Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Publications
    • rsf

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Publications
    • rsf
  • Log in
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Advanced Search

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Follow rsf on Twitter
  • Visit rsf on Facebook
  • Follow rsf on Google Plus
Research Article
Open Access

First- and Second-Order Methodological Developments from the Coleman Report

Samuel R. Lucas
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences September 2016, 2 (5) 117-140; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2016.2.5.06
Samuel R. Lucas
aProfessor in the Department of Sociology at the University of California, Berkeley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Additional
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Aigner, Dennis J
    . 1970. “A Comment on Problems in Making Inferences from the Coleman Report.” American Sociological Review 35(2): 249–52.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Akkina, K. R
    . 1974. “Application of Random Coefficient Regression Models to the Aggregation Problem.” Econometrica 42(2): 369–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Alexander, Karl L.,
    2. Doris R. Entwisle, , and
    3. Linda Steffel Olson
    . 2007. “Lasting Consequences of the Summer Learning Gap.” American Sociological Review 72(2): 167–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Barr, Rebecca, and Robert Dreeben, with Nonglak Wiratchai. 1983. How Schools Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  5. ↵
    1. Bowers, William J
    . 1968. “Normative Constraints on Deviant Behavior in the College Context.” Sociometry 31(4): 370–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Bowles, Samuel, and
    2. Henry M. Levin
    . 1968. “The Determinants of Scholastic Achievement: An Appraisal of Some Recent Evidence.” Journal of Human Resources 3(1): 3–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Boyd, Lawrence H., Jr., and Gudmund R. Iversen. 1979. Contextual Analysis: Concepts and Statistical Techniques. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.
  8. ↵
    1. Breen, Richard, and
    2. John H. Goldthorpe
    . 1997. “Explaining Educational Differentials: Towards a Formal Rational Action Theory.” Rationality and Society 9(3): 275–305.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Bruch, Elizabeth E., and
    2. Robert D. Mare
    . 2006. “Neighborhood Choice and Neighborhood Change.” American Journal of Sociology 112(3): 667–709.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Bryan, Mark L., and
    2. Stephen P. Jenkins
    . 2016. “Multilevel Modelling of Country Effects: A Cautionary Tale.” European Sociological Review 32(1): 3–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    Bryk, Anthony S., Valerie E. Lee, and Peter B. Holland. 1993. Catholic Schools and the Common Good. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  12. ↵
    Bryk, Anthony S., and Stephen W. Raudenbush. 1992. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.
  13. ↵
    Bryk, Anthony S., Stephen W. Raudenbush, M. Seltzer, and Richard T. Congdon. 1988. An Introduction to HLM: Computer Program and User’s Guide. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Department of Education.
  14. ↵
    1. Burstein, Leigh,
    2. Robert L. Linn, , and
    3. Frank J. Capell
    . 1978. “Analyzing Multilevel Data in the Presence of Heterogenous Within-Class Regressions.” Journal of Educational Statistics 3(4): 347–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Cain, Glen G., and
    2. Harold W. Watts
    . 1970. “Problems in Making Policy Inferences from the Coleman Report.” American Sociological Review 35(2): 228–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Chubb, John E., and
    2. Terry M. Moe
    . 1988. “Politics, Markets, and the Organization of Schools.” American Political Science Review 82(4): 1065–87.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Coleman, James S
    . 1968. “Equality of Educational Opportunity: Reply to Bowles and Levin.” Journal of Human Resources 3(2): 237–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Coleman, James S
    . 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94: S95–120.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    Coleman, James S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  20. Coleman, James S., Ernest Q. Campbell, Carol J. Hobson, James McPartland, Alexander M. Mood, Frederick D. Weinfeld, and Robert L. York. 1966. Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.
  21. ↵
    Coleman, James, Thomas Hoffer, and Sally Kilgore. 1981. Public and Private Schools: Report to the National Center for Education Statistics. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
  22. ↵
    1. Crain, Robert L
    . 1967. “Review of Equality of Educational Opportunity.” American Journal of Sociology 73(3): 354–56.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Crane, Jonathan
    . 1991. “The Epidemic Theory of Ghettos and Neighborhood Effects on Dropping Out and Teenage Childbearing.” American Journal of Sociology 96(5): 1226–59.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    Csikszentmihalyi, Mihalyi. 1990. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper & Row.
