The Presentation of Self in Virtual Life: Disinformation Warnings and the Spread of Misinformation Regarding COVID-19

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Barratt, Stephen

   . 2018. “Mission Statement: Quackwatch.” Accessed February 20, 2019. https://www.quackwatch.org/00AboutQuackwatch/mission.html.
2. ↵
   1. Baud, David,
   2. Xiaolong Qi,
   3. Karin Nielsen-Saines,
   4. Didier Musso,
   5. Léo Pomar, and
   6. Guillaume Favre

   . 2020. “Real Estimates of Mortality Following COVID-19 Infection.” The Lancet Infectious Diseases 20(7): 773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30195-X.

   OpenUrlPubMed
3. ↵
   1. Beer, Thomas

   . 2020. “All the Times Trump Compared Covid-19 to the Flu, Even After He Knew Covid-19 Was Far More Deadly.” Forbes, September 10.
4. ↵
   1. boyd, danah

   . 2006. “Friends, Friendster and MySpace Top 8: Writing Community into Being on Social Network Sites.” First Monday, 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v11i12.1418.
5. ↵
   1. boyd, danah

   . 2007. “Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life.” In Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, edited by David Buckingham. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
6. ↵
   1. Brennan, Scott,
   2. Felix M. Simon,
   3. Philip N. Howard, and
   4. Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

   . 2020. “Types, Sources, and Claims of COVID-19 Misinformation.” RISJ factsheet. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Accessed July 6, 2022. https://www.primaonline.it/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/COVID-19_reuters.pdf.
7. ↵
   1. Broniatowski, David A.,
   2. Amelia M. Jamison,
   3. SiHua Qi,
   4. Lulwah AlKulaib,
   5. Tao Chen,
   6. Adrian Benton,
   7. Sandra Quinn, and
   8. Mark Dredze

   . 2018. “Weaponized Health Communication: Twitter Bots and Russian Trolls Amplify the Vaccine Debate.” American Journal of Public Health 108(10): 1378–84.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
8. ↵
   1. Bullingham, Liam, and
   2. Ana C. Vasconcelos

   . 2013. “The Presentation of Self in On-Line World: Goffman and the Study of On-Line Identities.” Journal of Information Science 39(1): 101–12.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. ↵
   1. Burns, Andrew, and
   2. Kat Albrecht

   . 2022. “Localized Syndemic Assemblages: COVID-19, Substance Use Disorder, and Overdose Risk in Small-Town America.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(8): 245–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.8.11.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Carpenter, Timothy

    . 2022. “Kansas State Legislature Passes Bill Boosting Access to Ivermectin and Weakening School Vaccine Rules.” Kansas City, Mo.: KCUR.
11. ↵
    1. Cohen, Alison K.,
    2. Rachel Brahinsky,
    3. Kathleen M. Coll, and
    4. Miranda P. Dotson

    . 2022. “‘We Keep Each Other Safe’: San Francisco Bay Area Community-Based Organizations Respond to Enduring Crises in the COVID-19 Era.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(8): 70–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.8.04.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Coker, Ann L.,
    2. Heather M. Bush,
    3. Bonnie S. Fisher,
    4. Suzanne C. Swan,
    5. Corrine M. Williams,
    6. Emily R. Clear, and
    7. Sara DeGue

    . 2016. “Multi-College Bystander Intervention Evaluation for Violence Prevention.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 50(3): 295–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.034.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. ↵
    1. Confessore, Nicholas

    . 2018. “Cambridge Analytica and Facebook: The Scandal and Fallout So Far.” New York Times, April 4.
14. ↵
    1. Doctors Without Borders

    . 2020. “Facts and Figures About the Coronavirus Disease Outbreak: COVID-19.” Accessed July 6, 2022. https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/covid19.
15. ↵
    1. Dunn Tenpas, Kathryn

