Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Publications
    • rsf

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Publications
    • rsf
  • Log in
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Advanced Search

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Follow rsf on Twitter
  • Visit rsf on Facebook
  • Follow rsf on Google Plus
Research Article
Open Access

Private Probation Costs, Compliance, and the Proportionality of Punishment: Evidence from Georgia and Missouri

Beth M. Huebner, Sarah K.S. Shannon
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences January 2022, 8 (1) 179-199; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.1.08
Beth M. Huebner
aProfessor in the Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of Missouri–St. Louis, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Beth M. Huebner
Sarah K.S. Shannon
bAssociate professor of sociology at the University of Georgia, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sarah K.S. Shannon
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Alarid, Leanne Fiftal, and
    2. Christine S. Schloss
    . 2009. “Attorney Views on the Use of Private Agencies for Probation Supervision and Treatment.” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 53(3): 278–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Albin-Lackey, Chris
    . 2014. Profiting from Probation America’s “Offender-Funded” Probation Industry. New York: New York Human Rights Watch.
  3. ↵
    1. Appleman, Laura I.
    2016. “Nickel and Dimed into Incarceration: Cash Register Justice in the Criminal Justice System.” Boston College Law Review 57(5): 1483–541.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Bannon, Alicia,
    2. Mitali Nagrecha, and
    3. Rebekah Diller
    . 2010. Criminal Justice Debt: A Barrier to Re-entry. New York: Brennan Center for Justice.
  5. ↵
    1. Beckett, Katherine, and
    2. Alexes Harris
    . 2011. “On Cash and Conviction” Criminology & Public Policy 10(3): 509–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00726.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Beckett, Katherine, and
    2. Naomi Murakawa
    . 2012. “Mapping the Shadow Carceral State: Toward an Institutionally Capacious Approach to Punishment.” Theoretical Criminology 16(2): 221–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Bellacicco, Sarah Dolisca
    . 2013. “Safe Haven No Longer: The Role of Georgia Courts and Private Probation Companies in Sustaining a De Facto Debtors’ Prison System.” Georgia Law Review 48(3): 229–66.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Biernacki, Patrick, and
    2. Dan Waldorf
    . 1981. “Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling.” Sociological Methods & Research 10(2): 141–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Bing, Lindsay,
    2. Becky Pettit, and
    3. Ilya Slavinski
    . 2022. “Incomparable Punishments: How Economic Inequality Contributes to the Disparate Impact of Legal Fines and Fees.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(2): 118–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.2.06.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Brett, Sharon,
    2. Neda Khoshkhoo, and
    3. Mitali Nagrecha
    . 2020. Paying on Probation: How Financial Sanctions Intersect with Probation to Target, Trap, and Punish People Who Cannot Pay. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Law School.
  11. ↵
    1. Cadigan, Michele, and
    2. Gabriela Kirk
    . 2020. “On Thin Ice: Bureaucratic Processes of Monetary Sanctions and Job Insecurity.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 6(1): 113–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2020.6.1.05.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Cadigan, Michele, and
    2. Tyler Smith
    . 2021. “‘Are You Able-Bodied?’ Embodying Accountability in the Modern Criminal Justice System.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 37(1): 25–44.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Charmaz, Kathy
    . 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.
  14. ↵
    1. Colgan, Beth
    . 2014. “Reviving the Excessive Fines Clause.” California Law Review 277(2): 284–95.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Corbett, Ronald P.
    2015. “The Burdens of Leniency: The Changing Face of Probation.” Minnesota Law Review 99: 1697–732.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Council of State Government Justice Center
    . 2016. Justice Reinvestment in Georgia. Accessed November 16, 2021. https://csgjusticecenter.org/projects/justice-reinvestment/past-states/georgia/ Washington, DC: Council of State Governments.
  17. ↵
    1. Diller, Rebekah,
    2. Judith Greene, and
    3. Michelle Jacobs
    . 2009. Maryland’s Parole Supervision Fee: A Barrier to Reentry. New York: Brennan Center for Justice.
  18. ↵
    1. Doherty, Fiona
    . 2016. “Obey All Laws and Be Good: Probation and the Meaning of Recidivism.” Georgetown Law Journal 104(2): 291–354.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Duwe, Grant, and
    2. Valerie Clark
    . 2013. “The Effects of Private Prison Confinement on Offender Recidivism: Evidence from Minnesota.” Criminal Justice Review 38(3): 375–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Evans, Douglas
    . 2014. The Debt Penalty—Exposing the Financial Barriers to Offender Reintegration. New York: John Jay College of Criminal Justice.
  21. ↵
    1. Fernandes, April D.,
    2. Michele Cadigan,
    3. Frank Edwards, and
    4. Alexes Harris
    . 2019. “Monetary Sanctions: A Review of Revenue Generation, Legal Challenges, and Reform.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 15(1): 397–413.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Friedman, Brittany,
