Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Publications
    • rsf

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Publications
    • rsf
  • Log in
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Advanced Search

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Follow rsf on Twitter
  • Visit rsf on Facebook
  • Follow rsf on Google Plus
Research Article
Open Access

Gender in the Labor Market: The Role of Equal Opportunity and Family-Friendly Policies

Elizabeth L. Doran, Ann P. Bartel, Jane Waldfogel
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences December 2019, 5 (5) 168-197; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2019.5.5.09
Elizabeth L. Doran
aA doctoral candidate at Columbia University School of Social Work
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ann P. Bartel
bMerrill Lynch Professor of Workforce Transformation at Columbia Business School
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jane Waldfogel
cCompton Foundation Centennial Professor for the Prevention of Children’s and Youth Problems at Columbia University School of Social Work
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Million for Worker Flexibility
    . n.d. “Policy.” Accessed July 27, 2018. https://www.workflexibility.org/policy.
  2. ↵
    1. Ahn, Haksoon
    . 2012. “Child Care Subsidy, Child Care Costs, and Employment of Low-Income Single Mothers.” Children and Youth Services Review 34(2): 379–87.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Bartel, Ann,
    2. Charles L. Baum,
    3. Maya Rossin-Slater,
    4. Christopher J. Ruhm, and
    5. Jane Waldfogel
    . 2014. “California’s Paid Family Leave Law: Lessons from the First Decade.” DOL-OPS-14-C-0003. Washington: U.S. Department of Labor.
  4. ↵
    1. Bartel, Ann,
    2. Maya Rossin-Slater,
    3. Christopher Ruhm, and
    4. Jane Waldfogel
    . 2017. “Employer Attitudes to Paid Family Leave.” Working Paper. Sanford, Calif.: Stanford University. Accessed June 25, 2019. https://web.stanford.edu/~mrossin/Bartel_et_al_EmployerAttitudesReport_Aug2017.pdf.
  5. ↵
    1. Baum, Charles L., and
    2. Christopher J. Ruhm
    . 2016. “The Effects of Paid Family Leave in California on Labor Market Outcomes.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 35(2): 333–56.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Bedard, Kelly, and
    2. Maya Rossin-Slater
    . 2016. “The Economic and Social Impacts of Paid Family Leave in California: Report for the California Employment Development.” Los Angeles: Employment Development Department. Accessed June 25, 2019. https://www.edd.ca.gov/disability/pdf/PFL_Economic_and_Social_Impact_Study.pdf.
  7. ↵
    1. Bertrand, Marianne,
    2. Claudia Goldin, and
    3. Lawrence F. Katz
    . 2010. “Dynamics of the Gender Gap for Young Professionals in the Financial and Corporate Sector.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2 (July): 228–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Black, Sandra E.,
    2. Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach, and
    3. Audry Breitwieser
    . 2017. “The Recent Decline in Women’s Labor Force Participation.” In The 51% Driving Growth through Women’s Economic Participation, edited by Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach and Ryan Nunn. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
  9. ↵
    1. Blau, Francine D., and
    2. Lawrence M. Kahn
    . 2013. “Female Labor Supply: Why Is the US Falling Behind?” American Economic Review 103(3): 251–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Blau, Francine D., and
    2. Lawrence M. Kahn
    . 2017. “The Gender Wage Gap: Extent, Trends, and Explanations.” Journal of Economic Literature 55(3): 789–865.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Blau, Francine D., and
    2. Anne E Winkler
    . 2017. “Women, Work, and Family.” NBER working paper no. 23644. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  12. ↵
    1. Boushey, Heather
    . 2016. Finding Time: The Economics of Work-Life Conflict. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  13. ↵
    1. Budig, Michelle
    . 2014. “The Fatherhood Bonus and the Motherhood Penalty.” Washington, D.C.: Third Way. Accessed June 25, 2019. https://www.thirdway.org/report/the-fatherhood-bonus-and-the-motherhood-penalty-parenthood-and-the-gender-gap-in-pay.
