Can Technology Help Promote Equality of Educational Opportunities?

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   Anderson, Terry. 2008. The Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Edmonton, Calif.: Athabasca University Press.
2. ↵
   1. Angrist, Joshua D., and
   2. Victor Lavy

   . 1999. “Using Maimonides’ Rule to Estimate the Effect of Class Size on Scholastic Achievement.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(2): 533–75.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   Bakia, Marianne, K. Anderson, Eryn Heying, Kaeli Keating, and Jessica Mislevy. 2011. “Implementing Online Learning Labs in Schools and Districts: Lesson’s from Miami-Dade’s First Year.” Menlo Park, Calif.: SRI International.
4. Banerjee, Abhijit, Shawn Cole, Esther Duflo, and Leigh Linden. 2005. “Remedying Education: Evidence from Two Randomized Experiments in India.” Working Paper 11904. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
5. ↵
   1. Barker, Bruce

   . 1985. “Curricular Offerings in Small and Large High Schools: How Broad Is the Disparity?” Research in Rural Education 3(1): 35–38.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   Bettinger, Eric, Lindsay Fox, Susanna Loeb, and Eric Taylor. 2015. “Changing Distributions: How Online College Classes Alter Student and Professor Performance.” Working Paper 15-10. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University, Center for Education Policy Analysis (October). Available at: http://cepa.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/WP15-10.pdf (accessed December 14, 2015).
7. ↵
   1. Bowen, William G.,
   2. Matthew M. Chingos, ,
   3. Kelly A. Lack, , and
   4. Thomas I. Nygren

   . 2014. “Interactive Learning Online at Public Universities: Evidence from a Six-Campus Randomized Trial.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 33(1): 94–111.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. ↵
   1. Boyd, Donald,
   2. Hamilton Lankford, ,
   3. Susanna Loeb, ,
   4. Jonah Rockoff, , and
   5. James Wyckoff

   . 2008. “The Narrowing Gap in New York City Teacher Qualifications and Its Implications for Student Achievement in High-Poverty Schools.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 27(4): 793–818.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. Campuzano, Larissa, Mark Dynarski, Roberto Agodini, and Kristina Rall. 2009. “Effectiveness of Reading and Mathematics Software Products: Findings from Two Student Cohorts.” NCEE 2009-4041. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
10. 1. Carter, Prudence L

    . 2016. “Educational Equality Is a Multifaceted Issue: Why We Must Understand the School’s Sociocultural Context for Student Achievement.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 2(5). doi:10.7758/RSF.2016.2.5.07.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
11. ↵
    Cavalluzzo, Linda, Deborah L. Lowther, Christine Mokher, and Xitao Fan. 2012. “Effects of the Kentucky Virtual Schools’ Hybrid Program for Algebra I on Grade 9 Student Math Achievement: Final Report.” NCEE 2012-4020. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
12. ↵
    Cavanaugh, Cathy, Kathy Jo Gillan, Jeff Kromrey, Melinda Hess, and Robert Blomeyer. 2004. “The Effects of Distance Education on K–12 Student Outcomes: A Meta-analysis.” Naperville, Ill.: Learning Point Associates/North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL).
13. ↵
    Center for Research on Educational Outcomes (CREDO). 2011. Charter Schools’ Performance in Pennsylvania. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University, CREDO.
14. ↵
    Cheung, Alan C. K., and Robert E. Slavin. 2011. “The Effectiveness of Education Technology for Enhancing Reading Achievement: A Meta-analysis.” Baltimore: Center for Research and Reform in Education.
15. ↵
    1. Cheung, Alan C. K., and
    2. Robert E. Slavin

    . 2013. “The Effectiveness of Educational Technology Applications for Enhancing Mathematics Achievement in K–12 Classrooms: A Meta-analysis.” Educational Research Review 9(1): 88–113.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. ↵
    Christensen, Clayton M., Curtis W. Johnson, and Michael B. Horn. 2010. Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns. Expanded ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
17. ↵
    1. Clotfelter, Charles T.,
    2. Helen F. Ladd, , and
    3. Jacob L. Vigdor

    . 2007. “Teacher Credentials and Student Achievement: Longitudinal Analysis with Student Fixed Effects.” Economics of Education Review 26(6): 673–82. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.10.002.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. ↵
    Coleman, James S., Ernest Q. Campbell, Carol J. Hobson, James McPartland, Alexander M. Mood, Frederick D. Weinfeld, and Robert L. York. 1966. Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.
19. ↵
    1. Conati, Cristina

