Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Publications
    • rsf

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Publications
    • rsf
  • Log in
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Advanced Search

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Follow rsf on Twitter
  • Visit rsf on Facebook
  • Follow rsf on Google Plus
Research ArticleII. Limitations and Proposals for Change
Open Access

Charting the Relationship of English Learners and the ESEA: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back

Patricia Gándara
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences December 2015, 1 (3) 112-128; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2015.1.3.06
Patricia Gándara
aCo-director of the Civil Rights Project at the University of California, Los Angeles
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Abedi, Jamal
    . 2004. “The No Child Left Behind Act and English Language Learners: Assessment and Accountability Issues.” Educational Researcher 33(1): 4–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Abedi, Jamal, and
    2. Patricia Gándara
    . 2006. “Performance of English Language Learners as a Subgroup in Large-Scale Assessment: Interaction of Research and Policy.” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 25(4): 36–46.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    August, Diane, Claude Goldenberg, and Robert Rueda. 2010. “Restrictive State Language Policies: Are They Scientifically Based?” In Forbidden Language: English Learners and Restrictive Language Policies, edited by Patricia Gándara and Megan Hopkins. New York: Teachers College Press.
  4. ↵
    August, Diane and Kenji Hakuta. 1998. Educating Language Minority Children. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
  5. ↵
    Baker, Keith, and Adriana De Kanter. 1981. “The Effectiveness of Bilingual Education. A Review. Final Draft Report.” Washington: U.S. Department of Education. Available at: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED215010.pdf (accessed July 27, 2015).
  6. ↵
    Bialystok, Ellen. 2001. Bilingualism in Development: Language, Literacy, and Cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  7. ↵
    1. Bialystok, Ellen, and
    2. Fergus I. M. Craik
    . 2010. “Cognitive and Linguistic Processing in the Bilingual Mind.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 19(1): 19–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Bialystok, Ellen, and
    2. Shilpi Majumder
    . 1998. “The Relationship Between Bilingualism and the Development of Cognitive Processes in Problem Solving.” Applied Psycholinguistics 19(1): 69–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    Boyle, Andrea, James Taylor, Steven Hurlburt, and Kay Soga. 2010. “Title III Accountability: Behind the Numbers.” Palo Alto, Calif.: American Institutes for Research. Available at: http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/title-iii/behind-numbers.pdf (accessed July 27, 2015).
  10. ↵
    1. Bryant, Michael J.,
    2. Kimberly A. Hammond, ,
    3. Kathleen M. Bocian, ,
    4. Michael F. Rettig, ,
    5. Cathy A. Miller, , and
    6. Richard A. Cardullo
    . 2008. “School Performance Will Fail to Meet Legislated Benchmarks.” Science 321(5897): 1781–82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Callahan, Rebecca. 2013. “The English Learner Dropout Dilemma: Multiple Risks and Multiple Resources.” Santa Barbara: California Drop out Research Project. Available at: http://www.cdrp.ucsb.edu/pubs_reports.htm (accessed January 12, 2014).
  12. ↵
    1. Callahan, Rebecca,
    2. Lindsey Wilkinson, , and
    3. Chandra Muller
    . 2010. “Academic Achievement and Course Taking Among Language Minority Youth in U.S. Schools: Effects of ESL Placement.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 32(1): 84–117.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    Cummins, James. 1981. “The Role of Primary Language Development in Promoting Educational Success for Language Minority Students.” In Schooling and Language Minority Students: A Theoretical Framework. Los Angeles: California State University Evaluation, Dissemination, and Assessment Center.
  14. ↵
    Danoff, Malcolm N. 1978. “Evaluation of the Impact of ESEA Title VII Spanish/English Bilingual Education Programs.” ED154634. Washington, D.C.: American Institute for Research.
