Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Publications
    • rsf

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Publications
    • rsf
  • Log in
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Advanced Search

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Follow rsf on Twitter
  • Visit rsf on Facebook
  • Follow rsf on Google Plus
Research Article
Open Access

Could We Level the Playing Field? Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives, Nonmarital Fertility, and Poverty in the United States

Lawrence L. Wu, Nicholas D. E. Mark
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences February 2018, 4 (3) 144-166; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2018.4.3.08
Lawrence L. Wu
aProfessor of sociology and director of the NYU Population Center at New York University, Department of Sociology, New York University, Puck Building, 4th Floor, 295 Lafayette St., New York, NY 10012
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lawrence.wu@nyu.edu
Nicholas D. E. Mark
bPhD candidate in sociology at New York University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Bearak, Jonathan M.,
    2. Lawrence B. Finer,
    3. Jenna Jerman, and
    4. Megan L. Kavanaugh
    . 2016. “Changes in Out-of-Pocket Costs for Hormonal IUDs after Implementation of the Affordable Care Act: An Analysis of Insurance Benefit Inquiries.” Contraception 93(2): 139–44.
    OpenUrl
  2. Becker, Gary S. 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  3. ↵
    1. Beeson, Tishra,
    2. Susan Wood,
    3. Brian Bruen,
    4. Debora Goetz Goldberg,
    5. Holly Mead, and
    6. Sara Rosenbaum
    . 2014. “Accessibility of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives (LARCs) in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs).” Contraception 89(2): 91–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Bertko, John, Sherry Glied, Erin Miller, and Lee Wilson. 2012. “The Cost of Providing Contraceptives Through Health Insurance.” Washington: Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
  5. ↵
    1. Bongaarts, John
    . 1978. “A Framework for Analyzing the Proximate Determinants of Fertility.” Population and Development Review 4(1): 105–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    Branum, Amy M., and Jo Jones. 2015. “Trends in Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Use Among U.S. Women Aged 15 to 44.” NCHS Data Brief no. 188. Atlanta, Ga.: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
  7. ↵
    1. Bzostek, Sharon H.,
    2. Sara S. McLanahan, and
    3. Marcia J. Carlson
    . 2012. “Mothers’ Repartnering After a Nonmarital Birth.” Social Forces 90(3): 817–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Cancian, Maria, and
    2. Daniel R. Meyer
    . 2000. “Work after Welfare: Women’s Work Effort, Occupation, and Economic Well-Being.” Social Work Research 24(2): 69–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Davis, Kingsley, and
    2. Judith Blake
    . 1956. “Social Structure and Fertility: An Analytical Framework.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 4(4): 211–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Edin, Kathryn, Paula England, Emily Fitzgibbons Shafer, and Joanna Reed. 2007. “Forming Fragile Families: Was the Baby Planned, Unplanned, or In Between?” In Unmarried Couples with Children, edited by Paula England and Kathryn Edin. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  10. ↵
    1. England, Paula,
    2. Monica L. Caudillo,
    3. Krystale Littlejohn,
    4. Brooke Conroy Bass, and
    5. Joanna Reed
    . 2016. “Why Do Young, Unmarried Women Who Don’t Want to Get Pregnant Contracept Inconsistently? Mixed-Method Evidence for the Role of Efficacy.” Socius 2(1): 1–15.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Espey, Eve, and
    2. Tony Ogburn
    . 2011. “Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives: Intrauterine Devices and the Contraceptive Implant.” Obstetrics and Gynecology 117(3): 705–19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Farley, Timothy M. M.,
    2. Michael J. Rosenberg,
    3. Patrick J. Rowe,
    4. Jian-Hua Chen, and
    5. Olav Meirik
    . 1992. “Intrauterine Devices and Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: An International Perspective.” The Lancet 339(8796): 785–88.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Finer, Lawrence B., and
    2. Mia R. Zolna
    . 2014. “Shifts in Intended and Unintended Pregnancies in the United States, 2001–2008.” American Journal of Public Health 104(S1): S43–S48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Furstenberg, Frank F., Jr..
