Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Publications
    • rsf

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Publications
    • rsf
  • Log in
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Advanced Search

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Follow rsf on Twitter
  • Visit rsf on Facebook
  • Follow rsf on Google Plus
Research ArticleIII. Policy Interventions: Incentives, Controls, and Metrics
Open Access

The Promises and Pitfalls of Measuring Community College Quality

Michal Kurlaender, Scott Carrell, Jacob Jackson
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences April 2016, 2 (1) 174-190; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2016.2.1.08
Michal Kurlaender
aAssociate professor of education at the University of California, Davis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott Carrell
bAssociate professor of economics at the University of California, Davis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacob Jackson
cResearch fellow at the Public Policy Institute of California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Alon, Sigal, and
    2. Marta Tienda
    . 2005. “Assessing the ‘Mismatch’ Hypothesis: Differentials in College Graduation Rates by Institutional Selectivity.” Sociology of Education 78(4): 294–315.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Altonji, Joseph G.,
    2. Todd E. Elder, and
    3. Christopher R. Taber
    . 2005. “Selection on Observed and Unobserved Variables: Assessing the Effectiveness of Catholic Schools,” Journal of Political Economy 113(1): 151–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    Altonji, Joseph, and Richard Mansfield. 2014. “Group-Average Observables as Controls for Sorting on Unobservables When Estimating Group Treatment Effects: The Case of School and Neighborhood Effects.” NBER working paper no. 20781. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  4. ↵
    Anderson, Nick. 2013. “Napolitano, University of California President, ‘Deeply Skeptical’ of Obama College Rating Plan.” Washington Post, December 6, 2013, Nick Anderson, The Washington Post. Accessed December 17, 2015. http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/napolitano-uc-president-deeply-skeptical-of-keyassumption-in-obama-college-rating-plan/2013/12/06/f4f505fa-5eb8-11e3-bc56-c6ca94801fac_story.html.
  5. ↵
    Anelli, Massimo. 2014. “Returns to Elite College Education: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis.” Job Market paper. Davis: University of California. Accessed December 16, 2015. http://www.econ.ku.dk/Kalender/seminarer/28012015/paper/MassimoAnelli_JobMarketPaper.pdf.
  6. ↵
    1. Bailey, Thomas,
    2. Juan Carlos Calcagno,
    3. Davis Jenkins,
    4. Timothy Leinbach, and
    5. Gregory Kienzl
    . 2006. “Is Student-Right-to-Know All You Should Know? An Analysis of Community College Graduation Rates.” Research in Higher Education 47(5): 491–519.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Black, Dan, and
    2. Jeffrey Smith
    . 2004. “How Robust Is the Evidence on the Effects of College Quality? Evidence from Matching.” Journal of Econometrics 121(1–2): 99–124.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Black, Dan, and
    2. Jeffrey Smith
    . 2006. “Estimating the Returns to College Quality with Multiple Proxies for Quality.” Journal of Labor Economics 24(3): 701–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Borman, Geoffrey, and
    2. Maritza Dowling
    . 2010. “Schools and Inequality: A Multilevel Analysis of Coleman's Equality of Educational Opportunity Data.” Teachers College Record 112(5): 1201–46.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Bowen, William G., Matthew M. Chingos, and Michael McPherson. 2009. Crossing the Finish Line. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  11. ↵
    1. Brand, Jennie E., and
    2. Charles N. Halaby
    . 2006. “Regression and Matching Estimates of the Effects of Elite College Attendance on Educational and Career Achievement.” Social Science Research 35(3): 749–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    Brint, Steve, and Jerome Karabel. 1989. The Diverted Dream: Community Colleges and the Promise of Educational Opportunity in America, 1900–1985. New York: Oxford University Press.
  13. ↵
    1. Calcagno, Juan Carlos,
    2. Thomas Bailey,
    3. Davis Jenkins,
    4. Gregory Kienzl, and
    5. Timothy Leinbach
    . 2008. “Community College Student Success: What Institutional Characteristics Make a Difference?” Economics of Education Review 27(6): 632–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Carrell, Scott E., and
    2. James E. West
    . 2010. “Does Professor Quality Matter? Evidence from Random Assignment of Students to Professors,” Journal of Political Economy 118(3): 409–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Clotfelter, Charles T.,
