The Impact of Remote Hearing Policies on Racial Equity in Criminal Case Outcomes During the Pandemic

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Alexander, Diane, and
   2. Ezra Karger

   . 2020. “Do Stay-At-Home Orders Cause People to Stay at Home? Effects of Stay-at-Home Orders on Consumer Behavior.” Working paper no. 2020-12. Chicago: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://www.chicagofed.org/publications/working-papers/2020/2020-12.
2. ↵
   1. Arizona Supreme Court

   . 2022. “Recommended Remote and In-Person Hearings in Arizona State Courts in the Post-Pandemic World.” Phoenix: Arizona Supreme Court. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://www.azcourts.gov/courtservices/Court-Services-Home/Remote-Appearances.
3. ↵
   1. Arnold, David,
   2. Will Dobbie, and
   3. Crystal S. Yang

   . 2018. “Racial Bias in Bail Decisions.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 133(4): 1885–932.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Baldwin, Julie Marie,
   2. John M. Eassey, and
   3. Erika J. Brooke

   . 2020. “Court Operations During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” American Journal of Criminal Justice 45(4): 743–58.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Ballasone, Merrill

   . 2020. “California Counties Keeping COVID-19 Emergency Bail Schedules.” California Courts Newsroom. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://newsroom.courts.ca.gov/news/california-counties-keeping-covid-19-emergency-bail-schedules.
6. ↵
   1. Benninger, Taylor,
   2. Courtney Colwell,
   3. Debbie Mukamal, and
   4. Leah Plachinski

   . 2021. Virtual Justice? A National Study Analyzing the Transition to Remote Criminal Court. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Law School. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://www-cdn.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Virtual-Justice-Final-Aug-2021.pdf.
7. ↵
   1. Berry, Christopher R.,
   2. Anthony Fowler,
   3. Tamara Glazer,
   4. Samantha Handel-Meyer, and
   5. Alec MacMillen

   . 2021. “Evaluating the Effects of Shelter-In-Place Policies During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(15): e2019706118.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. ↵
   1. Bild, Elena,
   2. Annabel Redman,
   3. Eryn J. Newman,
   4. Bethany R. Muir,
   5. David Tait, and
   6. Norbert Schwarz

   . 2021. “Sound and Credibility in the Virtual Court: Low Audio Quality Leads to Less Favorable Evaluations of Witnesses and Lower Weighting of Evidence.” Law and Human Behavior 45(5): 481.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Bird, Mia,
   2. Omair Gill,
   3. Johanna Lacoe,
   4. Molly Pickard,
   5. Steven Raphael, and
   6. Alissa Skog

   . 2022. “An Overview of Sentencing in California.” Berkeley: California Policy Lab. Accessed December 14, 2022. https://www.capolicylab.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/An-Overview-of-Sentencing-in-California.pdf.
10. ↵
    1. California Department of Justice (DOJ)

    . 2022. “Data Request Process.” Sacramento: California Department of Justice Research Center. Accessed December 13, 2022. https://oag.ca.gov/research-center/request-process.
11. ↵
    1. Clarke, Sarah E. Duhart, and
    2. Jessica Smith

    . 2021. “Virtual Proceedings in North Carolina.” Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, School of Government, Criminal Justice Innovation Lab. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://cjil.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/19452/2021/03/Virtual-Courts-Findings-Report-FINAL-3.15.2021docx.pdf.
12. ↵
    1. Committee on Revision of the Penal Code (CRPC)

    . 2021. “Sentencing Practices in California and Related Matters.” Memorandum 2021-11. Davis: University of California Davis Law School. Accessed November 12, 2022. http://www.clrc.ca.gov/CRPC/Pub/Memos/CRPC21-11.pdf.
13. ↵
    1. Corren, Blaine

    . 2020. “Judicial Council Adopts New Rules to Lower Jail Population, Suspend Evictions and Foreclosures.” California Courts Newsroom, April 6. San Francisco: Judicial Council of California. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://newsroom.courts.ca.gov/news/judicial-council-adopts-new-rules-lower-jail-population-suspend-evictions-and-foreclosures.
14. ↵
    1. Demuth, Stephen, and
    2. Darrell Steffensmeier

    . 2004. “The Impact of Gender and Race-Ethnicity in the Pretrial Release Process.” Social Problems 51(2): 222–42.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. Dervan, Lucian, E

    . 2019. “Arriving at a System of Pleas: The History and State of Plea Bargaining.” In A System of Pleas: Social Science’s Contributions to the Real Legal System, edited by Vanessa A. Edkins and Alison D. Redlich. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. ↵
    1. Diamond, Shari Seidman,
    2. Locke E. Bowman,
    3. Manyee Wong, and
    4. Matthew M. Patton

    . 2010. “Efficiency and Cost: The Impact of Videoconferenced Hearings on Bail Decisions.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 100(3): 869–902.

