Racial and Ethnic Status Distinctions and Discrimination: The Effects of Prior Contact and Group Interaction

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. American Anthropological Association (AAA)

   . 1998. “AAA Statement on Race.” American Anthropologist 100(3): 712–13. Accessed June 11, 2022. https://www.americananthro.org/ConnectWithAAA/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=2583.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Barlow, Fiona Kate,
   2. Stefania Paolini,
   3. Anne Pedersen,
   4. Matthew J. Hornsey,
   5. Helena R. M. Radke,
   6. Jake Harwood,
   7. Mark Rubin, and
   8. Chris G. Sibley

   . 2012. “The Contact Caveat: Negative Contact Predicts Increased Prejudice More Than Positive Contact Predicts Reduced Prejudice.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38(12): 1629–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212457953.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Beelmann, Andreas, and
   2. Kim Sarah Heinemann

   . 2014. “Preventing Prejudice and Improving Intergroup Attitudes: A Meta-Analysis of Child and Adolescent Training Programs.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 35(1): 10–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2013.11.002.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. ↵
   1. Benard, Stephen,
   2. Doan Long,
   3. D. Adam Nicholson,
   4. Emily Meanwell,
   5. Eric L. Wright, and
   6. Peter Lista

   . 2022. “To Forgive Is Divine? Morality and the Status Value of Intergroup Revenge and Forgiveness.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation of the Social Sciences 8(6): 122–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.6.07.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Berger, Joseph,
   2. Bernard Cohen, and
   3. Morris Zelditch

   . 1972. “Status Characteristics and Social Interaction.” American Sociological Review 37(3): 241–55.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Berger, Joseph,
   2. M. Hammit Fişek,
   3. Robert Z. Norman, and
   4. Morris Zelditch Jr.

   . 1977. Status Characteristics and Social Interaction. New York: Elsevier.
7. ↵
   1. Berger, Joseph,
   2. Robert Z. Norman,
   3. James W. Balkwell, and
   4. Roy F. Smith

   . 1992. “Status Inconsistency in Task Situations: A Test of Four Status Processing Principles.” American Sociological Review 57(6): 843–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2096127.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Berger, Joseph,
   2. Susan J. Rosenholtz, and
   3. Morris Zelditch Jr.

   . 1980. “Status Organizing Processes.” Annual Review of Sociology 6(1): 479–508.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Berger, Joseph, and
   2. Murray Webster Jr.

   . 2006. “Expectations, Status, and Behavior.” In Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, edited by Peter J. Burke. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.
10. ↵
    1. Berger, Joseph, and
    2. Murray Webster Jr.

    . 2018. “Expectations, Status, and Behavior Theories.” In Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, 2nd ed. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
11. ↵
    1. Biernat, Monica, and
    2. Diane Kobrynowicz

    . 1997. “Gender- and Race-Based Standards of Competence: Lower Minimum Standards but Higher Ability Standards for Devalued Groups.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72(3): 544–57.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Binder, Jens,
    2. Hanna Zagefka,
    3. Rupert Brown,
    4. Friedrich Funke,
    5. Thomas Kessler,
    6. Amelie Mummendey,
    7. Annemie Maquil,
    8. Stephanie Demoulin, and
    9. Jacques-Philippe Leyens

    . 2009. “Does Contact Reduce Prejudice or Does Prejudice Reduce Contact? A Longitudinal Test of the Contact Hypothesis Among Majority and Minority Groups in Three European Countries.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96(4): 843–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013470.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Brambilla, Marco,
    2. Marcella Ravenna, and
    3. Miles Hewstone

    . 2012. “Changing Stereotype Content Through Mental Imagery: Imagining Intergroup Contact Promotes Stereotype Change.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 15(3): 305–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211427574.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Brown, Rupert, and
    2. Miles Hewstone

    . 2005. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Contact.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 37: 255–343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37005-5.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Cohen, Elizabeth G

    . 1982. “A Multi-Ability Approach to the Integrated Classroom.” Journal of Reading Behavior 14(4): 439–60.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Cohen, Elizabeth G