    . 2009. “Intelligent Tutoring Systems: New Challenges and Directions.” In Twenty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 9(1): 2–7.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Cooper, Harris,
    2. Kelly Charlton, ,
    3. Jeff C. Valentine, ,
    4. Laura Muhlenbruck, , and
    5. Geoffrey D. Borman

    . 2000. “Making the Most of Summer School: A Meta-analytic and Narrative Review.” Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 65(1): i–127.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
21. ↵
    Cuban, Larry. 2003. Oversold and Underused: Reforming Schools Through Technology, 1980–2000. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
22. ↵
    Dede, Christopher. 2006. Online Professional Development for Teachers: Emerging Models and Methods. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Education Press.
23. ↵
    Dettling, Lisa J., Sarena F. Goodman, and Jonathan Smith. 2015. “Every Little Bit Counts: The Impact of High-Speed Internet on the Transition to College.” Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2015-108. Washington, D.C.: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2015.108.
24. Drummond, Kathryn, Marjorie Chinen, Teresa Garcia Duncan, H. Ray Miller, Lindsay Fryer, Courtney Zmach, and Katherine Culp. 2011. “Impact of the Thinking Reader Software Program on Grade 6 Reading Vocabulary, Comprehension, Strategies, and Motivation.” NCEE 2010-4035. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
25. ↵
    Dynarski, Mark, Roberto Agodini, Sheila Heaviside, Timothy Novak, Nancy Carey, Larissa Campuzano, Barbara Means, Robert Murphy, William Penuel, Hal Javitz, Deborah Emery, and Willow Sussex. 2007. “Effectiveness of Reading and Mathematics Software Products: Findings from the First Student Cohort.” NCEE 2007-4005. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
26. ↵
    1. Figlio, David N.,
    2. Mark Rush, , and
    3. Lu Yin

    . 2013. “Is It Live or Is It Internet? Experimental Estimates of the Effects of Online Instruction on Student Learning.” Journal of Labor Economics 31(4): 763–84.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. ↵
    1. Fletcher-Flinn, Claire M., and
    2. Breon Gravatt

    . 1995. “The Efficacy of Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI): A Meta-analysis.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 12(3): 219–41.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. ↵
    Florida Bureau of Educational Technology. 2014. “Bureau of Educational Technology Archives: Fall 2014 Technology Resources Inventory.” Available at: http://www.fldoe.org/about-us/division-of-technology-info-services/educational-technology/archives (accessed January 3, 2016).
29. Florida Department of Management Services (FLDMS). 2014. Official update submission to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration under the State Broadband Initiative Program for the State of Florida (October). Available at: https://www2.ntia.doc.gov/grantee/florida-department-of-management-services (accessed April 20, 2020).
30. ↵
    Graesser, Arthur C., Mark W. Conley, and Andrew Olney. 2012. “Intelligent Tutoring Systems.” In APA Educational Psychology Handbook, vol. 3, Application to Learning and Teaching, edited by Karen R. Harris, Steve Graham, and Tim Urdan. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
31. ↵
    Gray, Lucinda, Nina Thomas, Laurie Lewis, and Peter Tice. 2010. “Teachers’ Use of Educational Technology in U.S. Public Schools: 2009.” NCES 2010-040. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
32. ↵
    Guha, Roneeta, Naomi Tyler, Samantha Astudillo, and Betsey Wolf. 2015. “Evaluation of Rocketship Students’ Middle School Outcomes: First-Year Findings.” Menlo Park, Calif.: SRI International.
33. ↵
    1. Harris, Douglas N., and
    2. Tim R. Sass

    . 2011. “Teacher Training, Teacher Quality, and Student Achievement.” Journal of Public Economics 95(7–8): 798–812. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.009.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. ↵
    Hart, Cassandra, Elizabeth Friedmann, and Michael Hill. 2014. “Online Course-Taking and Student Outcomes in California Community Colleges.” Unpublished paper, University of California, Davis.
35. ↵
    Heppen, Jessica B., Kirk Walters, Margaret Clements, Ann-Marie Faria, Cheryl Tobey, Nicholas Sorensen, and Katherine Culp. 2012. “Access to Algebra I: The Effects of Online Mathematics for Grade 8 Students.” NCEE 2012-4021. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
36. ↵
    1. Herold, Benjamin

    . 2014. “New Model Underscores Rocketship’s Growing Pains.” Education Week 33(19): 26.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Hoxby, Caroline M

