Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Publications
    • rsf

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Publications
    • rsf
  • Log in
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Advanced Search

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Follow rsf on Twitter
  • Visit rsf on Facebook
  • Follow rsf on Google Plus
Research Article
Open Access

Explaining the Gender Wage Gap in STEM: Does Field Sex Composition Matter?

Katherine Michelmore, Sharon Sassler
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences August 2016, 2 (4) 194-215; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2016.2.4.07
Katherine Michelmore
aAssistant professor in the Department of Public Administration and International Affairs at Syracuse University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sharon Sassler
bProfessor in the Department of Policy Analysis and Management at Cornell University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Beede, David N., Tiffany Julian, David Langdon, George McKittrick, Beethika Khan, and Mark Doms. 2011. “Women in STEM: A Gender Gap to Innovation.” ESA Issue Brief no. 04–11. Washington: U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration.
  2. ↵
    Bertrand, Marianne, Claudia Goldin, and Lawrence F. Katz. 2009. “Dynamics of the Gender Gap for Young Professionals in the Corporate and Financial Sectors.” NBER working paper no. 14681. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  3. ↵
    1. Blau, Francine D., and
    2. Lawrence M. Kahn
    . 1994. "Rising Wage Inequality and the U.S. Gender Gap." American Economic Review 84(2): 23–28.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Blau, Francine D., and
    2. Lawrence M. Kahn
    . 1997. "Swimming Upstream: Trends in the Gender Wage Differential in the 1980s." Journal of Labor Economics 15(1): 1–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Blau, Francine D., and
    2. Lawrence M. Kahn
    . 2006. "The U.S. Gender Pay Gap in the 1990s: Slowing Convergence." Industrial and Labor Relations Review 60(1): 45–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Buchmann, Claudia, and
    2. Anne McDaniel
    . 2016. "Motherhood and the Wages of Women in Professional Occupations." RSF: The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences 2(4). doi: 10.7758/RSF.2016.2.4.05.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Budig, Michelle J., and
    2. Paula England
    . 2001. "The Wage Penalty for Motherhood." American Sociological Review 66(2): 204–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Byker, Tanya
    . 2016. "The Opt-Out Continuation: Education, Work, and Motherhood from 1984 to 2008." RSF: The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences 2(4). doi: 10.7758/RSF.2016.2.4.02.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Cohen, Philip N., and
    2. Matt L. Huffman
    . 2003. "Individuals, Jobs, and Labor Markets: The Devaluation of Women's Work." American Sociological Review 68(3): 443–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Cohen, Philip N., and
    2. Matt L. Huffman
    . 2007. "Working for the Woman? Female Managers and the Gender Wage Gap." American Sociological Review 72(5): 681–704.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering and Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy (Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women). 2006. Beyond Bias and Barrier: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
  10. ↵
    1. Cotter, David A.,
    2. JoAnn DeFiore, ,
    3. Joan M. Hermsen, ,
    4. Brenda Marsteller Kowalewski, , and
    5. Reeve Vanneman
    . 1997. "All Women Benefit: The Macro-Level Effect of Occupational Integration on Gender Earnings Equality." American Sociological Review 62(5): 714–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    DiPrete, Thomas A., and Claudia Buchmann. 2013. The Rise of Women: The Growing Gender Gap in Education and What It Means for American Schools. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  12. ↵
    1. Ginther, Donna K
    . 2003. "Is MIT an Exception? Gender Pay Differences in Academic Science.” Bulletin of Science, Technology, and Society 23(1): 21–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Glass, Jennifer L.,
    2. Sharon Sassler, ,
    3. Yael Levitte, , and
    4. Katherine M. Michelmore
    . 2013. "What's So Special About STEM? A Comparison of Women's Retention in STEM and Professional Occupations." Social Forces 92(2): 723–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Goldin, Claudia. 2002. “A Pollution Theory of Discrimination: Male and Female Differences in Occupations and Earnings.” NBER working paper no. 8985. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  15. ↵
    1. Goldin, Claudia
    . 2014. "A Grand Gender Convergence: Its Last Chapter." American Economic Review 104(4): 1091–119.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Goldin, Claudia,
    2. Lawrence F. Katz, , and
    3. Ilyana Kuziemko
    . 2006. "The Homecoming of American College Women: The Reversal of the Gender Gap in College." Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(4): 133–56.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    Hakim, Catherine. 2000. Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  18. ↵
    1. Halrynjo, Sigtona, and
    2. Selma Therese Lyng
    . 2009. "Preferences, Constraints or Schemas of Devotion? Exploring Norwegian Mothers’ Withdrawals from High Commitment Careers." British Journal of Sociology 60(2): 321–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Hill, Catherine, Christianne Corbett, and Andresse St. Rose. 2010. Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, D.C.: American Association of University Women. Accessed April 6, 2016. https://www.aauw.org/files/2013/02/Why-So-Few-Women-in-Science-Technology-Engineering-and-Mathematics.pdf.
