Inequality and the Status Window: Inequality, Conflict, and the Salience of Status Differences in Conflicts over Resources

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Accominotti, Fabien,
   2. Freda Lynn, and
   3. Michael Sauder

   . 2022. “The Architecture of Status Hierarchies: Variations in Structure and Why They Matter for Inequality.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(6): 87–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.6.05.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Anderson, Cameron,
   2. Daniel R. Ames, and
   3. Samuel D. Gosling

   . 2008. “Punishing Hubris: The Perils of Overestimating One’s Status in a Group.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34(1): 90–101.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Anderson, Elijah

   . 1999. Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City. New York: W. W. Norton.
4. ↵
   1. Arum, Richard, and
   2. Josipa Roksa

   . 2011. Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. ↵
   1. Bell, Daniel

   . 1976. The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. New York: Basic Books.
6. ↵
   1. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

   . 2019. Survey of Consumer Finances, 2019. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Federal Reserve. https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/scfindex.htm.
7. ↵
   1. Brooks, Clem, and
   2. Elijah Harter

   . 2021. “Redistribution Preferences, Inequality Information, and Partisan Motivated Reasoning in the United States.” Societies 11(2): 65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11020065.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Bullock, Heather E.,
   2. Karen Fraser Wyche, and
   3. Wendy R. Williams

   . 2001. “Media Images of the Poor.” Journal of Social Issues 57(2): 229–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00210.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Butterick, Nicholas, and
   2. Shigehiro Oishi

   . 2016. “The Psychological Consequences of Income Inequality.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 11(3): e12304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12304.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Cikara, Mina, and
    2. Jay J. Van Bavel

    . 2014. “The Neuroscience of Intergroup Relations.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 9(3): 245–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614527464.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
11. ↵
    1. Correll, Shelley J., and
    2. Cecilia L. Ridgeway

    . 2006. “Consensus and the Creation of Status Beliefs.” Social Forces 85(1): 431–53.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Cote, Stéphane,
    2. Julian House, and
    3. Robb Willer

    . 2015. “High Economic Inequality Leads Higher-Income Individuals to Be Less Generous.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(52): 15838–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1511536112.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
13. ↵
    1. Cramer, Katherine J

    . 2016. The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. ↵
    1. Destin, Mesmin,
    2. Régine Debrosse,
    3. Michelle Rheischmidt-Same, and
    4. Jennifer A. Richeson

    . 2022. “Psychological Challenges and Social Supports that Shape the Pursuit of Socioeconomic Mobility.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(7): 158–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.7.08.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. DiMaggio, Paul, and
    2. Filiz Garip

    . 2012. “Networks and Inequality.” Annual Review of Sociology 38(1): 93–118.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. ↵
    1. Domhoff, G. William

    . 1998. Who Rules America? Power and Politics in the Year 2000. Houston, Tex.: Mayfield Publishing.
17. ↵
    1. Downs, Anthony

    . 1956. “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy.” Journal of Political Economy 65(2): 135–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/257897.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. EU-SILC

    . n.d. Statistics on Income, Social Inclusion, and Living Conditions. Accessed August 1, 2022. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/income-and-living-conditions/overview.
19. ↵
    1. Fishbacher, Urs, and
    2. Christian Thoni

    . 2008. “Excess Entry in an Experimental Winner-Take-All Market.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 67(1): 150–63.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. ↵
    1. Fiske, Susan T

    . 2011. Envy Up, Scorn Down: How Status Divides Us. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
21. ↵
    1. Frank, Robert H

    . 2001. Luxury Fever: Money and Happiness in an Era of Excess. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22. ↵
    1. Frank, Robert H

    . 2017. Success and Luck: Good Fortune and the Myth of Meritocracy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
23. ↵
    1. Frank, Robert H., and
    2. Phillip J. Cook

    . 1995. The Winner-Take-All Society: Why the Few at the Top Get So Much More Than the Rest of Us. New York: Penguin Books.
24. ↵
    1. Frank, Robert H., and
    2. Phillip J. Cook

    . 2013. “Winner-Take-All Markets.” Studies in Microeconomics 1(2): 131–54.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. ↵
    1. Gilens, Martin

    . 1996. “Race and Poverty in America: Public Misperceptions and the American News Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60(4): 515–41.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. ↵
    1. Grusky, David B., and
    2. Alair MacLean

    . 2016. “The Social Fallout of a High Inequality Regime.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 663(1): 33–52.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. ↵
    1. Hacker, Jacob, and
    2. Paul Pearson