    . 2000. “The Effects of Class Size on Student Achievement: New Evidence from Population Variation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(4): 1239–85.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. 1. Jennings, Jennifer L., and
    2. Douglas Lee Lauen

    . 2016. “Accountability, Inequality, and Achievement: The Effects of the No Child Left Behind Act on Multiple Measures of Student Learning.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 2(5). doi:10.7758/RSF.2016.2.5.11.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
39. ↵
    1. Jepsen, Christopher, and
    2. Steven Rivkin

    . 2009. “Class Size Reduction and Student Achievement: The Potential Trade-off Between Teacher Quality and Class Size.” Journal of Human Resources 44(1): 223–50.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
40. ↵
    1. Joyce, Ted J.,
    2. Sean Crockett, ,
    3. David A. Jaeger, ,
    4. Onur Altindag, , and
    5. Stephen D. O’Connell

    . 2015. “Does Classroom Time Matter?” Economics of Education Review 46: 64–77.

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. Kalogrides, Demetra, and
    2. Susanna Loeb

    . 2013. “Different Teachers, Different Peers: The Magnitude of Student Sorting Within Schools.” Educational Researcher 42(6): 304–16.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
42. ↵
    1. Kirkpatrick, Heather, and
    2. Larry Cuban

    . 1998. “Computers Make Kids Smarter—Right?” Technos 7(2): 26–31.

    OpenUrl
43. ↵
    1. Koedinger, Kenneth R.,
    2. John R. Anderson, ,
    3. William H. Hadley, , and
    4. Mary A. Mark

    . 1997. “Intelligent Tutoring Goes to School in the Big City.” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 8(1): 30–43.

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. Krueger, Alan B

    . 1999. “Experimental Estimates of Education Production Functions.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(2): 497–532.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
45. Kulik, James A. 1994. “Meta-analytic Studies of Findings on Computer-Based Instruction.” In Technology Assessment in Education and Training, edited by Eva L. Baker and Harold F. O’Neil Jr. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46. ↵
    1. Kulik, James A., and
    2. J. D. Fletcher

    . 2015. “Effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems: A Meta-analytic Review.” Review of Educational Research (April 17). doi: 10.3102/0034654315581420.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
47. ↵
    1. Ma, Wenting,
    2. Olusola O. Adesope, ,
    3. John C. Nesbit, , and
    4. Qing Liu

    . 2014. “Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Learning Outcomes: A Meta-analysis.” Journal of Educational Psychology 106(4): 901–18.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
48. ↵
    Means, Barbara, Yukie Toyama, Robert Murphy, Marianne Bakia, and Karla Jones. 2010. “Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies.” Washington: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.
49. ↵
    Molnar, Alex (ed.), Gary Miron, Luis Huerta, Jennifer King Rice, Larry Cuban, Brian Horvitz, Charisse Gulosino, and Sheryl Rankin Shafer. 2013. “Virtual Schools in the U.S. 2013: Politics, Performance, and Research Evidence.” Boulder, Colo.: National Education Policy Center.
50. ↵
    1. Nwana, Hyacinth S

    . 1990. “Intelligent Tutoring Systems: An Overview.” Artificial Intelligence Review 4(4): 251–77.

    OpenUrl
51. ↵
    1. Nye, Barbara,
    2. Spyros Konstantopoulos, , and
    3. Larry Hedges

    . 2004. “The Effects of Small Classes on Academic Achievement: The Results of the Tennessee Class Size Experiment.” American Educational Research Journal 37(1): 123–51.

    OpenUrl
52. 1. Pane, John F.,
    2. Beth Ann Griffin, ,
    3. Daniel F. McCaffrey, , and
    4. Rita Karam

    . 2014. “Effectiveness of Cognitive Tutor Algebra I at Scale.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 36(2): 127–44.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
53. 1. Pane, John F.,
    2. Daniel F. McCaffrey, ,
    3. Mary Ellen Slaughter, ,
    4. Jennifer L. Steele, , and
    5. Gina S. Ikemoto

    . 2010. “An Experiment to Evaluate the Efficacy of Cognitive Tutor Geometry.” Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 3(3): 254–81.

    OpenUrl
54. ↵
    1. Picciano, Anthony G.,
    2. Jeff Seaman, ,
    3. Peter Shea, , and
    4. Karen Swan

    . 2012. “Examining the Extent and Nature of Online Learning in American K–12 Education: The Research Initiatives of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.” The Internet and Higher Education 15(2): 127–35.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
55. ↵
    1. Pufahl, Ingrid, and
    2. Nancy C. Rhodes

    . 2011. “Foreign Language Instruction in U.S. Schools: Results of a National Survey of Elementary and Secondary Schools.” Foreign Language Annals 44(2): 258–88.