    2. Helen F. Ladd,
    3. Clara G. Muschkin, and
    4. Jacob L. Vigdor
    . 2013. “Success in Community College: Do Institutions Differ?” Research in Higher Education 54(7): 805–24.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    Coleman, James S. 1966. “Equality of Educational Opportunity.” Office of Education Pub no. 101-228-169. Washington: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
  17. ↵
    1. Cunha, Jesse M., and
    2. Trey Miller
    . 2014. “Measuring Value-Added in Higher Education: Possibilities and Limitations in the Use of Administrative Data.” Economics of Education Review 42(1): 64–77.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Dale, Stacy B., and
    2. Alan B. Krueger
    . 2002. “Estimating the Payoff to Attending a More Selective College: An Application of Selection on Observables and Unobservables.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(4): 1491–527.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    Dale, Stacy B., and Alan B. Krueger. 2012. “Estimating the Return to College Selectivity over the Career Using Administrative Earning Data.” NBER working paper no. 17159. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  20. ↵
    1. Dimick, Justin,
    2. Douglas Staiger, and
    3. John Birkmeyer
    . 2010. “Ranking Hospitals on Surgical Mortality: The Importance of Reliability Adjustment.” Health Services Research 45(6): 1614–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    Dougherty, Kevin J. 1994. The Contradictory College: The Conflicting Origins, Impacts, and Futures of the Community College. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  22. ↵
    Fain, Paul. 2013. “Performance Funding Goes Federal.” Inside Higher Ed, August 23. Accessed December 17, 2013. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/08/23/higher-education-leaders-respond-obamas-ambitous-ratings-system-plan.
  23. ↵
    Goldhaber, Dan, Stephanie Liddle, Roddy Theobald, and Joe Walch. 2010. “Teacher Effectiveness and the Achievement of Washington's Students in Mathematics.” CEDR working paper 2010–06. Seattle: University of Washington.
  24. ↵
    Gross, Karen. 2013. “Ratings Are Not So Easy.” Inside Higher Ed, August 23. Accessed December 17, 2015. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2013/08/23/obamas-ratings-system-may-be-difficult-pull-essay.
  25. ↵
    1. Grubb, W. Norton
    . 1991. “The Decline of Community College Transfer Rates: Evidence from National Longitudinal Surveys.” Journal of Higher Education 62(2): 194–222.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Hoekstra, Mark
    . 2009. “The Effect of Attending the Flagship State University on Earnings: A Discontinuity-Based Approach.” Review of Economics and Statistics 91(4): 717–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. ↵
    1. Hoxby, Caroline M
    . 2009. “The Changing Selectivity of American Colleges.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 23(4): 95–118.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    Hussar, William J., and Tabitha M. Bailey. 2009. Projections of Education Statistics to 2018, 37th ed. NCES 2009–062. Washington: U.S. Department of Education.
  29. ↵
    1. Jacoby, Daniel
    . 2006. “Effects of Part-Time Faculty Employment on Community College Graduation Rates.” Journal of Higher Education 77(6): 1081–103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Kane, Thomas J.,
    2. Jonah E. Rockoff, and
    3. Douglas O. Staiger
    . 2008. “What Does Certification Tell Us About Teacher Effectiveness? Evidence from New York City.” Economics of Education Review 27(6): 615–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    Kane, Thomas J., and Douglas O. Staiger. 2008. “Estimating Teacher Impacts on Student Achievement: An Experimental Evaluation.” NBER working paper no. 14607. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research. Accessed February 24, 2016. http://www.nber.org/papers/w14607.
  32. ↵
    1. Long, Mark C
    . 2008. “College Quality and Early Adult Outcomes.” Economics of Education Review 27(5): 588–602.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Monks, James
    . 2000. “The Returns to Individual and College Characteristics: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth.” Economics of Education Review 19(3): 279–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    1. Mullen, Ann L.,
    2. Kimberly Goyette, and
    3. Joseph A. Soares
    . 2003. “Who Goes to Graduate School? Social and Academic Correlates of Educational Continuation After College.” Sociology of Education 76(2): 143–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    1. Parker, Joseph P.,
    2. Zhongmin Li,
    3. Cheryl L. Damberg,
    4. Beat Danielsen, and
