Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Publications
    • rsf

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Publications
    • rsf
  • Log in
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Advanced Search

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Follow rsf on Twitter
  • Visit rsf on Facebook
  • Follow rsf on Google Plus
Research Article
Open Access

Status and Development: How Social Hierarchy Undermines Well-Being

Poulomi Chakrabarti
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences November 2022, 8 (6) 28-49; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.6.02
Poulomi Chakrabarti
aAssistant professor in the Department of Political Studies at Queen’s University, Canada, and a visiting scholar in the Department of Government at Harvard University, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Poulomi Chakrabarti
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Acemoglu, Daron,
    2. Camilo García-Jimeno, and
    3. James Robinson
    . 2012. “Finding Eldorado: Slavery and Long-Run Development in Colombia.” Journal of Comparative Economics 40(4): 534–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2012.07.003.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Acharya, Avidit,
    2. Matthew Blackwell, and
    3. Maya Sen
    . 2016. “The Political Legacy of American Slavery.” Journal of Politics 78(3): 621–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/686631.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Ahuja, Amit
    . 2019. Mobilizing the Marginalized: Ethnic Parties Without Ethnic Movements. New York: Oxford University Press.
  4. ↵
    1. Alesina, Alberto, and
    2. Edward Glaeser
    . 2004. Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. ↵
    1. Alesina, Alberto, and
    2. Eliana La Ferrara
    . 2000. “Participation in Heterogeneous Communities.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3): 847–904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554935.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Alesina, Alberto,
    2. Stelios Michalopoulos, and
    3. Elias Papaioannou
    . 2016. “Ethnic Inequality.” Journal of Political Economy 124(2): 428–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/685300.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Alexander, Amy C
    . 2012. “Change in Women’s Descriptive Representation and the Belief in Women’s Ability to Govern: A Virtuous Cycle.” Politics & Gender 8(4): 437–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X12000487.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Alter, Karen J, and
    2. Michael Zürn
    . 2020. “Conceptualising Backlash Politics: Introduction to a Special Issue on Backlash Politics in Comparison.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 22(4): 563–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120947958.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Anderson, Cameron,
    2. John Angus Hildreth, and
    3. Laura Howland
    . 2015. “Is the Desire for Status a Fundamental Human Motive? A Review of the Empirical Literature.” Psychological Bulletin 141(3): 574–601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038781.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Baldwin, Kate, and
    2. John Huber
    . 2010. “Economic versus Cultural Differences: Forms of Ethnic Diversity and Public Goods Provision.” American Political Science Review 104(4): 644–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Banerjee, Abhijit,
    2. Lakshmi Iyer, and
    3. Rohini Somanathan
    . 2005. “History, Social Divisions, and Public Goods in Rural India.” Journal of the European Economic Association 3(2/3): 639–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Beaman, Lori,
    2. Esther Duflo,
    3. Rohini Pande, and
    4. Petia Topalova
    . 2012. “Female Leadership Raises Aspirations and Educational Attainment for Girls: A Policy Experiment in India.” Science 335(6068): 582–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1212382.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Bearfield, Domonic
    . 2009. “What Is Patronage? A Critical Reexamination.” Public Administration Review 69(1): 64–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01941.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Bertrand, Marianne, and
    2. Sendhil Mullainathan
    . 2004. “Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination.” American Economic Review 94(4): 991–1013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828042002561.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Bharathi, Naveen,
    2. Deepak Malghan, and
    3. Andaleeb Rahman
    . 2015. “Neighbourhood-Scale Residential Segregation in Indian Metros.” Economic and Political Weekly 54(30): 7–8.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Bhavnani, Rikhil, and
    2. Alexander Lee
    . 2019. “Does Affirmative Action Worsen Bureaucratic Performance? Evidence from the Indian Administrative Service.” American Journal of Political Science 65(1): 5–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12497.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Bloom, Paul
    . 2010. “How Do Morals Change?” Nature 464(7288): 490.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Boyle, Jennifer Ellen
    . 2010. Anamorphosis in Early Modern Literature: Mediation and Affect. London: Ashgate Publishing.