    . 1993. “From Theory to Practice: The Development of an Applied Research Program.” In Theoretical Research Programs: Studies in the Growth of Theory, edited by Joseph Berger and Morris Zelditch. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
17. ↵
    1. Cohen, Elizabeth G., and
    2. Rachel Lotan

    , eds. 1997. Working for Equity in Heterogeneous Classrooms: Sociological Theory in Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
18. ↵
    1. Cohen, Elizabeth G., and
    2. Susan S. Roper

    . 1972. “Modification of Interracial Interaction Disability: An Application of Status Characteristic Theory.” American Sociological Review 37(6): 643–57.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. ↵
    1. Correll, Shelley J., and
    2. Cecilia Ridgeway

    . 2003. “Expectation States Theory.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by John Delamater. New York: Kluwer Academic Press.
20. ↵
    1. Delgado, Richard, and
    2. Jean Stefancic

    , eds. 2001. Critical Race Theory: An Introduction. New York: New York University Press. Accessed June 11, 2022. http://uolibraries.worldcat.org/title/critical-race-theory-an-introduction/oclc/45387241.
21. ↵
    1. Dinno, Alexis

    . 2017. Two One-Sided Tests of Equivalence [computer program]. Version 3.1.3. https://www.alexisdinno.com/stata/tost.html.
22. ↵
    1. Dittmann, Andrea G.,
    2. Nicole M. Stephens, and
    3. Sarah S. M. Townsend

    . 2020. “Achievement Is Not Class-Neutral: Working Together Benefits People from Working-Class Contexts.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Attitudes and Social Cognition 119(3): 517–39.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Dovidio, John F.,
    2. Angelika Love,
    3. Fabian M. H. Schellhaas, and
    4. Miles Hewstone

    . 2017. “Reducing Intergroup Bias through Intergroup Contact: Twenty Years of Progress and Future Directions.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 20(5): 606–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217712052.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Esqueda, Cynthia Willis,
    2. Russ K. E. Espinoza, and
    3. Scott E. Culhane

    . 2008. “The Effects of Ethnicity, SES, and Crime Status on Juror Decision Making: A Cross-Cultural Examination of European American and Mexican American Mock Jurors.” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 30(2): 181–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986308315319.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. Feagin, Joe R., and
    2. Kimberley Ducey

    . 2019. Racist America: Roots, Current Realities, and Future Reparations, 4th ed. New York: Routledge.
26. ↵
    1. Fişek, M. Hamit

    . 1991. “Complex Task Structures and Power and Prestige Orders.” Advances in Group Processes 8: 115–34.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Fiske, Susan T.,
    2. Amy J. C. Cuddy,
    3. Peter Glick, and
    4. Jun Xu

    . 2002. “A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82(6): 878–902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. ↵
    1. Freedman, David A

    . 1981. “Bootstrapping Regression Models.” Annals of Statistics 9(6): 1218–28.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Freese, Lee

    . 1976. “The Generalization of Specific Performance Expectations.” Sociometry 39(3): 194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2786512.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
30. ↵
    1. Fussell, Elizabeth

    . 2014. “Warmth of the Welcome: Attitudes Toward Immigrants and Immigration Policy in the United States.” Annual Review of Sociology 40(1): 479–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043325.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
31. ↵
    1. Goar, Carla, and
    2. Jane Sell

    . 2005. “Using Task Definition to Modify Racial Inequality Within Task Groups.” Sociological Quarterly 46(3): 525–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2005.00025.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. ↵
    1. Hamedani, Mar Yam G., and
    2. Hazel Rose Markus

    . 2019. “Understanding Culture Clashes and Catalyzing Change: A Culture Cycle Approach.” Frontiers in Psychology 10 (April): 700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00700.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Harkness, Sarah K

    . 2016. “Discrimination in Lending Markets: Status and the Intersections of Gender and Race.” Social Psychology Quarterly 79(1): 81–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272515623459.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
34. ↵
    1. Hayward, Lydia E.,
    2. Linda R. Tropp,
    3. Matthew J. Hornsey, and
    4. Fiona Kate Barlow

    . 2017. “Toward a Comprehensive Understanding of Intergroup Contact: Descriptions and Mediators of Positive and Negative Contact Among Majority and Minority Groups.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 43(3): 347–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216685291.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Hewstone, Miles,
    2. Charles M. Judd, and
    3. Melanie Sharp

