Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Publications
    • rsf

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Publications
    • rsf
  • Log in
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Advanced Search

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Follow rsf on Twitter
  • Visit rsf on Facebook
  • Follow rsf on Google Plus
Research Article
Open Access

The Affordable Care Act and the Diffusion of Policy Feedback: The Case of Medicaid Work Requirements

Richard C. Fording, Dana Patton
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences July 2020, 6 (2) 131-153; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2020.6.2.06
Richard C. Fording
aMarilyn Williams Elmore and John Durr Elmore Endowed Professor at the University of Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Richard C. Fording
Dana Patton
bassociate professor and director of the MPA Program in the Department of Political Science at the University of Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Additional
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Achen, Christopher, and
    2. Larry Bartels
    . 2016. “Democracy for Realists: Holding up a Mirror to the Electorate.” Juncture 22(4): 269–75.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Ansolabehere, Stephen
    . 2012. Cooperative Congressional Election Study, 2010: Common Content [computer file]. Release 1. February 26. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University [producer]. Accessed January 19, 2020. http://cces.gov.harvard.edu.
  3. ↵
    1. Ansolabehere, Stephen, and
    2. Brian F. Schaffner
    . 2015. Cooperative Congressional Election Study, 2014: Common Content [computer file]. Release 1. July 1. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University [producer]. Accessed January 19, 2020. http://cces.gov.harvard.edu.
  4. ↵
    1. Barrilleaux, Charles, and
    2. Carlisle Rainey
    . 2014. “The Politics of Need: Examining Governors’ Decisions to Oppose the ‘Obamacare’ Medicaid Expansion.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 14(4): 437–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Béland, Daniel
    . 2010. “Reconsidering Policy Feedback: How Policies Affect Politics.” Administration & Society 42: 568–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Béland, Daniel,
    2. Philip Rocco, and
    3. Alex Waddan
    . 2016. Obamacare Wars: Federalism, State Politics and the Affordable Care Act. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
  7. ↵
    1. Bernick, Ethan M., and
    2. Nathan Myers
    . 2012. “Issue Salience, Party Strength, and the Adoption of Health-Care Expansion Efforts.” Politics & Policy 40(1): 131–59.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Berry, Frances Stokes, and
    2. William D. Berry
    . 2018. “Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research.” In Theories of the Policy Process, 4th ed., edited by Christopher M. Weible and Paul A. Sabatier. New York: Westview Press.
  9. ↵
    1. Boehmke, Frederick J., and
    2. Richard Witmer
    . 2004. “Disentangling Diffusion: The Effects of Social Learning and Economic Competition on State Policy Innovation and Expansion.” Political Research Quarterly 57(1): 39–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Callaghan, Timothy, and
    2. Lawrence R. Jacobs
    . 2016. “Interest Group Conflict over Medicaid Expansion: The Surprising Impact of Public Advocates.” American Journal of Public Health 1062(2): 308–13.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Campbell, Andrea Louise
    . 2003. How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  12. ↵
    1. Campbell, Andrea Louise
    . 2011. “Policy Feedbacks and the Impact of Policy Designs on Public Opinion.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 36(6): 961–73.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Chattopadhyay, Jacqueline
    . 2017. “Is the ACA’s Dependent Coverage Provision Generating Positive Feedback Effects Among Young Adults?” Poverty & Public Policy 9(1): 42–70.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Clark, Jill
    . 1985. “Policy Diffusion and Program Scope: Research Directions.” Publius 15(1): 61–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Clinton, Joshua D., and
    2. Michael W. Sances
    . 2018. “The Politics of Policy: The Initial Mass Political Effects of Medicaid Expansion in the States.” American Political Science Review 112(1): 167–85.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Cohen, Jeffrey E., and
    2. James D. King
    . 2004. “Relative Unemployment and Gubernatorial Popularity. ”Journal of Politics 66(4): 1267–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Courtemanche, Charles,
    2. James Marton, and
    3. Aaron Yelowitz
    . 2020. “The Full Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Political Participation.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 6(2): 179–204. DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2020.6.2.08.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Durr, Robert H.,
    2. John B. Gilmour, and
    3. Christina Wolbrecht
    . 1997. “Explaining Congressional Approval.” American Journal of Political Science 41(1): 175–207.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Fenno, Richard F
    . 1975. “If, as Ralph Nader Says, Congress is ‘the Broken Branch,’ How Come We Love Our Congressmen So Much?” In Congress in Change: Evolution and Reform, edited by Norman J. Ornstein. New York: Praeger Press.
  20. ↵
    1. Fording, Richard C., and
    2. Dana J. Patton
    . 2019. “Medicaid Expansion and the Political Fate of the Governors Who Support It.” Policy Studies Journal 47(1). DOI: 10.1111/psj.12311.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Gilardi, Fabrizio
    . 2010. “Who Learns from What in Policy Diffusion Processes?” American Journal of Political Science 54(3): 650–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Glick, Henry R., and
