Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Publications
    • rsf

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Publications
    • rsf
  • Log in
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Advanced Search

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Follow rsf on Twitter
  • Visit rsf on Facebook
  • Follow rsf on Google Plus
Research Article
Open Access

COVID-19 and the Culture of American Federalism

Emily Pears, Emily Sydnor
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences December 2022, 8 (8) 181-220; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.8.09
Emily Pears
aAssistant professor of government at Claremont McKenna College, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Emily Pears
Emily Sydnor
bAssociate professor of political science at Southwestern University, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Emily Sydnor
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Albertson, Bethany, and
    2. Shana Kushner Gadarian
    . 2015. Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  2. ↵
    1. Barber, Bernard
    . 1983. The Logic and Limits of Trust. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
  3. ↵
    1. Berinsky, Adam J.,
    2. Gregory A. Huber, and
    3. Gabriel S. Lenz
    . 2012. “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis 20(3): 351–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Bokemper, Scott E.,
    2. Gregory A. Huber,
    3. Alan S. Gerber,
    4. Erin K. James, and
    5. Saad B. Omer
    . 2021. “Timing of COVID-19 Vaccine Approval and Endorsement by Public Figures.” Vaccine 39(5): 825–29.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Bulman-Pozen, Jessica
    . 2014. “Partisan Federalism.” Harvard Law Review 127(4): 1077–45.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Campbell, Angus,
    2. Philip E. Converse,
    3. Warren E. Miller, and
    4. Donald E. Stokes
    . 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  7. ↵
    1. Carlin, Ryan E., and
    2. Gregory J. Love
    . 2013. “The Politics of Interpersonal Trust and Reciprocity: An Experimental Approach.” Political Behavior 35: 43–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    . 2021. “National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network: U.S. State and Territorial Orders Requiring Masks in Public.” Accessed January 10, 2021. https://ephtracking.cdc.gov/DataExplorer/.
  9. ↵
    1. Chiang, Chun-Fang, and
    2. Brian Knight
    . 2011. “Media Bias and Influence: Evidence from Newspaper Endorsements.” Review of Economic Studies 78(3): 795–820.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Choudhry, Sujit
    . 2001. “Citizenship and Federations: Some Preliminary Reflections.” In The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union, edited by Kalypso Nicolaidis and Robert Howse. London: Oxford University Press.
  11. ↵
    1. Cramer, Katherine J
    . 2016. The Politics of Resentment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  12. ↵
    1. Delli Carpini, Michael X., and
    2. Scott Keeter
    . 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
  13. ↵
    1. Dinan, John, and
    2. Jac C. Heckelman
    . 2020. “Stability and Contingency in Federalism Preferences.” Public Administration Review 80(2): 234–43.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Easton, David
    . 1967. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  15. ↵
    1. Elazar, Daniel J
    . 1966. American Federalism: A View from the States. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
  16. ↵
    1. Evans, John H., and
    2. Eszter Hargittai
    . 2020. “Who Doesn’t Trust Fauci? The Public’s Belief in the Expertise and Shared Values of Scientists in the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 6. First published online August 6, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120947337.
  17. ↵
    1. Faul, Franz,
    2. Edgar Erdfelder,
    3. Axel Buchner, and
    4. Albert-Georg Lang
    . 2009. “Statistical Power Analyses Using G*Power 3.1: Tests for Correlation and Regression Analyses.” Behavior Research Methods 41(4): 1149–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Feeley, Malcolm M., and
    2. Edward Rubin
    . 2008. Federalism: Political Identity and Tragic Compromise. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  19. ↵
    1. Funk, Cary,
    2. Meg Hefferon,
    3. Brian Kennedy and
    4. Courtney Johnson
    . 2019. “Trust and Mistrust in Americans’ Views of Scientific Experts.” Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center. Accessed July 23, 2022. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2019/08/02/partisanship-influences-views-on-the-role-and-value-of-scientific-experts-in-policy-debates/.
  20. ↵
    1. Gallup
    . 2020. “Trust in Government.” Accessed July 23, 2022. https://news.gallup.com/poll/5392/Trust-Government.aspx.
  21. ↵
    1. Gamson, William A
    . 1968. Power and Discontent. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press.
