Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Publications
    • rsf

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Publications
    • rsf
  • Log in
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Advanced Search

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Follow rsf on Twitter
  • Visit rsf on Facebook
  • Follow rsf on Google Plus
Research Article
Open Access

Who Gets Accepted and Who Gets Rejected? Status in the Production of Social Science

Kevin Nazar, Roberta Spalter-Roth, James C. Witte
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences November 2022, 8 (7) 192-209; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.7.10
Kevin Nazar
aDoctoral candidate in public and applied sociology at George Mason University, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roberta Spalter-Roth
bSenior research fellow at George Mason University, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James C. Witte
cProfessor in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology and director of the Institute for Immigration Research at George Mason University, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for James C. Witte
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Allen, Walter R.,
    2. Susan A. Suh,
    3. Gloria Gonzales, and
    4. Joshua Yang
    . 2008. “Quo Bono: Explaining of Defending Winners and Losers in the Competition for Educational Achievement.” In White Logic, White Methods, edited by Tukufu Zuberi and Edwardo Bonilla-Silva. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.
  2. ↵
    1. American Sociological Association (ASA)
    . 2019. “Report of the ASA Task Force on Membership. American Sociological Association. Accessed July 14, 2022. https://www.asanet.org/sites/default/files/task_force_on_membership_report_-_20190930.pdf.
  3. ↵
    1. American Sociological Association (ASA)
    . 2020. “Data Dashboard: ASA Total Membership Trend.” American Sociological Association. Accessed June 11, 2022. https://asanet.org/academic-professional-resources/data-about-discipline/asa-membership/asa-total-membership-trend.
  4. ↵
    1. Bakanic, Von,
    2. Clark McPhail, and
    3. Rita Simon
    . 1987. “The Manuscript Review and Decision-Making Process.” American Journal of Sociology 52(5): 631–42.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Begg, Colin B., and
    2. Jesse A. Berlin
    . 1988. “Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 155(3): 419–63.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Blackwell, James E., and
    2. Morris Janowitz
    , eds. 1974. Black Sociologists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  7. ↵
    1. Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo
    . 2015. “The Structure of Racism in Color-Blind, ‘Post-Racial’ America.” American Behavioral Scientist 59(11): 1358–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo
    . 2017. “What We Were, What We Are, and What We Should Be: The Racial Problem of American Sociology.” Social Problems 64(2): 179–87.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo, and
    2. David G. Embrick
    . 2005. “Racism Without Racists: Killing Me Softly’ with Color Blindness.” In Re-Inventing Critical Pedagogy: Widening the Circle of Anti-Oppression Education, edited by Cesar Rossatto, Ricky Lee Allen, and Marc Pryun. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.
  10. ↵
    1. Bourdieu, Pierre, and
    2. Jean-Claude Passeron
    . 1977. Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
  11. ↵
    1. Bowles, Sam, and
    2. Herbert Gintis
    . 2011. Schooling in Capitalist America. Chicago: Haymarket.
  12. ↵
    1. Brewer, Rose M
    . 1989. “Black Women and Feminist Sociology: The Emerging Perspective.” American Sociologist 9(20): 57–70.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Burawoy, Michael
    . 2005. “For Public Sociology.” American Sociological Review 70 (February): 4–28. Accessed June 11, 2022. http://burawoy.berkeley.edu/Public%20Sociology,%20Live/Burawoy.pdf.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Calhoun, Craig, and
    2. Jonathan Van Antwerpen
    . 2007. “Orthodoxy, Heterodoxy, and Hierarchy: ‘Mainstream’ Sociology and its Challengers.” In Sociology in America: A History, edited by Craig Calhoun. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  15. ↵
    1. Camic, Charles,
    2. Neil Gross, and
    3. Michele Lamont
    . 2011. “Introduction: the Study of Social Knowledge in the Making.” In Social Knowledge in the Making, edited by Charles Camic, Neil Gross, and Michele Lamont. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  16. ↵
    1. Collins, Patricia H
    . 1986. “Learning from the Outsider Within.” Social Problems 33(6): S14–S32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Collins, Patricia H
    . 1990. “Black Feminist Thought and the Matrix of Domination.” In Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment, by Patricia H. Collins. New York: Routledge.
  18. ↵
    1. Collins, Patricia H., and
    2. Sirma Bilge
    . 2016. Intersectionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  19. ↵
    1. Crane, Diana
    . 1967. “The Gatekeepers of Science: Some Factors Affecting the Selection of Articles for Scientific Journals.” The American Sociologist 2(4): 195–201.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Crenshaw, Kimberle
    . 1989. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics.” University of Chicago Legal Forum 1, Article 8. Accessed June 11, 2022. http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/.
  21. ↵
    1. CSMGEP
