Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Publications
    • rsf

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Publications
    • rsf
  • Log in
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Advanced Search

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Follow rsf on Twitter
  • Visit rsf on Facebook
  • Follow rsf on Google Plus
Research ArticleIII. Policy Interventions: Incentives, Controls, and Metrics
Open Access

Pricing and University Autonomy: Tuition Deregulation in Texas

Jeongeun Kim, Kevin Stange
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences April 2016, 2 (1) 112-146; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2016.2.1.06
Jeongeun Kim
aAssistant professor at Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College, Arizona State University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin Stange
bAssistant professor at Ford School of Public Policy, University of Michigan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Berg, David J., and
    2. Stephen A. Hoenack
    . 1987. “The Concept of Cost-Related Tuition and its Implementation at the University of Minnesota.” Journal of Higher Education 58(3): 276–305.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Bound, John,
    2. Michael Lovenheim, and
    3. Sarah Turner
    . 2010. “Why Have College Completion Rates Declined: Marginal Students or Marginal College?” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2(3): 129–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    Camou, Michelle, and Wendy Patton. 2012. “Deregulation and Higher Education: Potential Impact on Access, Affordability, and Achievement in Ohio.” Policy Matters Ohio, September. Accessed December 14, 2015. http://www.policymattersohio.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/HigherEd_Oct2012.pdf.
  3. ↵
    Carlson, Andrew. 2011. “State Tuition, Fees, and Financial Assistance Policies for Public Colleges and Universities, 2010–2011.” Boulder, Colo.: State Higher Education Executive Officers.
  4. ↵
    Clotfelter, Charles T. 1996. Buying the Best: Cost Escalation in Elite Higher Education. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  5. ↵
    Cornell Higher Education Research Institute. 2012. “2011 Survey of Differential Tuition at Public Higher Education Institutions.” Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University. Accessed February 23, 2016. https://www.ilr.cornell.edu/cheri/surveys.
  6. ↵
    Deaton, Steven B. 2006. “Policy Shifts in Tuition Setting Authority in the American States: An Event History Analysis of State Policy Adoption.” Ph.D. diss., Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
  7. ↵
    Duderstadt, James J., and Farris W. Womack. 2003. The Future of the Public University in America: Beyond the Crossroad. Baltimore, Md.: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  8. ↵
    Ehrenberg, Ronald G. 2001. “The Supply of American Higher Education Institutions.” ILR School working paper. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University. Accessed December 14, 2015. https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ffpfp0102.pdf.
  9. Ehrenberg, Ronald G. 2007. “The Economics of Tuition and Fees in American Higher Education.” ILR School working paper. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University.
  10. ↵
    1. Ehrenberg, Ronald G
    . 2012. “American Higher Education in Transition.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26(1): 193–216.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    Ehrenberg, Ronald G., and Daniel R. Sherman. 1987. “Optimal Financial Aid Policies for a Selective University.” NBER working paper no. 1014. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research. Accessed December 14, 2015. http://www.nber.org/papers/w1014.
  12. ↵
    1. Epple, Dennis,
    2. Richard Romano, and
    3. Holger Seig
    . 2006. “Admission, Tuition, and Financial Aid Policies in the Market for Higher Education.” Econometrica 74(4): 885–928.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Flores, Stella M., and
    2. Justin C. Shepard
    . 2014. “Pricing Out the Disadvantaged? The Effect of Tuition Deregulation in Texas Public Four-Year Institutions.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 655 (September): 99–122.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    Hall, Delaney. 2003. “Lawmakers Deregulate UT Tuition.” Daily Texan, June 2. Accessed December 14, 2015. http://www.utwatch.org/oldnews/texan_tuitionderegualted_6_02_03.html.
  14. ↵
    Harwell, Erica J. 2013. “Students’ Perceptions of Differential Tuition Based on Academic Program and the Impact on Major Choice.” Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  15. ↵
    1. Hearn, James C.,
    2. Carolyn P. Griswold, and
    3. Ginger. M. Marine
    . 1996. “Region, Resources, and Reason: A Contextual Analysis of State Tuition and State Aid Policies.” Research in Higher Education 37(3): 241–78.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    Heller, Donald E. 2006. “State Support of Higher Education: Past, Present, and Future.” In Privatization and Public Universities, edited by Douglas M. Priest and Edward P. St. John. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  17. Hemelt, Steven W., and Kevin Stange. 2014. “The Effect of Marginal Price on Student Progress at Public Universities.” NBER working paper no. 20779. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  18. ↵
    Hernandez, José Carlos. 2009. “Student Price Response: The Effect of Tuition Deregulation in Texas on Student Enrollment Trends in Texas Public Institutions of Higher Education.” Ph.D. diss., University of Texas at El Paso.
  19. ↵
    1. Hoenack, Stephen A., and
    2. William C. Weiler