  25. ↵
    1. Dyer, Henry
    . 1968. “School Factors and Equal Educational Opportunity.” Harvard Educational Review 38(1): 38–56.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Ehrenberg, Ronald G., and
    2. Dominic J. Brewer
    . 1995. “Did Teachers’ Verbal Ability and Race Matter in the 1960s? Coleman Revisited.” Economics of Education Review 14(1): 1–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    Elwert, Felix. 2013. “Graphical Causal Models.” In Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research, edited by Stephen L. Morgan. New York: Springer.
  28. ↵
    1. Farkas, George
    . 1974. “Specifications, Residuals, and Context Effects.” Sociological Methods and Research 2(3): 333–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    1. Fuchs, Ira H
    . 2001. “Prospects and Possibilities of the Digital Age.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 145(1): 45–53.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Gamoran, Adam
    . 1987. “The Stratification of High School Learning Opportunities.” Sociology of Education 60(3): 135–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    1. Gamoran, Adam
    . 1992. “The Variable Effects of High School Tracking.” American Sociological Review 57(6): 812–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Gamoran, Adam, and
    2. Mark Berends
    . 1987. “The Effects of Stratification in Secondary Schools: Synthesis of Survey and Ethnographic Research.” Review of Educational Research 57(4): 415–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    1. Gamoran, Adam, and
    2. Robert Dreeben
    . 1986. “Coupling and Control in Educational Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 31(4): 612–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Gamoran, Adam, and
    2. Robert D. Mare
    . 1989. “Secondary School Tracking and Educational Equality: Compensation, Reinforcement, or Neutrality?” American Journal of Sociology 94(5): 1146–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. Garet, Michael S., and
    2. Brian DeLany
    . 1988. “Students, Courses, and Stratification.” Sociology of Education 61(2): 61–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    1. Goldberger, Arthur S., and
    2. Glen G. Cain
    . 1982. “The Causal Analysis of Cognitive Outcomes in the Coleman, Hoffer, and Kilgore Report.” Sociology of Education 55(2–3): 103–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    1. Goldstein, Harvey
    . 1994. “Multilevel Cross-Classified Models.” Sociological Methods and Research 22(3): 364–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    Goldstein, Harvey. 2003. Multilevel Statistical Models. 3rd ed. London: Arnold.
  38. ↵
    1. Goldstein, Harvey,
    2. M. J. R. Healy, , and
    3. Jon Rasbash
    . 1994. “Multilevel Time Series Models with Application to Repeated Measures Data.” Statistics in Medicine 13(16): 1643–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    1. Grant, Gerald
    . 1973. “Shaping Social Policy: The Politics of the Coleman Report.” Teachers College Record 75(1): 17–54.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  40. ↵
    Hanushek, Eric A., and John F. Kain. 1972. “On the Value of ‘Equality of Educational Opportunity’ as a Guide to Public Policy.” In On Equality of Educational Opportunity, edited by Frederick Mosteller and Daniel Patrick Moynihan. New York: Random House.
  41. ↵
    1. Hauser, Robert M
    . 1970a. “Context and Consex: A Cautionary Tale.” American Journal of Sociology 75(4): 645–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. ↵
    1. Hauser, Robert M
    . 1970b. “The Author Replies.” American Journal of Sociology 76(3): 517–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. ↵
    1. Hauser, Robert M
    . 1974. “Contextual Analysis Revisited.” Sociological Methods and Research 2(3): 365–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  44. ↵
    1. Havighurst, Robert J
    . 1967. Review. Journal of the American Statistical Association 62: 1071–73.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Heckman, James J., and
    2. Brook S. Payner
    . 1989. “Determining the Impact of Federal Antidiscrimination Policy on the Economic Status of Blacks: A Study of South Carolina.” American Economic Review 79(1): 138–77.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. Hedeker, Donald, and
    2. Robert D. Gibbons
    . 1994. “A Random-Effects Ordinal Regression Model for Multilevel Analysis.” Biometrics 50(4): 933–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. ↵
    Hedström, Peter. 2005. Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytic Sociology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  48. ↵
    Heyns, Barbara. 1979. Summer Learning and the Effects of Schooling. New York: Academic Press.