  22. ↵
    1. Green, Donald P.,
    2. Bradley Pamquist, and
    3. Eric Schickler
    . 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
  23. ↵
    1. Green, John C., and
    2. James L. Guth
    . 1989. “The Missing Link: Political Activists and Support for School Prayer.” Public Opinion Quarterly 53(1): 41–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    1. Grossman, Guy,
    2. Soojong Kim,
    3. Jonah M. Rexer, and
    4. Harsha Thirumurthy
    . 2020. “Political Partisanship Influences Behavioral Responses to Governors’ Recommendations for COVID-19 Prevention in the United States.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117(39): 24144–53.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Hetherington, Marc J
    . 2004. Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  26. ↵
    1. Hetherington, Marc J., and
    2. John D. Nugent
    . 2001. “Explaining Public Support for Devolution: The Role of Political Trust.” In What Is It about Government That Americans Dislike?, edited by John R. Hibbing, Elizabeth Theiss-Morse, and James H. Kuklinski. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  27. ↵
    1. Hopkins, Daniel J
    . 2018. The Increasingly United States: How and Why American Political Behavior Nationalized. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  28. ↵
    1. Huddy, Leonie, and
    2. Nadia Khatib
    . 2007. “American Patriotism, National Identity, and Political Involvement.” American Journal of Political Science 51(1): 63–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    1. Huddy, Leonie,
    2. Lilliana Mason, and
    3. Lene Aarøe
    . 2015. “Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity.” American Political Science Review 109(1): 1–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    1. Ipsos
    . 2022. “KnowledgePanel.” Accessed October 25, 2022. https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/solutions/public-affairs/knowledgepanel.
  31. ↵
    1. Jacobs, Nicholas F., and
    2. B. Kal Munis
    . 2019. “Place-Based Imagery and Voter Evaluations: Experimental Evidence on the Politics of Place.” Political Research Quarterly 72(2): 263–77.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. James, Sarah,
    2. Caroline Tervo, and
    3. Theda Skocpol
    . 2022. “Institutional Capacities, Partisan Divisions, and Federal Tensions in U.S. Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(8): 154–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.8.08.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Jennings, M. Kent, and
    2. Harmon Zeigler
    . 1970. “The Salience of American State Politics.” American Political Science Review 64(2): 523–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Jones, Jeffrey M
    . 2021. “Quarterly Gap in Party Affiliation Largest Since 2012.” Gallup Inc., April 7. Accessed October 25, 2022. https://news.gallup.com/poll/343976/quarterly-gap-party-affiliation-largest-2012.aspx.
  34. ↵
    1. Kelleher, Christine A., and
    2. Jennifer Wolak
    . 2007. “Explaining Public Confidence in the Branches of State Government.” Political Research Quarterly 60(4): 707–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    1. Kennedy, Courtney,
    2. Andrew Mercer Scott Keeter,
    3. Nick Hatley,
    4. Kyley McGeeney, and
    5. Alejandra Gimenez
    . 2016. “Evaluating Online Nonprobability Surveys.” Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center. Accessed July 23, 2022. https://www.pewresearch.org/methods/2016/05/02/evaluating-online-nonprobability-surveys/.
  36. ↵
    1. Konisky, David
    . 2011. “Public Preferences for Environmental Policy Responsibility.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 41(1): 76–100.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. ↵
    1. Lenz, Gabriel S
    . 2012. Follow the Leader?: How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  38. ↵
    1. Levay, Kevin E.,
    2. Jeremy Freese, and
    3. James N. Druckman
    . 2016. “The Demographic and Political Composition of Mechanical Turk Samples.” SAGE Open 6(1). First published March 15, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016636433.
  39. ↵
    1. Levi, Margaret
    . 1997. Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  40. ↵
    1. Levi, Margaret
    . 1998. “A State of Trust.” In Trust and Governance, by Karen S. Cook and Russell Hardin, edited by Valerie Braithwaite and Margaret Levi. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  41. ↵
    1. Levy, Jacob T
    . 2007. “Federalism, Liberalism, and the Separation of Loyalties.” American Political Science Review 101(3): 459–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    1. Marien, Sophie, and
    2. Marc Hooghe
    . 2011. “Does Political Trust Matter? An Empirical Investigation into the Relation Between Political Trust and Support for Law Compliance.” European Journal of Political Research 50(2): 267–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    1. McCarthy, Justin
    . 2018. “Americans Still More Trusting of Local Than State Government.” Gallup, October 8. Accessed July 23, 2022. https://news.gallup.com/poll/243563/americans-trusting-local-state-government.aspx.
