Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Publications
    • rsf

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Publications
    • rsf
  • Log in
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Advanced Search

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Follow rsf on Twitter
  • Visit rsf on Facebook
  • Follow rsf on Google Plus
Research Article
Open Access

The Geography of Polarization, 1950 to 2015

Tom VanHeuvelen, Katherine Copas
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences September 2019, 5 (4) 77-103; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2019.5.4.03
Tom VanHeuvelen
aAssistant professor of sociology at the University of Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katherine Copas
bPhD candidate of sociology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Additional
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Relationship Between Percentage of Affluent and Poor Households

    Source: Authors’ compilation based on 1950–2000 census and 2005–2015 American Community Survey data (Ruggles et al. 2019).

    Note: A total of 722 commuting zones. Percent affluent computed as the number of households at or above the nation-level 95th household income percentile over the total number of households in a commuting zone. Percent relative poverty is the number of households in a commuting zone at or below half the nation-level median household income. Markers are weighted by the number of households in a commuting zone. For ease of interpretation, in figures we label years 2005–2009 as “2005” and 2011–2015 as “2010.”

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Relative Change in Segregation of Affluent, Poor, and In-Between Households

    Source: Authors’ compilation based on 1950–2000 census and 2005–2015 American Community Survey data (Ruggles et al. 2019).

    Note: A total of 722 commuting zones. Segregation measures computed from household counts at the commuting zone level and estimated separately by year. All segregation measures normalized to equal 1 in 1950 to ease interpretation. Affluent refers to households at or above the nation-level 95th household income percentile. Poor refers to households at or below half the nation-level household median income. Middle refers to all other households. Substantively similar results used when comparing income deciles and ventiles.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Year-Specific Coefficients from Fixed-Effects Models

    Source: Authors’ compilation based on 1950–2000 census and 2005–2015 American Community Survey data (Ruggles et al. 2019).

    Note: Coefficients follow fixed-effects (commuting zone FEs) regression models in table 2. Affluence (top panel) and poverty (bottom panel) coefficients are interacted with time period indicators. Shaded areas represent 95 percent confidence intervals.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Change in Wage Differences Across CZs at High-, Middle-, and Low-Wage Levels

    Source: Authors’ compilation based on 1950–2000 census and 2005–2015 American Community Survey data (Ruggles et al. 2019).

    Note: Percentiles represent locations in CZ-specific wage distributions. Lines represent difference in wages at specific percentiles across CZs, specifically those at or above the 95th percentile minus those at or below the 5th percentile. For example, the solid black line in the lower left indicates the difference in wages at the 95th percentile between the most densely populated CZs (such as New York City and Newark, New Jersey) and the least densely populated CZs (such as Lakeview, Oregon, and Jordan, Montana). High pay refers to wages at the 95th percentile, middle pay refers to wages at the 50th percentile, and low pay refers to wages at the 10th percentile.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Wage Bill Share Across Affluence, Population Density, and Relative Poverty

    Source: Authors’ compilation based on 1950–2000 census and 2005–2015 American Community Survey data (Ruggles et al. 2019).

    Note: Lines computed from locally weighted regressions of wage bill against variables indicated along the x-axis, separately by year. Bandwidth = 0.3.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Replication of Figure 4, by Sex, Race-Ethnicity, and Nativity Groups

    Source: Authors’ compilation based on 1950–2000 census and 2005–2015 American Community Survey data (Ruggles et al. 2019).

    Note: Figures replicate top left panel of figure 4, which shows the maximum difference of wages across 722 CZs. Right y-axis of right panel is for foreign-born individuals. Foreign born begins in year 1980 because of small number of observations of foreign born workers in years 1950 through 1970.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Percent of Workers Above and Below 10th Wage Percentile

    Source: Authors’ compilation based on 1950–2000 census and 2005–2015 American Community Survey data (Ruggles et al. 2019).

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Percent Prime-Age High School or Less Working Part Time

    Source: Authors’ compilation based on 1950–2000 census and 2005–2015 American Community Survey data (Ruggles et al. 2019).

    Note: Lines computed from locally weighted regressions of the percent of prime-aged part-time workers in a commuting zone against variables indicated along the x-axis, separately by year. Bandwidth = 0.6.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • Table 1.
  • Table 2.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Appendix

    Appendix

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Appendix
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: 5 (4)
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Vol. 5, Issue 4
1 Sep 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Geography of Polarization, 1950 to 2015
(Your Name) has sent you a message from RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 15 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Geography of Polarization, 1950 to 2015
Tom VanHeuvelen, Katherine Copas
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Sep 2019, 5 (4) 77-103; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2019.5.4.03

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Geography of Polarization, 1950 to 2015
Tom VanHeuvelen, Katherine Copas
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Sep 2019, 5 (4) 77-103; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2019.5.4.03
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • BACKGROUND
    • DATA
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • CONCLUSION
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Additional
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • wage inequality
  • local labor markets
  • poverty
  • affluence
  • low-wage work

© 2025 RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Powered by HighWire