  49. ↵
    1. Hoffer, Thomas B
    . 1992. “Middle School Ability Grouping and Student Achievement in Science and Mathematics.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 14(3): 205–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  50. ↵
    1. Horan, Patrick M
    . 1978. “Is Status Attainment Research Atheoretical?” American Sociological Review 43(4): 534–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  51. ↵
    1. Hotchkiss, Lawrence, and
    2. Linda E. Dorsten
    . 1987. “Curriculum Effects on Early Post–High School Outcomes.” Research in the Sociology of Education and Socialization 7(1): 191–219.
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    Hox, Joop. 1995. Applied Multilevel Analysis. Amsterdam: TT-Publikaties.
  53. ↵
    Irby, Nolan Meaders. 1930. “A Program for the Equalization of Educational Opportunities in the State of Arkansas.” PhD diss., George Peabody College for Teachers, Nashville, Tenn.
  54. ↵
    1. Jones, James D.,
    2. Beth E. Vanfossen, , and
    3. Margaret E. Ensminger
    . 1995. “Individual and Organizational Predictors of High School Track Placement.” Sociology of Education 68(4): 287–300.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  55. ↵
    Kreft, Ita, and Jan de Leeuw. 1998. Introducing Multilevel Modeling. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
  56. ↵
    Krueger, Alan B., and Diane M. Whitmore. 2002. “Would Smaller Classes Help Close the Black-White Achievement Gap?” In Bridging the Achievement Gap, edited by John E. Chubb and Tom Loveless. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
  57. ↵
    1. Lindley, D. V., and
    2. A. F. M. Smith
    . 1972. “Bayes Estimates for the Linear Model” (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 34(1): 1–41.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  58. ↵
    1. Little, Roderick J. A
    . 1992. “Regression with Missing X’s: A Review.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 87(420): 1227–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  59. ↵
    1. Looker, E. Diane
    . 1989. “Accuracy of Proxy Reports of Parental Status Characteristics.” Sociology of Education 62(4): 257–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  60. ↵
    Lucas, Samuel Roundfield. 1999. Tracking Inequality: Stratification and Mobility in American Schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
  61. Lucas, Samuel Roundfield. 2008. “School Tracking.” In Encyclopedia of the Life Course and Human Development, edited by Deborah Carr. Farmington Hills, Mich.: Macmillan Reference, USA.
  62. ↵
    1. Lucas, Samuel Roundfield
    . 2009. “Stratification Theory, Socioeconomic Background, and Educational Attainment: A Formal Analysis.” Rationality and Society 21(4): 459–511.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  63. ↵
    1. Lucas, Samuel Roundfield
    . 2014. “An Inconvenient Dataset: Bias and Inappropriate Inference with the Multilevel Model.” Quality and Quantity 48(3): 1619–49.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  64. ↵
    1. Lucas, Samuel R., and
    2. Mark Berends
    . 2002. “Sociodemographic Diversity, Correlated Achievement, and de Facto Tracking.” Sociology of Education 75(4): 328–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  65. ↵
    1. Lucas, Samuel R., and
    2. Mark Berends
    . 2007. “Race and Track Location in U.S. Public Schools.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 25(3): 169–87.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  66. ↵
    Lucas, Samuel R., and Adam Gamoran. 2002. “Tracking and the Achievement Gap.” In Bridging the Achievement Gap, edited by John E. Chubb and Tom Loveless. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
  67. ↵
    Lucas, Samuel R., Steven Ingels, Harrison Greene, and Louise Little. 1987. “Student Data Collection.” In Steven Ingels et al., Field Test Report: National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988 (NELS:88), prepared for U.S. Department of Education, Center for Education Statistics.
  68. ↵
    1. Lucas, Samuel R., and
    2. Alisa Szatrowski
    . 2014. “Qualitative Comparative Analysis in Critical Perspective.” Sociological Methodology 44(1): 1–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  69. ↵
    Luke, Douglas A. 2004. Multilevel Modeling. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
  70. Mack, Raymond W. 1968. Our Children’s Burden: Studies of Desegregation in Nine American Communities. New York: Random House.