    2. Scott P. Hays
    . 1991. “Innovation and Reinvention in State Policymaking: Theory and the Evolution of Living Will Laws.” Journal of Politics 53(3): 835–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Gore, Leada
    . 2018. “Alabama May Require Some Medicaid Recipients to Work.” AL.com, January 17. Accessed April 30, 2019. https://www.al.com/news/2018/01/alabama_wants_to_require_some.html.
  24. ↵
    1. Graham, Erin R.,
    2. Charles R. Shipan, and
    3. Craig Volden
    . 2013. “The Diffusion of Policy Diffusion Research in Political Science.” British Journal of Political Science 43(3): 673–701.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Gray, Virginia
    . 1973. “Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study.” American Political Science Review 67(4): 1174–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Grogan, Colleen M., and
    2. Sunggeun Ethan Park
    . 2017. “The Racial Divide in State Medicaid Expansions.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 42(3): 539–72.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Grogan, Colleen M
    . 2018. “Medicaid Retrenchment Politics: Fragmented or Unified?” Journal of Aging & Social Policy 30(3–4): 372–99.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Grogan, Colleen N.,
    2. Phillip M. Singer, and
    3. David K. Jones
    . 2017. “Rhetoric and Reform in Waiver States.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 42(2): 247–84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Hacker, Jacob S., and
    2. Paul Pierson
    . 2018. “The Dog That Almost Barked: What the ACA Repeal Fight Says About the Resilience of the American Welfare State.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 43(4): 551–77.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Haselswerdt, Jake
    . 2017. “Expanding Medicaid, Expanding the Electorate: The Affordable Care Act’s Short-Term Impact on Political Participation.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 42(4): 667–95.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Holyoke, Thomas T.,
    2. Jeffrey R. Henig,
    3. Heath Brown, and
    4. Natalie Lacireno-Paquet
    . 2009. “Policy Dynamics and the Evolution of State Charter School Laws.” Policy Sciences 42(1): 33–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    1. Hopkins, Daniel J., and
    2. Kalind Parish
    . 2018. “The Medicaid Expansion and Attitudes Toward the Affordable Care Act: Testing for a Policy Feedback on Mass Opinion.” 83(1): 123–34.
  33. ↵
    1. Jacobs, Lawrence R., and
    2. Timothy Callaghan
    . 2013. “Why States Expand Medicaid: Party, Resources, and History.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 38(5): 1023–50.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Kaiser Family Foundation
    . 2016. “Kaiser Health Tracking Poll: November 2016.” December 1. Accessed December 19, 2019. https://www.kff.org/health-costs/poll-finding/kaiser-health-tracking-poll-november-2016/.
  35. ↵
    1. Kaiser Family Foundation
    . 2019a. “Status of State Action on the Medicaid Expansion.” Accessed December 15, 2019. https://www.kff.org/health-reform/state-indicator/state-activity-around-expanding-medicaid-under-the-affordable-care-act.
  36. ↵
    1. Kaiser Family Foundation
    . 2019b. “Medicaid Waiver Tracker: Approved and Pending Section 1115 Waivers by State.” Accessed December 19, 2019. https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/medicaid-waiver-tracker-approved-and-pending-section-1115-waivers-by-state/.
  37. ↵
    1. Karch, Andrew
    . 2007. Democratic Laboratories: Policy Diffusion Among the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  38. ↵
    1. Karch, Andrew, and
    2. Matthew Cravens
    . 2014. “Rapid Diffusion and Policy Reform: The Adoption and Modification of Three Strikes Laws.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 14(4): 461–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. ↵
    1. Kingdon, John W
    . 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd ed. New York: Addison-Wesley.
  40. ↵
    1. Kousser, Thad, and
    2. Justin H. Phillips
    , 2012. The Power of American Governors: Winning on Budgets and Losing on Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  41. ↵
    1. Ku, Leighton.,
    2. Erin Brantley,
    3. Erika Steinmetz,
    4. Brian Bruen, and
    5. Drisht Pillai
    . 2018. “Medicaid Work Requirements: Will They Help the Unemployed Gain Jobs or Improve Health?” Issue Brief. Washington, D.C.: Commonwealth Fund.
  42. ↵
    1. Lanford, Daniel, and
    2. Jill Quadagno
    . 2016. “Implementing ObamaCare: The Politics of Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act of 2010.” Sociological Perspectives 59(3): 619–39.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. ↵
    1. Lerman, Amy E., and
    2. Katherine T. McCabe
    . 2017. “Personal Experience and Public Opinion: A Theory and Test of Conditional Policy Feedback.” Journal of Politics 79(2): 624–41.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Lukens, Gideon
    . 2014. “State Variation in Health Care Spending and the Politics of State Medicaid Policy.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 39(6): 1213–51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Mayer, Martin,
    2. Robert Kenter, and
    3. John C. Morris
    . 2015. “Partisan Politics or Public-Health Need?: An Empirical Analysis of State Choice During Initial Implementation of the Affordable Care Act.” Politics and Life Sciences 34(2): 44–51.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. McCarthy, Justin
    . 2017. “More in U.S. Say Healthcare is the Most Important Problem.” Gallup, July 14. Accessed February 26, 2020. http://news.gallup.com/poll/214049/say-healthcare-important-problem.aspx
  47. ↵
    1. Mettler, Suzanne