    OpenUrl
56. ↵
    1. Reardon, Sean F., and
    2. Ann Owens

    . 2014. “60 Years After Brown: Trends and Consequences of School Segregation.” Annual Review of Sociology 40: 199–218.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
57. ↵
    Ritter, Gary, and Martin F. Lueken. 2013.“Value-Added in a Virtual Learning Environment: An Evaluation of the Arkansas Virtual Academy.” Paper prepared for the Thirty-Eighth Annual Conference of the Association for Education Finance and Policy. New Orleans (March 14–16).
58. ↵
    1. Rivkin, Steven,
    2. Eric Hanushek, , and
    3. John F. Kain

    . 2005. “Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement.” Econometrica 73(2): 417–58.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
59. ↵
    Ruggles, Steven, Katie Genadek, Ronald Goeken, Josiah Grover, and Matthew Sobek. 2015. “Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 6.0” [machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
60. ↵
    1. Sass, Tim R.,
    2. Jane Hannaway, ,
    3. Zeyu Xu, ,
    4. David Figlio, , and
    5. Li Feng

    . 2012. “Value Added of Teachers in High-Poverty Schools and Lower-Poverty Schools.” Journal of Urban Economics 72(2): 104–22.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
61. 1. Schneider, Barbara, and
    2. Guan Saw

    . 2016. “Racial and Ethnic Gaps in Postsecondary Aspirations and Enrollment.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 2(5). doi: 10.7758/RSF.2016.2.5.04.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
62. ↵
    1. Schorr, Jonathan, and
    2. Deborah McGriff

    . 2011. “Future Schools: Blending Face-to-Face and Online Learning.” Education Next 11(3). http://uconnhealth2020.uchc.edu/knowledgebase/pdfs/education/future_schools.pdf (accessed September 14, 2015).
63. ↵
    Shute, Valerie J., and Joseph Psotka. 1994. “Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Past, Present, and Future.” Report 94-17332. Brooks Air Force Base, TX: Armstrong Laboratory, Human Resources Directorate.
64. ↵
    1. Steenbergen-Hu, Saiying, and
    2. Harris Cooper

    . 2013. “A Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems on K–12 Students’ Mathematical Learning.” Journal of Educational Psychology 105(4): 970–87.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
65. ↵
    Streich, Francine E. 2014. Online Education in Community Colleges: Access, School Success, and Labor-Market Outcomes. PhD diss., University of Michigan.
66. Taylor, Eric 2015. “New Technology and Teacher Productivity.” Working paper. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Graduate School of Education.
67. ↵
    U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC). National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). 2014. “State Broadband Initiative.” Washington: USDOC (June 30).
68. ↵
    1. VanLehn, Kurt,
    2. Collin Lynch, ,
    3. Kay Schulze, ,
    4. Joel A. Shapiro, ,
    5. Robert Shelby, ,
    6. Linwood Taylor, ,
    7. Don Treacy, ,
    8. Anders Weinstein, , and
    9. Mary Wintersgill

    . 2005. “The Andes Physics Tutoring System: Lessons Learned.” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 15(3): 147–204.

    OpenUrl
69. ↵
    Watson, John, and Butch Gemin. 2008. “Using Online Learning for At-Risk Students and Credit Recovery.” Vienna, Va.: North American Council for Online Learning.
70. ↵
    Watson, John, Amy Murin, Lauren Vashaw, Butch Gemin, and Chris Rapp. 2012. “Keeping Pace with K–12 Online Learning: An Annual Review of Policy and Practice 2011.” Durango, Colo.: Evergreen Education Group.
71. ↵
    Wicks, Matthew. 2010. “A National Primer on K–12 Online Learning: Version 2.” Vienna, Va.: International Association for K–12 Online Learning.
72. ↵
    1. Xu, Di, and
    2. Shanna Jaggars

    . 2011. “The Effectiveness of Distance Education Across Virginia’s Community Colleges: Evidence from Introductory College-Level Math and English Courses.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 33(3): 360–77.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
73. ↵
    1. Xu, Di, and
    2. Shanna Jaggars

    . 2013. “The Impact of Online Learning on Students’ Course Outcomes: Evidence from a Large Community and Technical College System.” Economics of Education Review 3: 46–57.

    OpenUrl