Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Publications
    • rsf

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Publications
    • rsf
  • Log in
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Advanced Search

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Follow rsf on Twitter
  • Visit rsf on Facebook
  • Follow rsf on Google Plus
Research Article
Open Access

The Significance of Status: What It Is and How It Shapes Inequality

Cecilia L. Ridgeway, Hazel Rose Markus
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences November 2022, 8 (6) 1-25; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.6.01
Cecilia L. Ridgeway
aLucie Stern Professor in the Social Sciences, Emerita, at Stanford University, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Cecilia L. Ridgeway
Hazel Rose Markus
bDavis-Brack Professor in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hazel Rose Markus
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

    1. Accominotti, Fabien,
    2. Freda Lynn, and
    3. Michael Sauder
    . 2022. “The Architecture of Status Hierarchies: Variations in Structure and Why They Matter for Inequality.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation of the Social Sciences 8(6): 87–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.6.05.
    OpenUrl
  1. ↵
    1. Adler, Nancy E.,
    2. Thomas Boyce,
    3. Margaret A. Chesney,
    4. Sheldon Cohen,
    5. Susan Folkman,
    6. Robert L. Khan, and
    7. S. Leonard Syme
    . 1994. “Socioeconomic Status and Health: The Challenge of the Gradient.” American Psychologist 49: 15–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Adler, Nancy E., and
    2. Judith Stewart
    . 2010. “Health Disparities Across the Lifespan: Meaning, Methods, and Mechanisms.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1186(1): 5–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Allport, Gordon W
    . 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
  3. ↵
    1. Anderson, Cameron,
    2. Daniel R. Ames, and
    3. Samuel D. Gosling
    . 2008. “Punishing Hubris: The Perils of Overestimating One’s Status in a Group.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34(1): 90–101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Anderson, Cameron,
    2. John A. Hildreth, and
    3. Laura Howland
    . 2015. “Is the Desire for Status a Fundamental Human Motive? A Review of the Empirical Literature.” Psychological Bulletin 141(3): 574–601.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Anderson, Cameron,
    2. Sanjay Srivastava,
    3. Jennifer S. Beer,
    4. Sandra E. Spataro, and
    5. Jennifer A. Chatman
    . 2006. “Knowing Your Place: Self-Perceptions of Status in Face-to-Face Groups.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91(6): 1094–110.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Anderson, Cameron, and
    2. Robb Willer
    . 2014. “Do Status Hierarchies Benefit Groups? A Bounded Functionalist Account of Status.” In The Psychology of Social Status, edited by Joey T. Cheng, Jessica L. Tracy, and Cameron Anderson. New York: Springer.
  7. ↵
    1. Anderson, Cameron,
    2. Robb Willer,
    3. Gavin J. Kilduff, and
    4. Courtney Brown
    . 2012. “The Origins of Deference: When Do People Prefer Lower Status?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 102(5): 1077–88.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Bales, Robert F
    . 1950. Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
  9. ↵
    1. Bales, Robert F
    . 1970. Personality and Interpersonal Behavior. New York; Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
    1. Benjamin, Lehn M
    . 2022. “How Helping Can Reinforce or Attenuate Status Inequalities: The Case of Nonprofit Organizations.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(7): 210–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.7.11.
    OpenUrl
    1. Benard, Stephen,
    2. Long Doan,
    3. D. Adam Nicholson,
    4. Emily Meanwell,
    5. Eric L. Wright, and
    6. Peter Lista
    . 2022. “To Forgive Is Divine? Morality and the Status Value of Intergroup Revenge and Forgiveness.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(6): 122–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.6.07.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Berger, Joseph, M.
    2. Hamit Fisek,
    3. Robert Z. Norman, and
    4. Morris Zelditch
    . 1977. Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation-States Approach. New York: Elsevier.