    . 2005. Soldiers to Citizens: The GI Bill and the Making of the Greatest Generation. New York: Oxford University Press.
  48. ↵
    1. Oberlander, Jonathan, and
    2. R. Kent Weaver
    . 2015. “Unraveling from Within? The Affordable Care Act and Self-Undermining Policy Feedbacks.” The Forum 13(1): 37–62.
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    1. Pacheco, Julianna,
    2. Jake Haselswerdt, and
    3. Jamila Michener
    . 2020. “The Affordable Care Act and Polarization in the United States.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 6(2): 114–30. DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2020.6.2.06.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. ↵
    1. Patashnik, Eric M., and
    2. Julian E. Zelizer
    . 2013. “The Struggle to Remake Politics: Liberal Reform and the Limits of Policy Feedback in the Contemporary American State.” Perspectives on Politics 11(4): 1071–87.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  51. ↵
    1. Pew Research Center
    . 2018. “3. Wide Partisan Differences on Importance of Many Issues.” September 26. Accessed February 26, 2020. https://www.people-press.org/2018/09/26/wide-partisan-differences-on-importance-of-many-issues/.
  52. ↵
    1. Pierson, Paul
    . 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State?: Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  53. ↵
    1. Plein, Christopher L
    . 2014. “An Uncertain Federalism: The States and the Affordable Care Act.” Journal of Health and Human Services Administration 37(3): 350–77.
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    1. Quinn, Mattie
    . 2018. “Work Requirements May Be Just the Beginning of Medicaid Changes Under Trump.” Governing, January 12. Accessed April 30, 2019. https://www.governing.com/topics/health-human-services/gov-medicaid-work-trump-drug-testing-kentucky.html.
  55. ↵
    1. Rogers, Everett M
    . 1995. Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed. New York: Free Press.
  56. ↵
    1. Schwartz, David
    . 2013. “Arizona Governor Jan Brewer Signs Medicaid Expansion.” Reuters, June 17. Accessed January 10, 2020. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-arizona-medicaid/arizona-governor-jan-brewer-signs-medicaid-expansion-idUSBRE95G12N20130617.
  57. ↵
    1. Seljan, Ellen C., and
    2. Nicholas Weller
    . 2011. “Diffusion in Direct Democracy: The Effect of Political Information on Proposals for Tax and Expenditure Limits in the US States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 11(3): 348–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  58. ↵
    1. Shipan, Charles R., and
    2. Craig Volden
    . 2008. “The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science 52(4): 840–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  59. ↵
    1. Skocpol, Theda
    . 1992. “State Formation and Social Policy in the United States.” American Behavioral Scientist 35(4–5): 559–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  60. ↵
    1. Soss, Joe,
    2. Richard C. Fording, and
    3. Sanford F. Schram
    . 2011. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  61. ↵
    1. Taber, Charles S., and
    2. Milton Lodge
    . 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50(3): 755–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  62. ↵
    1. Tesler, Michael
    . 2012. “The Spillover of Racialization into Health Care: How President Obama Polarized Public Opinion by Racial Attitudes and Race.” American Journal of Political Science 56(3): 690–704.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  63. ↵
    1. Walker, Jack L
    . 1969. “The Diffusion of Innovations Among the American States.” American Political Science Review 63(3): 880–99.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  64. ↵
    1. Wheaton, Sara
    . 2015. “GOP Warms to Obamacare—If Americans Work for It.” Politico, April 30. Accessed January 10, 2020. https://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/obamacare-republicans-work-requirements-117486.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: 6 (2)
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Vol. 6, Issue 2
1 Jul 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Affordable Care Act and the Diffusion of Policy Feedback: The Case of Medicaid Work Requirements
(Your Name) has sent you a message from RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Affordable Care Act and the Diffusion of Policy Feedback: The Case of Medicaid Work Requirements
Richard C. Fording, Dana Patton
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Jul 2020, 6 (2) 131-153; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2020.6.2.06

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Affordable Care Act and the Diffusion of Policy Feedback: The Case of Medicaid Work Requirements
Richard C. Fording, Dana Patton
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Jul 2020, 6 (2) 131-153; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2020.6.2.06
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • THE COMPLEXITY OF POLICY FEEDBACK EFFECTS
    • POLICY FEEDBACK IN A DECENTRALIZED POLICY ENVIRONMENT
    • THE DIFFUSION OF POLICY FEEDBACK IN A FEDERAL SYSTEM: AN ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK
    • APPLYING THE FRAMEWORK TO MEDICAID EXPANSION
    • THE INITIAL ADOPTION OF MEDICAID EXPANSION
    • POLICY FEEDBACK EFFECTS AND THE DIFFUSION OF POLICY MODIFICATION
    • MEDICAID EXPANSION AND EVALUATIVE FEEDBACK: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS
    • EVALUATIVE FEEDBACK EFFECTS AND MEDICAID WORK REQUIREMENTS
    • CONCLUSION
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Additional
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • policy feedback
  • Medicaid
  • health care
  • Obamacare
  • Affordable Care Act
  • policy diffusion

© 2025 RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Powered by HighWire