    . 2018. “Why Is Trump’s Staff Turnover Higher Than the 5 Most Recent Presidents?” Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution. Accessed July 6, 2022. https://www.brookings.edu/research/why-is-trumps-staff-turnover-higher-than-the-5-most-recent-presidents.
16. ↵
    1. Dunn Tenpas, Kathryn

    . 2020. “Tracking Turnover in the Trump Administration.” Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution. Accessed July 6, 2022. https://www.brookings.edu/research/tracking-turnover-in-the-trump-administration.
17. ↵
    1. Eagly, Alice H., and
    2. Shelly Chaiken

    . 1998. “Attitude Structure and Function.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by Daniel T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske, and Gardner Lindzey. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. ↵
    1. Epley, Nicholas, and
    2. Thomas Gilovich

    . 2016. “The Mechanics of Motivated Reasoning.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 30(3): 133–40.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Evans, Laura E.,
    2. Raymond Foxworth,
    3. Gabriel R. Sanchez,
    4. Cheryl Ellenwood, and
    5. Carmela M. Roybal

    . 2022. “Representative Voices: Native American Representation, Political Power, and COVID-19 in U.S. States.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(8): 135–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.8.07.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Facebook

    . 2019. “Understanding Facebook’s Fact-Checking Program.” Meta (Facebook blog), November 22. Accessed July 6, 2022. https://www.facebook.com/gpa/blog/misinformation-resources.
21. ↵
    1. Fallis, Don

    . 2015. “What Is Disinformation?” Library Trends 63(3): 401–26.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Fen, Christina

    . 2019. “CrowdTangle Codebook.” CrowdTangle. Accessed October 15, 2021. https://help.crowdtangle.com/en/articles/3213537-crowdtangle-codebook.
23. ↵
    1. French, Martin, and
    2. Torin Monahan

    . 2020. “Dis-ease Surveillance: How Might Surveillance Studies Address COVID-19?” Surveillance and Society 18(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v18i1.13985.
24. ↵
    1. Friedman, Lisa, and
    2. Brad Plumer

    . 2020. “Trump’s Response to Virus Reflects a Long Disregard for Science.” New York Times, April 28. Accessed July 6, 2022. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/28/climate/trump-coronavirus-climate-science.html.
25. ↵
    1. Fung, Brian

    . 2020. “Twitter Updates Warning Label for Election Misinformation to Say Joe Biden Won.” CNN Business, December 19. Accessed July 6, 2022. https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/19/tech/twitter-election-warning-label/index.html.
26. ↵
    1. Gentzkow, Matthew

    . 2017. “Small Media, Big Impact.” Science 358(6364): 726–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar2579.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
27. ↵
    1. Ghenai, Amira, and
    2. Yelena Mejova

    . 2018. “Fake Cures: User-Centric Modelling of Health Misinformation in Social Media.” Proceedings of the ACM Human-Computer Interaction 2(CSCW): Article 58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3274327.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Gibbs, Alexandra

    . 2016. “‘Post-Truth’ in the Word of the Year Thanks to Brexit, Trump’s Election Campaigns.” CNBC, November 16. Accessed February 22, 2019. https://www.cnbc.com/2016/11/16/post-truth-is-the-word-of-the-year-thanks-to-brexit-trumps-election-campaigns-says-oxford-dictionaries.html.
29. ↵
    1. Glenza, Jessica

    . 2018. “Russian Trolls ‘Spread Discord’ over Vaccine Safety Online.” The Guardian, August 23. Accessed February 20, 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/aug/23/russian-trolls-spread-vaccine-misinformation-on-twitter.
30. ↵
    1. Goffman, Irving

    . 1964. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
31. ↵
    1. Gowen, Annie,
    2. Juliet Eiloerin,
    3. Ben Guarino, and
    4. Andrew Ba Tran

    . 2020. “Science Ranks Grow Thin in Trump Administration.” Washington Post, January 23. Accessed July 8, 2022. https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/science-ranks-grow-thin-in-trump-administration/2020/01/23/5d22b522-3172-11ea-a053-dc6d944ba776_story.html.
32. ↵
    1. Graves, Lisa