    . 2010. Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer—and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon & Schuster.
28. ↵
    1. Hahl, Oliver,
    2. Minjae Kim, and
    3. Ezra Zuckerman Sivan

    . 2018. “The Authentic Appeal of the Lying Demagogue: Proclaiming the Deeper Truth About Political Illegitimacy.” American Sociological Review 83(1): 1–33.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Halpern, Jake

    . 2007. Fame Junkies: The Hidden Truths Behind America’s Favorite Addiction. Boston, Mass.: Houghton-Mifflin.
30. ↵
    1. Hawdin, James,
    2. Colin Bernatzky, and
    3. Matthew Costello

    . 2019. “Cyber-Routines, Political Attitudes, and Exposure to Violence-Advocating On-Line Extremism.” Social Forces 98(1): 329–53.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Hochschild, Arlie R

    . 2016. Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York: The New Press.
32. ↵
    1. Hout, Michael

    . 2012. “Social and Economic Returns to College in the United States.” Annual Review of Sociology 38(1): 379–400.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
33. ↵
    1. Hundley, Greg

    . 2008. “Assessing the Horatio Alger Myth: Is Self-Employment Especially Beneficial for Those from Less-Advantaged Family Backgrounds?” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 26(4): 307–22.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. International Social Survey Programme (ISSP)

    . 2009. Social Inequality IV. GESIS: Leibniz Institute of Social Sciences.
35. ↵
    1. Inzlicht, Michael, and
    2. Toni Schmader

    . 2012. Stereotype Threat: Theory, Process, and Application. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. ↵
    1. Israel, Emil, and
    2. Amnon Frenkel

    . 2018. “Social Justice and Spatial Inequality: Toward a Conceptual Framework.” Progress in Human Geography 42(5): 647–65.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Iyengar, Shanto

    . 1990. “Framing Responsibility for Political Issues: The Case of Poverty.” Political Behavior 12(1): 19–40.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
38. ↵
    1. Johnson, Wendy, and
    2. Robert F. Krueger

    . 2005. “Higher Perceived Life Control Decreases Genetic Variance in Physical Health: Evidence from a National Twin Study.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88(1): 165–73.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. ↵
    1. Kelly, Nathan R

    . 2019. America’s Inequality Trap. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. ↵
    1. Koenig, Biko

    . 2022. “Politicizing Status Loss Among Trump Supporters in 2020.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(6): 69–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.6.04.

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. Kossinets, Gueorgi, and
    2. Duncan Watts

    . 2009. “Origins of Homophily in an Evolving Social Network.” American Journal of Sociology 115(2): 405–50.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
42. ↵
    1. Kraus, Michael W., and
    2. Nicole M. Stephens

    . 2012. “A Road Map for an Emerging Psychology of Social Class.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 6(9): 642–56.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
43. ↵
    1. Lachman, Margie E., and
    2. Suzanne L. Weaver

    . 1998. “The Sense of Control as a Moderator of Social Class Differences in Health and Well-Being.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(3): 763–73.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
44. ↵
    1. Leicht, Kevin T

    . 2008. “Broken Down by Race and Gender? Sociological Explanations of New Sources of Earnings Inequality.” Annual Review of Sociology. 34(1): 237–55.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
45. ↵
    1. Leicht, Kevin T

    . 2016. “Getting Serious About Inequality.” Sociological Quarterly 57(2): 211–31.

    OpenUrl
46. ↵
    1. Lovaglia, Michael J.,
    2. Jeffrey W. Lucas, and
    3. Shane R. Thye

    . 1998. “Status Processes and Mental Ability Test Scores.” American Journal of Sociology 104(1): 195–228.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
47. ↵
    1. Lowery, Brian S.,
    2. Eric D. Knowles, and
    3. Miguel Unzueta

    . 2007. “Framing Inequity Safely: Whites’ Motivated Perceptions of Racial Privilege.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 33(9): 1237–50.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
48. ↵
    1. Manza, Jeff, and
    2. Clem Brooks

    . 1999. Social Cleavages and Political Change: Voter Realignments and U.S. Party Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
49. ↵
    1. Massey, Douglas S., and
    2. Nancy Denton

    . 1995. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
50. ↵
    1. McPherson, Miller,
    2. Lynn Smith-Lovin, and
    3. James M. Cook

    . 2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
51. ↵
    1. Mendelberg, Tali

    . 2022. “Status, Symbols, and Politics: A Theory of Symbolic Status Politics.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(6): 50–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.6.03.