    1992. “Teenage Childbearing and Cultural Rationality: A Thesis in Search of Evidence.” Family Relations 41(April): 239–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Gatny, Heather,
    2. Yasamin Kusunoki, and
    3. Jennifer S. Barber
    . 2014. “Pregnancy scares and subsequent unintended pregnancy.” Demographic Research 31(40): 1229–42.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Geronimus, Arlene
    . 1991. “Teenage Childbearing and Social and Reproductive Disadvantage: The Evolution of Complex Questions and the Demise of Simple Answers.” Family Relations 40(4): 463–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Gibson-Davis, Christina
    . 2014. “Magic Moment? Maternal Marriage for Children Born Out of Wedlock.” Demography 51(4): 1345–56.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Gomez, Anu Manchikanti,
    2. Liza Fuentes, and
    3. Amy Allina
    . 2014. “Women or LARC First? Reproductive Autonomy and the Promotion of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods.” Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 46(3): 171–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Gordon, Linda. 2002. The Moral Property of Women: A History of Birth Control Politics in America. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  19. ↵
    1. Gubrium, Aline C.,
    2. Emily S. Mann,
    3. Sonya Borrero,
    4. Christine Dehlendorf,
    5. Jessica Fields,
    6. Arline T. Geronimus,
    7. Anu M. Gomez,
    8. Lisa H. Harris,
    9. Jenny A. Higgins,
    10. Katrina Kimport,
    11. Kristin Luker,
    12. Zakiya Luna,
    13. Laura Mamo,
    14. Dorothy Roberts,
    15. Diana Romero, and
    16. Gretchen Sisson
    . 2016. “Realizing Reproductive Health Equity Needs More Than Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC).” American Journal of Public Health 106(1): 18–19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Hotz, V. Joseph,
    2. Susan Williams McElroy, and
    3. Seth G. Sanders
    . 2005. “Teenage Childbearing and Its Life Cycle Consequences: Exploiting a Very Natural Experiment.” Journal of Human Resources 40(3): 683–715.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Hov, Gunhild Garmo,
    2. Finn Egil Skjeldestad, and
    3. Torunn Hilstad
    . 2007. “Use of IUD and Subsequent Fertility-Follow-Up after Participation in a Randomized Clinical Trial.” Contraception 75(2): 88–92.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Hubacher, David,
    2. Roger Lara-Ricalde,
    3. Douglas J. Taylor,
    4. Fernando Guerra-Infante, and
    5. Raymundo Guzma-Rodriguez
    . 2002. “Use of Copper Intrauterine Devices and the Risk of Tubal Infertility Among Nulligravid Women.” New England Journal of Medicine 345(8): 561–67.
    OpenUrl
    1. Kavanaugh, Megan L.,
    2. Jenna Jerman, and
    3. Lawrence B. Finer
    . 2015. “Changes in Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods Among US Women, 2009–2012.” Obstetrics and Gynecology 126(5): 917–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Kline, Wendy. 2002. Building a Better Race: Gender, Sexuality, and Eugenics from the Turn of the Century to the Baby Boom. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  24. ↵
    1. Lindo, Jason, and
    2. Analisa Packham
    . 2017. “How Much Can Expanding Access to Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives Reduce Teen Birth Rates?” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 9(3): 348–76.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    Lombardo, Paul A. 2008. Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  26. ↵
    Mayer, Susan E. 1997. What Money Can’t Buy: Family Income and Children’s Life Chances. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  27. ↵
    Manski, Charles F. 1995. Identification Problems in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  28. ↵
    1. McLanahan, Sara, and
    2. Audrey N. Beck
    . 2010. “Parental Relationships in Fragile Families.” The Future of Children 20(2): 17–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    1. McLanahan, Sara, and
    2. Christine Percheski
    . 2008. “Family Structure and the Reproduction of Inequalities.” Annual Review of Sociology 34: 257–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. McLanahan, Sara,
    2. Laura Tach, and
    3. Daniel Schneider
    . 2013. “The Causal Effects of Father Absence.” Annual Review of Sociology 39: 399–427.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. McNicholas, Colleen,
    2. Tessa Madden,
    3. Gina Secura, and
    4. Jeffrey F. Peipert
    . 2014. “The Contraceptive CHOICE Project Round Up: What We Did and What We Learned.” Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 57(4): 635–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. Monea, Emily, and Adam Thomas. 2011. “The Public Cost of Pregnancy.” Brookings working paper. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
  33. National Center for Health Statistics. 2015. Vital Statistics on Natality [dataset]. Hyattsville, Md.: National Center for Health Statistics. Accessed November 16, 2017. http://www.nber.org/data/vital-statistics-natality-data.html.