    2. Alexes Harris,
    3. Beth M. Huebner,
    4. Karin D. Martin,
    5. Becky Pettit,
    6. Sarah K.S. Shannon, and
    7. Bryan L. Sykes
    . 2022. “What Is Wrong with Monetary Sanctions? Directions for Policy, Practice, and Research.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(1): 221–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.1.10.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Harris, Alexes,
    2. Beth M. Huebner,
    3. Karin D. Martin,
    4. Mary Pattillo,
    5. Becky Pettit,
    6. Bryan L. Sykes,
    7. Christopher Uggen, and
    8. April D. Fernandes
    . 2017. Monetary Sanctions in the Criminal Justice System. New York: Arnold Foundation.
  24. ↵
    1. Harris, Alexes,
    2. Mary Pattillo, and
    3. Bryan L. Sykes
    . 2022. “Studying the System of Monetary Sanctions.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(1): 1–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.1.01.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Harris, Alexes,
    2. Tyler Smith, and
    3. Emmi Obara
    . 2019. “Justice ‘Cost Points.’ ” Criminology and Public Policy 18(2): 343–59.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Heaton, Paul,
    2. Sandra Mayson, and
    3. Megan Stevenson
    . 2017. “The Downstream Consequences of Misdemeanor Pretrial Detention.” Stanford Law Review 69(3): 711–94.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Huebner, Beth M., and
    2. Andrea Giuffre
    . 2022. “Reinforcing the Web of Municipal Courts: Evidence and Implications Post-Ferguson.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(1): 108–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.1.05.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Kaeble, Danielle, and
    2. Mariel Alper
    . 2020. Probation and Parole in the United States, 2017–2018. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
  29. ↵
    1. Klingele, Cecelia
    . 2013. “Rethinking the Use of Community Supervision.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 103(4): 1015–70.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Kohler-Hausmann, Issa
    . 2013. “Misdemeanor Justice: Control Without Conviction.” American Journal of Sociology 119(2): 351–93.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Kohler-Hausmann, Issa
    . 2018. Misdemeanorland: Criminal Courts and Social Control in an Age of Broken Windows Policing. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  32. ↵
    1. Latessa, Edward J., and
    2. Lori Brusman Lovins
    . 2019. “Privatization of Community Corrections.” Criminology & Public Policy 18(2): 323–41.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Link, Nathan W.
    2019. “Criminal Justice Debt During the Prisoner Reintegration Process: Who Has It and How Much?” Criminal Justice and Behavior 46(1): 154–72.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Link, Nathan W.,
    2. Jordan Hyatt, and
    3. Ebony Ruhland
    . 2020. “Monetary Sanctions, Legal and Collateral Consequences, and Probation and Parole: Where Do We Go From Here?” UCLA Criminal Justice Law Review 4(1): 200–211.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Lofland, J.,
    2. David A. Snow,
    3. Leon A. Anderson, and
    4. Lyn H. Lofland
    . 2005. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. New York: Wadsworth.
  36. ↵
    1. Martin, Karin D.,
    2. Kimberly Spencer-Suarez, and
    3. Gabriela Kirk
    . 2022. “Pay or Display: Monetary Sanctions and the Performance of Accountability and Procedural Integrity in New York and Illinois Courts.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(1): 128–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.1.06.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Martin, Karin D.,
    2. Bryan L. Sykes,
    3. Sarah K.S. Shannon,
    4. Frank Edwards, and
    5. Alexes Harris
    . 2018. “Monetary Sanctions: Legal Financial Obligations in US Systems of Justice.” Annual Review of Criminology 1(1): 471–95.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Maruschak, Laura, and
    2. Todd D. Minton
    . 2020. Correctional Populations in the United States, 2017–2018. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
  39. ↵
    1. Mayson, Sandra, and
    2. Megan Stevenson
    . 2020. “Misdemeanors by the Numbers.” Boston College Law Review 61(3).
  40. ↵
    1. Miles, Matthew B., and
    2. A. Michael Huberman
    . 1993. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.
  41. ↵
    1. Montes, Andrea N., and
    2. Daniel P. Mears
    . 2019. “Privatized Corrections in the 21st Century.” Criminology & Public Policy 18(2): 217–39.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Montes, Andrea N., and
    2. Skyler J. Morgan
    . 2020. “Helpful or Harmful? Theorizing Privatized Corrections: Findings from a Qualitative Study.” Journal of Crime and Justice. Published online November 20. Accessed August 10, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2020.1820368.
  43. ↵
    1. Morris, Norval, and
    2. Michael Tonry
    . 1990. Between Prison and Probation: Intermediate Punishments in a Rational Sentencing System. New York: Oxford University Press.
  44. ↵
    1. Natapoff, Alexandra
    . 2018. Punishment Without Crime: How Our Massive Misdemeanor System Traps the Innocent and Makes America More Unequal. New York: Basic Books.
  45. ↵
    1. O’Malley, Pat
    . 1998. “Imagining Insurance Risk, Thrift and Industrial Life Insurance in Britain.” Connecticut Insurance Law Journal 5(2): 676–703.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. Pattillo, Mary,
    2. Erica Banks,
    3. Brian Sargent, and
    4. Daniel J. Boches
