Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Publications
    • rsf

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Publications
    • rsf
  • Log in
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Advanced Search

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Follow rsf on Twitter
  • Visit rsf on Facebook
  • Follow rsf on Google Plus
Research Article
Open Access

An Engine of Change? The Affordable Care Act and the Shifting Politics of Demonstration Projects

Philip Rocco, Andrew S. Kelly
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences July 2020, 6 (2) 67-84; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2020.6.2.03
Philip Rocco
aAssistant professor in the Department of Political Science at Marquette University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Philip Rocco
Andrew S. Kelly
bAssistant professor in the Department of Health Sciences at California State University, East Bay
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Additional
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Appleby, Julie
    . 2016. “Obamacare’s Test Kitchen for Payment Experiments Faces an Uncertain Future.” NPR, November 30. Accessed June 30, 2019. https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/11/30/503863311/health-law-s-test-kitchen-for-payment-changes-could-offer-tool-for-gop-ideas.
  2. ↵
    1. Beauregard, Lisa Kalimon, and
    2. Edward Alan Miller
    . 2020. “Why Do States Pursue Medicaid Home Care Opportunities? Explaining State Adoption of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s Home and Community-Based Services Initiatives.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 6(2): 154–78. DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2020.6.2.07.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Brodkin, Evelyn Z., and
    2. Alexander Kaufman
    . 2000. “Policy Experiments and Poverty Politics.” Social Service Review 74(4): 507–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Carpenter, Daniel P
    . 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  5. ↵
    1. Cassidy, Amanda
    . 2008. The Fundamentals of Medicare Demonstrations. Background Paper no. 63. Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University. Accessed December 26, 2019. http://www.nhpf.org/library/background-papers/BP63_MedicareDemos_07-22-08.pdf.
  6. ↵
    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
    . 2016a. “Medicare Program; Medicare Shared Savings Program; Accountable Care Organizations—Revised Benchmark Rebasing Methodology, Facilitating Transition to Performance-Based Risk, and Administrative Finality of Financial Calculations.” Federal Register 81, no. 112 (June 10): 37950–8017.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
    . 2016b. “Medicare Program; Revisions to Payment Policies Under the Physician Fee Schedule and Other Revisions to Part B for CY 2017; Medicare Advantage Bid Pricing Data Release; Medicare Advantage and Part D Medical Loss Ratio Data Release; Medicare Advantage Provider Network Requirements; Expansion of Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program Model; Medicare Shared Savings Program Requirements.” Federal Register 81, no. 220 (November 15): 80170–562.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
    . 2018a. “CMS Announces Participants in New Bundled Payment Model.” October 9. Accessed March 31, 2019. https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/cms-announces-participants-new-value-based-bundled-payment-model.
  9. ↵
    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
    . 2018b. “Medicare Program; Medicare Shared Savings Program; Accountable Care Organizations-Pathways to Success and Extreme and Uncontrollable Circumstances Policies for Performance Year 2017.” Federal Register 83, no. 249 (December 31): 67816–8082.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
    . 2019. “Fast Facts Archives.” Accessed March 31, 2019. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/sharedsavingsprogram/Downloads/fast-facts-archives.zip.
  11. ↵
    1. Congressional Budget Office (CBO)
    . 2009. “Cost Estimate for the Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to H.R. 3590, as Proposed in the Senate on November 18, 2009.” Washington: Government Printing Office. Accessed March 31, 2019. https://www.cbo.gov/publication/41423.
  12. ↵
    1. Cook, Thomas D.,
    2. Donald Thomas Campbell, and
    3. William R. Shadish
    . 2002. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin.
