaint Database. Accessed September 1, 2021. https://www.consumerfinance.gov/data-research/consumer-complaints/#download-the-data.
12. ↵
    1. Darolia, Rajeev, and
    2. Andrew Sullivan

    . 2020. “Federal Student Loan Servicing Accountability and Incentives in Contracts.” FRB of Philadelphia Payment Cards Center discussion paper no. DP 20–05. Philadelphia: Federal Reserve Bank. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21799/frbp.dp.2020.05.
13. ↵
    1. Delisle, Jason D., and
    2. Lexi West

    . 2019. “Student Loan Servicers: Scammers or Scapegoats?” Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.
14. ↵
    1. Dudley, Kristin,
    2. Samuel Austin Caperton,
    3. Nichole Smith Ritchie, and
    4. David Richards

    . 2020. 2012 Beginning Postsecondary Students Longitudinal Study (BPS: 12) Student Records Collection. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed December 22, 2022. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2021/2021524.pdf.
15. ↵
    1. Frotman, Seth, and
    2. Sarah Gibbs

    . 2017. “Too Many Student Loan Borrowers Struggling, Not Enough Benefiting from Affordable Repayment Options.” CFPB Blog, August 16. Accessed December 22, 2022. https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/blog/too-many-student-loan-borrowers-struggling-not-enough-benefiting-affordable-repayment-options/.
16. ↵
    1. Goldstein, Adam, and
    2. James Frank Wharam

    . 2022. “Choose the Plan That’s Right for You’: Choice Devolution as Class-Biased Institutional Change in Employer Sponsored Insurance.” Working paper. Princeton University.
17. ↵
    1. Greene, Jessica,
    2. Judith H. Hibbard,
    3. Anna Dixon, and
    4. Martin Tusler

    . 2006. “Which Consumers Are Ready for Consumer-Directed Health Plans?” Journal of Consumer Policy 29(3): 247–62.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. ↵
    1. Haughwout, Andrew F.,
    2. Donghoon Lee,
    3. Joelle Scally, and
    4. Wilbert Van der Klaauw

    . 2019. “Racial Disparities in Student Loan Outcomes.” Liberty Street Economics (Federal Reserve Bank of New York blog), November 13. Accessed December 22, 2022. https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2019/11/just-released-racial-disparities-in-student-loan-outcomes/.
19. ↵
    1. Herd, Pamela, and
    2. Donald P. Moynihan

    . 2018. Administrative Burden: Policymaking by Other Means. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
20. ↵
    1. Houle, Jason, and
    2. Fenaba Addo

    . 2018. “Racial Disparities in Student Loan Debt and the Reproducation of the Fragile Black Middle Class.” Madison: Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
21. ↵
    1. Karamcheva, Nadia,
    2. Jeffrey Perry, and
    3. Constantine Yannelis

    . 2020. “Income-Driven Repayment Plans for Student Loans.” Working Paper 2020-02. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Budget Office.
22. ↵
    1. Kopparam, Rasha, and
    2. Austin Clemens

    . 2020. “The Rising Number of U.S. Households with Burdensome Student Debt Calls for a Federal Response.” Washington, D.C.: Washington Center for Equitable Growth. Accessed December 22, 2022. https://equitablegrowth.org/the-rising-number-of-u-s-households-with-burdensome-student-debt-calls-for-a-federal-response/.
23. ↵
    1. Lareau, Annette

    . 2015. “Cultural Knowledge and Social Inequality.” American Sociological Review 80(1): 1–27.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. ↵
    1. Lewis, Kevin M., and
    2. Nicole Vanatko

    . 2019. “Federal and State Regulation of Student Loan Servicers: A Legal Overview.” CRS Report R45917, Version 2. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.
25. ↵
    1. Moss, Jennifer L.,
    2. Norman J. Johnson,
    3. Mandy Yu,
    4. Sean F. Altekruse, and
    5. Kathleen A. Cronin

    . 2021. “Comparisons of Individual- and Area-Level Socioeconomic Status as Proxies for Individual-level Measures: Evidence from the Mortality Disparities in American Communities Study.” Population Health Metrics 19, Article 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-020-00244-x.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Moynihan, Donald,
    2. Pamela Herd, and
    3. Hope Harvey

    . 2015. “Administrative Burden: Learning, Psychological, and Compliance Costs in Citizen-State Interactions.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25(1): 43–69.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. ↵
    1. Mueller, Holger M., and
    2. Constantine Yannelis

    . 2019. “Reducing Barriers to Enrollment in Federal Student Loan Repayment Plans: Evidence from the Navient Field Experiment.” Working paper. New York University. Accessed December 22, 2022. https://www.stern.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/assets/documents/Mueller_Yannelis_Navient_April%2022_2019.pdf.
28. ↵
    1. OECD