    . 2020. “Who’s Behind the ‘Reopen’ Protests?” New York Times, April 22. Accessed July 8, 2022. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/22/opinion/coronavirus-protests-astroturf.html.
33. ↵
    1. Hitlin, Paul,
    2. Lee Raine, and
    3. Kenneth Olmstead

    . 2019. “Facebook Algorithms and Personal Data.” Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center. Accessed July 8, 2022. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/01/16/facebook-algorithms-and-personal-data/.
34. ↵
    1. Hogan, Bernie

    . 2010. “The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online.” Bulletin of Science, Technology, and Society 30(6): 377–86.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. ↵
    1. James, Sarah,
    2. Caroline Tervo, and
    3. Theda Skocpol

    . 2022. “Institutional Capacities, Partisan Divisions, and Federal Tensions in U.S. Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(8): 154–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.8.08.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Jernigan, David H., and
    2. Anne E. Rushman

    . 2014. “Measuring Youth Exposure to Alcohol Marketing on Social Networking Sites: Challenges and Prospects.” Journal Public Health Policy 35(1): 91–104.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Jurkowitz, Mark, and
    2. Amy Mitchell

    . 2020. “Cable TV and COVID-19: How Americans Perceive the Outbreak and View Media Coverage Differ by Main News Source.” Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center on Journalism and the Media. Accessed April 27, 2020. https://www.journalism.org/2020/04/01/cable-tv-and-covid-19-how-americans-perceive-the-outbreak-and-view-media-coverage-differ-by-main-news-source.
38. ↵
    1. Kamp Dush, Claire M.,
    2. Wendy D. Manning,
    3. Miranda N. Berrigan, and
    4. Rachel R. Hardeman

    . 2022. “Stress and Mental Health: A Focus on COVID-19 and Racial Trauma Stress.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(8): 104–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.8.06.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Kavanagh, Jennifer, and
    2. Michael D. Rich

    . 2018. Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in Public Life. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2314.html.
40. ↵
    1. Kleinhesselink, Randall R., and
    2. Richard E. Edwards

    . 1975. “Seeking and Avoiding Belief-Discrepant Information as a Function of Its Perceived Refutability.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31(5): 787.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. ↵
    1. Kunda, Ziva

    . 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 108(3): 480.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. ↵
    1. Lazer, David,
    2. Matthew A. Baum,
    3. Yochai Benkler,
    4. Adam J. Berinsky,
    5. Kelly M. Greenhill,
    6. Filippo Menczer,
    7. Miriam J. Metzger, et al

    . 2018. “The Science of Fake News: Addressing Fake News Requires an Interdisciplinary Effort.” Science 359(6380): 1094–96. Accessed July 8, 2022. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aao2998.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
43. ↵
    1. Leicht, Kevin T

    . 2016. “Market Fundamentalism, Cultural Fragmentation, Post-Modern Skepticism, and the Future of Professional Work.” Journal of Professions and Organization 3(1): 103–17.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
44. ↵
    1. Leicht, Kevin T., and
    2. Mary Fennell

    . 2022. The New Dark Age: American Professions in Decline. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
45. ↵
    1. Leicht, Kevin T.,
    2. Joseph Yun,
    3. Brant Houston, and
    4. Loretta Auvil

    . 2020. “The War on Professional Expertise: The Global Spread of Online Myths About Medicine and Health.” Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, National Center for Supercomputing Applications Fellowship.
46. ↵
    1. Leicht, Kevin T.,
    2. Joseph Yun,
    3. Brant Houston,
    4. Loretta Auvil,
    5. Peter Ondish,
    6. James Evans, and
    7. Prassana Balpradesh

    . 2021. “Developing Easy-to-Use Application-Based Software to Combat Social Media Misinformation—a Multi-Disciplinary Collaboration.” Chicago: Discovery Partners Institute.
47. ↵
    1. Lewis, Kevin,
    2. Jason Kaufman, and
    3. Nicholas Christakis

    . 2008. “The Taste for Privacy: An Analysis of College Student Privacy Settings in an Online Social Network.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14(1): 79–100.