  14. ↵
    1. Budig, Michelle, and
    2. Paula England
    . 2001. “The Wage Penalty for Motherhood.” American Sociological Review 66(2): 204–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Budig, Michelle, and
    2. Melissa J. Hodges
    . 2014. “Statistical Models and Empirical Evidence for Differences in the Motherhood Penalty Across the Earnings Distribution.” American Sociological Review 79(2): 358–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Budig, Michelle,
    2. Joya Misra, and
    3. Irene Boeckmann
    . 2015. “Work–Family Policy Trade-Offs for Mothers? Unpacking the Cross-National Variation in Motherhood Earnings Penalties.” Work and Occupations 43(2): 119–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Chaudry, Ajay,
    2. Taryn Morrissey,
    3. Christina Weiland, and
    4. Hirokazu Yoshikawa
    . 2017. Cradle to Kindergarten: A New Plan to Combat Inequality. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  18. ↵
    1. Chung, YoonKyung,
    2. Barbara Downs,
    3. Danielle H. Sandler, and
    4. Robert Sienkiewicz
    . 2017. “The Parental Gender Earnings Gap in the United States.” CES working paper no. 17–68. Washington: U.S. Census Bureau.
  19. ↵
    1. Correll, Shelley J.,
    2. Stephen Benard, and
    3. In Paik
    . 2007. “Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?” American Journal of Sociology 112(5): 1297–339.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Craig, Lyn, and
    2. Killian Mullan
    . 2010. “Parenthood, Gender and Work-Family Time in the United States, Australia, Italy, France, and Denmark.” Journal of Marriage and Family 72(5): 1344–61.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Dey, Judith
    . 2014. “How Has Labor Force Participation Among Young Moms and Dads Changed? A Comparison of Two Cohorts.” Beyond the Numbers 3, no. 19 (September). Accessed June 25, 2019. https://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-3/pdf/how-has-labor-force-participation-among-young-moms-and-dads-changed.pdf.
  22. ↵
    1. Goldin, Claudia
    . 2014. “A Grand Gender Convergence: Its Last Chapter.” American Economic Review 104(4): 1091–19.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    1. Goldin, Claudia, and
    2. Lawrence F. Katz
    . 2016. “A Most Egalitarian Profession: Pharmacy and the Evolution of a Family-Friendly Occupation.” Journal of Labor Economics 34(3): 705–46.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Goldin, Claudia, and
    2. Joshua Mitchell
    . 2017. “The New Life Cycle of Women’s Employment: Disappearing Humps, Sagging Middles, Expanding Tops.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 31(1): 161–82.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Gruber, Jonathan
    . 1994. “The Incidence of Mandated Maternity Benefits.” American Economic Review 84(3): 622–41.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Ha, Yoonsook, and
    2. Daniel P. Miller
    . 2015. “Child Care Subsidies and Employment Outcomes of Low-Income Families.” Children and Youth Services Review 59 (December): 139–48.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Henly, Julia R., and
    2. Susan J. Lambert
    . 2014. “Unpredictable Work Timing in Retail Jobs: Implications for Employee Work-Life Conflict.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 67(3): 986–1016.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    1. Herbst, Chris M
    . 2010. “The Labor Supply Effects of Child Care Costs and Wages in the Presence of Subsidies and the Earned Income Tax Credit.” Review of Economics of the Household 8(2): 199–230.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Herr, Jane Leber, and
    2. Catherine D. Wolfram
    . 2012. “Work Environment and Opt-out Rates at Motherhood across High-Education Career Paths.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 65(4): 928–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    1. Hipp, Lena,
    2. Taryn W. Morrissey, and
    3. Mildred E. Warner
    . 2017. “Who Participates and Who Benefits From Employer-Provided Child-Care Assistance?” Journal of Marriage and Family 79(3): 614–35.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Holzer, Harry J., and
    2. David Neumark
    . 2000. “Assessing Affirmative Action.” Journal of Economic Literature 38(3): 483–568.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    1. Holzer, Harry J., and
    2. David Neumark
    . 2006. “Affirmative Action: What Do We Know?” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 25(2): 463–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    1. Horowitz, Juliana M.,
    2. Kim Parker,
    3. Nikki Graf, and
    4. Gretchen Livingston
    . 2017. “Americans Widely Support Paid Family and Medical Leave, but Differ over Specific Policies.” Washington D.C.: Pew Research Center.
