Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
Conceptual Representation of Four Status Lenses
Source: Author’s conceptual diagram.
- Figure 2.
Occupational Means and Rater Variances in Prestige
Source: Author’s calculations.
- Figure 3.
Observed Dispersion in Prestige Ratings Across Social Groups Far and Close to Traditional Power in the United States
Source: Author’s calculations.
- Figure 4.
Predicted Dispersion for Groups Close to and Far from Centers of Power
Source: Author’s calculations.
- Figure 5.
Observed Correlations of Dyads in Rank Orderings of Core Occupations by Social Group
Source: Author’s calculations.
- Figure 6.
Predicted Correlations of Dyads in Rank Orderings of Core Occupations by Social Group
Source: Author’s calculations.
- Figure A.1.
Descriptive Differences in Kendall’s tau (a) Correlations by Dyad
Source: Author’s calculations.
- Figure A.2.
Descriptive Differences in Kendall’s tau (b) Correlations by Dyad
Source: Author’s calculations.
- Figure A.3.
Predicted Values for Kendall’s tau (a) by Social Group
Source: Author’s calculations.
- Figure A.4.
Predicted Values for Kendall’s tau (b) by Social Group
Source: Author’s calculations.
Taken together, Figures A.1 through A.4 demonstrate that results presented for dyadic correlations of rank orderings are not sensitive to the measure of ordinal correlation used because they are consistent across all three measures (Spearman’s ρ, Kendall’s τ a and Kendall’s τ b).
Tables
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.