  19. ↵
    1. Brodkin, Karen
    . 1998. How Jews Became White Folks and What That Says about Race in America. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
  20. ↵
    1. Chakrabarti, Poulomi
    . 2019. “One Nation, Many Worlds: Varieties of Developmental Regimes in India.” PhD diss., Brown University.
  21. ↵
    1. Chakrabarti, Poulomi
    . 2021. “The Politics of Dignity: How Status Inequality Shaped Redistributive Politics in India.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3932850. Rochester, N.Y.: Social Science Research Network. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3932850.
  22. ↵
    1. Chandra, Kanchan
    . 2004. Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  23. ↵
    1. Chandra, Kanchan
    . 2006. “What Is Ethnic Identity and Does It Matter?” Annual Review of Political Science 9(1): 397–424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.062404.170715.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    1. Chandra, Kanchan, and
    2. Omar García-Ponce
    . 2019. “Why Ethnic Subaltern-Led Parties Crowd Out Armed Organizations: Explaining Maoist Violence in India.” World Politics 71(2): 367–416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S004388711800028X.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Chauchard, Simon
    . 2014. “Can Descriptive Representation Change Beliefs about a Stigmatized Group? Evidence from Rural India.” American Political Science Review 108(02): 403–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000033.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Coffey, Diane,
    2. Payal Hathi,
    3. Nidhi Khurana, and
    4. Amit Thorat
    . 2018. “Explicit Prejudice.” Economic & Political Weekly 53(1): 47.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Cotterill, Sarah,
    2. James Sidanius,
    3. Arjun Bhardwaj, and
    4. Vivek Kumar
    . 2014. “Ideological Support for the Indian Caste System: Social Dominance Orientation, Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Karma.” Journal of Social and Political Psychology 2(1): 98–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v2i1.171.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    1. Coulthard, Glen Sean
    . 2014. Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  29. ↵
    1. Cramer, Katherine J
    . 2016. The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  30. ↵
    1. Curry, Jessica
    . 2018. “Opinion: Looking Up to Michelle Obama.” New York Times, March 12. Accessed June 5, 2022. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/12/opinion/michelle-obama-portrait-sherald-parker.html.
  31. ↵
    1. Darby, Derrick
    . 2009. Rights, Race, and Recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  32. ↵
    1. Deshpande, Ashwini, and
    2. Thomas Weisskopf
    . 2014. “Does Affirmative Action Reduce Productivity? A Case Study of the Indian Railways.” World Development 64(December): 169–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.05.024.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Dixon, John,
    2. Mark Levine,
    3. Steve Reicher, and
    4. Kevin Durrheim
    . 2012. “Beyond Prejudice: Are Negative Evaluations the Problem and Is Getting Us to Like One Another More the Solution?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35(6): 411–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11002214.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Dubow, Saul
    . 1995. Scientific Racism in Modern South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  35. ↵
    1. Dunning, Thad, and
    2. Janhavi Nilekani
    . 2013. “Ethnic Quotas and Political Mobilization: Caste, Parties, and Distribution in Indian Village Councils.” American Political Science Review 107(01): 35–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000573.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    1. Dusenbery, Maya
    . 2018. Doing Harm: The Truth About How Bad Medicine and Lazy Science Leave Women Dismissed, Misdiagnosed, and Sick. New York: HarperOne.
  37. ↵
    1. Ejdemyr, Simon,
    2. Eric Kramon, and
    3. Amanda Lea Robinson
    . 2018. “Segregation, Ethnic Favoritism, and the Strategic Targeting of Local Public Goods.” Comparative Political Studies 51(9). SAGE Publications Inc: 1111–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017730079.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Esping-Andersen, Gosta
    . 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  39. ↵
    1. Fanon, Frantz
    . 2008. Black Skin, White Masks. New York: Grove Press.
  40. ↵
    1. Fernandez, Sergio,
    2. Samuel Koma, and
    3. Hongseok Lee
    . 2018. “Establishing the Link between Representative Bureaucracy and Performance: The South African Case.” Governance 31(3): 535–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12319.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Finkelman, Paul
    . 2012. “Opinion: The Real Thomas Jefferson.” New York Times, November 30. Accessed June 5, 2022. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/01/opinion/the-real-thomas-jefferson.html.