  34. ↵
    1. Klerman, Jacob Alex,
    2. Kelly Daley, and
    3. Alyssa Pozniak
    . 2012. Family and Medical Leave in 2012: Technical Report. Washington: U.S. Department of Labor and Abt Associates.
  35. ↵
    1. Kleven, Henrik,
    2. Camille Landais, and
    3. Jakob Egholt Søgaard
    . 2018. “Children and Gender Inequality: Evidence from Denmark.” NBER working paper no. 24219. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  36. ↵
    1. Kuziemko, Ilyana,
    2. Jessica Pan,
    3. Jenny Shen, and
    4. Ebonya Washington
    . 2018. “The Mommy Effect: Do Women Anticipate the Employment Effects of Motherhood?” NBER working paper no. 24740. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  37. ↵
    1. Laughlin, Lynda
    . 2013. “Who’s Minding the Kids? Child Care Arrangements: Spring 2011.” Household Economics Studies no. P70-135. Washington: U.S. Census Bureau.
  38. ↵
    1. Loprest, Pamela,
    2. Shayne Spaulding, and
    3. Demetra Smith Nightingale
    . 2019. “Disconnected Young Adults: Increasing Engagement and Opportunity.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 5(5): 221–43. DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2019.5.5.11.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. ↵
    1. Malik, Rasheed
    . 2018. “The Effects of Universal Preschool in Washington, D.C.: Children’s Learning and Mothers’ Earnings.” Washington, D.C.: Center for American Progress. Accessed June 25, 2019. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/early-childhood/reports/2018/09/26/458208/effects-universal-preschool-washington-d-c/.
  40. ↵
    1. Mathur, Aparna,
    2. Isabel V. Sawhill,
    3. Heather Boushey,
    4. Ben Gitis,
    5. Ron Haskins,
    6. Doug Holtz-Eakin,
    7. Harry J. Holzer, et al
    . 2017. “Paid Family and Medical Leave: An Issue Whose Time Has Come.” AEI-Brookings Working Group on Paid Family Leave. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
  41. ↵
    1. Milkman, Ruth, and
    2. Eileen Appelbaum
    . 2013. Unfinished Business: Paid Family Leave in California and the Future of U.S. Work-Family Policy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
  42. ↵
    1. National Partnership for Women & Families
    . 2018. “State Paid Family Leave Insurance Laws.” Accessed June 25, 2019. http://www.nationalpartnership.org/our-work/workplace/state-paid-leave-laws.html.
  43. ↵
    1. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
    . 2017. Starting Strong 2017: Key OECD Indicators on Early Childhood Education and Care. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  44. ↵
    1. Olivetti, Claudia, and
    2. Barbara Petrongolo
    . 2017. “The Economic Consequences of Family Policies: Lessons from a Century of Legislation in High-Income Countries.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 31(1): 205–30.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Pal, Ipshita, and
    2. Jane Waldfogel
    . 2016. “The Family Gap in Pay: New Evidence for 1967 to 2013.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 2(4): 104–27. DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2016.2.4.04.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  46. ↵
    1. Rodgers, William M., III.
    . 2019. “Race in the Labor Market: The Role of Equal Employment Opportunity and Other Policies.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 5(5): 198–220. DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2019.5.5.10.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  47. ↵
    1. Rossin-Slater, Maya
    . 2017. “Maternity and Family Leave Policy.” NBER working paper no. 23069. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  48. ↵
    1. Rossin-Slater, Maya,
    2. Christopher J. Ruhm, and
    3. Jane Waldfogel
    . 2013. “The Effects of California’s Paid Family Leave Program on Mothers’ Leave-Taking and Subsequent Labor Market Outcomes.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 32(2): 224–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Stearns, Jenna
    . 2015. “The Effects of Paid Maternity Leave: Evidence from Temporary Disability Insurance.” Journal of Health Economics 43 (September): 85–102.