  11. ↵
    1. Berger, Joseph,
    2. Cecilia L. Ridgeway,
    3. M. Hamit Fisek, and
    4. Robert Z. Norman
    . 1998. “The Legitimation and Delegitimation of Power and Prestige Orders.” American Sociological Review 63(3): 379–405.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Berger, Joseph,
    2. Susan J. Rosenholtz, and
    3. Morris Zelditch Jr.
    . 1980. “Status Organizing Processes.” Annual Review of Sociology 6: 479–508.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Berger, Joseph, and
    2. Murray Webster Jr.
    . 2018. “Expectations, Status, and Behavior.” In Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, 2nd ed., edited by Peter J. Burke. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
  14. ↵
    1. Blumer, Herbert
    . 1958. “Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position.” Pacific Sociological Review 1(1): 3–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Bobo, Lawrence
    . 1999. “Prejudice as Group Position: Microfoundations of a Sociological Approach to Racism and Race Relations.” Journal of Social Issues 55(3): 445–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Botelho, Tristan L., and
    2. Mabel Abraham
    . 2017. “Pursuing Quality: How Search Costs and Uncertainty Magnify Gender-Based Double Standards in a Multistage Evaluation Process.” Administrative Science Quarterly 62(4): 698–730.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Brannon, Tiffany N.,
    2. Hazel R. Markus, and
    3. Valerie J. Taylor
    . 2015. “‘Two Souls, Two Thoughts’, Two Self-Schemas: Positive Consequences of Double Consciousness for Self-Construal and Academic Performance.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 108(4): 586–609.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Brescoll, Victoria L.,
    2. Tyler G. Okimoto, and
    3. Andrea C. Vial
    . 2018. “You’ve Come a Long Way . . . Maybe: How Moral Emotions Trigger Backlash Against Women Leaders.” Journal of Social Issues 74(1): 144–64.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Brown, Tony N., and
    2. R. Jay Turner
    . 2014. “Racial Identity and Allostatic Load: Deepening Our Understanding of the Deleterious Impact of Racism for Blacks.” Presented at the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Las Vegas, Nev. August 19–23, 2011.
  20. ↵
    1. Burdick, Alan
    . 2021. “Measuring the Cost of Racial Abuse in Soccer.” New York Times, July 16. Accessed July 29, 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/16/science/covid-racism-soccer-football-falco.html.
  21. ↵
    1. Cabrera, Susan F., and
    2. Melissa Thomas-Hunt
    . 2007. “‘Street Cred’ and the Executive Woman: The Effects of Gender Differences in Social Networks on Career Advancement.” In Social Psychology of Gender, vol. 24, edited by Shelley Correll. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
  22. ↵
    1. Caselli, Mauro,
    2. Paolo Falco, and
    3. Gianpiero Mattera
    . 2021. “When the Mob Goes Silent: Uncovering the Effects of Racial Harassment through a Natural Experiment.” Department of Economics and Management Working Papers 2021/01. Trento, IT: University of T6rento.
    1. Chakrabarti, Poulimi
    . 2022. “Status and Development.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation of the Social Sciences 8(6): 28–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.6.02.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Cheng, Joey T., and
    2. Jessica L. Tracy
    . 2014. “Toward a Unified Science of Hierarchy: Dominance and Prestige Are Two Fundamental Pathways to Human Social Rank.” In The Psychology of Social Status, edited by Joey T. Cheng, Jessica L. Tracy, and Cameron Anderson. New York: Springer.
  24. ↵
    1. Cheryan, Sapna, and
    2. Hazel R. Markus
    . 2021. “Masculine Defaults: Identifying and Mitigating Hidden Cultural Biases.” Psychological Review 127(6): 1022–52.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Cheryan, Sapna,
    2. Victoria C. Plaut,
    3. Paul Davies, and
    4. Claude Steele
    . 2009. “Ambient Belonging: How Stereotypical Cues Impact Gender Participation in Computer Science.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97(6): 1045–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016239.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Chwe, Michael Suk-Young
    . 2001. Rational Ritual: Culture, Coordination, and Common Knowledge. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  27. ↵
    1. Cohen, Geoffrey. L.,
    2. Julio Garcia,
    3. Nancy Apfel, and
    4. Allison Master
    . 2006. “Reducing the Racial Achievement Gap: A Social-Psychological Intervention.” Science 313(5791): 1307–10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Conway, Michael, M.