    OpenUrl
17. 1. Dobbie, Will,
    2. Jacob Goldin, and
    3. Crystal S. Yang

    . 2018. “The Effects of Pretrial Detention on Conviction, Future Crime, and Employment: Evidence from Randomly Assigned Judges.” American Economic Review 108(2): 201–40.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Dobbie, Will, and
    2. Crystal S. Yang

    . 2021. “The US Pretrial System: Balancing Individual Rights and Public Interests.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 35(4): 49–70.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Eisenstein, James, and
    2. Herbert Jacob

    . 1977. Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts. Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown.
20. ↵
    1. Gelbach, Jonah B

    . 2016. “When Do Covariates Matter? And Which Ones, and How Much?” Journal of Labor Economics 34(2): 509–43.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Godfrey, Barry,
    2. Jane C. Richardson, and
    3. Sandra Walklate

    . 2022. “The Crisis in the Courts: Before and Beyond COVID.” British Journal of Criminology 62(4): 1036–53.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Goolsbee, Austan, and
    2. Chad Syverson

    . 2021. “Fear, Lockdown, and Diversion: Comparing Drivers of Pandemic Economic Decline 2020.” Journal of Public Economics 193 (January): 104311.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
23. ↵
    1. Gourdet, Camille,
    2. Amanda R. Witwer,
    3. Lynn Langton,
    4. Duren Banks,
    5. Michael G. Planty,
    6. Dulani Woods, and
    7. Brian A. Jackson

    . 2020. “Court Appearances in Criminal Proceedings through Telepresence.” Research Reports RR-3222-NIJ. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Corporation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/RR3222.
24. ↵
    1. Harris, Heather M

    . 2020. “California’s Prison Population Drops Sharply, but Overcrowding Still Threatens Prisoner Health.” Public Policy Institute of California (blog), March 2. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://www.ppic.org/blog/californias-prison-population-drops-sharply-but-overcrowding-still-threatens-prisoner-health/.
25. ↵
    1. Harris, Heather M

    . 2023. “Pandemic Policymaking and Changed Outcomes in Criminal Courts.” San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
26. ↵
    1. Harris, Heather M.,
    2. Justin Goss, and
    3. Alexandria Gumbs

    . 2019. “Pretrial Risk Assessment in California.” San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California. Accessed November 18, 2022. https://www.ppic.org/publication/pretrial-risk-assessment-in-california/.
27. ↵
    1. Heaton, Paul

    . 2020. “The Expansive Reach of Pretrial Detention.” North Carolina Law Review 98 (March 10): 369–78.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Jackson, Brian A.,
    2. Michael J.D. Vermeer,
    3. Dulani Woods,
    4. Duren Banks,
    5. Sean E. Goodison,
    6. Joe Russo,
    7. Jeremy D. Barnum, et al

    . 2020. The U.S. Criminal Justice System in the Pandemic Era and Beyond. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Corporation. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA108-8.html.
29. ↵
    1. JFA Institute

    . 2021. “The Impact of COVID-19 on Crime, Arrests, and Jail Populations.” Washington, D.C.: JFA Institute. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://safetyandjusticechallenge.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/The-Impact-of-COVID-19-on-Crime-Arrests-and-Jail-Populations-JFA-Institute.pdf.
30. ↵
    1. Jingnan, Huo

    . 2022. “To Try or Not to Try—Remotely. As Jury Trials Move Online, Courts See Pros and Cons.” National Public Radio, March 18. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://www.npr.org/2022/03/18/1086711379/as-jury-trials-move-online-courts-see-pros-and-cons.
31. ↵
    1. Johnson, Brian D

    . 2005. “Contextual Disparities in Guidelines Departures: Courtroom Social Contexts, Guidelines Compliance, and Extralegal Disparities in Criminal Sentencing.” Criminology 43(3): 761–96.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. ↵
    1. Judicial Council of California (JCC)

    . 2019. “Remote Video Appearances for Most Noncriminal Hearings 2018–2019: Workstream Phase I Report, Final.” San Francisco: Judicial Council of California. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/jctc-20191125-materials.pdf.
33. ↵
    1. Judicial Council of California (JCC)

    . 2020. “2020 Court Statistics Report: Statewide Caseload Trends 2009–2010 Through 2018–2019.” San Francisco: Judicial Council of California. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/2020-Court-Statistics-Report.pdf.
34. ↵
    1. LaVoie, Megan