  42. ↵
    1. Fong, Christina
    . 2001. “Social Preferences, Self-Interest, and the Demand for Redistribution.” Journal of Public Economics 82(2): 225–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00141-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    1. Fraser, Nancy
    . 1995. “From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a ‘Post-Socialist’ Age.” New Left Review 1(212): 68–93.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Freedman, Joshua
    . 2020. “Back of the Queue: Brexit, Status Loss, and the Politics of Backlash.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 22(4): 631–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120949824.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Galanter, Marc
    . 1984. Competing Equalities: Law and the Backward Classes in India. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  46. ↵
    1. Gethin, Amory,
    2. Clara Martínez-Toledano, and
    3. Thomas Piketty
    . 2021. “Brahmin Left Versus Merchant Right: Changing Political Cleavages in 21 Western Democracies, 1948–2020.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 137(1): 1–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjab036.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Golway, Terry
    . 2014. Machine Made: Tammany Hall and the Creation of Modern American Politics. New York: Liveright.
  48. ↵
    1. Griffin, John D., and
    2. Michael Keane
    . 2006. “Descriptive Representation and the Composition of African American Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 50(4): 998–1012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00229.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  49. ↵
    1. Gusfield, Joseph
    . 1986. Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
  50. ↵
    1. Habyarimana, James,
    2. Daniel Posner,
    3. Macartan Humphreys, and
    4. Jeremy Weinstein
    . 2007. “Why Does Ethnic Diversity Undermine Public Goods Provision? An Experimental Approach.” American Political Science Review 101(4): 709–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  51. ↵
    1. Hajnal, Zoltan L
    . 2001. “White Residents, Black Incumbents, and a Declining Racial Divide.” American Political Science Review 95(3): 603–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055401003033.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  52. ↵
    1. Harris, Allison P
    . 2020. “Can Racial Diversity Among Judges Affect Sentencing Outcomes?” Unpublished paper.
  53. ↵
    1. Heller, Patrick
    . 2020. “The Age of Reaction: Retrenchment Populism in India and Brazil.” International Sociology 35(6): 590–609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580920949979.
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    1. Hoekstra, Mark, and
    2. CarlyWill Sloan
    . 2022. “Does Race Matter for Police Use of Force? Evidence from 911 Calls.” American Economic Review 112(3): 827–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20201292.
    OpenUrl
  55. ↵
    1. Hoff, Karla, and
    2. Priyanka Pandey
    . 2006. “Discrimination, Social Identity, and Durable Inequalities.” American Economic Review 96(2): 206–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30034643.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  56. ↵
    1. Hoffman, Kelly M.,
    2. Sophie Trawalter,
    3. Jordan R. Axt, and
    4. M. Norman Oliver
    . 2016. “Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs about Biological Differences between Blacks and Whites.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(16): 4296–4301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    1. Horowitz, Donald
    . 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  58. ↵
    1. Houle, Christian
    . 2017. “Inequality, Ethnic Diversity, and Redistribution.” Journal of Economic Inequality 15(1): 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-016-9340-8.
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    1. Huber, Evelyne,
    2. Charles Ragin, and
    3. John D. Stephens
    . 1993. “Social Democracy, Christian Democracy, Constitutional Structure, and the Welfare State.” American Journal of Sociology 99(3): 711–49.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  60. ↵
    1. Ince, Onur Ulas
    . 2022. “Deprovincializing Racial Capitalism: John Crawfurd and Settler Colonialism in India.” American Political Science Review 116(1): 144–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000939.
    OpenUrl
  61. ↵
    1. Jackman, Mary R
    . 1994. The Velvet Glove: Paternalism and Conflict in Gender, Class, and Race Relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  62. ↵
    1. Jaffrelot, Christophe
    . 2003. India’s Silent Revolution: The Rise of the Lower Castes in North India. New York: Columbia University Press.