    . 2018. “Committee of the Status of Minority Groups in the Economics Profession.” AEA Papers and Proceedings 108: 722–35. Accessed June 11, 2022. https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/pandp.108.722.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Darity, William A., Jr.
    . 2010. “Notes from the Back of the Academic Bus.” In The Future of Diversity, edited by Daniel Little and Satya P. Mohanty. New York Palgrave Macmillan.
  23. ↵
    1. Delgado, Alberto Falk, and
    2. Anna Falk Delgado
    . 2018. “Home Institution Bias in the New England Journal of Medicine? A Noninferiority Study on Citation Rates.” Scientometrics 115: 607–11. Accessed June 11, 2022. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11192-017-2584-7.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Dixon-Reeves, Regina
    . 2003. “Mentoring as a Precursor to Incorporation: An Assessment of the Mentoring Experience of Recently Minted PhDs.” Journal of Black Studies 34(1): 12–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Embrick, David G
    . 2017 “Discontents within the Discipline: Sociological Hypnagogia, Negligence, and Denial.” Social Problems 64(2): 188–93.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Flahrety, Colleen
    . 2019. “Study: Men Frame Their Research Findings More Positively Than Do Women.” Inside Higher Education, December 17. Accessed June 11, 2022. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2019/12/17/study-men-frame-their-research-findings-more-positively-do-women.
  27. ↵
    1. Fortunato, Santo,
    2. Carl T. Bergstrom,
    3. Katy Börner,
    4. James A. Evans,
    5. Dirk Helbing,
    6. Staša Milojević,
    7. Alexander M. Petersen, et al.
    2018. “Science of Science.” Science 359(6379): eaao0185.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Golash-Boza, Tanya
    . 2016. “A Critical and Comprehensive Sociological Theory of Race and Racism.” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 2(2): 129–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    1. Golde, Chris M., and
    2. George M. Walker
    , eds. 2006. Envisioning the Future of Doctoral Education: Preparing Stewards of the Discipline. Carnegie Essays on the Doctorate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  30. ↵
    1. Helmer, Markus,
    2. Manuel Schottdorf,
    3. Andreas Neef, and
    4. Demian Battaglia
    . 2017. “Gender Bias in Scholarly Peer Review.” eLife 6:e21718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21718.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. King, Mollie M.,
    2. Carl T. Bergstrom,
    3. Shelley J. Correll,
    4. Jennifer Jacquet, and
    5. Jevin D. West
    . 2017. “Men Set Their Own Cites High: Gender and Self-Citation Across Fields and over Time.” Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 3. First published online December 8, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117738903.
  32. ↵
    1. Korom, Philipp
    . 2020. “The Prestige Elite in Sociology: Toward a Collective Biography of the Most Cited Scholars (1970–2010).” Sociological Quarterly 61(1): 128–63.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Laland, Kevin N
    . 2020. “Racism in Academia, and Why the Little Things Matter.” Nature, August 25.
  34. ↵
    1. Lamont, Michele, and
    2. Katri Huutoniemi
    . 2011. “Comparing Customary Rules of Fairness: Evaluative Practices in Various Types of Peer Review Panels.” In Social Knowledge in the Making, edited by Charles Camic, Neil Gross, and Michele Lamont. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  35. ↵
    1. Leahey, Erin, and
    2. James Moody
    . 2014. “Sociological Innovation Through Subfield Integration.” Social Currents 1(3): 228–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    1. Moody, James
    . 2004. “The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999.” American Sociological Review 69(2): 213–38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    1. Moore, Kyle K.,
    2. Ismael Cid-Martinez,
    3. Jermaine Toney,
    4. Jason A. Smith,
    5. Amber C. Kalb,
    6. Jean H. Shin, and
    7. Roberta M. Spalter-Roth
    . 2018. “Who Climbs the Academic Ladder? Race and Gender Stratification in a World of Whiteness.” Review of Black Political Economy 45(3): 216–44.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Moore, Mignon R
    . 2017. “Women of Color in the Academy: Navigating Multiple Intersections and Multiple Hierarchies.” Social Problems 64(2): 200–205.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Nielsen, Mathias Willum, and
    2. Jens Peter Andersen
    . 2021. “Global Citation Inequality Is on the Rise.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 118(7): e2012208118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2012208118.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. NSF
    . 2020. National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Survey of Earned Doctorates. NCSES Interactive Data Tool. Accessed July 7, 2020. https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/explorer.
  41. ↵
    1. NSF
    . 2021. National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Survey of Earned Doctorates. NCSES Interactive Data Tool. Accessed September 15, 2021. https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/explorer.
  42. ↵
    1. Olson, Steven, and
    2. Adam P. Fagen
    , eds. 2007. Understanding Interventions That Encourage Minorities to Pursue Research Careers: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/12022.
  43. ↵
    1. Pettigrew, Thomas F
    . 2007. “Future Directions for Intergroup Contact Theory and Research.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 32(3): 187–99.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Radicchi, Phillip,
    2. Santo Fortunato, and
