Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Publications
    • rsf

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Publications
    • rsf
  • Log in
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Advanced Search

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Follow rsf on Twitter
  • Visit rsf on Facebook
  • Follow rsf on Google Plus
Research Article
Open Access

Do Perceptions of Privilege Enhance—or Impede—Perceptions of Intelligence? Evidence from a National Survey Experiment

Natasha Quadlin
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences November 2022, 8 (7) 48-69; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.7.03
Natasha Quadlin
aAssociate professor of sociology and faculty fellow in the California Center for Population Research at the University of California, Los Angeles, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Natasha Quadlin
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Aisch, Gregor,
    2. Larry Buchanan,
    3. Amanda Cox, and
    4. Kevin Quealy
    . 2017. “Some Colleges Have More Students from the Top 1 Percent Than the Bottom 60. Find Yours.” New York Times, January 18. Accessed November 19, 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/18/upshot/some-colleges-have-more-students-from-the-top-1-percent-than-the-bottom-60.html.
  2. ↵
    1. Arcidiacono, Peter,
    2. Josh Kinsler, and
    3. Tyler Ransom
    . 2022. “Legacy and Athlete Preferences at Harvard.” Journal of Labor Economics 40(1): 133–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/713744.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Bartz, Kevin
    . 2009. “English First Names for Chinese Americans.” Harvard University Social Science Statistics Blog, March 13. Accessed November 21, 2021. https://blogs.iq.harvard.edu/english_first_n.
  4. ↵
    1. Bénabou, Roland, and
    2. Jean Tirole
    . 2006. “Belief in a Just World and Redistributive Politics.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 121(2): 699–746.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Berger, Joseph,
    2. Bernard P. Cohen, and
    3. Morris Zelditch
    . 1972. “Status Characteristics and Social Interaction.” American Sociological Review 37(3): 241–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Bero, Tayo
    . 2021. “Turns Out, Harvard Students Aren’t That Smart After All.” The Guardian, November 17. Accessed November 19, 2021. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/nov/17/harvard-university-students-smart-iq.
  7. ↵
    1. Binder, Amy J.,
    2. Daniel B. Davis, and
    3. Nick Bloom
    . 2016. “Career Funneling: How Elite Students Learn to Define and Desire ‘Prestigious’ Jobs.” Sociology of Education 89(1): 20–39.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Blau, Peter M., and
    2. Otis Dudley Duncan
    . 1967. The American Occupational Structure. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  9. ↵
    1. Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo
    . 2006. Racism Without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in the United States. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.
  10. ↵
    1. Bourdieu, Pierre
    . 1986. “The Forms of Capital.” In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by John G. Richardson. New York: Greenwood.
  11. ↵
    1. Calarco, Jessica McCrory
    . 2011. “‘I Need Help!’ Social Class and Children’s Help-Seeking in Elementary School.” American Sociological Review 76(6): 862–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Castro, Abril
    . 2020. “An Elite College Has Dropped Legacy Admissions—It’s Time for Other Higher Education Institutions to Do the Same.” Center for American Progress, January 30. Accessed November 21, 2021. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/elite-college-dropped-legacy-admissions-time-higher-education-institutions/.
  13. ↵
    1. Conwell, Jordan A
    . 2021. “Diverging Disparities: Race, Parental Income, and Children’s Math Scores, 1960 to 2009.” Sociology of Education 94(2): 124–42.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Conwell, Jordan A., and
    2. Natasha Quadlin
    . 2022. “Race, Gender, Higher Education, and Socioeconomic Attainment: Evidence from Baby Boomers at Mid-Life.” Social Forces 100(3): 990–1024.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Conwell, Jordan A., and
    2. Leafia Zi Ye
    . 2021. “All Wealth Is Not Created Equal: Race, Parental Net Worth, and Children’s Achievement.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 7(3): 101–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2021.7.3.05.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Crabtree, Charles, and
    2. Volha Chykina
    . 2018. “Last Name Selection in Audit Studies.” Sociological Science 5(2): 21–28.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Cuddy, Amy J. C.,
    2. Susan T. Fiske, and
    3. Peter Glick
    . 2008. “Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 40: 61–149.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Cullen, Jim
    . 2003. The American Dream: A Short History of an Idea That Shaped a Nation. New York: Oxford University Press.