  63. ↵
    1. Jensenius, Francesca
    . 2017. Social Justice Through Inclusion: The Consequences of Electoral Quotas in India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  64. ↵
    1. Jost, John T., and
    2. Mahzarin R. Banaji
    . 1994. “The Role of Stereotyping in System-Justification and the Production of False Consciousness.” British Journal of Social Psychology 33(1): 1–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  65. ↵
    1. Jost, John T.,
    2. Mahzarin R. Banaji, and
    3. Brian A. Nosek
    . 2004. “A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo.” Political Psychology 25(6): 881–919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x.
    OpenUrl
  66. ↵
    1. Kalev, Alexandra,
    2. Frank Dobbin, and
    3. Erin Kelly
    . 2006. “Best Practices or Best Guesses? Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Affirmative Action and Diversity Policies.” American Sociological Review 71(4): 589–617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100404.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  67. ↵
    1. Kelman, Herbert G
    . 1973. “Violence without Moral Restraint: Reflections on the Dehumanization of Victims and Victimizers.” Journal of Social Issues 29(4): 25–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1973.tb00102.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  68. ↵
    1. Kohli, Atul
    . 2020. Imperialism and the Developing World: How Britain and the United States Shaped the Global Periphery. New York: Oxford University Press.
  69. ↵
    1. Kolbert, Elizabeth
    . 2018. “There’s No Scientific Basis for Race—It’s a Made-Up Label.” National Geographic, April 1. Accessed June 5, 2022. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2018/04/race-genetics-science-africa/.
  70. ↵
    1. Koonz, Claudia
    . 2003. The Nazi Conscience. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  71. ↵
    1. Kruks-Wisner, Gabrielle
    . 2018. Claiming the State: Active Citizenship and Social Welfare in Rural India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  72. ↵
    1. Kteily, Nour S., and
    2. Alexander P. Landry
    . 2022. “Dehumanization: Trends, Insights, and Challenges.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 26(3): 222–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.12.003.
    OpenUrl
  73. ↵
    1. Kustov, Alexander, and
    2. Giuliana Pardelli
    . 2018. “Ethnoracial Homogeneity and Public Outcomes: The (Non)Effects of Diversity.” American Political Science Review 112(4): 1096–1103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000308.
    OpenUrl
  74. ↵
    1. Kymlicka, Will
    . 1995. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  75. ↵
    1. Lamont, Michèle
    . 2018. “Addressing Recognition Gaps: Destigmatization and the Reduction of Inequality.” American Sociological Review 83(3): 419–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418773775.
    OpenUrl
  76. ↵
    1. Luebbert, Gregory M
    . 1991. Liberalism, Fascism, or Social Democracy: Social Classes and the Political Origins of Regimes in Interwar Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
  77. ↵
    1. Lukes, Steven
    . 1997. “Humiliation and the Politics of Identity.” Social Research 64(1): 36–51.
    OpenUrl
  78. ↵
    1. Lupu, Noam, and
    2. Jonas Pontusson
    . 2011. “The Structure of Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution.” American Political Science Review 105(2): 316–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000128.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  79. ↵
    1. Mansbridge, Jane
    . 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’” Journal of Politics 61(3): 628–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2647821.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  80. ↵
    1. Marwah, Inder S.,
    2. Jennifer Pitts,
    3. Timothy Bowers Vasko,
    4. Onur Ulas Ince, and
    5. Robert Nichols
    . 2020. “Empire and Its Afterlives.” Contemporary Political Theory 19(2): 274–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-020-00391-8.
    OpenUrl
  81. ↵
    1. Mehta, Uday Singh
    . 1999. Liberalism and Empire: A Study in Nineteenth-Century British Liberal Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  82. ↵
    1. Mendelberg, Tali
    . 2022. “Status, Symbols, and Politics: A Theory of Symbolic Status Politics.” RSF: Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(6): 50–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.6.03.
    OpenUrl
  83. ↵
    1. Miguel, Edward, and
    2. Mary Kay Gugerty
    . 2005. “Ethnic Diversity, Social Sanctions, and Public Goods in Kenya.” Journal of Public Economics 89(11–12): 2325–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.09.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  84. ↵
    1. Mill, John Stuart
    . 1865. On Liberty. London: Longmans, Green.