    2. Teresa Pizzamiglio, and
    3. Lauren Mount
    . 1996. “Status, Communality, and Agency: Implications for Stereotypes of Gender and Other Groups.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71(1): 25–38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    1. Correll, Shelley J., and
    2. Cecilia L. Ridgeway
    . 2003. “Expectation States Theory.” In The Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by John DeLamater. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
  30. ↵
    1. Correll, Shelley J.,
    2. Cecilia L. Ridgeway,
    3. Ezar W. Zuckerman,
    4. Sharon Jank,
    5. Sara Jordan-Bloch, and
    6. Sandra Nakagawa
    . 2017. “It’s the Conventional Thought that Counts: How Third-Order Inference Produces Status Advantage.” American Sociological Review 82(2): 297–327.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Craig, Maureen A., and
    2. Jennifer Richeson
    . 2014. “‘On the Precipice of a Majority-Minority America’: Perceived Status Threat from the Racial Demographic Shift Affects White Americans’ Political Ideology.” Psychological Science 25(6): 1189–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Cramer, Katherine J
    . 2016. The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  33. ↵
    1. Cuddy, Amy J.,
    2. Susan T. Fiske, and
    3. Peter Glick
    . 2007. “The BIAS Map: Behaviors from Intergroup Affect and Stereotypes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92(4): 631–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Destin, Mesmin,
    2. Régine Debrosse,
    3. Michelle Rheinschmidt-Same, and
    4. Jennifer A. Richeson
    . 2022. “Psychological Challenges and Social Supports That Shape the Pursuit of Socioeconomic Mobility.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(7): 158–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.7.08.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Diekman, Amanda B.,
    2. Emily K. Clark,
    3. Amanda M. Johnston,
    4. Elizabeth R. Brown, and
    5. Mia Steinberg
    . 2011. “Malleability in Communal Goals and Beliefs Influnces Attraction to STEM Careers: Evidence for a Goal Congruity Perspective.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101(5): 902–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Duguid, Michelle M.,
    2. Denise L. Lloyd, and
    3. Pamela S. Tolbert
    . 2012. “The Impact of Categorical Status, Numeric Representation, and Work Group Prestige on Preference for Demographically Similar Others: A Value Threat Approach.” Organization Science 23(2): 386–401.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    1. Emerson, Richard M
    . 1962. “Power-Dependence Relations.” American Sociological Review 27(1): 31–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    1. Espeland, Wendy Nelson, and
    2. Michael Sauder
    . 2016. Engines of Anxiety: Academic Rankings, Reputation, and Accountability. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  38. ↵
    1. Fiske, Susan T
    . 2011. Envy Up, Scorn Down: How Status Divides Us. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  39. ↵
    1. Fiske, Susan T.,
    2. Amy J. C. Cuddy,
    3. Peter Glick, and
    4. Jun Xu
    . 2002. “A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82(6): 878–902.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. ↵
    1. Fiske, Susan T., and
    2. Hazel R. Markus
    . 2012. Facing Social Class: How Societal Rank Influences Interaction. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  41. ↵
    1. Franks, Peter,
    2. Peter Meunnig,
    3. Erica Lubetkin, and
    4. Haomiao Jia
    . 2006. “The Burden of Disease Associated with Being African-American in the United States and the Contribution of Socio-Economic Status.” Social Science & Medicine 62(10): 2469–78.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Gidron, Noam, and
    2. Peter A. Hall
    . 2017. “The Politics of Social Status: Economic and Cultural Roots of the Populist Right.” British Journal of Sociology 68(S1): S57–84.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Goffman, Erving
    . 1956. “The Nature of Deference and Demeanor.” American Anthropologist 58(3): 473–502.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  44. ↵
    1. Goode, William J
    . 1978. The Celebration of Heroes. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  45. ↵
    1. Gould, Roger V
    . 2002. “The Origins of Status Hierarchies: A Formal Theory and Empirical Test.” American Journal of Sociology 107(5): 1143–78.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  46. ↵
    1. Gray-Little, Bernadette, and
    2. Adam R. Hafdahl
    . 2000. “Factors Influencing Racial Comparisons of Self-Esteem: A Quantitative Review.” Psychological Bulletin 126(1): 26–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. ↵
    1. Grusky, David,
    2. Peter A. Hall, and
    3. Hazel Rose Markus
    . 2019 “The Rise of Opportunity Markets: How Did It Happen & What Can We Do?” Daedalus 148(3): 19–45.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Hamedani, MarYam G., and
    2. Hazel Markus
    . 2019. “Understanding Culture Clashes and Catalyzing Change: A Culture Cycle Approach.” Frontiers in Psychology, 10(700): 1–7.