    3. Claudio Castellano
    . 2008. “Universality of Citation Distributions: Toward and Objective Measure of Scientific Impact.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(45): 17268–72.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Reskin, Barbara F., and
    2. Patricia A. Roos
    . 1987. “Status Hierarchies and Sex Segregation.” In Ingredients for Women’s Employment Policy, edited by Christine Bose and Glenna Spitze. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press.
  46. ↵
    1. Ridgeway, Cecelia
    . 2011. Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World. New York: Oxford University Press.
  47. ↵
    1. Spalter-Roth, Roberta
    . 2021. “Obstacles to Sustaining Diversity: Historical Context and Current Experiences of Underrepresented Minority Women and Men in Sociology and Economics.” Sustainability 13(21): 11858. Accessed June3 11, 2022. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11858/html.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Spalter-Roth, Roberta, and
    2. William Erskine
    . 2007. Race and Ethnicity in the Sociology Pipeline. Washington, D.C.: American Sociological Association.
    1. Spalter-Roth, Roberta,
    2. Jean Shin,
    3. Olga Mayorova, and
    4. Patricia White
    . 2011. The Impact of Cross-Race Mentoring for Ideal and Alternative Career in Sociology. Washington, D.C.: American Sociological Association.
  49. ↵
    1. Spalter-Roth, Roberta,
    2. Jean Shin,
    3. Jason A. Smith,
    4. Amber Kalb,
    5. Kyle K. Moore,
    6. Ismael Cid-Martinez, and
    7. Jermaine Toney
    . 2019. “Raced Organizations and the Academic Success of Underrepresented Minority Faculty Members in Sociology.” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 5(2): 261–77.
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. Upthegrove, Rachel,
    2. Angharad De Cates,
    3. Alice Shuttleworth,
    4. Derek. K. Tracey,
    5. Matthew R. Broome, and
    6. Anne Lingford-Hughes
    . 2020. “Gender Equality in Academic Publishing: Action from the BJPsych.” British Journal of Psychiatry 218(3): 128–30.
    OpenUrl
  51. ↵
    1. Walker, George E.,
    2. Chris M. Golde,
    3. Laura Jones,
    4. Andrea Conklin Bueschel, and
    5. Pat Hutchings
    . 2008. The Formation of Scholars: Rethinking Doctoral Education for the Twenty-First Century. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  52. ↵
    1. Weakliem, David L.,
    2. Gordon Gauchat, and
    3. Bradley R. E. Wright
    . 2012. “Sociological Stratification: Change and Continuity in the Distribution of Departmental Prestige, 1965–2007.” American Sociologist 43(3): 310–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. ↵
    1. Weber, Max
    . 2018. “Class, Status, and Party.” In The Inequality Reader: Contemporary and Foundational Readings in Race, Class, and Gender, edited by David Grusky. New York: Routledge, 2018.
  54. ↵
    1. Wellmon, Chad, and
    2. Andrew Piper
    . 2017. “Publication, Power, and Patronage: On Inequality and Academic Publishing.” Critical Inquiry 44(1). Accessed June 11, 2022. https://criticalinquiry.uchicago.edu/publication_power_and_patronage_on_inequality_and_academic_publishing/.
  55. ↵
    1. West, Jevin D,
    2. Jennifer Jacquet,
    3. Molly M. King,
    4. Shelly J. Correll, and
    5. Carl T. Bergstrom
    . 2013. “The Role of Gender in Scholarly Authorship.” PLOS One 8(7): e66212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone0066212.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Williams, Monica T
    . 2020. “Racism in Academic Publishing.” Psychology Today, July 7. Accessed June 11, 2022. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/culturally-speaking/202007/racism-in-academic-publishing.
  57. ↵
    1. Zambrana, Ruth Enid,
    2. Adia Harvey Wingfield,
    3. Lisa M. Lapeyrouse,
    4. Brianne A. Davila,
    5. Tangere L. Hoagland, and
    6. Robert Burciaga Valdez
    . 2017. “Blatant, Subtle, and Insidious: URM Faculty Perceptions of Discriminatory Practices in Predominantly White Institutions.” Sociological Inquiry 87(2): 207–32.
    OpenUrl
  58. ↵
    1. Zuberi, Tukufu, and
    2. Eduardo Bonilla-Silva
    2008. White Logic, White Methods: Racism and Methodology. Lanham, Md.: Roman & Littlefield.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: 8 (7)
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Vol. 8, Issue 7
1 Nov 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Who Gets Accepted and Who Gets Rejected? Status in the Production of Social Science
(Your Name) has sent you a message from RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
15 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Who Gets Accepted and Who Gets Rejected? Status in the Production of Social Science
Kevin Nazar, Roberta Spalter-Roth, James C. Witte
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Nov 2022, 8 (7) 192-209; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2022.8.7.10

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Who Gets Accepted and Who Gets Rejected? Status in the Production of Social Science
Kevin Nazar, Roberta Spalter-Roth, James C. Witte
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Nov 2022, 8 (7) 192-209; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2022.8.7.10
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • STUDY PURPOSE
    • PREVIOUS RESEARCH
    • RESEARCH DATA AND DESIGN: THE ASR DIGITAL ARCHIVE
    • FINDINGS
    • CONCLUSION
    • Appendix
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • gender
  • knowledge production
  • peer review
  • publication bias
  • race
  • status
  • stratification

© 2025 RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Powered by HighWire