  85. ↵
    1. Moynihan, Daniel Patrick, and
    2. James Q. Wilson
    . 1964. “Patronage in New York State, 1955–1959.” American Political Science Review 58(2): 286–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1952863.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  86. ↵
    1. Mutz, Diana
    . 2018. “Status Threat, Not Economic Hardship, Explains the 2016 Presidential Vote.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(19): E4330–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718155115.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  87. ↵
    1. Nandy, Ashis
    . 1983. The Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery of Self Under Colonialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  88. ↵
    1. Nussbaum, Martha C
    . 2000. “Aristotle, Politics, and Human Capabilities: A Response to Antony, Arneson, Charlesworth, and Mulgan.” Ethics 111(1): 102–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/233421.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  89. ↵
    1. Nussbaum, Martha C
    . 2011. Creating Capabilities. Reprint edition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  90. ↵
    1. Paluck, Elizabeth Levy
    . 2009. “What’s in a Norm? Sources and Processes of Norm Change.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96(3): 594–600.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  91. ↵
    1. Paluck, Elizabeth Levy
    . 2012. “The Dominance of the Individual in Intergroup Relations Research: Understanding Social Change Requires Psychological Theories of Collective and Structural Phenomena.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35(6): 443–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12001288.
    OpenUrl
  92. ↵
    1. Paluck, Elizabeth Levy,
    2. Seth A. Green, and
    3. Donald P. Green
    . 2019. “The Contact Hypothesis Re-Evaluated.” Behavioural Public Policy 3(2): 129–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2018.25.
    OpenUrl
  93. ↵
    1. Pantoja, Adrian D., and
    2. Gary M. Segura
    . 2003. “Does Ethnicity Matter? Descriptive Representation in Legislatures and Political Alienation Among Latinos*.” Social Science Quarterly 84(2): 441–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8402014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  94. ↵
    1. Pardelli, Giuliana, and
    2. Alexander Kustov
    . 2022. “When Coethnicity Fails.” World Politics, February. Cambridge University Press, 1–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887121000241.
  95. ↵
    1. Pettigrew, Thomas F., and
    2. Linda R. Tropp
    . 2006. “A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90(5): 751–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  96. ↵
    1. Piven, Frances Fox, and
    2. Richard Cloward
    . 1979. Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Vintage Books.
  97. ↵
    1. Posner, Daniel
    . 2005. Institutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  98. ↵
    1. Postero, Nancy
    . 2017. The Indigenous State: Race, Politics, and Performance in Plurinational Bolivia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  99. ↵
    1. Preuhs, Robert R
    . 2006. “The Conditional Effects of Minority Descriptive Representation: Black Legislators and Policy Influence in the American States.” Journal of Politics 68(3): 585–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00447.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  100. ↵
    1. Preuhs, Robert R
    . 2007. “Descriptive Representation as a Mechanism to Mitigate Policy Backlash: Latino Incorporation and Welfare Policy in the American States.” Political Research Quarterly 60(2): 277–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907301981.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  101. ↵
    1. Quadagno, Jill S
    . 1994. The Color of Welfare: How Racism Undermined the War on Poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  102. ↵
    1. Rai, Tage S.,
    2. Piercarlo Valdesolo, and
    3. Jesse Graham
    . 2017. “Dehumanization Increases Instrumental Violence, but Not Moral Violence.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(32): 8511–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705238114.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  103. ↵
    1. Rao, Vijayendra, and
    2. Paromita Sanyal
    . 2010. “Dignity through Discourse: Poverty and the Culture of Deliberation in Indian Village Democracies.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 629(1): 146–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716209357402.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  104. ↵
    1. Ravallion, Martin
    . 2016. The Economics of Poverty: History, Measurement, and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190212766.001.0001.
  105. ↵
    1. Ray, Tridip,
    2. Arka Roy Chaudhuri, and
    3. Komal Sahai
    . 2020. “Whose Education Matters? An Analysis of Inter Caste Marriages in India.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 176(August): 619–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.02.011.