  71. ↵
    1. Manski, Charles F
    . 1993. “Identification Problems in the Social Sciences.” Sociological Methodology 23(1): 1–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  72. Manski, Charles F. 1995. Identification Problems in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    1. Mason, William M.,
    2. George Y. Wong, , and
    3. Barbara Entwisle
    . 1983. “Contextual Analysis Through the Multilevel Linear Model.” Sociological Methodology 14(2): 72–103.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  73. ↵
    1. Mickelson, Roslyn Arlin
    . 2001. “Subverting Swann: First- and Second-Generation Segregation in Charlotte-Mecklenberg Schools.” American Educational Research Journal 38(2): 215–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  74. Morgan, Stephen L., and Christopher Winship. 2007. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  75. ↵
    1. Moses, Earl R
    . 1941. “Indices of Inequalities in a Dual System of Education.” Journal of Negro Education 10(2): 239–44.
    OpenUrl
  76. ↵
    Mosteller, Frederick, and Daniel P. Moynihan. 1972. On Equality of Educational Opportunity. New York: Random House.
  77. ↵
    1. Muthén, Bengt O
    . 1994. “Multilevel Covariance Structure Analysis.” Sociological Methods and Research 22(3): 376–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  78. ↵
    1. Nichols, Robert C
    . 1966. “Schools and the Disadvantaged.” Science 154(3754): 1312–14.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  79. Norton, John K. 1926. The Ability of the States to Support Education. Washington, D.C.: National Educational Association.
  80. ↵
    1. Nystrand, Martin, and
    2. Adam Gamoran
    . 1991. “Instructional Discourse, Student Engagement, and Literature Achievement.” Research in the Teaching of English 25(3): 261–90.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Nystrand, Martin,
    2. Lawrence L. Wu, ,
    3. Adam Gamoran, ,
    4. Susie Zeiser, , and
    5. Daniel A. Long
    . 2003. “Questions in Time: Investigating the Structure and Dynamics of Unfolding Classroom Discourse.” Discourse Processes 35(2): 135–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  81. ↵
    1. Oakes, Jeannie
    . 1982. “Classroom Social Relationships: Exploring the Bowles and Gintis Hypothesis.” Sociology of Education 55(4): 197–212.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  82. ↵
    1. Pager, Devah
    . 2003. “The Mark of a Criminal Record.” American Journal of Sociology 108(5): 937–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  83. ↵
    1. Pallas, Aaron M.,
    2. Doris R. Entwisle, ,
    3. Karl L. Alexander, , and
    4. M. Francis Stluka
    . 1994. “Ability-Group Effects: Instructional, Social, or Institutional?” Sociology of Education 67(1): 27–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  84. ↵
    1. Pearl, Judea
    . 2010. “The Foundations of Causal Inference.” Sociological Methodology 40(1): 75–149.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  85. ↵
    1. Pettigrew, Thomas F
    . 1968. “Race and Equal Educational Opportunity.” Harvard Educational Review 38(1): 66–76.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  86. Pfautz, Harold W. 1967. Review. American Sociological Review 32(3): 481–83.
  87. ↵
    1. Phillips, Myrtle R
    . 1932. “Financial Support.” Journal of Negro Education 1(2): 108–36.
    OpenUrl
  88. Plato. 1921. Cratylus. In Plato in Twelve Volumes, vol. 12, translated by Harold N. Fowler. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd. Available at: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0172%3Atext%3DCrat.%3Asection%3D402a (accessed June 28, 2016).
  89. Pinheiro, José C., and Douglas M. Bates. 2004. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer.
  90. ↵
    1. Riehl, Carolyn,
    2. Aaron M. Pallas, , and
    3. Gary Natriello
    . 1999. “Rites and Wrongs: Institutional Explanations for the Student Course-Scheduling Process in Urban High Schools.” American Journal of Education 107(2): 116–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  91. ↵
    1. Robins, James M
    . 1999. “Association, Causation, and Marginal Structural Models.” Synthese 121(1): 151–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  92. ↵
    1. Robins, James M.,
    2. Miguel Angel Hernán, , and
    3. Babette Brumback
    . 2000. “Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology.” Epidemiology 11(5): 550–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  93. ↵
    1. Rosenbaum, James E
    . 1980. “Track Misperceptions and Frustrated College Plans: An Analysis of the Effects of Tracks and Track Perceptions in the National Longitudinal Survey.” Sociology of Education 53(2): 74–88.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  94. ↵
    1. Schelling, Thomas C
    . 1971. “Dynamic Models of Segregation.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1(2): 143–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  95. ↵
    1. Sewell, William H
    . 1967. “Review of Equality of Educational Opportunity.” American Sociological Review 32: 475–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  96. ↵
    1. Sharkey, Patrick, and
    2. Felix Elwert
    . 2011. “The Legacy of Disadvantage: Multigenerational Neighborhood Effects on Cognitive Ability.” American Journal of Sociology 116(6): 1934–81.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Shernoff, David J.,
    2. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, ,
    3. Barbara Schneider, , and
    4. Elisa Steele Shernoff
    . 2003. “Student Engagement in High School Classrooms from the Perspective of Flow Theory.” School Psychology Quarterly 18(2): 158–76.