  13. ↵
    1. Coyle, Dennis J., and
    2. Aaron Wildavsky
    . 1986. “Social Experimentation in the Face of Formidable Fables.” In Lessons from Income Maintenance Experiments, edited by Alicia Munnell. Boston, Mass.: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
  14. ↵
    1. Elliott, Rebecca
    . 2018. “‘Scarier Than Another Storm’: Values at Risk in the Mapping and Insuring of US Floodplains.” British Journal of Sociology 70(3): 1067–90. DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.12381.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Elmore, Richard F
    . 1986. “A Political Scientist’s View of the Income Maintenance Experiments.” In Lessons from Income Maintenance Experiments, edited by Alicia Munnell. Boston, Mass.: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
  16. ↵
    1. Espeland, Wendy Nelson
    . 1998. The Struggle for Water: Politics, Rationality, and Identity in the American Southwest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  17. ↵
    1. Gilardi, Fabrizio
    . 2010. “Who Learns from What in Policy Diffusion Processes?” American Journal of Political Science 54(3): 650–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Gore, Radhika,
    2. Ritu Dhar,
    3. Sadia Mohaimin,
    4. Priscilla M. Lopez,
    5. Anna A. Divney,
    6. Jennifer M. Zanowiak,
    7. Lorna E. Thorpe, and
    8. Nadia Islam
    . 2020. “Changing Clinic-Community Social Ties in Immigrant-Serving Primary Care Practices in New York City: Social and Organizational Implications of the Affordable Care Act’s Population-Health-Related Provisions.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 6(2): 264–88. DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2020.6.2.12.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Government Accountability Office (GAO)
    . 2018. “CMS Innovation Center: Model Implementation and Center Performance.” GAO-18–302. Washington: Government Printing Office. Accessed March 31, 2019. https://www.gao.gov/assets/700/690875.pdf.
  20. ↵
    1. Guterman, Stuart,
    2. Karen Davis,
    3. Kristof Stremikis, and
    4. Heather Drake
    . 2010. “Innovation in Medicare and Medicaid Will Be Central to Health Reform’s Success.” Health Affairs 29(6): 1188–93.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Hadley, Mark
    . 2016. “CBO’s Estimates of the Budgetary Effects of the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation.” Testimony before the Committee on the Budget, U.S. House of Representatives, September 7. Washington: Congressional Budget Office. Accessed December 26, 2019. https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/114th-congress-2015-2016/reports/51921-cmmitestimony.pdf.
  22. ↵
    1. Hinnant, Laurie,
    2. Sima Razi,
    3. Rebecca Lewis,
    4. Amy Sun,
    5. Martia Alva,
    6. Tom Hoerger,
    7. Sara Jacobs, and
    8. Michael Halpern
    . 2016. “Evaluation of the Health Care Innovation Awards: Community Resource Planning, Prevention, and Monitoring, Annual Report 2015: YMCA of the USA.” Research Triangle Park, N.C.: RTI International. Accessed December 26, 2019. https://innovation.cms.gov/Files/reports/hcia-ymcadpp-evalrpt.pdf.
  23. ↵
    1. Hood, Katherine
    . 2017. “The Science of Value: Economic Expertise and the Valuation of Human Life in US Federal Regulatory Agencies.” Social Studies of Science 47(4): 441–65.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Kahn, Katherine L.,
    2. Justin W. Timbie,
    3. Mark W. Friedberg,
    4. Peter Mendel,
    5. Liisa Hiatt,
    6. Emily K. Chen,
    7. Amii M. Kress,
    8. Christine Buttorff,
    9. Tara A. Lavelle,
    10. Beverly A. Weidmer,
    11. Harold D. Green,
    12. Mallika Kommareddi,
    13. Rosalie Malsberger,
    14. Aaron Kofner,
    15. Afshin Rastegar, and
    16. Claude Messan Setodji
    . 2016. Evaluation of CMS’s Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) Advanced Primary Care Practice (APCP) Demonstration: Final Report. RR-886/2-CMS. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Corporation. Accessed December 26, 2019. https://downloads.cms.gov/files/cmmi/fqhc-finalevalrpt.pdf.
  25. ↵
    1. Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF)
    . 2017. “Total Medicaid Managed Care Enrollment.” Accessed December 26, 2019. https://www.kff.org/medicaid/state-indicator/total-medicaid-mc-enrollment.
  26. ↵
    1. Karch, Andrew
    . 2007. Democratic Laboratories: Policy Diffusion Among the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  27. ↵
    1. Kelemen, R. Daniel
    . 2009. The Rules of Federalism: Institutions and Regulatory Politics in the EU and Beyond. New York: Oxford University Press.