  15. ↵
    1. de Jong, Esther. J., and
    2. Candace A. Harper
    . 2005. “Preparing Mainstream Teachers for English-Language Learners: Is Being a Good Teacher Good Enough?” Teacher Education Quarterly 32(2): 101–24.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    Desilver, Drew. 2013. “U.S. Income Inequality, on Rise for Decades, Is Now Highest Since 1928.” Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center. Available at: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/12/05/u-s-income-inequality-on-rise-for-decades-is-now-highest-since-1928/ (accessed November 12, 2014).
  17. ↵
    1. Durgunoğlu, Aydin Y.,
    2. William E. Nagy, , and
    3. Barbara J. Hancin-Bhatt
    . 1993. “Cross-language Transfer of Phonemic Awareness.” Journal of Educational Psychology 85(3): 453–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    Editorial Projects in Education Research Center. 2013. “Findings from a National Survey of Teacher Perspectives on the Common Core.” Bethesda, Md. EPERC. Available at: http://www.edweek.org/media/epe_survey_teacher_perspctives_common_core_2013.pdf (accessed July 27, 2015).
  19. ↵
    Flores, Edward, Gary Painter, Zachary Harlow-Nash, and Harry Pachon, 2009. “¿Qué Pasa? Are English Language Learning Students Staying in English Learning Classes Too Long?” Policy Brief. Los Angeles: Tomás Rivera Policy Institute, University of Southern California. Available at: http://trpi.org/wpcontent/uploads/archives/LAUSD%20Policy%20Brief.pdf (accessed July 27, 2015).
  20. ↵
    Gándara, Patricia. 2015. “Is There Really a Labor Market Advantage to Bilingualism in the U.S.?” Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service.
  21. ↵
    Gándara, Patricia, Julie Maxwell-Jolly, and Anne Driscoll. 2005. “Listening to Teachers of English Language Learners: A Survey of California Teachers’ Challenges, Experiences, and Professional Development Needs.” Santa Cruz, Calif.: Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning. Available at: http://www.wested.org/resources/listening-to-teachers-of-english-language-learners-a-survey-of-california-teachers-challenges-experiences-and-professional-development-needs (accessed July 27, 2015).
  22. ↵
    1. Gándara, Patricia,
    2. Rachel Moran, , and
    3. Eugene Garcia
    . 2004. “Legacy of Brown: Lau and Language Policy in the United States.” Review of Research in Education 28(1): 27–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    Gándara, Patricia, and Gary Orfield. 2012. “Segregating Arizona's English Learners: A Return to the ‘Mexican Room?’” Teachers College Record 114(9): 1–27. Available at: http://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=16600 (accessed July 27, 2015).
  24. ↵
    1. Gass, Susan M.,
    2. Alison Mackey, , and
    3. Teresa Pica
    . 1998. “The Role of Input and Interaction in Second Language Acquisition: Introduction to the Special Issue. The Modern Language Journal 82(3): 299–307.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    Genesee, Fred, Kathryn Lindholm-Leary, William Saunders, and Donna Christian. 2006. Educating English Learners: A Synthesis of Research Evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  26. ↵
    1. Gifford, Bernard R., and
    2. Guadalupe Valdés
    . 2006. “The Linguistic Isolation of Hispanic Students in California's Public Schools: The Challenge of Reintegration.” Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education 105(2): 125–154.
    OpenUrl
  27. Goldenberg, Claude. 2008. “Teaching English Language Learners.” American Educator (Summer): 8–44. Available at: http://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/periodicals/goldenberg.pdf (accessed July 27, 2015).
  28. ↵
    1. Grubb, W. Norton
    . 2000. “Opening Classrooms and Improving Teaching: Lessons from School Inspections in England.” Teachers College Record 102(4): 696–723.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    Haertel, Edward. 2007. “Declaration of Edward Haertel in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Issuance of Writ of Mandate in Coachella Valley Unified School District et al. v. State of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger et al.” April 23, 2007.