  34. ↵
    1. Neumark, David
    . 2002. “Youth Labor Markets in the U.S.: Shopping Around vs. Staying Put.” Review of Economics and Statistics 84(3): 462–82.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Northridge, Jennifer L., and
    2. Susan M. Coupey
    . 2016. “Realizing Reproductive Health Equity for Adolescents and Young Adults.” American Journal of Public Health 105(7): 1284.
    OpenUrl
    1. Peipert, Jeffrey F.,
    2. Tessa Madden,
    3. Jenifer E. Allsworth, and
    4. Gina M. Secura
    . 2012. “Preventing Unintended Pregnancies by Providing No-Cost Contraception.” Obstetrics and Gynecology 120(6): 1291–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, P.L. 104–193, Sec. 510(b).
  37. Plotnick, Robert D. 2016. “The Benefits of Declining Teenage Childbearing.” In The Good Crisis: How Population Stabilization Can Foster a Healthy U.S. Economy, edited by John Seager and Lee S. Polansky. Washington, D.C.: Population Connection. Accessed October 27, 2017. http://www.populationconnection.org/pathways/the-good-crisis/.
  38. ↵
    1. Ricketts, Sue,
    2. Greta Klingler, and
    3. Renee Schwalberg
    . 2014. “Game Change in Colorado: Widespread Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives and Rapid Decline in Births Among Young, Low-Income Women.” Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 46(3): 125–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Romero, Lisa,
    2. Karen Pazol,
    3. Lee Warner,
    4. Lorne Gavin,
    5. Susan Moskosky,
    6. Ghenet Besera,
    7. Ana Carolina Loyola Briceno,
    8. Tara Jatlaoui, and
    9. Wanda Barfield
    . 2015. “Vital Signs: Trends in Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Among Teens Aged 1519 Years Seeking Contraceptive Services—United States, 2005–2013.” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 64(13): 363–69.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Rosenzweig, Mark R., and
    2. Kenneth I. Wolpin
    . 1995. “Sisters, Siblings, and Mothers: The Effect of Teen-Age Childbearing on Birth Outcomes in a Dynamic Family Context.” Econometrica 63(2): 303–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. ↵
    Sawhill, Isabel V. 2014. Generations Unbound: Drifting into Sex and Parenthood Without Marriage. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute Press.
  42. ↵
    Sawhill, Isabel, Quentin Karpilow, and Joanna Venator. 2014. “The Impact of Unintended Childbearing on Future Generations.” Washington, D.C.: Center on Children and Families at Brookings.
  43. ↵
    1. Sayegh, M. Aaron,
    2. J. Dennis Fortenberry,
    3. Marcia Shew, and
    4. Donald P. Orr
    . 2006. “The Developmental Association of Relationship Quality, Hormonal Contraceptive Choice and Condom Non-Use among Adolescent Women.” Journal of Adolescent Health 39(3): 388–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. ↵
    1. Secura, Gina
    . 2013. “Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: A Practical Solution to Reduce Unintended Pregnancy.” Minerva Ginecologica 65(3): 271–77.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Stern, Alexandra M
    . 2005. “Sterilized in the Name of Public Health: Race, Immigration, and Reproductive Control in Modern California.” American Journal of Public Health 5(7): 1128–38.
    OpenUrl
    1. Strumbos, Diana,
    2. Donna Linderman, and
    3. Carson C. Hicks
    . 2018. “Postsecondary Pathways Out of Poverty: CUNY ASAP and the Case for National Policy.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 4(3): 100–17. DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2018.4.3.06.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  46. ↵
    Sweeney, Megan M., Mieke C. W. Eeckhaut, and Jessica D. Gipson. 2016. “Reconsidering (In)Equality in the Use of IUDs: The Changing Context of Contraceptive Choice across the Reproductive Lifespan.” Paper presented at the 2016 Annual Meetings of the Population Association of America, Washington, D.C. (March 31–April 2, 2016).