    . 1975. “Cost-Related Tuition Policies and University Enrollments.” Journal of Human Resources 10(3): 332–60.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    Hoxby, Caroline M. 1997. “How the Changing Market Structure of U.S. Higher Education Explains College Tuition.” NBER working paper no. 6323. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research. Accessed February 23, 2016. http://www.nber.org/papers/w6323.pdf.
  21. ↵
    1. Hoxby, Caroline M
    . 2009. “The Changing Selectivity of American Colleges.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 23(4): 95–118.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. James, Estelle
    . 1978. “Product Mix and Cost Disaggregation: A Reinterpretation of the Economics of Higher Education.” Journal of Human Resources 13(2): 157–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Johnson, William R., and
    2. Sarah Turner
    . 2009. “Faculty Without Students: Resource Allocation in Higher Education.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 23(2): 169–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    Kane, Thomas J. 1999. The Price of Admission: Rethinking How Americans Pay for College. Washington, D.C. / New York: Brookings Institution / Russell Sage Foundation.
  25. ↵
    1. Koshal, Rajindar K., and
    2. Monjulika Koshal
    . 2000. “State Appropriation and Higher Education Tuition: What Is the Relationship?” Education Economics 8(1): 81–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    1. Little, Michael W.,
    2. Dennis O'Toole, and
    3. James Wetzel
    . 1997. “The Price Differential's Impact on Retention, Recruitment, and Quality in a Public University.” Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 8(2): 37–51.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Long, Bridget Terry
    . 2004. “How Do Financial Aid Policies Affect College? The Institutional Impact of the Georgia HOPE Scholarship.” Journal of Human Resources 39(4): 1045–66.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Lowry, Robert C
    . 2001. “Governmental Structure, Trustee Selection, and Public University Prices and Spending: Multiple Means to Similar Ends.” American Journal of Political Science 45(4): 845–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    Marley, Patrick, and Karen Herzog. 2015. “Walker Opens Door to UW System Tuition Limits After 2017.” Milwaukee-Wisconsin Journal Sentinel, February 12. Accessed December 14, 2015. http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/walker-opens-door-to-uw-system-tuition-cap-after-2017-b99443872z1–291673721.html.
  30. ↵
    McBain, Lesley. 2010. “Tuition-Setting Authority and Deregulation at State Colleges and Universities.” A Higher Education Policy Brief. Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Colleges and Universities. Accessed December 14, 2015. http://www.aascu.org/policy/publications/policy-matters/2010/tuitionsettingauthority.pdf.
  31. ↵
    McLendon, Michael K., James C. Hearn, and Robert G. Hammond. 2013. “Pricing the Flagships: The Politics of Tuition Setting at Public Research Universities.” Raleigh: North Carolina State University. Accessed December 14, 2015. http://www4.ncsu.edu/~rghammon/Pricing_the_Flagships.pdf.
  32. ↵
    Middaugh, Michael F., Rosalina Graham, and Abdus Shahid. 2003. A National Study of Higher Education Instructional Expenditures: The Delaware Study of Instructional Costs and Productivity. NCES 2003–161. Washington: U.S. Department of Education. Accessed December 14, 2015. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2003/2003161.pdf.
  33. ↵
    Morphew, Christopher C., and Peter D. Eckel. 2009. Privatizing the Public University: Perspectives from Across the Academy. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  34. ↵
    Mortenson, Thomas G. 2004. Postsecondary Education Opportunity. Report no. 139. Oskaloosa, IA: Mortenson Research Seminar on Public Policy Analysis of Opportunity for Postsecondary Education.
  35. ↵
    Nelson, Glen R. 2008. “Differential Tuition by Undergraduate Major: Its Use, Amount, and Impact at Public Research Universities.” Ph.D. diss., University of Nebraska–Lincoln.
  36. ↵
    Palmer, Jim. 2013. “Grapevine: An Annual Compilation of Data on State Fiscal Support for Higher Education.” Normal, Ill.: Grapevine. Last updated January 2015. Accessed January 2, 2016. http://education.illinoisstate.edu/grapevine.
  37. ↵
    Paulsen, Michael B. 2000. “Economic Perspectives on Rising College Tuition: A Theoretical and Empirical Exploration.” In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 15, edited by J. C. Smart. New York: Agathon Press.
  38. ↵
    Ravensoft, Michael, and Christine Enyeart. 2009. “Differential Tuition at Public Universities: Models and Implementation Strategies.” Custom Research Brief, March 19. Washington, D.C.: Education Advisory Board.
  39. ↵
    Rizzo Michael J., and Ronald G. Ehrenberg. 2004. “Resident and Non-Resident Tuition and Enrollment at State Flagship Universities.” In College Choices: The Economics of Where to Go, When to Go, and How to Pay for It, edited by Caroline M. Hoxby. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  40. ↵
    1. Rothschild, Michael, and
    2. Lawrence J. White
    . 1995. “The Analysis of the Pricing of Higher Education and Other Services in Which the Customers Are Inputs.” Journal of Political Economy 103(3): 573–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  41. ↵
    1. Shin, Jung Cheol, and
    2. Sande Milton
    . 2008. “Student Response to Tuition Increase by Academic Majors: Empirical Grounds for a Cost-Related Tuition Policy.” Higher Education 55: 719–34.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    Simone, Sean. 2010. “Tuition and Fee Differentiation at Degree Granting Postsecondary Education Institutions.” An AIR/NCES Data Policy Fellowship Report. May 2010. Washington: U.S. Department of Education.