  30. ↵
    Hakuta, Kenji, Yuko Goto Butler, and Daria Witt. 2000. “How Long Does It Take English Learners to Attain Proficiency?” Policy Report no. 2000–01. Santa Barbara: University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
  31. ↵
    Hill, Laura E., Margaret Weston, and Joseph M. Hayes. 2014. “Reclassification of English Learner Students in California.” San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California. Available at: http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/report/R_114LHR.pdf (accessed July 27, 2015).
  32. ↵
    1. Hopkins, Megan
    . 2013. “Building on Our Teaching Assets: The Unique Pedagogical Contributions of Bilingual Educators.” Bilingual Research Journal 36(3): 350–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    Johnson, Hans, and Ria Sengupta. 2009. “Closing the Gap: Meeting California's Need for College Graduates.” San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California. Available at: http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/report/R_409HJR.pdf (accessed July 27, 2015).
  34. ↵
    Kelly, Patrick, and Julie Strawn. 2011. “Not Just Kid Stuff Anymore: The Economic Imperative for More Adults to Complete College.” Boulder, Colo.: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems. Available at: http://www.nchems.org/pubs/docs/NotKidStuffAnymoreAdultStudentProfile-1.pdf (accessed July 27, 2015).
  35. ↵
    Kloss, Hans. 1998. The American Bilingual Tradition, 2nd ed. Washington, D.C.: Delta Systems and Center for Applied Linguistics.
  36. ↵
    Krashen, Stephen D. 1987. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Prentice Hall.
  37. ↵
    Lessow-Hurley, Judith. 2004. The Foundations of Dual Language Instruction, 4th ed. New York: Pearson Higher Education.
  38. ↵
    1. Lillie, Karen,
    2. Amy Markos, ,
    3. Beatriz Arias, , and
    4. Terence Wiley
    . 2012. “Separate and Not Equal: The Implementation of Structured English Immersion in Arizona's Classrooms.” Teachers College Record 114(9): 1–33.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    1. Loeb, Susanna,
    2. James Soland, , and
    3. Lindsay Fox
    . 2014. “Is a Good Teacher a Good Teacher for All? Comparing Value-Added of Teachers with Their English Learners and Non-English Learners.” Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis 36(4): 457–75.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    Martinez-Wenzl, Mary. 2014. “¿Listo para el Colegio? Examining College Readiness Among Latino Newcomer Immigrants.” Ph.D. diss., University of California, Los Angeles.
  41. ↵
    1. Martinez-Wenzl, Mary,
    2. Karla Pérez, , and
    3. Patricia Gándara
    . 2012. “Is Arizona's Approach to Educating Its English Learners Superior to Other Forms of Instruction?” Teachers College Record 114(9): 1–32.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    Maxwell, Leslie. 2013. “Arne Duncan Touts Advantages of Bilingualism.” Learning the Language Blog. Education Week, May 30, 2013. Available at: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/learning-the-language/2013/05/arne_duncan_touts_advantages_o.html (accessed May 17, 2015).
    1. Mehlman Petrzela, Natalia
    . 2010. “Before the Federal Bilingual Education Act: Legislation and Lived Experience in California.” Peabody Journal of Education 85(4): 406–24.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Menken, Kate
    . 2010. “Teaching to the Test: How No Child Left Behind Impacts Language Policy, Curriculum, and Instruction for English Language Learners.” Bilingual Research Journal 30(2): 521–46.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    Meyer, Michael E., and Stephen M. Fienberg. 1992. Assessing Evaluation Studies: The Case of Bilingual Education Strategies. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
  45. ↵
    Moran, Rachel. 1988. “The Politics of Discretion: Federal Intervention in Bilingual Education.” California Law Review 76(6): 1249–351. Available at: http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/californialawreview/vol76/iss6/2/ (accessed November 14, 2014).
  46. ↵
    1. Moran, Rachel
    . 2013. “Untoward Consequences: The Ironic Legacy of Keyes v. School District No. 1.” Denver University Law Review 90(5): 1209–229.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). 2014. “The Nation's Report Card: 2013 Mathematics and Reading Grade 12 Assessments.” NCES 2014087. Washington: National Center for Education Statistics. Available at: http://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_g12_2013/#/ (accessed May 13, 2015).