    OpenUrl
52. ↵
    1. Milanovic, Branko

    . 2010. “Four Critiques of the Redistribution Hypothesis: An Assessment.” European Journal of Political Economy 26(1): 147–54.

    OpenUrl
53. ↵
    1. Mintzberg, Henry

    . 2005. Managers, Not MBAs: A Hard Look at the Soft Practice of Managing and Management Development. New York: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
54. ↵
    1. Morrison, Kimberly Rios,
    2. Nathanael J. Fast, and
    3. Oscar Ybarra

    . 2009. “Group Status, Perceptions of Threat, and Support for Social Inequality.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45(1): 204–10.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
55. ↵
    1. Mutz, Diana C

    . 2018. “Status Threat, Not Economic Hardship, Explains the 2016 Presidential Vote.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(19): E4330–39.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
56. ↵
    1. Niehues, Judith

    . 2014. “Subjective Perceptions of Inequality and Redistributive Preferences: An International Comparison.” UW Trends no. 2. Cologne: German Economic Institute.
57. ↵
    1. Nishi, Akihiro,
    2. Hirokazu Shirado,
    3. David G. Rand, and
    4. Nicholas A. Christakis

    . 2015. “Inequality and Visibility of Wealth in Experimental Social Networks.” Nature 526: 426–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15392.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
58. ↵
    1. Norton, Michael, and
    2. Dan Ariely

    . 2011. “Building a Better America—One Wealth Quintile at a Time.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 6(1): 9–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393524.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
59. ↵
    1. O’Connor, James

    . 1973. The Fiscal Crisis of the State. New York: Routledge.
60. ↵
    1. Phillips, Kevin

    . 1992. Boiling Point: Democrats, Republicans, and the Decline of Middle-Class Prosperity. New York: Random House.
61. ↵
    1. Piff, Paul K.,
    2. Michael W. Krause, and
    3. Dacher Keltner

    . 2018. “Unpacking the Inequality Paradox: The Psychological Roots of Inequality and Social Class.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 57: 53–124.

    OpenUrl
62. ↵
    1. PSID

    . 2022. Panel Study of Income Dynamics, Public Use Dataset. Produced and distributed by the Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
63. ↵
    1. Ridgeway, Cecilia L

    . 2014. “Why Status Matters for Inequality.” American Sociological Review 79(1): 1–16.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
64. ↵
    1. Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and
    2. Hazel Rose Markus

    . 2022. “The Significance of Status: What It Is and How It Shapes Inequality.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(6): 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.6.01.

    OpenUrl
65. ↵
    1. Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and
    2. Sandra Nakagawa

    . 2014. “Status.” In Handbook of the Social Psychology of Inequality, edited by Jane D. McLeod, Edward J. Lawler, and Michael Schwalbe. New York: Springer.
66. ↵
    1. Rodríguez-Bailón, Rosa,
    2. Ángel Sánchez-Rodríguez,
    3. Efraín García-Sánchez,
    4. Katerina Petkanopoulou, and
    5. Guillermo B. Willis

    . 2020. “Inequality Is in the Air: Contextual Psychosocial Effects of Power and Social Class.” Current Opinion in Psychology 33: 120–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.004.

    OpenUrl
67. ↵
    1. Roex, Karlijn L. A.,
    2. Tim Huijts, and
    3. Inge Sieben

    . 2019. “Attitudes Towards Income Inequality: ‘Winners’ versus ‘Losers’ of the Perceived Meritocracy.” Acta Sociologica 62(1): 47–63.

    OpenUrl
68. ↵
    1. Rubens, Jim

    . 2009. OverSuccess: Healing the American Obsession with Wealth, Fame, Power and Perfection. Austin, Tex.: Greenleaf Book Group.
69. ↵
    1. Sakamoto, Arthur

    , ed. 2020. “Occupation, Stratification, and Mobility.” Special issue, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 70 (December).
70. ↵
    1. Sarachek, Bernard

    . 1978. “American Entrepreneurs and the Horatio Alger Myth.” Journal of Economic History 38(2): 439–56.