    5. David M. Carlisle
    . 2006. “Administrative Versus Clinical Data for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Report Cards: The View from California.” Medical Care 44(7): 687–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    Rabe-Hesketh, Sophia, and Anders Skrondal. 2008. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata, 2nd ed. College Station, Tex.: Stata Press.
  37. ↵
    1. Rivkin, Steven G.,
    2. Eric A. Hanushek, and
    3. John F. Kain
    . 2005. “Teachers, Schools and Academic Achievement.” Econometrica 73(2): 417–58.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  38. ↵
    Rosenbaum, James. 2001. Beyond College for All: Career Paths for the Forgotten Half. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  39. ↵
    1. Rumberger, Russell, and
    2. Gregory Palardy
    . 2005. “Does Segregation Still Matter? The Impact of Student Composition on Academic Achievement in High School.” Teachers College Record 107(9): 1999–2045.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  40. ↵
    1. Sengupta, Ria, and
    2. Christopher Jepsen
    . 2006. “California's Community College Students.” California Counts: Population Trends and Profiles 8(2): 1–24.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    Shulock, Nancy, and Colleen Moore. 2007. “Rules of the Game: How State Policy Creates Barriers to Degree Completion and Impedes Student Success in the California Community Colleges.” Sacramento, Calif.: Institute for Higher Education and Leadership.
  42. ↵
    1. Small, Mario L., and
    2. Christopher Winship
    . 2007. “Black Students’ Graduation from Elite Colleges: Institutional Characteristics and Between-Institution Differences.” Social Science Research 36(2007): 1257–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. ↵
    1. Stange, Kevin
    . 2012. “Ability Sorting and the Importance of College Quality to Student Achievement: Evidence from Community Colleges.” Education Finance and Policy 7(1): 74–105.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Startz, Richard
    . 2012. “Policy Evaluation Versus Explanation of Outcomes in Education: That Is, Is It the Teachers? Is It the Parents?” Education Finance and Policy 7(3): 1–15.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    State of California. 1960. A Master Plan for Higher Education in California: 1960–1975. Sacramento: California State Department of Education. Accessed December 17, 2015. http://www.ucop.edu/acadinit/mastplan/MasterPlan1960.pdf.
  46. ↵
    U.S. Department of Education. 2015. “College Scorecard.” Accessed December 17, 2015. https://collegescorecard.ed.gov.
  47. ↵
    The White House. 2010. “The White House Summit on Community Colleges: Summit Report.” Washington, D.C. Accessed December 17, 2015. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/community_college_summit_report.pdf.
  48. ↵
    The White House. 2013. “Fact Sheet on the President's Plan to Make College More Affordable: A Better Bargain for the Middle Class.” Washington, D.C.: Office of the Press Secretary. Accessed December 17, 2015. https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/08/22/fact-sheet-president-s-plan-make-college-more-affordable-better-bargain-.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: 2 (1)
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Vol. 2, Issue 1
1 Apr 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Promises and Pitfalls of Measuring Community College Quality
(Your Name) has sent you a message from RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
14 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Promises and Pitfalls of Measuring Community College Quality
Michal Kurlaender, Scott Carrell, Jacob Jackson
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Apr 2016, 2 (1) 174-190; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2016.2.1.08

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Promises and Pitfalls of Measuring Community College Quality
Michal Kurlaender, Scott Carrell, Jacob Jackson
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Apr 2016, 2 (1) 174-190; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2016.2.1.08
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • BACKGROUND
    • RESEARCH DESIGN
    • RESULTS
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Pricing and University Autonomy: Tuition Deregulation in Texas
  • Looking Inside the Black Box of Performance Funding for Higher Education: Policy Instruments, Organizational Obstacles, and Intended and Unintended Impacts
Show more III. Policy Interventions: Incentives, Controls, and Metrics

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • community colleges
  • college quality
  • transfer

© 2025 RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Powered by HighWire