    . 2022. “Monetary Sanctions and Housing Instability.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of Social Sciences 8(2): 57–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.2.03.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Pattillo, Mary, and
    2. Gabriela Kirk
    . 2021. “Layaway Freedom: Coercive Financialization in the Criminal Legal System.” American Journal of Sociology 126(4): 1–41.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Petersilia, Joan
    . 2003. When Prisoners Come Home: Parole and Prisoner Reentry. New York: Oxford University Press.
  49. ↵
    1. Phelps, Michelle S.
    2020. “Mass Probation from Micro to Macro: Tracing the Expansion and Consequences of Community Supervision.” Annual Review of Criminology 3(1): 261–79.
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. Phelps, Michelle S., and
    2. Ebony L Ruhland
    . 2021. “Governing Marginality: Coercion and Care in Probation.” Social Problems. Published online January 6. Accessed August 10, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spaa060.
  51. ↵
    1. Pleggenkuhle, Breanne
    . 2018. “The Financial Cost of a Criminal Conviction: Context and Consequences.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 45(1): 121–45.
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. Ramachandra, Komala
    . 2018. “Set Up to Fail” The Impact of Offender-Funded Private Probation on the Poor. New York: New York Human Rights Watch.
  53. ↵
    1. Rappleye, Hannah, and
    2. Lisa Riodian-Seville
    . 2012. “‘Cash Register Justice: Private Probation Services Face Legal Counterattack.” NBC News, October 24. Accessed August 10, 2021. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/investigations/cash-register-justice-private-probation-services-face-legal-counterattack-flna1c6646131.
  54. ↵
    1. Rosenthal, Alan, and
    2. Marsha Weissman
    . 2007. Sentencing for Dollars: The Financial Consequences of a Criminal Conviction. Syracuse, N.Y.: Center for Community Alternatives Justice Strategies.
  55. ↵
    1. Ruhland, Ebony
    . 2019. “It’s All About the Money: An Exploration of Probation Fees.” Corrections 6(1): 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2018.1564635.
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    1. Ruhland, Ebony,
    2. Bryan Holmes, and
    3. Amber Petkus
    . 2020. “The Role of Fines and Fees on Probation Outcomes.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 47(10): 1244–63.
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    1. Schloss, Christine S., and
    2. Leanne F. Alarid
    . 2007. “Standards in the Privatization of Probation Services: A Statutory Analysis.” Criminal Justice Review 32(3): 233–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  58. ↵
    1. Shannon, Sarah
    . 2020. “Probation and Monetary Sanctions in Georgia: Evidence from a Multi-Method Study.” Georgia Law Review 54(4): 1213–34.
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    1. Spencer-Suarez, Kimberly, and
    2. Karin D. Martin
    . 2021. “Navigating the Monetary Sanctions Maze: Understanding and Confusion Among Criminal Legal Debtors.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 37(1): 4–24.
    OpenUrl
  60. ↵
    1. Stevenson, Megan, and
    2. Sandra Mayson
    . 2018. “The Scale of Misdemeanor Justice.” Boston University Law Review 98(3): 731–78.
    OpenUrl
  61. ↵
    1. Teague, Michael
    . 2011. “Probation in America: Armed, Private and Unaffordable?” Probation Journal 58(4): 317–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  62. ↵
    1. Uggen, Christopher, and
    2. Robert Stewart
    . 2015. “Piling On: Collateral Consequences and Community Supervision.” Minnesota Law Review 99(5): 1871–910.
    OpenUrl
  63. ↵
    1. Williams, Jarred,
    2. Vincent Schiraldi, and
    3. Kendra Bradner
    . 2019. The Wisconsin Community Corrections Story. New York: Columbia University Justice Lab.
  64. ↵
    1. Wilson, Justin P.
    2018. Private Probation Services Council: Performance Audit Report. Nashville: Tennessee Department of the Auditor.
  65. ↵
    1. Wooldredge, John, and
    2. Joshua C. Cochran
    . 2019. “Equal or Not? Private Versus Public Corrections Services, Programming, and Climate.” Criminology & Public Policy 18(2): 295–321.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: 8 (1)
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Vol. 8, Issue 1
1 Jan 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Private Probation Costs, Compliance, and the Proportionality of Punishment: Evidence from Georgia and Missouri
(Your Name) has sent you a message from RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Private Probation Costs, Compliance, and the Proportionality of Punishment: Evidence from Georgia and Missouri
Beth M. Huebner, Sarah K.S. Shannon
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Jan 2022, 8 (1) 179-199; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2022.8.1.08

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Private Probation Costs, Compliance, and the Proportionality of Punishment: Evidence from Georgia and Missouri
Beth M. Huebner, Sarah K.S. Shannon
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Jan 2022, 8 (1) 179-199; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2022.8.1.08
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • COSTS OF PROBATION
    • RITUALS OF COMPLIANCE IN MUNICIPAL COURTS
    • STUDY SITES
    • METHODS
    • ANALYSIS
    • COST OF PRIVATE PROBATION
    • HIDDEN COSTS
    • RITUALS OF COMPLIANCE
    • DISPROPORTIONALITY OF PRIVATE PROBATION
    • DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • monetary sanctions
  • community corrections
  • municipal courts
  • private probation
  • punishment

© 2025 RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Powered by HighWire