  19. ↵
    1. DiMaggio, Paul
    . 1982. “Cultural Capital and School Success: The Impact of Status Culture Participation on the Grades of U.S. High School Students.” American Sociological Review 47(2): 189–201.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. Dippong, Joseph, and
    2. Will Kalkhoff
    . 2015. “Predicting Performance Expectations from Affective Impressions: Linking Affect Control Theory and Status Characteristics Theory.” Social Science Research 50(3): 1–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. DiPrete, Thomas A., and
    2. Gregory M. Eirich
    . 2006. “Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments.” Annual Review of Sociology 32(1): 271–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Doan, Long,
    2. Natasha Quadlin, and
    3. Brian Powell
    . 2019. “Americans’ Perceptions of Transgender People’s Sex: Evidence from a National Survey Experiment.” Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 5: 1–15.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Dynarski, Susan
    . 2015. “For the Poor, the Graduation Gap Is Even Wider Than the Enrollment Gap.” New York Times, June 2. Accessed November 21, 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/02/upshot/for-the-poor-the-graduation-gap-is-even-wider-than-the-enrollment-gap.html.
  24. ↵
    1. Eagly, Alice H., and
    2. Linda L. Carli
    . 2007. Through the Labyrinth: The Truth About How Women Become Leaders. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
  25. ↵
    1. Erikson, Robert, and
    2. John H. Goldthorpe
    . 2002. “Intergenerational Inequality: A Sociological Perspective.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16(3): 31–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Ermish, John,
    2. Markus Jäntti, and
    3. Timothy M. Smeeding
    , eds. 2012. From Parents to Children: The Intergenerational Transmission of Advantage. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  27. ↵
    1. Espenshade, Thomas J. and
    2. Chang Y. Chung
    . 2005. “The Opportunity Cost of Admission Preferences at Elite Universities.” Social Science Quarterly 86(2): 293–305.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. Fiske, Susan T.,
    2. Amy J. C. Cuddy,
    3. Peter Glick, and
    4. Jun Xu
    . 2002. “A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82(6): 878–902.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    1. Gaddis, S. Michael
    . 2017a. “How Black Are Lakisha and Jamal? Racial Perceptions from Names Used in Correspondence Audit Studies.” Sociological Science 4: 469–89.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Gaddis, S. Michael
    . 2017b. “Racial/Ethnic Perceptions from Hispanic Names: Selecting Names to Test for Discrimination.” Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 3: 1–11.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Galperin, Roman V.,
    2. Oliver Hahl,
    3. Adina D. Sterling, and
    4. Jerry Guo
    . 2020. “Too Good to Hire? Capability and Inferences about Commitment in Labor Markets.” Administrative Science Quarterly 65(2): 275–313.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Glick, Peter, and
    2. Susan T. Fiske
    . 1996. “The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70(3): 491–512.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Hamilton, Darrick, and
    2. William Darity
    . 2010. “Can ‘Baby Bonds’ Eliminate the Racial Wealth Gap in Putative Post-Racial America?” Review of Black Political Economy 37: 207–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. Hochschild, Jennifer L
    . 1995. Facing Up to the American Dream: Race, Class, and the Soul of the Nation. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  35. ↵
    1. Hout, Michael
    . 2018. “Americans’ Occupational Status Reflects the Status of Both of Their Parents.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(38): 9527–32.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Jaschik, Scott
    . 2021. “Legacy Admissions Banned in Colorado.” Admissions Insider, June 1. Accessed November 21, 2021. https://www.insidehighered.com/admissions/article/2021/06/01/colorado-bars-public-colleges-using-legacy-admissions.