  44. ↵
    1. Miller, Arthur H
    . 1974. “Rejoinder to ‘Comment’ by Jack Citrin: Political Discontent or Ritualism?” American Political Science Review 68(3): 989–1001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    1. Morisi, Davide,
    2. John T. Jost, and
    3. Vishal Singh
    . 2019. “An Asymmetrical President-in-Power Effect.” American Political Science Review 113(2): 614–20.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. Newport, Frank
    . 2020a. “The Partisan Gap in Views of the Coronavirus.” Gallup, May 15. Accessed July 23, 2022. https://news.gallup.com/opinion/polling-matters/311087/partisan-gap-views-coronavirus.aspx.
  47. ↵
    1. Newport, Frank
    . 2020b. “Further Dissecting the Partisan Gap in Views of the Coronavirus.” Gallup, July 31. Accessed July 23, 2022. https://news.gallup.com/opinion/polling-matters/316520/further-dissecting-partisan-gap-views-coronavirus.aspx.
  48. ↵
    1. Newport, Frank
    . 2020c. “Partisanship and Vaccine Uptake Strategies.” Gallup, December 18. Accessed July 23, 2022. https://news.gallup.com/opinion/polling-matters/328034/partisanship-vaccine-uptake-strategies.aspx.
  49. ↵
    1. Oreffice, Sonia, and
    2. Climent Quintana-Domeque
    . 2020. “Gender Inequality in Covid-19 Times: Evidence from UK Prolific Participants.” IZA discussion paper no. 3648803. Bonn: IZA Institute of Labor Economics. Accessed July 23, 2022. https://covid-19.iza.org/publications/dp13463/.
  50. ↵
    1. Page-Tan, Courtney,
    2. Summer Marion, and
    3. Daniel P. Aldrich
    . 2022. “Information Trust Falls: The Role of Social Networks and Information During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Suburbanites.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(8): 32–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.8.02.
    OpenUrl
  51. ↵
    1. Pagliaro Stefano,
    2. Simona Sacchi,
    3. Maria Giuseppina Pacilli,
    4. Marco Brambilla,
    5. Francesca Lionetti,
    6. Karim Bettache, et al
    . 2021. “Trust Predicts COVID-19 Prescribed and Discretionary Behavioral Intentions in 23 Countries.” PLoS ONE 16(3): e0248334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248334.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Palan, Stefan, and
    2. Christian Schitter
    . 2018. “Prolific. Ac—A Subject Pool for Online Experiments.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 17 (March): 22–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. ↵
    1. Peer, Eyal,
    2. Laura Brandimarte,
    3. Sonam Samat, and
    4. Alessandro Acquisti
    . 2017. “Beyond the Turk: Alternative Platforms for Crowdsourcing Behavioral Research.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 70 (May): 153–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  54. ↵
    1. Pew Research Center
    . 2019. “Public Trust in Government: 1958–2019.” Pew Research Center: U.S. Politics & Policy, April 11. Accessed July 23, 2022. https://www.pewresearch.org.
  55. ↵
    1. Prolific Team
    . 2019. “Representative Samples.” Prolific, May 31. Accessed July 23, 2022. https://researcher-help.prolific.co/hc/en-gb/articles/360019236753.
  56. ↵
    1. Rattay, Petra,
    2. Niels Michalski,
    3. Olga Maria Domanska,
    4. Anna Kaltwasser,
    5. Freia De Bock,
    6. Lothar H. Wieler, and
    7. Susanne Jordan
    . 2021. “Differences in Risk Perception, Knowledge, and Protective Behaviour Regarding COVID-19 by Education Level Among Women and Men in Germany. Results from the COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring (COSMO) Study.” PLoS One 16(5): e0251694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251694.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Roawhouser-Mylet, Georgia, and
    2. Peter Hanson
    . 2020. “American National Identity and Attitudes Towards President Trump.” Data Analysis and Social Inquiry Lab at Grinnell College, May 8. Accessed October 25, 2022. https://dasil.sites.grinnell.edu/2020/05/american-national-identity-and-attitudes-towards-president-trump/.
  57. ↵
    1. Richardson, Lilliard E.,
    2. David M. Konisky, and
    3. Jeffrey Milyo
    . 2012. “Public Approval of State Legislatures.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 37(1): 99–116.
    OpenUrl
  58. ↵
    1. Riker, William H
    . 1964. Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. New York: Little, Brown.
    1. Saad, Lydia
    . 2021. “Americans’ Political Ideology Held Steady in 2020.” Gallup Inc., January 11. Accessed October 25, 2022. https://news.gallup.com/poll/328367/americans-political-ideology-held-steady-2020.aspx.