    . 2011. “Do Observer Ratings Validate Self-Reports of Intergroup Contact?: A Round-Robin Analysis.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47(3): 599–609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.014.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
36. ↵
    1. Janssen, Arnold, and
    2. Stefan Wellek

    . 2010. “Exact Linear Rank Tests for Two-Sample Equivalence Problems with Continuous Data.” Statistica Neerlandica 64(4): 482–504.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Katz, Irwin,
    2. Judith Goldston, and
    3. Lawrence Benjamin

    . 1958. “Behavior and Productivity in Biracial Work Groups.” Human Relations 11(2): 126–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675801100203.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Killewald, Alexandra, and
    2. Brielle Bryan

    . 2018. “Falling Behind: The Role of Inter- and Intragenerational Processes in Widening Racial and Ethnic Wealth Gaps Through Early and Middle Adulthood.” Social Forces 97(2): 705–40.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Kotzur, Patrick F., and
    2. Ulrich Wagner

    . 2021. “The Dynamic Relationship between Contact Opportunities, Positive and Negative Intergroup Contact, and Prejudice: A Longitudinal Investigation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 120(2): 418–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000258.

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Kozol, Jonathan

    . 2005. The Shame of the Nation: The Restoration of Apartheid Schooling in America. New York: Three Rivers Press.
41. ↵
    1. Laar, Colette Van,
    2. Shana Levin,
    3. Stacey Sinclair, and
    4. Jim Sidanius

    . 2005. “The Effect of University Roommate Contact on Ethnic Attitudes and Behavior.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41(4): 329–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.08.002.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. ↵
    1. Livingston, Robert W.,
    2. Ashleigh Shelby Rosette, and
    3. Ella F. Washington

    . 2012. “Can an Agentic Black Woman Get Ahead? The Impact of Race and Interpersonal Dominance on Perceptions of Female Leaders.” Psychological Science 23(4): 354–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611428079.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
43. ↵
    1. Lolliot, Simon,
    2. Benjamin Fell,
    3. Katharina Schmid,
    4. Ralf Wölfer,
    5. Hermann Swart,
    6. Alberto Voci,
    7. Oliver Christ,
    8. Rachel New, and
    9. Miles Hewstone

    . 2015. “Measures of Intergroup Contact.” In Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs, edited by Gregory J. Boyle, Donald H. Saklofsky, and Gerald Matthews. New York: Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386915-9.00023-1.
44. ↵
    1. Long, J. Scott, and
    2. Jeremy Freese

    . 2014. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata, 3rd ed. College Station, Tex.: Stata Press.
45. ↵
    1. Lopez, J. Derek

    . 2005. “Race-Related Stress and Sociocultural Orientation Among Latino Students During Their Transition Into a Predominately White, Highly Selective Institution.” Journal of Hispanic Higher Education 4(4): 354–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192705279594.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
46. ↵
    1. Maloney, E. K.,
    2. Kimberly B. Rogers, and
    3. Lynn Smith-Lovin

    . 2022. “Status as Deference: Cultural Meaning as a Source of Occupational Behavior.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(7): 70–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.7.04.

    OpenUrl
47. ↵
    1. Manago, Bianca,
    2. Jane Sell, and
    3. Carla Goar

    . 2019. “Groups, Inequality, and Synergy.” Social Forces 97(3): 1365–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soy063.

    OpenUrl
48. ↵
    1. Markovsky, Barry,
    2. Le Roy F. Smith, and
    3. Joseph Berger

    . 1984. “Do Status Interventions Persist?” American Sociological Review 49(3): 373–82.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
49. ↵
    1. Mousa, Salma

    . 2020. “Building Social Cohesion Between Christians and Muslims Through Soccer in Post-ISIS Iraq.” Science 369(6505): 866–70.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
50. ↵
    1. Pager, Devah, and
    2. Hana Shepherd

    . 2008. “The Sociology of Discrimination: Racial Discrimination in Employment, Housing, Credit, and Consumer Markets.” Annual Review of Sociology 34(1): 181–209.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
51. ↵
    1. Pager, Devah,
    2. Bruce Western, and
    3. Bart Bonikowski