  37. ↵
    1. Jost, John T.,
    2. Mahzarin R. Banaji, and
    3. Brian A. Nosek
    . 2004. “A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo.” Political Psychology 25(6): 881–919.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Kim, ChangHwan,
    2. Christopher R. Tamborini, and
    3. Arthur Sakamoto
    . 2015. “Field of Study in College and Lifetime Earnings in the United States.” Sociology of Education 88(4): 320–39.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. ↵
    1. Kluegel, James R., and
    2. Eliot R. Smith
    . 1986. Beliefs About Inequality: Americans’ Views of What Is and What Ought to Be. New York: Routledge.
  40. ↵
    1. Koenig, Biko
    . 2022. “Politicizing Status Loss Among Trump Supporters in 2020.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(6): 69–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.6.04.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Massey, Douglas S.,
    2. Camille Z. Charles,
    3. Garvey Lundy, and
    4. Mary J. Fischer
    . 2011. The Source of the River: The Social Origins of Freshmen at America’s Selective Colleges and Universities. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  42. ↵
    1. McCall, Leslie
    . 2013. The Undeserving Rich: American Beliefs About Inequality, Opportunity, and Redistribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  43. ↵
    1. McCall, Leslie,
    2. Derek Burk,
    3. Marie Laperrière, and
    4. Jennifer A. Richeson
    . 2017. “Exposure to Rising Inequality Shapes Americans’ Opportunity Beliefs and Policy Support.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(36): 9593–98.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. McNamee, Stephen J., and
    2. Robert K. Miller
    . 2009. The Meritocracy Myth, 2nd ed. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.
  45. ↵
    1. Medina, Jennifer,
    2. Katie Benner, and
    3. Kate Taylor
    . 2019. “Actresses, Business Leaders and Other Wealthy Parents Charged in U.S. College Entry Fraud.” New York Times, March 12. Accessed November 21, 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/12/us/college-admissions-cheating-scandal.html.
  46. ↵
    1. Merton, Robert K
    . 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science: The Reward and Communication Systems of Science Are Considered.” Science 159(3810): 56–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Mijs, Jonathan J. B
    . 2021. “The Paradox of Inequality: Income Inequality and Belief in Meritocracy Go Hand in Hand.” Socio-Economic Review 19(1): 7–35.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. O’Brien, Timothy L., and
    2. Shiri Noy
    . 2020. “Political Identity and Confidence in Science and Religion in the United States.” Sociology of Religion 81(4): 439–61.
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    1. Owens, Ann
    . 2018. “Income Segregation Between School Districts and Inequality in Students’ Achievement.” Sociology of Education 91(1): 1–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. ↵
    1. Pedulla, David S
    . 2014. “The Positive Consequences of Negative Stereotypes: Race, Sexual Orientation, and the Job Application Process.” Social Psychology Quarterly 77(1): 75–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  51. ↵
    1. Pfeffer, Fabian T
    . 2008. “Persistent Inequality in Educational Attainment and Its Institutional Context.” European Sociological Review 24(5): 543–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  52. ↵
    1. Pfeffer, Fabian T., and
    2. Alexandra Killewald
    . 2018. “Generations of Advantage. Multigenerational Correlations in Family Wealth.” Social Forces 96(4): 1411–42.
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    1. Quadlin, Natasha
    . 2018. “The Mark of a Woman’s Record: Gender and Academic Performance in Hiring.” American Sociological Review 83: 331–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  54. ↵
    1. Quadlin, Natasha
    . 2019a. Perceptions of Intelligence, Privilege, and Kindness Among Recent College Graduates (data set). Redwood City, Calif.: YouGov.
  55. ↵
    1. Quadlin, Natasha
    . 2019b. “Sibling Achievement, Sibling Gender, and Beliefs about Parental Investment: Evidence from a National Survey Experiment.” Social Forces 97(4): 1603–30.
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    1. Quadlin, Natasha, and
    2. Jordan A. Conwell
    . 2021. “Race, Gender, and Parental College Savings: Assessing Economic and Academic Factors.” Sociology of Education 94(1): 20–42.