    . 2021. Annual Statistical Report for the Texas Judiciary. Austin: Texas Judicial Branch, Office of Court Administration. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://www.txcourts.gov/media/1454127/fy-21-annual-statistical-report-final.pdf.
35. ↵
    1. Leslie, Emily, and
    2. Nolan G. Pope

    . 2017. “The Unintended Impact of Pretrial Detention on Case Outcomes: Evidence from New York City Arraignments.” Journal of Law and Economics 60(3): 529–57.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Levin, Marc

    . 2021. “Reducing the Staggering Backlog of Court Cases.” Route Fifty, October 8. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://www.route-fifty.com/public-safety/2021/10/reducing-criminal-case-backlog/185971/.
37. ↵
    1. Li, Weihua

    . 2020. “Police Arrested Fewer People During Coronavirus Shutdowns—Even Fewer Were White.” New York: The Marshall Project. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://www.themarshallproject.org/2020/06/02/police-arrested-fewer-people-during-coronavirus-shutdowns-even-fewer-were-white.
38. ↵
    1. Lizotte, Alan J

    . 1978. “Extra-Legal Factors in Chicago’s Criminal Courts: Testing the Conflict Model of Criminal Justice.” Social Problems 25(5): 564–80.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
39. ↵
    1. Lofstrom, Magnus, and
    2. Brandon Martin

    . 2021. “Recent State Crime Trends Mostly Mirror the Nation.” Public Policy Institute of California (blog), October 8. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://www.ppic.org/blog/recent-state-crime-trends-mostly-mirror-the-nation/.
40. ↵
    1. Lopez, Ernesto, and
    2. Richard Rosenfeld

    . 2021. “Crime, Quarantine, and the US Coronavirus Pandemic.” Criminology & Public Policy 20(3): 401–22.

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. May, David C.,
    2. Brandon K. Applegate,
    3. Rick Ruddell, and
    4. Peter B. Wood

    . 2014. “Going to Jail Sucks (and It Really Doesn’t Matter Who You Ask).” American Journal of Criminal Justice 39(2): 250–66.

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    1. Moran, Lyle

    . 2021. “California Is Poised to Permit Remote Court Hearings Through at Least Mid-2023.” ABA Journal, September 16. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://www.abajournal.com/web/article/california-to-permit-remote-court-hearings-through-at-least-mid-2023.
43. ↵
    1. Moreland, Amanda,
    2. Christine Herlihy,
    3. Michael A. Tynan,
    4. Gregory Sunshine,
    5. Russell F. McCord,
    6. Charity Hilton,
    7. Jason Poovey, et al

    . 2020. “Timing of State and Territorial COVID-19 Stay-at-Home Orders and Changes in Population Movement—United States, March 1–May 31, 2020.” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 69(35): 1198.

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. Nealon, Terence R., et al

    . 2021. “Remote Proceedings Task Force: Continued Use of Advanced Communication Technology (ACT) Following the Termination of Judicial Emergencies.” Philadelphia: Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://www.pacourts.us/Storage/media/pdfs/20211215/171538-remoteproceedingstaskforce-continueduseofadvancedcommunicationtechnology(act)followingtheterminationofjudicialemergencies(june2021).pdf.
45. ↵
    1. Nivette, Amy E.,
    2. Renee Zahnow,
    3. Raul Aguilar,
    4. Andri Ahven,
    5. Shai Amram,
    6. Barak Ariel,
    7. María José Arosemena Burbano, et al

    . 2021. “A Global Analysis of the Impact of COVID-19 Stay-At-Home Restrictions on Crime.” Nature Human Behaviour 5(7): 868–77.

    OpenUrl
46. ↵
    1. Ostrom, Brian,
    2. John Douglas,
    3. Suzanne Tallarico, and
    4. Shannon Roth

    . 2021. “The Use of Remote Hearings in Texas State Courts: The Impact on Judicial Workload.” Williamsburg, Va.: National Center for State Courts. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://www.ncsc.org/_media/ncsc/files/pdf/newsroom/TX-Remote-Hearing-Assessment-Report.pdf.
47. ↵
    1. Petersilia, Joan

    . 1997. “Probation in the United States.” Crime and Justice 22 (1997): 149–200.

    OpenUrl
48. ↵
    1. Piquero, Alex R

    . 2021. “The Policy Lessons Learned from the Criminal Justice System Response to COVID-19.” Criminology & Public Policy 20(3): 385.