  48. ↵
    National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2014. “English Language Learners.” Available at: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/pdf/Indicator_CGF/coe_cgf_2014_05.pdf (accessed July 27, 2015).
  49. ↵
    National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. 2005. “Income of U.S. Workforce Projected to Decline If Education Doesn't Improve.” Education Policy Alert. San Jose, Calif.: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. Available at: http://www.highereducation.org/reports/pa_decline/pa_decline.pdf (accessed May 13, 2015).
  50. ↵
    Novak, John R., and Bruce Fuller. 2003. “Penalizing Diverse Schools? Similar Test Scores, but Different Students, Bring Federal Sanctions.” PACE Policy Brief no. 03–4. Berkeley: Policy Analysis for California Education. Available at: http://nepc.colorado.edu/files/EPRU-0312-48-RW.pdf (accessed July 27, 2015).
  51. ↵
    Office for Civil Rights. 1970. “DHEW Memo Regarding Language Minority Children.” Washington: U.S. Department of Education. Available at: http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/lau1970.html (accessed July 27, 2015).
  52. ↵
    Ovando, Carlos, and Virginia Collier. 1985. Bilingual and ESL Classrooms. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  53. ↵
    Porras, Diane, Joy Ee, and Patricia Gándara. 2014. “Employer Preferences: Do Bilingual Applicants and Employees Experience an Advantage?” In The Bilingual Advantage: Language, Literacy, and the U.S. Labor Market, edited by Rebecca Callahan and Patricia Gándara. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    1. Portes, Alejandro, and
    2. Lingxin Hao
    . 2002. “The Price of Uniformity: Language, Family, and Personality Adjustment in the Immigrant Second Generation.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 25(6): 889–912.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  54. Ramirez, David J., Sandra D. Yuen, Dena R. Ramey, David J. Pasta, and David K. Billings. 1991. Longitudinal Study of Structured-English Immersion Strategy, Early-Exit and Late-Exit Transitional Bilingual Education Programs for Language-Minority Children. Final Report. Volumes I & II. San Mateo, Calif.: Aguirre International.
  55. ↵
    Ravitch, Diane. 2011. The Death and Life of the Great American School System. New York: Basic Books.
  56. ↵
    1. Robinson, Joseph
    . 2011. “Evaluating Criteria for English Learner Reclassification: A Causal-Effects Approach Using a Binding-Score Regression Discontinuity Design with Instrumental Variables.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 33(3): 267–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  57. ↵
    1. Ruiz, Richard
    . 1984. “Orientations in Language Planning.” NABE Journal 8(2): 15–34.
    OpenUrl
  58. Rumbaut, Rubén. 2014. “English Plus: Exploring the Socio-Economic Benefits of Bilingualism in Southern California.” In The Bilingual Advantage: Language, Literacy and the U.S. Labor Market, edited by Rebecca Callahan and Patricia Gándara. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  59. ↵
    Ryan, Camille. 2013. “Language Use in the United States: American Community Survey Reports.” ACS-22. Washington: U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: https://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/acs-22.pdf (accessed July 27, 2015).
  60. Santibañez, Lucrecia, and Maria Estela Zárate. 2014. “Bilinguals in the United States and College Enrollment.” In The Bilingual Advantage: Language, Literacy and the U.S. Labor Market, edited by Rebecca Callahan and Patricia Gándara. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  61. ↵
    Schneider, Susan Gilbert. 1976. Revolution, Reaction or Reform? The 1974 Bilingual Education Act. New York: Las Americas.