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    1. Quadlin, Natasha, and
    2. Brian Powell
    . 2022. Who Should Pay? Higher Education, Responsibility, and the Public. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  58. ↵
    1. Ray, Rashawn
    . 2017. “Black People Don’t Exercise in My Neighborhood: Perceived Racial Composition and Leisure-Time Physical Activity Among Middle Class Blacks and Whites.” Social Science Research 66: 42–57.
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    1. Reardon, Sean F
    . 2011. “The Widening Academic Achievement Gap Between the Rich and the Poor: New Evidence and Possible Explanations.” In Whither Opportunity? Rising Inequality, Schools, and Children’s Life Chances, edited by Greg J. Duncan and Robert J. Murnane. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  60. ↵
    1. Ridgeway, Cecilia L
    . 2011. Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World. New York: Oxford University Press.
  61. ↵
    1. Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and
    2. Shelley J. Correll
    . 2004. “Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations.” Gender & Society 18(4): 510–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  62. ↵
    1. Risman, Barbara J., and
    2. Myra Marx Ferree
    . 1995. “Making Gender Visible.” American Sociological Review 60(5): 775–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  63. ↵
    1. Rivera, Lauren A
    . 2015. Pedigree: How Elite Students Get Elite Jobs. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  64. ↵
    1. Schachter, Ariela
    . 2016. “From ‘Different’ to ‘Similar’: An Experimental Approach to Understanding Assimilation.” American Sociological Review 81(5): 981–1013.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  65. ↵
    1. Sewell, William H.,
    2. Archibald O. Haller, and
    3. Alejandro Portes
    . 1969. “The Educational and Early Occupational Attainment Process.” American Sociological Review 34(1): 82–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  66. ↵
    1. Stevens, Mitchell L
    . 2009. Creating a Class: College Admissions and the Education of Elites. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  67. ↵
    1. Streib, Jessi
    . 2020. Privilege Lost: Who Leaves the Upper Middle Class and How They Fall. New York: Oxford University Press.
  68. ↵
    1. Valentino, Lauren
    . 2020. “The Segregation Premium: How Gender Shapes the Symbolic Valuation Process of Occupational Prestige Judgments.” Social Forces 99(1): 31–58.
    OpenUrl
  69. ↵
    1. VanHeuvelen, Tom, and
    2. Natasha Quadlin
    . 2021. “Gender Inequality in STEM Employment and Earnings at Career Entry: Evidence from Millennial Birth Cohorts.” Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 7: 1–15. First published online: December 11, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231211064392.
    OpenUrl
  70. ↵
    1. Weisshaar, Katherine,
    2. Koji Chavez, and
    3. Tania Cabello-Hutt
    . 2020. “An Imperfect Match? How Gender and Race Influence Perceptions of Underqualified Job Applicants.” Paper presented at the virtual annual meeting of the Population Association of America, April 23–25, 2020.
  71. ↵
    1. Wildeman, Christopher,
    2. Kris Scardamalia,
    3. Elizabeth G. Walsh,
    4. Rourke L. O’Brien, and
    5. Bridget Brew
    . 2017. “Paternal Incarceration and Teachers’ Expectations of Students.” Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 3: 1–14.
    OpenUrl
  72. ↵
    1. Young, Michael
    . 1958. The Rise of the Meritocracy. New York: Transaction Publishers.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: 8 (7)
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Vol. 8, Issue 7
1 Nov 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Do Perceptions of Privilege Enhance—or Impede—Perceptions of Intelligence? Evidence from a National Survey Experiment
(Your Name) has sent you a message from RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Do Perceptions of Privilege Enhance—or Impede—Perceptions of Intelligence? Evidence from a National Survey Experiment
Natasha Quadlin
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Nov 2022, 8 (7) 48-69; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2022.8.7.03

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Do Perceptions of Privilege Enhance—or Impede—Perceptions of Intelligence? Evidence from a National Survey Experiment
Natasha Quadlin
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Nov 2022, 8 (7) 48-69; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2022.8.7.03
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • BACKGROUND
    • DATA AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
    • Appendix
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • educational inequality
  • income and wealth
  • social perceptions
  • experimental methods
  • conjoint experiments

© 2025 RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Powered by HighWire