    . 2009. “Discrimination in a Low-Wage Labor Market: A Field Experiment.” American Sociological Review 74(5): 777–99.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
52. ↵
    1. Paluck, Elizabeth Levy, and
    2. Donald P. Green

    . 2009. “Prejudice Reduction: What Works? A Review and Assessment of Research and Practice.” Annual Review of Psychology 60(1): 339–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163607.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
53. ↵
    1. Paluck, Elizabeth Levy,
    2. Seth A. Green, and
    3. Donald P. Green

    . 2019. “The Contact Hypothesis Re-Evaluated.” Behavioural Public Policy 3(2): 129–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2018.25.

    OpenUrl
54. ↵
    1. Paluck, Elizabeth Levy,
    2. Roni Porat,
    3. Chelsey S. Clark, and
    4. Donald P. Green

    . 2021. “Prejudice Reduction: Progress and Challenges.” Annual Review of Psychology 72(1): 533–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-071620-030619.

    OpenUrl
55. ↵
    1. Paolini, Stefania,
    2. Jake Harwood,
    3. Mark Rubin,
    4. Shenel Husnu,
    5. Nicholas Joyce, and
    6. Miles Hewstone

    . 2014. “Positive and Extensive Intergroup Contact in the Past Buffers against the Disproportionate Impact of Negative Contact in the Present: Past Contact Moderates Negative Contact Effects.” European Journal of Social Psychology 44(6): 548–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2029.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
56. ↵
    1. Pettigrew, Thomas F

    . 1997. “Generalized Intergroup Contact Effects on Prejudice.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23(2): 173–85.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
57. ↵
    1. Pettigrew, Thomas F

    . 2008. “Future Directions for Intergroup Contact Theory and Research.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 32(3): 187–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2007.12.002.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
58. ↵
    1. Pettigrew, Thomas F., and
    2. Miles Hewstone

    . 2017. “The Single Factor Fallacy: Implications of Missing Critical Variables from an Analysis of Intergroup Contact Theory ¹: The Single Factor Fallacy.” Social Issues and Policy Review 11(1): 8–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12026.

    OpenUrl
59. ↵
    1. Pettigrew, Thomas F., and
    2. Linda R. Tropp

    . 2006. “A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90(5): 751–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.90.5.751.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
60. ↵
    1. Pettigrew, Thomas F., and
    2. Linda R. Tropp

    . 2008. “How Does Intergroup Contact Reduce Prejudice? Meta-Analytic Tests of Three Mediators.” European Journal of Social Psychology 38(6): 922–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.504.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
61. ↵
    1. Pettigrew, Thomas F.,
    2. Linda R. Tropp,
    3. Ulrich Wagner, and
    4. Oliver Christ

    . 2011. “Recent Advances in Intergroup Contact Theory.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 35(3): 271–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
62. ↵
    1. Quillian, Lincoln,
    2. John Lee, and
    3. Brandon Honoré

    . 2020. “Racial Discrimination in the U.S. Housing and Mortgage Lending Markets: A Quantitative Review of Trends, 1976–2016.” Race and Social Problems 12(1): 13–28.

    OpenUrl
63. ↵
    1. Richeson, Jennifer A., and
    2. J. Nicole Shelton

    . 2007. “Negotiating Interracial Interactions: Costs, Consequences, and Possibilities.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 16(6): 316–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00528.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
64. ↵
    1. Ridgeway, Cecilia L

    . 1991. “The Social Construction of Status Value: Gender and Other Nominal Characteristics.” Social Forces 70(2): 367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2580244.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
65. ↵
    1. Ridgeway, Cecilia L

    . 2019. Status: Why Is It Everywhere? Why Does It Matter? New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
66. ↵
    1. Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and
    2. Hazel Rose Markus

    . 2022. “The Significance of Status: What It Is and How It Shapes Inequality.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(7): 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.7.01.