  43. ↵
    1. Singell, Larry D., and
    2. Joe A. Stone
    . 2007. “For Whom the Pell Tolls: The Response of University Tuition to Federal Grants-in-Aid.” Economics of Education Review 26(3): 285–95.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    South Regional Education Board 2013. “Higher Education Finance & Budgets (By-College Funding): Funding for Higher Education Related Operations.” Last updated June 2013. Accessed December 14, 2015. http://www.sreb.org/page/1359/data_library_higher_ed_finance__budgets.html#By_College_Public_Funding.
  45. ↵
    1. Stange, Kevin M
    . 2015. “Differential Pricing in Undergraduate Education: Effects on Degree Production by Field.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 34(1): 107–35.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    Texas A&M University. 2010. “Proposal for Differential Tuition: Dwight Look College of Engineering.” College Station, Tex.: Texas A&M University. Accessed January 2, 2016. http://sec.tamu.edu/upload/documents/LCOE%20Differential%20Tuition-11_08_10.pdf.
  47. ↵
    Texas Guaranteed Tuition Plan. 2012. “Plan Overview.” Accessed January 2, 2016. http://www.tgtp.org/details/overview.html.
  48. ↵
    Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB). 2000. “Closing the Gaps: The Texas Higher Education Plan.” Austin: THECB. Accessed December 14, 2015. http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/.
  49. ↵
    Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB). 2010a. “General Academic Institutions Expenditure Study (formerly Cost Study).” Austin: THECB. Accessed January 2, 2016. http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/index.cfm?objectid=50067F8C-D180-18DE-B88C060BCE74E409.
  50. ↵
    Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB). 2010b. “Overview: Tuition Deregulation.” Austin: THECB. Accessed January 2, 2016. http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/reports/pdf/2010.pdf.
  51. ↵
    Thornton, Saranna. 2007. “Financial Inequality In Higher Education: The Annual Report on the Economic Status of the Profession, 2006–2007.” Washington, D.C.: American Association of University Professors.
  52. ↵
    Totzke, Deana. 2011. “Electrical Engineering Opens New Student Computer Lab with Differential Tuition Dollars.” College Station, Tex.: Dwight Look College of Engineering, Texas A&M University. Accessed Jan 2, 2016. https://engineering.tamu.edu/news/2011/11/11/electrical-engineering-opens-new-student-computer-lab-with-differential-tuition-dollars.
  53. ↵
    1. Toutkoushian, Robert K., and
    2. Paula Hollis
    . 1998. “Using Panel Data to Examine Legislative Demand for Higher Education.” Education Economics 6(2): 141–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  54. ↵
    1. Turner, Nicholas
    . 2012. “Who Benefits from Student Aid? The Economic Incidence of Tax-Based Federal Student Aid.” Economics of Education Review 31(4): 463–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  55. ↵
    University of Texas. 2008. “Access and Affordability: Frequently Asked Questions.” Austin: The University of Texas System. Accessed Jan 2, 2016. http://web.archive.org/web/20080517022159/http://www.utsystem.edu/Affordability/faq.htm.
  56. ↵
    Ward, David, and John Aubrey Douglass. 2005. “The Dynamics of Variable Fees: Exploring Institutional and Public Policy Responses.” CSHE occasional paper no. 5.05. Berkeley: University of California.
  57. ↵
    Weisbroad, Burton A., Jeffrey P. Ballou, and Evelyn D. Asch. 2008. Mission and Money: Understanding the University. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  58. ↵
    1. Yanikoski, Richard A., and
    2. Richard F. Wilson
    . 1984. “Differential Pricing of Undergraduate Education.” Journal of Higher Education 55(6): 735–50.
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    Zemsky, Robert, Gregory R. Wegner, and William F. Massy. 2005. “Today's Colleges Must Be Market Smart and Mission Centered.” Chronicle of Higher Education, July 15.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: 2 (1)
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Vol. 2, Issue 1
1 Apr 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pricing and University Autonomy: Tuition Deregulation in Texas
(Your Name) has sent you a message from RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
16 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Pricing and University Autonomy: Tuition Deregulation in Texas
Jeongeun Kim, Kevin Stange
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Apr 2016, 2 (1) 112-146; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2016.2.1.06

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Pricing and University Autonomy: Tuition Deregulation in Texas
Jeongeun Kim, Kevin Stange
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Apr 2016, 2 (1) 112-146; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2016.2.1.06
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • BACKGROUND
    • THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
    • CROSS-STATE COMPARISONS
    • WITHIN TEXAS COMPARISONS
    • DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
    • APPENDIX
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Looking Inside the Black Box of Performance Funding for Higher Education: Policy Instruments, Organizational Obstacles, and Intended and Unintended Impacts
  • The Promises and Pitfalls of Measuring Community College Quality
Show more III. Policy Interventions: Incentives, Controls, and Metrics

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • tuition
  • deregulation
  • differential tuition
  • college pricing

© 2025 RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Powered by HighWire