    2020. “Measuring Consumer Detriment and the Impact of Consumer Policy: Feasibility Study.” OECD Digital Economy Papers, no. 293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/0c2e643b-en.
29. ↵
    1. Pearl, Joanna

    . 2021. “Driving Inequity: Are IDR’s Documentation Requirements Hurting Borrowers of Color?” Improving and Delivering Relief: Income-Driven Repayment Paper Series. Washington, D.C.: Student Borrower Protection Center. Accessed December 22, 2022. https://protectborrowers.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Driving_Inequity.pdf.
30. ↵
    1. Peeters, Rik

    . 2019. “The Political Economy of Administrative Burdens: A Theoretical Framework for Analyzing the Organizational Origins of Administrative Burdens.” Administration & Society 52(4): 566–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399719854367.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Postsecondary National Policy Institute

    . 2019. “Loan Servicer Primer.” Washington, D.C.: PNPI. Accessed December 22, 2022. http://pnpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/3-LS-Overview-1-PNPI-LS-Primer-in-Color.pdf.
32. ↵
    1. Quinn, Sarah

    . 2017. “The Miracles of Bookkeeping: How Budget Politics Link Fiscal Policies and Financial Markets.” American Journal of Sociology 123(1): 48–85.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Raval, Devesh

    . 2020. “Which Communities Complain to Policymakers? Evidence from Consumer Sentinel.” Economic Inquiry 58(4): 1628–42.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Ray, Victor,
    2. Pamela Herd, and
    3. Donald Moynihan

    . 2022. “Racialized Burdens: Applying Racialized Organization Theory to the Administrative State.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. First published online: January 29, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac001.
35. 1. Salganik, Matthew J

    . 2019. Bit by Bit: Social Research in the Digital Age. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
36. ↵
    1. Schanzenbach, Diane W

    . 2009. “Experimental Estimates of the Barriers to Food Stamp Enrollment.” Madison, Wisc.: Institute for Research on Poverty. Accessed December 22, 2022. https://irp.wisc.edu/publications/dps/pdfs/dp136709.pdf.
37. ↵
    1. Soobader, Mah-jabeen,
    2. Felicia B. LeClere,
    3. Wilbur Hadden, and
    4. Brooke Maury

    . 2001. “Using Aggregate Geographic Data to Proxy Individual Socioeconomic Status: Does Size Matter?” American Journal of Public Health 91(4): 632–36.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. ↵
    1. Soss, Joe,
    2. Richard C. Fording, and
    3. Sanford F. Schram

    . 2011. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. ↵
    1. Student Borrower Protection Center and American Federation of Teachers

    . 2020. Broken Promises: The Untold Failures of ACS Servicing. Washington, D.C.: Student Borrower Protection Center. Accessed December 22, 2022. https://protect borrowers.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12 /Broken-Promises_ACS-12_9.pdf.
40. ↵
    1. Sunstein, Cass R

    . 2019. “Sludge and Ordeals.” Duke Law Journal 68(8): 1843–83.

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. University of California Consumer Credit Panel Data

    . 2021. Accessed November 15, 2021. https://www.capolicylab.org/data-resources/university-of-california-consumer-credit-panel/.
42. 1. U.S. Department of Education

    . 2021. “U.S. Department of Education Increases Servicer Performance, Transparency, and Accountability Before Loan Payments Restart.” Press release, October 15. Accessed December 21, 2022. https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/us-department-education-increases-servicer-performance-transparency-and-accountability-loan-payments-restart.
43. ↵
    1. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO)

    . 2016. “Federal Student Loans: Education Could Improve Direct Loan Program Customer Service and Oversight.” GAO-16–523. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. Accessed December 22, 2022. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-16-523.
44. ↵
    1. U.S. Federal Reserve Board of Governors

    . 2019. “Survey of Consumer Finances.” Machine Readable File. https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/files/scf2019s.zip.
45. ↵
    1. Weir, Margaret, and
    2. Jessica Schirmer

    . 2018. “America’s Two Worlds of Welfare: Subnational Institutions and Social Assistance in Metropolitan America.” Perspectives on Politics 16(2): 380–99.

    OpenUrl
46. ↵
    1. Wu, Derek, and
    2. Bruce Meyer

    . 2021. “Certification and Recertification in Welfare Programs: What Happens When Automation Goes Wrong?” Working paper. University of Chicago. Accessed December 22, 2022. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BNhdITIPaJ7H7eWGxqEN06-dxNLzpYhk/view.
47. ↵
    1. Young, Cristobal, and
    2. Xinxiang Chen

    . 2020. “Patients as Consumers in the Market for Medicine: the Halo Effect of Hospitality.” Social Forces 99(2): 504–31.

    OpenUrl