    OpenUrl
48. ↵
    1. Lord, Charles G.,
    2. Lee Ross, and
    3. Mark R. Lepper

    . 1979. “Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(11): 2098.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
49. ↵
    1. Marcon, Alessandro R.,
    2. Blake Murdoch, and
    3. Timothy Caulfield

    . 2017. “Fake News Portrayals of Stem Cells and Stem Cell Research.” Regenerative Medicine 12(7): 765–75.

    OpenUrl
50. ↵
    1. Marwick, Alice E., and
    2. danah boyd

    . 2010. “I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience.” New Media & Society 13(1): 114–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
51. ↵
    1. McCloskey, Brian, and
    2. David L. Heymann

    . 2020. “SARS and Novel Coronavirus—Old Lessons and New Lessons.” Epidemiology and Infection 148(e22): 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268820000254.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
52. ↵
    1. McPherson, Karla

    . 1983. “Opinion-Related Information Seeking: Personal and Situational Variables.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 9(1): 116–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167283091017.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
53. ↵
    1. Mendelson, Andrew, and
    2. Zizi Papacharissi

    . 2010. “Look at Us: Collective Narcissism in College Student Facebook Photo Galleries.” In The Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites, edited by Zizi Papcharissi. London: Routledge.
54. ↵
    1. Morse, Jack

    . 2020. “Facebook Announces Bold Plan to Label Some Awful Content, Sometimes.” Tech Industry, June 26. Mashable.com. Accessed July 8, 2022. https://mashable.com/article/facebook-label-violating-content-newsworthy-sometimes.
55. ↵
    1. Nichols, Tom

    . 2017. The Death of Expertise: The Campaign Against Established Knowledge and Why It Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56. ↵
    1. Nyhan, Brendan, and
    2. Jason Reifler

    . 2010. “When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions.” Political Behavior 32(2): 303–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
57. ↵
    1. Pears, Emily, and
    2. Emily Sydnor

    . 2022. “COVID-19 and the Culture of American Federalism.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(8): 181–220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.8.09.

    OpenUrl
58. ↵
    1. Pennycook, Gordon,
    2. Jonathon McPhetres,
    3. Yunhao Zhang,
    4. Jackson G. Lu, and
    5. David G. Rand

    . 2020. “Fighting Covid-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention.” Psychological Science 71: 770–80.

    OpenUrl
59. ↵
    1. Pennycook, Gordon, and
    2. David G. Rand

    . 2019. “Lazy, Not Biased: Susceptibility to Partisan Fake News Is Better Explained by Lack of Reasoning Than by Motivated Reasoning.” Cognition 188: 39–50.

    OpenUrlPubMed
60. ↵
    1. Pezzia, Carla,
    2. Magda C. Rogg, and
    3. Tammy Leonard

    . 2022. “Social, Resource, and Institution Disruptions and the Evolving Lives of Economically Vulnerable Older Adults: Implications for Policies and Programs in the New Normal.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(8): 88–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.8.05.

    OpenUrl
61. ↵
    1. Quan-Haase, Annabelle, and
    2. Jessica L. Collins

    . 2008. “I’m There, But I Might Not Want to Talk to You.” Information, Communication and Society 11: 526–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180801999043.

    OpenUrl
62. ↵
    1. Rajgor, Dimple D.,
    2. Meng Har Lee,
    3. Sophia Archuleta,
    4. Natasha Bagdasarian, and
    5. Swee Chye Quek

    . 2020. “The Many Estimates of the COVID-19 Case Fatality Rate.” The Lancet Infectious Diseases 20(7): 776–77.

    OpenUrlPubMed
63. ↵
    1. Redbird, Beth,
    2. Laurel Harbridge-Yong, and
    3. Rachel Davis Mersey

    . 2022. “The Social and Political Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Introduction.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(8): 1–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.8.01.