  59. ↵
    1. Schildkraut, Deborah J
    . 2011. “National Identity in the United States,” In Handbook of Identity Theory and Research, edited by Seth J. Schwartz, Koen Luyckx, and Vivian L. Vignoles. New York: Springer.
    1. Schildkraut, Deborah J.,
    2. Jeffrey M. Berry, and
    3. James M. Glaser
    . 2020. “Public Opinion About Federalism During the Coronavirus Pandemic.” Data for Progress (blog), May 4. Accessed July 23, 2022. https://www.dataforprogress.org/blog/5/4/public-opinion-federalism.
  60. ↵
    1. Schneider, Saundra K., and
    2. William G. Jacoby
    . 2003. “Public Attitudes Toward the Policy Responsibilities of the National and State Governments: Evidence from South Carolina.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 3(3): 246–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  61. ↵
    1. Schneider, Saundra K.,
    2. William G. Jacoby, and
    3. Daniel C. Lewis
    . 2011. “Public Opinion Toward Intergovernmental Policy Responsibilities.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 41(1): 1–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  62. ↵
    1. Scholz, John T., and
    2. Mark Lubell
    . 1998. “Trust and Taxpaying: Testing the Heuristic Approach to Collective Action.” American Journal of Political Science 42(2): 398–417.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  63. ↵
    1. Stokes, Donald E
    . 1962. “Popular Evaluations of Government: An Empirical Assessment.” In Ethics and Bigness, edited by Harlan Cleveland and Harold D. Lasswell. New York: Klaus Reprint Company.
  64. ↵
    1. Suhay, Elizabeth,
    2. Aparna Soni,
    3. Claudia Persico, and
    4. Dave E. Marcotte
    . 2022. “Americans’ Trust in Government and Health Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(8): 221–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.8.10.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth
    . 2009. Who Counts as an American?: The Boundaries of National Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  66. ↵
    1. Thompson, Lyke, and
    2. Richard Elling
    . 1999. “Let Them Eat Marblecake: The Preferences of Michigan Citizens for Devolution and Intergovernmental Service-Provision.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 29(1): 139–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  67. ↵
    1. Tyson, Alec
    . 2020. “Republicans Remain Far Less Likely Than Democrats to View COVID-19 as a Major Threat to Public Health.” FactTank (Pew Research Center blog), July 22. Accessed July 23, 2022. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/07/22/republicans-remain-far-less-likely-than-democrats-to-view-covid-19-as-a-major-threat-to-public-health/.
  68. ↵
    1. Uslaner, Eric
    . 2001. “Is Washington Really the Problem?” In What Is It about Government That Americans Dislike?, edited by John R. Hibbing, Elizabeth Theiss-Morse, and James H. Kuklinski. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  69. ↵
    1. Wolak, Jennifer
    . 2016. “Core Values and Partisan Thinking about Devolution.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 46(4): 463–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  70. ↵
    1. Wolak, Jennifer
    . 2020. “Why Do People Trust Their State Government?” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 20(3): 313–29.
    OpenUrl
  71. ↵
    1. Zaller, John R
    . 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  72. ↵
    1. Zhao, Erfei,
    2. Qiaoa Wu,
    3. Eileen M. Crimmins, and
    4. Jennifer A. Ailshire
    . 2020. “Media Trust and Infection Mitigating Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the USA.” BMJ Global Health 5:e003323.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: 8 (8)
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Vol. 8, Issue 8
1 Dec 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
COVID-19 and the Culture of American Federalism
(Your Name) has sent you a message from RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
COVID-19 and the Culture of American Federalism
Emily Pears, Emily Sydnor
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Dec 2022, 8 (8) 181-220; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2022.8.8.09

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
COVID-19 and the Culture of American Federalism
Emily Pears, Emily Sydnor
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Dec 2022, 8 (8) 181-220; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2022.8.8.09
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • LITERATURE REVIEW
    • FEDERALISM MATTERS
    • HYPOTHESES
    • METHODOLOGY
    • FINDINGS
    • DISCUSSION
    • APPENDIX A: OLS MODELS UNDERLYING FIGURES 1–4
    • APPENDIX B: OLS MODELS USING CORRECTIVE PARTISAN WEIGHTS
    • APPENDIX C: FINDINGS USING ALTERNATIVE DATA SOURCES
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • place-based identity
  • federalism
  • COVID-19
  • partisanship
  • political information

© 2025 RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Powered by HighWire