  28. ↵
    1. Kelly, Andrew S., and
    2. Philip Rocco
    . 2019. “From ‘Trial and Error’ to Major Reform: The Politics of Medicare Demonstration Projects.” Public Administration 97(3): 621–38. DOI: 10.1111/padm.12585.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    1. Lakoff, Andrew, and
    2. Eric Klinenberg
    . 2010. “Of Risk and Pork: Urban Security and the Politics of Objectivity.” Theory and Society 39(5): 503–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Laugesen, Miriam J
    . 2016. Fixing Medical Prices: How Physicians Are Paid. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  31. ↵
    1. Levy, Helen,
    2. Andrew Ying, and
    3. Nicholas Bagley
    . 2020. “What’s Left of the Affordable Care Act? A Progress Report.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 6(2): 42–66. DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2020.6.2.02.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    1. Lewin Group
    . 2017. CMS Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative Models 2–4: Year 3 Evaluation and Annual Monitoring Report. Falls Church, Va.: The Lewin Group. Accessed December 26, 2019. https://downloads.cms.gov/files/cmmi/bpci-models2-4yr3evalrpt.pdf.
  33. ↵
    1. Lewin Group
    . 2018. CMS Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model: Performance Year 1 Evaluation Report. Falls Church, Va.: The Lewin Group. Accessed December 26, 2019. https://innovation.cms.gov/Files/reports/cjr-firstannrpt.pdf.
  34. ↵
    1. L&M Policy Research
    . 2016a. Evaluation of CMMI Accountable Care Organization Initiatives: Advance Payment ACO Final Report. November 25. Washington, D.C.: L&M. Accessed December 26, 2019. https://innovation.cms.gov/Files/reports/advpayaco-fnevalrpt.pdf.
  35. ↵
    1. L&M Policy Research
    . 2016b. Evaluation of CMMI Accountable Care Organization Initiatives: Pioneer ACO Final Report. December 2. Washington, D.C.: L&M. Accessed December 26, 2019. https://innovation.cms.gov/Files/reports/pioneeraco-finalevalrpt.pdf.
  36. ↵
    1. Masi, Paul, and
    2. Tom Bradley
    . 2015. “Estimating the Budgetary Effects of Legislation Involving the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation.” CBO blog, July 30. Accessed December 26, 2019. https://www.cbo.gov/publication/50692.
  37. ↵
    1. Mathematica Policy Research
    . 2018. Evaluation of the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiatives: Fourth Annual Report. Baltimore, Md.: Mathematica Policy Research. Accessed December 26, 2019. https://downloads.cms.gov/files/cmmi/CPC-initiative-fourth-annual-report.pdf.
  38. ↵
    1. McCann, Pamela J. Clouser,
    2. Charles R. Shipan, and
    3. Craig Volden
    . 2015. “Top-Down Federalism: State Policy Responses to National Government Discussions.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 45(4): 495–525.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. ↵
    1. Mennicken, Andrea, and
    2. Wendy Nelson Espeland
    . 2019. “What’s New with Numbers? Sociological Approaches to the Study of Quantification.” Annual Review of Sociology 45(1): 223–45. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041343.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. ↵
    1. Moe, Terry M., and
    2. Michael Caldwell
    . 1994. “The Institutional Foundations of Democratic Government: A Comparison of Presidential and Parliamentary Systems.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 150(1): 171–95.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Muller, Jerry Z
    . 2018. The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  42. ↵
    1. Nathan, Richard
    . 2000. Social Science in Government: The Role of Policy Researchers. Albany, N.Y.: Rockefeller Institute Press.
  43. ↵
    1. Oakley, Ann
    . 1998. “Public Policy Experimentation: Lessons from America.” Policy Studies 19(2): 93–114.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. O’Connor, Alice
    . 2009. Poverty Knowledge: Social Science, Social Policy, and the Poor in Twentieth-Century US History. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  45. ↵
    1. Orren, Karen, and
    2. Stephen Skowronek
    . 2017. The Policy State: An American Predicament. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  46. ↵
    1. Pierson, Paul
    . 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  47. ↵
    1. Porter, Theodore M
    . 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  48. ↵
    1. Power, Michael
    . 2004. The Risk Management of Everything: Rethinking the Politics of Uncertainty. London: Demos.