    OpenUrl
  106. ↵
    1. Ridgeway, Cecilia
    . 2014. “Why Status Matters for Inequality.” American Sociological Review 79(1): 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122413515997.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  107. ↵
    1. Ridgeway, Cecilia
    . 2019. Status: Why Is It Everywhere? Why Does It Matter? New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  108. ↵
    1. Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and
    2. Hazel Rose Markus
    . 2022. “The Significance of Status: What It Is and How It Shapes Inequality.” RSF: Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(6): 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.6.01.
    OpenUrl
  109. ↵
    1. Robinson, Cedric J
    . 1983. Black Marxism: The Making of the Black Radical Tradition. London: Zed Press.
  110. ↵
    1. Rocha, Rene R.,
    2. Caroline J. Tolbert,
    3. Daniel C. Bowen, and
    4. Christopher J. Clark
    . 2010. “Race and Turnout: Does Descriptive Representation in State Legislatures Increase Minority Voting?” Political Research Quarterly 63(4): 890–907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912910376388.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  111. ↵
    1. Roediger, David R
    . 2005. Working Toward Whiteness: How America’s Immigrants Became White: The Strange Journey from Ellis Island to the Suburbs. New York: Basic Books.
  112. ↵
    1. Roemer, John E
    . 2009. Equality of Opportunity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  113. ↵
    1. Rosenfeld, Michael J
    . 2017. “Moving a Mountain: The Extraordinary Trajectory of Same-Sex Marriage Approval in the United States.” Socius 3(January): 2378023117727658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117727658.
    OpenUrl
  114. ↵
    1. Rueschemeyer, Dietrich,
    2. Evelyne Huber, and
    3. John Stephens
    . 1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  115. ↵
    1. Saini, Angela
    . 2019. Superior: The Return of Race Science. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press.
  116. ↵
    1. Sandbrook, Richard,
    2. Marc Edelman,
    3. Patrick Heller, and
    4. Judith Teichman
    . 2007. Social Democracy in the Global Periphery: Origins, Challenges, Prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  117. ↵
    1. Satia, Priya
    . 2020. Time’s Monster: How History Makes History. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.
  118. ↵
    1. Satia, Priya
    . 2021. “Britain’s Culture War: Disguising Imperial Politics as Historical Debate about Empire.” Journal of Genocide Research, September, 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2021.1968137.
  119. ↵
    1. Scherer, Nancy, and
    2. Brett Curry
    . 2010. “Does Descriptive Race Representation Enhance Institutional Legitimacy? The Case of the U.S. Courts.” Journal of Politics 72(1): 90–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609990491.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  120. ↵
    1. Sen, Amartya
    . 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  121. ↵
    1. Shayo, Moses
    . 2009. “A Model of Social Identity with an Application to Political Economy: Nation, Class, and Redistribution.” American Political Science Review 103(2): 147–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409090194.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  122. ↵
    1. Sidanius, Jim, and
    2. Felicia Pratto
    . 1999. Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  123. ↵
    1. Singh, Prerna, and
    2. Matthias vom Hau
    . 2016. “Ethnicity in Time: Politics, History, and the Relationship between Ethnic Diversity and Public Goods Provision.” Comparative Political Studies 49(10): 1303–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016633231.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  124. ↵
    1. Smith, David Livingstone
    . 2011. Less Than Human: Why We Demean, Enslave, and Exterminate Others. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  125. ↵
    1. Steele, Claude, and
    2. Joshua Aronson
    . 1995. “Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69(5): 797–811.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  126. ↵
    1. Steele, Jennifer, and
    2. Nalini Ambady
    . 2006. “Math Is Hard: The Effect of Gender Priming on Women’s Attitudes.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42(4): 428–36. citeulike-article-id:6089208.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  127. ↵
    1. Stone, Jeff,
    2. Christian I. Lynch,
    3. Mike Sjomeling, and
    4. John M. Darley
    . 1999. “Stereotype Threat Effects on Black and White Athletic Performance.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77(6): 1213–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  128. ↵
    1. Suryanarayan, Pavithra
    . 2019. “When Do the Poor Vote for the Right Wing and Why: Status Hierarchy and Vote Choice in the Indian States.” Comparative Political Studies 52(2): 209–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018758752.