    OpenUrl
71. ↵
    1. Schmader, Toni,
    2. Tara C. Dennehy, and
    3. Andrew S. Baron

    . 2022. “Why Antibias Interventions (Need Not) Fail.” Perspectives on Psychological Science, May 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211057565.
72. ↵
    1. Schmader, Toni, and
    2. William M. Hall

    . 2014. “Stereotype Threat in School and at Work: Putting Science Into Practice.” Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1(1): 30–37.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
73. ↵
    1. Schor, Juliet

    . 1996. The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure. New York: Basic Books.
74. ↵
    1. Schor, Juliet

    . 1998. The Overspent American: Why We Want What We Don’t Need. New York: HarperPerennial.
75. ↵
    1. Schumpeter, Joseph

    . 2003. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: HarperPerennial.
76. ↵
    1. Schwalbe, Michael, and
    2. Heather Shay

    . 2014. “Dramaturgy and Dominance.” In Handbook of the Social Psychology of Inequality, edited by Jane D. McLeod, Edward J. Lawler, and Michael Schwalbe. New York: Springer.
77. ↵
    1. Scott, James C

    . 1977. The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
78. ↵
    1. Shapiro, Thomas

    . 2017. Toxic Inequality: How America’s Wealth Gap Destroys Mobility, Deepens the Racial Divide, and Threatens Our Future. New York: Basic Books.
79. ↵
    1. Stephens, Nicole M.,
    2. MarYam G. Hamedani,
    3. Hazel Rose Markus,
    4. Hilary B. Bergsieker, and
    5. Liyam Eloul

    . 2009. “Why Did They ‘Choose’ to Stay? Perspectives of Hurricane Katrina Observers and Survivors.” Psychological Science 20(7): 878–86.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
80. ↵
    1. Stephens, Nicole,
    2. Hazel Rose Markus, and
    3. L. Taylor Phillips

    . 2014. “Social Class and Culture Cycles: How Three Gateway Contexts Shape Selves and Fuel Inequality.” Annual Review of Psychology 65(1): 611–34.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
81. ↵
    1. Stephens, Nicole M.,
    2. Hazel Rose Markus, and
    3. Sarah S. M. Townsend

    . 2007. “Choice as an Act of Meaning: The Case of Social Class.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93(5): 814–30.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
82. ↵
    1. Stephens, Nicole M.,
    2. Sarah S. M. Townsend, and
    3. Andrea G. Dittmann

    . 2019. “Social-Class Disparities in Higher Education and Professional Workplaces: The Role of Cultural Mismatch.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 28(1): 67–73.

    OpenUrl
83. ↵
    1. Stephens, Nicole M.,
    2. Sarah S. M. Townsend,
    3. Hazel Rose Markus, and
    4. L. Taylor Phillips

    . 2012. “A Cultural Mismatch: Independent Cultural Norms Produce Greater Increases in Cortisol and More Negative Emotions Among First-Generation College Students.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48(6): 1389–93.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
84. ↵
    1. Tóth, Gergő,
    2. Johannes Wachs,
    3. Riccardo Di Clemente,
    4. Ákos Jakobi,
    5. Bence Ságvári,
    6. János Kertész, and
    7. Balázs Lengyel

    . 2021. “Inequality Is Rising Where Social Network Segregation Interacts with Urban Topology.” Nature Communications 12(1): 1–9.

    OpenUrl
85. ↵
    1. Trump, Kris-Stella

    . 2020. “When and Why Is Economic Inequality Seen as Fair.” Behavioral Sciences 34: 46–51.

    OpenUrl
86. ↵
    1. U.S. Census Bureau

    . n.d. Income Gini Ratio of Families by Race of Householder, White, Hispanic Origin (Any Race), and African American [GINIHARF]. Washington: U.S. Department of Commerce. Accessed July 14, 2022. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GINIHARF.
87. ↵
    1. U.S. Census Bureau

    . n.d. Table H-1: “Income Limits for Each Fifth and Top 5 Percent of All Households: 1967 to 2014.” Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplements. Washington: U.S. Department of Commerce. https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/income-poverty/historical-income-inequality.html.
88. ↵
    1. U.S. Census Bureau

    . n.d. Table 3: “Poverty Status of People by Age, Race, and Hispanic Origin: 1959 to 2020.” Historical Poverty Tables: People and Families—1959 to 2020. Accessed July 14, 2022. Washington: U.S. Department of Commerce. https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/income-poverty/historical-poverty-people.html.
89. ↵
    1. Wilkinson, Richard G., and
    2. Kate E. Pickett

    . 2017. “The Enemy Within Us: The Psychological and Social Costs of Inequality.” European Journal of Social Psychology 47(1): 11–24.

    OpenUrl
90. ↵
    1. Wilson, William Julius

    . 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.