  49. ↵
    1. Rajkumar, Rahul
    . 2016. “Request for Determination of Eligibility for Expansion of Diabetes Prevention Program.” March 14. Baltimore, Md.: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Accessed December 26, 2019. https://innovation.cms.gov/Files/x/mdpp-certification.pdf.
  50. ↵
    1. Revesz, Richard L., and
    2. Michael A. Livermore
    . 2008. Retaking Rationality: How Cost-Benefit Analysis Can Better Protect Our Environment and Our Health. New York: Oxford University Press.
  51. ↵
    1. Rocco, Philip,
    2. Andrew S. Kelly, and
    3. Ann C. Keller
    . 2018. “Politics at the Cutting Edge: Intergovernmental Policy Innovation in the Affordable Care Act.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 48(3): 425–53.
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. Rosenbaum, Sara
    . 1992. “Mothers and Children Last: the Oregon Medicaid Experiment.” American Journal of Law and Medicine 18(1): 97–126.
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    1. RTI
    . 2017. Evaluation of the Initiatives to Reduce Avoidable Hospitalizations Among Nursing Facility Residents: Final Report. Walham, Mass. RTI International. Accessed December 26, 2019. https://downloads.cms.gov/files/cmmi/irahnfr-finalevalrpt.pdf.
  54. ↵
    1. Shipan, Charles R., and
    2. Craig Volden
    . 2008. “The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science 52(4): 840–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  55. ↵
    1. Shrank, William
    . 2013. “The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation’s Blueprint for Rapid-Cycle Evaluation of New Care and Payment Models.” Health Affairs 32(4): 807–12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Spitalnic, Paul
    . 2015. “Certification of Pioneer Model Savings.” April 10. Baltimore, Md.: CMS Office of the Actuary. Accessed December 26, 2019. https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Research/ActuarialStudies/Downloads/Pioneer-Certification-2015-04-10.pdf.
  57. ↵
    1. Spitalnic, Paul
    . 2016. “Certification of Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program.” March 14. Baltimore, Md.: CMS Office of the Actuary. Accessed December 26, 2019. https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Research/ActuarialStudies/Downloads/Diabetes-Prevention-Certification-2016-03-14.pdf.
  58. ↵
    1. Teles, Stephen M., and
    2. Timothy S. Prinz
    . 2001. “The Politics of Rights Retraction: Welfare Reform from Entitlement to Block Grant.” In Seeking the Center: Politics and Policymaking at the New Century, edited by Martin Levin, Marc Landy, and Martin Shapiro. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
  59. ↵
    1. Thompson, Frank J
    . 2012. Medicaid Politics: Federalism, Policy Durability, and Health Reform. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
  60. ↵
    1. Urban Institute
    . 2018. Strong Start for Mothers and Newborns Evaluation: Year 5 Project Synthesis, vol. 1: Cross-Cutting Findings. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute. Accessed December 26, 2019. https://downloads.cms.gov/files/cmmi/strongstart-prenatal-finalevalrpt-v1.pdf.
  61. ↵
    1. U.S. Congress. House of Representatives
    . 2009. “America’s Affordable Health Choices Act. Report of the House Energy and Commerce Committee on H.R. 3200.” 111th Cong. 1st sess. H Rept. 111–299, pt. I.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: 6 (2)
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Vol. 6, Issue 2
1 Jul 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An Engine of Change? The Affordable Care Act and the Shifting Politics of Demonstration Projects
(Your Name) has sent you a message from RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
An Engine of Change? The Affordable Care Act and the Shifting Politics of Demonstration Projects
Philip Rocco, Andrew S. Kelly
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Jul 2020, 6 (2) 67-84; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2020.6.2.03

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
An Engine of Change? The Affordable Care Act and the Shifting Politics of Demonstration Projects
Philip Rocco, Andrew S. Kelly
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Jul 2020, 6 (2) 67-84; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2020.6.2.03
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS AND THE POLITICS OF TRIAL AND ERROR
    • DATA AND METHODS
    • FINDINGS
    • DISCUSSION
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Additional
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Medicare
  • Medicaid
  • Affordable Care Act
  • demonstration projects
  • policy learning
  • payment reform

© 2025 RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Powered by HighWire