    OpenUrl
  97. ↵
    1. Slavin, Robert E
    . 1990. “Achievement Effects of Ability Grouping in Secondary Schools: A Best-Evidence Synthesis.” Review of Educational Research 60(3): 471–99.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  98. Snijders, Tom, and Roel Bosker. 1999. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
  99. ↵
    1. Sørensen, Aage Bøttger
    . 1970. “Organizational Differentiation of Students and Educational Opportunity.” Sociology of Education 43(4): 355–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  100. ↵
    1. Sørensen, Aage B., and
    2. Maureen Hallinan
    . 1977. “A Reconceptualization of School Effects.” Sociology of Education 50(4): 273–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  101. ↵
    1. Steele, Fiona,
    2. Harvey Goldstein, , and
    3. William Browne
    . 2004. “A General Multistate Competing Risks Model for Event History Data, with an Application to a Study of Contraceptive Use Dynamics.” Journal of Statistical Modelling 4(2): 145–59.
    OpenUrl
  102. Strayer, George. 1949. The Report of a Survey of the Public Schools of the District of Columbia. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  103. Vaughan, Diane. 1996. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  104. ↵
    1. Wallace, Elsie Hill
    . 1951. “A Study of Negro Elementary Education in North Alabama.” Journal of Negro Education 20(1): 39–49.
    OpenUrl
  105. ↵
    1. Wiatrowski, Michael D.,
    2. Stephen Hansell, ,
    3. Charles R. Massey, , and
    4. David L. Wilson
    . 1982. “Curriculum Tracking and Delinquency.” American Sociological Review 47(1): 151–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  106. ↵
    1. Wilson, Alan
    . 1968. “Social Class and Equal Educational Opportunity.” Harvard Educational Review 38(1): 77–84.
    OpenUrl
  107. ↵
    1. Winship, Christopher, and
    2. Robert D. Mare
    . 1992. “Models for Sample Selection Bias.” Annual Review of Sociology 18: 327–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  108. ↵
    1. Wong, George Y., and
    2. William M. Mason
    . 1985. “The Hierarchical Logistic Regression Model for Multi-level Analysis.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 80(391): 513–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  109. Zellner, Arnold. 1969. “On the Aggregation Problem: A New Approach to a Troublesome Problem.” In Economic Models, Estimation, and Risk Programming: Essays in Honor of Gerhard Tintner, Lecture Notes 15, edited by K. A. Fox, J. K. Sengupta, and G. V. L. Narasimham. New York: Springer-Verlag.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: 2 (5)
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Vol. 2, Issue 5
1 Sep 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
First- and Second-Order Methodological Developments from the Coleman Report
(Your Name) has sent you a message from RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
First- and Second-Order Methodological Developments from the Coleman Report
Samuel R. Lucas
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Sep 2016, 2 (5) 117-140; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2016.2.5.06

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
First- and Second-Order Methodological Developments from the Coleman Report
Samuel R. Lucas
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Sep 2016, 2 (5) 117-140; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2016.2.5.06
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • IMPORTANT DESIGN ELEMENTS OF THE COLEMAN REPORT
    • KEY CRITICISMS OF THE COLEMAN REPORT
    • EXEMPLARY FIRST-ORDER RESPONSES
    • FIRST-ORDER METHODOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS CHALLENGED
    • SECOND-ORDER METHODOLOGICAL RESPONSES
    • WHAT IS TO BE DONE? HARVESTING THE INSIGHTS OF SECOND-ORDER DEVELOPMENTS
    • CONCLUDING REMARKS
    • Acknowledgments
    • APPENDIX A
    • APPENDIX B
    • APPENDIX C
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Additional
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • tracking
  • context effects
  • school organization
  • multilevel model
  • parameter identification
  • agent-based models
  • directed acyclic graphs

© 2025 RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Powered by HighWire