    OpenUrl
49. ↵
    1. Plummer, Samantha,
    2. Timothy Ittner,
    3. Angie Monreal,
    4. Jasmin Sandelson, and
    5. Bruce Western

    . 2023. “Life During COVID for Court-Involved People.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 9(3): 232–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2023.9.3.10.

    OpenUrl
50. ↵
    1. Premkumar, Deepak,
    2. Thomas Sloan,
    3. Magnus Lofstrom, and
    4. Joseph Hayes

    . 2023. “Assessing the Impact of COVID-19 on Arrests in California.” San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
51. ↵
    1. Raymond, Nate

    . 2020. “Texas Tries a Pandemic First: A Jury Trial by Zoom.” Reuters, May 18. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-courts-texas/texas-tries-a-pandemic-first-a-jury-trial-by-zoom-idUSKBN22U1FE.
52. ↵
    1. Rosenfeld, Richard,
    2. Thomas Abt, and
    3. Ernesto Lopez

    . 2021. “Pandemic, Social Unrest, and Crime in U.S. Cities.” Washington, D.C.: Council on Criminal Justice. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://build.neoninspire.com/counciloncj/wp-content/uploads/sites/96/2021/07/DESIGNED_FINAL1.pdf.
53. ↵
    1. San Diego Superior Court

    . 2020. “In RE: Prioritization of Jury Trials Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. (General Order of the Presiding Department 090920-89).” San Diego, Calif.: San Diego Superior Court. Accessed December 14, 2022. https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/sites/default/files/sdcourt/generalinformation/news/2020_news_releases/sdsc%20general%20order%20090920-89.pdf.
54. ↵
    1. Slayton, David

    . 2020. “Annual Statistical Report for the Texas Judiciary.” Austin: Texas Judicial Branch, Office of Court Administration. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://www.txcourts.gov/media/1451853/fy-20-annual-statistical-report_final_mar10_2021.pdf.
55. ↵
    1. Smith, Patrick

    . 2021. “As the Nation’s Courthouses Reopen, They Face Massive Backlogs in Criminal Cases.” National Public Radio, July 14. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://www.npr.org/2021/07/13/1015526430/the-nations-courthouses-confront-massive-backlogs-in-criminal-cases.
56. ↵
    1. Smith, Tyler,
    2. Kristina J. Thompson, and
    3. Michele Cadigan

    . 2022. “Sensemaking in the Legal System: A Comparative Case Study of Changes to Monetary Sanction Laws.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(1): 63–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.1.03.

    OpenUrl
57. ↵
    1. Tafoya, Sonya

    . 2013. “Assessing the Impact of Bail on California’s Jail Population.” San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://www.ppic.org/publication/assessing-the-impact-of-bail-on-californias-jail-population/.
58. ↵
    1. Tafoya, Sonya,
    2. Mia Bird,
    3. Ryken Grattet, and
    4. Viet Nguyen

    . 2017. “Pretrial Release in California.” San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://www.ppic.org/publication/pretrial-release-in-california/.
59. ↵
    1. Thumma, Samuel A., and
    2. Marcus W. Reinkensmeyer

    . 2022. “Post-Pandemic Recommendations: COVID-19 Continuity of Court Operations During a Public Health Emergency Workgroup.” SMU Law Review Forum 75(1): 1–116.

    OpenUrl
60. ↵
    1. Turner, Jenia I

    . 2021. “Remote Criminal Justice.” Texas Tech Law Review 53 (2021): 197–269.

    OpenUrl
61. ↵
    1. Wildeman, Christopher,
    2. Maria D. Fitzpatrick, and
    3. Alyssa W. Goldman

    . 2018. “Conditions of Confinement in American Prisons and Jails.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 14: 29–47.

    OpenUrl
62. ↵
    1. Wood, Peter B., and
    2. David C. May

    . 2003. “Racial Differences in Perceptions of the Severity of Sanctions: A Comparison of Prison with Alternatives.” Justice Quarterly 20(3): 605–31.

    OpenUrl
63. ↵
    1. Workgroup on Post-Pandemic Initiatives (WPPI)

    . 2021. “Interim Report: Remote Access to Courts.” San Francisco: Judicial Council of California. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://newsroom.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/newsroom/2021-08/P3%20Workgroup%20Remote%20Access%20Interim%20Report%2008162021.pdf.
64. ↵
    1. Wurst, Wendell J., et al

    . 2021. “Recommendations for Videoconferencing in Kansas Courts.” Topeka: Kansas Judicial Branch Videoconferencing Committee. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://www.kscourts.org/KSCourts/media/KsCourts/Judges%20-%20Secondary%20Nav%20Page%20PDFs/VideoconferencingReport110614.pdf.