  20. ↵
    1. Huffman, Matt L., and
    2. Steven C. Velasco
    . 1997. "When More Is Less: Sex Composition, Organizations, and Earnings in U.S. Firms." Work and Occupations 24(2): 214–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Jacobsen, Joyce P
    . 2007. "Occupational Segregation and the Tipping Phenomenon: The Contrary Case of Court Reporting in the USA.” Gender, Work, and Organization 14(2): 130–61.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Kogan, Irena, and
    2. Frank Kalter
    . 2006. "The Effects of Relative Group Size on Occupational Outcomes: Turks and Ex-Yugoslavs in Austria." European Sociological Review 22(1): 35–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    1. Levanon, Asaf,
    2. Paula England, , and
    3. Paul Allison
    . 2009. "Occupational Feminization and Pay: Assessing Causal Dynamics Using 1950–2000 U.S. Census Data." Social Forces 88(2): 865–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    1. Ma, Yingyi, and
    2. Gokhan Savas
    . 2014. "Which Is More Consequential: Field of Study or Institutional Selectivity?" Review of Higher Education 37(2): 221–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Mandel, Hadas
    . 2013. "Up the Down Staircase: Women's Upward Mobility and the Wage Penalty for Occupational Feminization, 1970–2007." Social Forces 91(4): 1183–207.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Mandel, Hadas, and
    2. Moshe Semyonov
    . 2014. "Gender Pay Gap and Employment Sector: Sources of Earnings Disparities in the United States, 1970–2010." Demography 51(5): 1597–618.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Mann, Allison, and
    2. Thomas A. DiPrete
    . 2013. "Trends in Gender Segregation in the Choice of Science and Engineering Majors." Social Science Research 42(6): 1519–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Morgan, Laurie A
    . 1998. "Glass-Ceiling Effect or Cohort Effect? A Longitudinal Study of the Gender Earnings Gap for Engineers, 1982 to 1989." American Sociological Review 63(4): 479–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Pal, Ipshita, and
    2. Jane Waldfogel
    . 2015. "The Family Gap in Pay: New Evidence for 1967 to 2013." RSF: The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences 2(4). doi: 10.7758/RSF.2016.2.4.04.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    Pew Research Center. 2013. “On Pay Gap, Millennial Women Near Parity—For Now.” Washington, D.C.: Social & Demographic Trends Project. Accessed April 6, 2016. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2013/12/11/on-pay-gap-millennial-women-near-parity-for-now/.
  30. ↵
    1. Prokos, Anastasia, and
    2. Irene Padavic
    . 2005. "An Examination of Competing Explanations for the Pay Gap Among Scientists and Engineers." Gender and Society 19(4): 523–43.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Roos, Patricia A., and
    2. Barbara F. Reskin
    . 1992. "Occupational Desegregation in the 1970s: Integration and Economic Equity?" Sociological Perspectives 35(1): 69–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    1. Sana, Mariano
    . 2010. "Immigrants and Natives in U.S. Science and Engineering Occupations, 1994–2006." Demography 47(3): 801–20.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. ↵
    Sassler, Sharon, Jennifer L. Glass, Yael Levitte, and Katherine M. Michelmore. 2011. “The Missing Women in STEM? Accounting for Gender Differences in Entrance into Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Occupations.” Presented at the 2012 Population Association of America annual meeting, Washington, D.C. (September 19, 2011).
  34. ↵
    1. Stähli, Michèle Ernst,
    2. Jean-Marie Le Goff, ,
    3. René Levy, , and
    4. Eric Widmer
    . 2009. "Wishes or Constraints? Mothers Labour Force Participation and Its Motivation in Switzerland." European Sociological Review 25(3): 333–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Weeden, Kim A.,
    2. Youngjoo Cha, , and
    3. Mauricio Bucca
    . 2016. "Long Work Hours, Part-Time Work, and Trends in the Gender Gap in Pay, the Motherhood Wage Penalty, and the Fatherhood Wage Premium." RSF: The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences 2(4). doi: 10.7758/RSF.2016.2.4.03.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. ↵
    Xie, Yu, and Kimberlee A. Shauman. 2003. Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: 2 (4)
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Vol. 2, Issue 4
1 Aug 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Explaining the Gender Wage Gap in STEM: Does Field Sex Composition Matter?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
11 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Explaining the Gender Wage Gap in STEM: Does Field Sex Composition Matter?
Katherine Michelmore, Sharon Sassler
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Aug 2016, 2 (4) 194-215; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2016.2.4.07

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Explaining the Gender Wage Gap in STEM: Does Field Sex Composition Matter?
Katherine Michelmore, Sharon Sassler
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Aug 2016, 2 (4) 194-215; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2016.2.4.07
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • EXPLANATIONS FOR THE PERSISTENT GENDER WAGE GAP
    • DATA AND MEASUREMENT
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • APPENDIX
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Computer science skills across China, India, Russia, and the United States
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • scientists and engineers
  • gender wage gap
  • women in STEM

© 2025 RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Powered by HighWire