  47. ↵
    1. Topel, Robert H., and
    2. Michael P. Ward
    . 1992. “Job Mobility and the Careers of Young Men.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107(2): 439–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    Trenholm, Christopher, Barbara Devaney, Ken Fortson, Lisa Quay, Justin Wheeler, and Melissa Clark. 2007. “Impacts of Four Title V, Section 510 Abstinence Education Programs.” Princeton, N.J.: Mathematica Policy Research.
  49. ↵
    1. Trussell, James
    . 2011. “Contraceptive Failure in the United States.” Contraception 83(5): 397–404.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. ↵
    1. Trussell, James,
    2. Fareen Hassan,
    3. Julia Lowin,
    4. Amy Law, and
    5. Anna Filonenko
    . 2015. “Achieving Cost-Neutrality with Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods.” Contraception 91(1): 49–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. Wilson, William Julius. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  52. ↵
    1. Wood, Robert G.,
    2. Quinn Moore,
    3. Andrew Clarkwest, and
    4. Alexandra Killewald
    . 2014. “The Long-Term Effects of Building Strong Families: A Program for Unmarried Parents.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 76(2): 446–63.
    OpenUrl
    1. Wood, Susan,
    2. Tishra Beeson,
    3. Brian Bruen,
    4. Debora Goetz Goldberg,
    5. Holly Mead,
    6. Peter Shin,
    7. Sara Rosenbaum
    . 2014. “Scope of Family Planning Services Available in Federally Qualified Health Centers.” Contraception 89(2): 85–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. World Health Organization (WHO
    . 1982. “Interval IUD Insertion in Parous Women: A Randomized Multicentre Comparative trial of the Lippes Loop D, TCu220C, and the Copper 7.” Contraception 26(1): 1–22.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. World Health Organization Task Force on the Safety and Efficacy of Fertility Regulating Methods (WHO
    . 1990. “The TCu380A, TCu220C, Multiload 250 and Nova T IUDS at 3,5 and 7 Years of Use—Results from Three Randomized Multicentre Trials.” Contraception 42(2): 141–58.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. ↵
    Wu, Lawrence L. 2015. “Could We Level the Playing Field? Some (Very) Speculative Remarks on Nonmarital Fertility.” Panel presentation, Plenary Session on “The Rise of Nonmarital Fertility.” 2015 Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association, Chicago. (August 22–25, 2015).
  54. ↵
    1. Wu, Lawrence L., and
    2. Steven P. Martin
    . 2015. “Premarital First Births: The Influence of the Timing of Sexual Onset Versus Post-Onset Risks in the United States.” Population Studies 69(3): 281–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Wu, Lawrence L.,
    2. Steven P. Martin, and
    3. Paula England
    . 2017. “The Decoupling of Sex and Marriage in the United States: Cohort Trends in Who Did and Did Not Delay Sex Until Marriage.” Sociological Science 4: 151–75.
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    Zolna, Mia R., and Laura Lindberg. 2012. “Unintended Pregnancies: Incidence and Outcomes among Young Adult Unmarried Women in the United States, 2001 and 2008.” New York: Guttmacher Institute.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: 4 (3)
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Vol. 4, Issue 3
1 Feb 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Could We Level the Playing Field? Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives, Nonmarital Fertility, and Poverty in the United States
(Your Name) has sent you a message from RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Could We Level the Playing Field? Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives, Nonmarital Fertility, and Poverty in the United States
Lawrence L. Wu, Nicholas D. E. Mark
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Feb 2018, 4 (3) 144-166; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2018.4.3.08

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Could We Level the Playing Field? Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives, Nonmarital Fertility, and Poverty in the United States
Lawrence L. Wu, Nicholas D. E. Mark
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Feb 2018, 4 (3) 144-166; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2018.4.3.08
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • BACKGROUND
    • FERTILITY-RELATED BEHAVIORS AND PAST POLICY
    • A POLICY PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT, AND NO-COST ACCESS TO, A RANGE OF CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS
    • COSTS AND BENEFITS
    • DISCUSSION
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • nonmarital fertility
  • unintended pregnancies and births
  • long-acting reversible contraceptives
  • dynamic selection
  • longitudinal intent-to-treat trial
  • poverty reduction

© 2025 RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Powered by HighWire