  62. ↵
    1. Slama, Rachel B
    . 2014. “Investigating Whether and When English Learners Are Reclassified into Mainstream Classrooms in the United States: A Discrete-Time Survival Analysis.” American Educational Research Journal 51(2): 220–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Slavin, Robert E., and
    2. Alan Cheung
    . 2005. “A Synthesis of Research on Language of Reading Instruction for English Language Learners.” Review of Educational Research 75(2): 247–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  63. ↵
    Sunderman, Gail L., Christopher A. Tracey, Jimmy Kim, and Gary Orfield. 2004. “Listening to Teachers: Classroom Realities and No Child Left Behind.” Cambridge, Mass.: Civil Rights Project, Harvard University. Available at: http://civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/K–12-education/nclb-title-i/listening-to-teachers-classroom-realities-and-no-child-left-behind/sunderman-tracey-kim-orfield-listening-teachers.pdf (accessed July 27, 2015).
  64. ↵
    1. Umansky, Ilana M., and
    2. Sean F. Reardon
    . 2014. “Reclassification Patterns among Latino English Learner Students in Bilingual, Dual Immersion, and English Immersion Classrooms.” American Educational Research Journal 51(5): 871–912.
    OpenUrl
  65. ↵
    Valentino, Rachel, and Sean F. Reardon. 2015. “Effectiveness of Four Instructional Programs Designed to Serve English Language Learners: Variation by Ethnicity and Initial English Proficiency.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis forthcoming in print. Online April 1, 2105. Available at: http://epa.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/04/01/0162373715573310.full (accessed July 27, 2015).
  66. ↵
    1. Verhoeven, Ludo T
    . 1994. “Transfer in Bilingual Development: The Linguistic Interdependency Hypothesis Revisited.” Language Learning 44(3): 381–415.
    OpenUrl
  67. ↵
    1. Wiese, Anne-Marie, and
    2. Eugene E. Garcia
    . 1998. “The Bilingual Education Act: Language Minority Students and Equal Educational Opportunity.” Bilingual Research Journal 22(1): 1–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  68. ↵
    1. Willig, Ann C
    . 1985. “A Meta-Analysis of Selected Studies on the Effectiveness of Bilingual Education.” Review of Educational Research 55(3): 269–317.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  69. Zehr, Mary Ann. 2007. “NCLB Seen as a Damper on Bilingual Programs: Some States and Districts Say Testing Requirements May Discourage Efforts.” Education Week, online May 8, 2007.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: 1 (3)
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Vol. 1, Issue 3
1 Dec 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Charting the Relationship of English Learners and the ESEA: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back
(Your Name) has sent you a message from RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Charting the Relationship of English Learners and the ESEA: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back
Patricia Gándara
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Dec 2015, 1 (3) 112-128; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2015.1.3.06

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Charting the Relationship of English Learners and the ESEA: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back
Patricia Gándara
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Dec 2015, 1 (3) 112-128; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2015.1.3.06
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • REAUTHORIZATIONS AND THE EVOLVING LEGISLATION
    • HISTORIC TRENDS IN EDUCATION OF ENGLISH LEARNERS
    • A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE RESEARCH ON PROGRAMS FOR ENGLISH LEARNERS
    • A NEW GENERATION OF RESEARCH ON BILINGUALISM AND ITS BENEFITS
    • LEGAL RIGHTS OF ENGLISH LEARNERS
    • THE UNDOING OF LEGAL RIGHTS
    • A NEW ERA OF ESEA AND THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THE BEA
    • THE CURRENT STATE OF EDUCATION POLICY FOR ENGLISH LEARNERS
    • THE DEMOGRAPHIC IMPERATIVE
    • LOOKING FORWARD
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Shift from Adequacy to Equity in Federal Education Policymaking: A Proposal for How ESEA Could Reshape the State Role in Education Finance
  • Getting to Sesame Street? Fifty Years of Federal Compensatory Education
  • The Quest for a Targeted and Effective Title I ESEA: Challenges in Designing and Implementing Fiscal Compliance Rules
Show more II. Limitations and Proposals for Change

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • bilingual education
  • Bilingual Education Act
  • English (language) learners
  • Title VII
  • Title III

© 2025 RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Powered by HighWire