    OpenUrl
  129. ↵
    1. Táíwò, Olúfẹ́mi O
    . 2022. Elite Capture: How the Powerful Took Over Identity Politics (And Everything Else). Chicago: Haymarket Books.
  130. ↵
    1. Tajima, Yuhki,
    2. Krislert Samphantharak, and
    3. Kai Ostwald
    . 2018. “Ethnic Segregation and Public Goods: Evidence from Indonesia.” American Political Science Review 112(3): 637–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000138.
    OpenUrl
  131. ↵
    1. Taylor, Charles
    . 1994. “The Politics of Recognition.” In Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, edited by Charles Taylor and Amy Gutmann. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  132. ↵
    1. Teltumbde, Anand
    . 2017. “Introduction: Bridging the Unholy Rift.” In India and Communism, by B R Ambedkar. New Delhi: LeftWord.
    1. Thorat, Amit, and
    2. Omkar Joshi
    . 2020. “The Continuing Practice of Untouchability in India.” Economic & Political Weekly 55(2): 36–45.
    OpenUrl
  133. ↵
    1. Thorat, Sukhadeo, and
    2. Katherine S. Newman
    . 2007. “Caste and Economic Discrimination: Causes, Consequences and Remedies.” Economic and Political Weekly 42(41): 4121–24.
    OpenUrl
  134. ↵
    1. Tilly, Charles
    . 1998. Durable Inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  135. ↵
    1. Uslaner, Eric M
    . 2012. Segregation and Mistrust: Diversity, Isolation, and Social Cohesion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  136. ↵
    1. Weber, Max
    . 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  137. ↵
    1. Weiner, Myron
    . 1991. The Child and the State in India: Child Labor and Education Policy in Comparative Perspective. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  138. ↵
    1. Wikimedia Commons
    . 2020. “File:Statue of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar in front of Indian Parliament Perennially Directing Its Proceedings Against Social Reaction!.jpg.” Last edited October 30, 2020. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Statue_of_Dr._Babasaheb_Ambedkar_in_front_of_Indian_Parliament_perennially_directing_its_proceedings_against_social_reaction!.jpg.
  139. ↵
    1. Wikimedia Commons
    . 2021. “File:Ms. Mayawati’s Statues Akin to Emblem of India, the Four Asiatic Lions.jpg.” Last updated December 21, 2021. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ms._Mayawati%27s_statues_akin_to_Emblem_of_India,_the_four_Asiatic_lions.jpg.
  140. ↵
    1. Wimmer, Andreas
    . 2016. “Is Diversity Detrimental? Ethnic Fractionalization, Public Goods Provision, and the Historical Legacies of Stateness.” Comparative Political Studies 49(11): 1407–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015592645.
    OpenUrl
  141. ↵
    1. Witsoe, Jeffrey
    . 2013. Democracy against Development: Lower-Caste Politics and Political Modernity in Postcolonial India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  142. ↵
    1. Zinn, Howard
    . 2014. Disobedience and Democracy: Nine Fallacies on Law and Order. 2nd ed. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: 8 (6)
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Vol. 8, Issue 6
1 Nov 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Status and Development: How Social Hierarchy Undermines Well-Being
(Your Name) has sent you a message from RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
14 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Status and Development: How Social Hierarchy Undermines Well-Being
Poulomi Chakrabarti
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Nov 2022, 8 (6) 28-49; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2022.8.6.02

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Status and Development: How Social Hierarchy Undermines Well-Being
Poulomi Chakrabarti
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Nov 2022, 8 (6) 28-49; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2022.8.6.02
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • DEHUMANIZATION AND THE HISTORICAL ROOTS OF STATUS
    • WHY STATUS MATTERS FOR ECONOMIC INEQUALITY
    • WHY STATUS MATTERS FOR DEVELOPMENT
    • REPRESENTATION AND EGALITARIAN POLITICS
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • status
  • development
  • redistribution
  • inequality
  • ethnic politics
  • discrimination

© 2025 RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Powered by HighWire