    OpenUrl
67. ↵
    1. Scacco, Alexandra, and
    2. Shana S. Warren

    . 2018. “Can Social Contact Reduce Prejudice and Discrimination? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Nigeria.” American Political Science Review 112(3): 654–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000151.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
68. ↵
    1. Schäfer, Sarina J.,
    2. Mathias Kauff,
    3. Francesca Prati,
    4. Mathijs Kros,
    5. Timothy Lang, and
    6. Oliver Christ

    . 2021. “Does Negative Contact Undermine Attempts to Improve Intergroup Relations? Deepening the Understanding of Negative Contact and Its Consequences for Intergroup Contact Research and Interventions.” Journal of Social Issues 77(1): 197–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12422.

    OpenUrl
69. ↵
    1. Schuirmann, Donald J

    . 1987. “A Comparison of the Two One-Sided Tests Procedure and the Power Approach for Assessing the Equivalence of Average Bioavailability.” Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 15(6): 657–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
70. ↵
    1. Seaman, Michael A., and
    2. Ronald C. Serlin

    . 1998. “Equivalence Confidence Intervals for Two-Group Comparisons of Means.” Psychological Methods 3(4): 403–11.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
71. ↵
    1. Short, Robert, and
    2. Lisa Magaña

    . 2002. “Political Rhetoric, Immigration Attitudes, and Contemporary Prejudice: A Mexican American Dilemma.” Journal of Social Psychology 142(6): 701–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540209603930.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
72. ↵
    1. Sobel, Michael E

    . 1982. “Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models.” Sociological Methodology 13: 290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/270723.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
73. ↵
    1. Stephan, Walter G

    . 2014. “Intergroup Anxiety: Theory, Research, and Practice.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 18(3): 239–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314530518.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
74. ↵
    1. Stephan, Walter G., and
    2. Cookie White Stephan

    . 1985. “Intergroup Anxiety.” Journal of Social Issues 41(3): 157–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01134.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
75. ↵
    1. Stephens, Nicole M.,
    2. Hazel Rose Markus, and
    3. L. Taylor Phillips

    . 2014. “Social Class Culture Cycles: How Three Gateway Contexts Shape Selves and Fuel Inequality.” Annual Review of Psychology 65(1): 611–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115143.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
76. ↵
    1. Stephens, Nicole M.,
    2. Sarah S. M. Townsend, and
    3. Andrea G. Dittmann

    . 2019. “Social-Class Disparities in Higher Education and Professional Workplaces: The Role of Cultural Mismatch.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 28(1): 67–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418806506.

    OpenUrl
77. ↵
    1. Tropp, Linda R

    . 2007. “Perceived Discrimination and Interracial Contact: Predicting Interracial Closeness among Black and White Americans.” Social Psychology Quarterly 70(1): 70–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250707000108.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
78. ↵
    1. Tropp, Linda R., and
    2. Thomas F. Pettigrew

    . 2005. “Differential Relationships Between Intergroup Contact and Affective and Cognitive Dimensions of Prejudice.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31(8): 1145–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205274854.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
79. ↵
    1. Valencia, Richard R., and
    2. Mary S. Black

    . 2002. “‘’Mexican Americans Don’t Value Education!’—On the Basis of the Myth, Mythmaking, and Debunking.” Journal of Latinos & Education 1(2): 81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532771XJLE0102_2.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
80. ↵
    1. Valentino, Lauren

    . 2022. “Status Lenses: Mapping Hierarchy and Consensus in Status Beliefs.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(7): 89–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.7.05.

    OpenUrl
81. ↵
    1. Webster, Murray, and
    2. Stuart J. Hysom

    . 1998. “Creating Status Characteristics.” American Sociological Review 63(3): 351–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2657554.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
82. ↵
    1. Welch, Kelly,
    2. Allison Ann Payne,
    3. Ted Chiricos, and
    4. Marc Gertz

    . 2011. “The Typification of Hispanics as Criminals and Support for Punitive Crime Control Policies.” Social Science Research 40(3): 822–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.09.012.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
83. ↵
    1. Zhou, Shelly,
    2. Elizabeth Page-Gould,
    3. Arthur Aron,
    4. Anne Moyer, and
    5. Miles Hewstone

    . 2019. “The Extended Contact Hypothesis: A Meta-Analysis on 20 Years of Research.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 23(2): 132–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318762647.

    OpenUrlPubMed