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. Thomas, Mallika
    . 2018. “The Impact of Mandated Maternity Benefits on the Gender Differential in Promotions: Examining the Role of Adverse Selection.” American Economics Review 84(3): 622–41.
    OpenUrl
    1. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)
    . 2011. “American Time Use Survey (ATUS) Leave Module Microdata Files.” Washington: U.S. Department of Labor. Accessed November 12, 2018. https://www.bls.gov/tus/lvdatafiles.htm.
    1. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)
    . 2011–2015. “National Longitudinal Surveys: The NLSY97.” Washington: U.S. Department of Labor. Accessed October 20, 2018. https://www.bls.gov/nls/nlsy97.htm.
  51. ↵
    1. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)
    . 2017. “National Compensation Survey.” Washington: U.S. Department of Labor. Accessed October 29, 2018. https://www.bls.gov/ncs/#data.
  52. ↵
    1. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
    . 1997. “EEOC Notice 915.002.” Washington: EEOC. Accessed June 25, 2019. https://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/guidance-inquiries.html.
  53. ↵
    1. Usdansky, Margaret L, and
    2. Douglas A Wolf
    . 2008. “When Child Care Breaks Down: Mothers’ Experiences with Child Care Problems and Resulting Missed Work.” Journal of Family Issues 29(9): 1185–210.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  54. ↵
    1. Waldfogel, Jane
    . 1997. “The Effect of Children on Women’s Wages.” American Sociological Review 62(2): 209–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  55. ↵
    1. Weeden, Kim A
    . 2005. “Is There a Flexiglass Ceiling? Flexible Work Arrangements and Wages in the United States.” Social Science Research 34(2): 454–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  56. ↵
    1. Weeden, Kim A.,
    2. Youngjoo Cha, and
    3. Mauricio Bucca
    . 2016. “Long Work Hours, Part-Time Work, and Trends in the Gender Gap in Pay, the Motherhood Wage Penalty, and the Fatherhood Wage Premium.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 2(4): 71–102. DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2016.2.4.03.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  57. ↵
    1. Weisshaar, Katherine
    . 2018. “From Opt Out to Blocked Out: The Challenges for Labor Market Re-Entry After Family-Related Employment Lapses.” American Sociological Review 83(1): 34–60.
    OpenUrl
  58. ↵
    1. Williams, Joan C.,
    2. Susan J. Lambert,
    3. Saravanan Kesavan,
    4. Peter J. Fugiel,
    5. Lori A. Ospina,
    6. Erin D. Rapoport,
    7. Meghan Jarpe,
    8. Dylan Bellisle,
    9. Pradeep Pendem,
    10. Lisa McCorkell, and
    11. Sarah Adler-Milstein
    . 2018. “Stable Scheduling Increases Productivity and Sales.” San Francisco: WorkLife Law.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: 5 (5)
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Vol. 5, Issue 5
1 Dec 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gender in the Labor Market: The Role of Equal Opportunity and Family-Friendly Policies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Gender in the Labor Market: The Role of Equal Opportunity and Family-Friendly Policies
Elizabeth L. Doran, Ann P. Bartel, Jane Waldfogel
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Dec 2019, 5 (5) 168-197; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2019.5.5.09

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Gender in the Labor Market: The Role of Equal Opportunity and Family-Friendly Policies
Elizabeth L. Doran, Ann P. Bartel, Jane Waldfogel
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Dec 2019, 5 (5) 168-197; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2019.5.5.09
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • RECENT TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS
    • ACCESS TO FAMILY-FRIENDLY BENEFITS
    • POLICY IMPLICATIONS
    • CONCLUSION
    • Appendices
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • gender
  • equal opportunity
  • family-friendly policies

© 2025 RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Powered by HighWire