    OpenUrl
64. ↵
    1. Robi, Jill

    . 2018. Coping with Hate Crimes. New York: Rosen Young Adult.
65. ↵
    1. Robinson, Laura

    . 2007. “The Cyberself: The Self-ing Project Goes Online, Symbolic Interaction in the Digital Age.” New Media and Society 9(1): 93–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807072216.

    OpenUrl
66. ↵
    1. Rose, Jonathan

    . 2017. “Brexit, Trump, and Post-Truth Politics.” Public Integrity 19: 555–58.

    OpenUrl
67. ↵
    1. Ross, Karen

    . 2008. “Crackdown on Unproven Cancer Treatments Focuses on Internet Marketers.” Journal of the National Cancer Institute 100(17): 1200–202.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
68. ↵
    1. Schaffner, Brian F., and
    2. Cameron Roche

    . 2016. “Misinformation and Motivated Reasoning: Responses to Economic News in a Politicized Environment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 81(1): 86–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw043.

    OpenUrl
69. ↵
    1. Schild, Leonard,
    2. Chen Ling,
    3. Jeremy Blackburn,
    4. Gianluca Stringhini,
    5. Yang Zhang, and
    6. Savvas Zannettou

    . 2020. “‘Go Eat a Bat, Chang!’: An Early Look on the Emergence of Sinophobic Behavior on Web Communities in the Face of COVID-19.” Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University, arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.04046.
70. ↵
    1. Schroeder, Ralph

    . 2002. “The Social Life of Avatars: Presence and Interaction in Shared Virtual Environments.” In Social Interaction in Virtual Environments: Key Issues, Common Themes, and a Framework for Research, edited by Ralph Schroeder. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
71. ↵
    1. Spinney, Laura

    . 2017. “How Facebook, Fake News and Friends Are Warping Your Memory.” Nature News 543(7644): 168.

    OpenUrl
72. ↵
    1. Suciu, Peter

    . 2020. “During COVID-19 Pandemic It Isn’t Just Fake News But Seriously Bad Misinformation That Is Spreading on Social Media.” Forbes, April 8. Accessed April 10, 2020. https://www.forbes.com/sites/petersuciu/2020/04/08/during-covid-19-pandemic-it-isnt-just-fake-news-but-seriously-bad-misinformation-that-is-spreading-on-social-media/#7d55b2f87e55.
73. ↵
    1. Suhay, Elizabeth,
    2. Aparna Soni,
    3. Claudia Persico, and
    4. Dave E. Marcotte

    . 2022. “Americans’ Trust in Government and Health Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(8): 221–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.8.10.

    OpenUrl
74. ↵
    1. Taber, Charles S., and
    2. Milton Lodge

    . 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50(3): 755–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
75. ↵
    1. Tufekci, Zeynep

    . 2008. “Grooming, Gossip, Facebook and Myspace.” Information, Communication and Society 11: 544–64.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
76. ↵
    1. Twenge, Jean M.,
    2. W. Keith Campbell, and
    3. Nathan T. Carter

    . 2014. “Declines in Trust in Others and Confidence in Institutions Among American Adults and Late Adolescents, 1972–2012.” Psychological Science 25(10):1914 –23.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
77. ↵
    1. Vogel, Wendy

    . 2011. “Internet Oncology: Cure Seekers Beware!” Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology 2: 409–12.

    OpenUrl
78. ↵
    1. Vraga, Emily K., and
    2. Leticia Bode

    . 2017. “Using Expert Sources to Correct Health Misinformation on Social Media.” Science Communication 39: 621–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017731776.

    OpenUrl
79. ↵
    1. Yun, Joseph T.,
    2. Utku Pamuksuz, and
    3. Brittany R. L. Duff

    . 2019. “Are We Who We Follow? Computationally Analyzing Human Personality and Brand Following on Twitter.” International Journal of Advertising 38(5): 776–95.

    OpenUrl