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    1. Harris, Meena
    . 2021. Ambitious Girl. New York: Little, Brown Books for Young Readers.
  50. ↵
    1. Henrich, Joseph, and
    2. Francisco J. Gil-White
    . 2001. “The Evolution of Prestige: Freely Conferred Deference as a Mechanism for Enhancing the Benefits of Cultural Transmission.” Evolution and Human Behavior 22(3): 165–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. ↵
    1. Hochschild, Arlie R
    . 2016. Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York: The New Press.
  52. ↵
    1. Hoebel, Jens, and
    2. Thomas Lampert
    . 2020. “Subjective Social Status and Health: Multidisciplinary Explanations and Methodological Challenges.” Journal of Health Psychology 25(2): 173–85.
    OpenUrl
    1. Holbrow, Hilary J
    . 2022. “When All Assistants Are Women, Are All Women Assistants? Gender Inequality and the Gender Composition of Support Roles.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(7): 28–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.7.02.
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    1. Horne, Christine
    . 2004. “Collective Benefits, Exchange Interests, and Norm Enforcement.” Social Forces 82(3): 1037–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  54. ↵
    1. House, James S., and
    2. David R. Williams
    . 2000. Understanding and Reducing Socioeconomic and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Health.” In Promoting Health: Intervention Strategies from Social and Behavioral Research, edited by Brian D. Smedley and S. Leonard Syme. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
  55. ↵
    1. Hsu, Tiffany
    . 2020. “Corporate Voices Get Behind ‘Black Lives Matter’ Cause.” New York Times, May 31. Accessed July 29, 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/31/business/media/companies-marketing-black-lives-matter-george-floyd.html.
  56. ↵
    1. Hysom, Stuart J
    . 2009. “Status Valued Goal Objects and Performance Expectations.” Social Forces 87(3): 1623–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  57. ↵
    1. James, Sofia
    . 2021. “All California Public School Students Can Now Get Free School Lunches.” LAist, July 21. Accessed July 29, 2021. https://laist.com/news/food/all-california-public-school-students-can-now-get-free-school-lunches.
  58. ↵
    1. Johnson, Cathryn,
    2. Timothy Dowd, and
    3. Cecilia Ridgeway
    . 2006. “Legitimacy as a Social Process.” Annual Review of Sociology 32: 53–78.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  59. ↵
    1. Kalkhoff, Will,
    2. David Melamed,
    3. Josh Pollock,
    4. Brennan Miller,
    5. Jon Overton, and
    6. Matthew Pfeiffer
    . 2020. “Cracking the Black Box: Capturing the Role of Expectation States in Status Processes.” Social Psychology Quarterly 83(1): 26–48.
    OpenUrl
  60. ↵
    1. Kang, Cecilia
    . 2014. “Google Data-Mines Its Approach to Promoting Women.” Washington Post, April 2. Accessed July 29, 2021. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2014/04/02/google-data-mines-its-women-problem/.
  61. ↵
    1. Karpowitz, Christopher F., and
    2. Tali Mendelberg
    . 2014. The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  62. ↵
    1. Keltner, Dacher,
    2. Deborah H. Gruenfeld, and
    3. Cameron Anderson
    . 2003. “Power, Approach, and Inhibition.” Psychological Review 110(2): 265–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Koenig, Biko
    . 2022. “Politiczing Status Loss Among Trump Supporters in 2020.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation of the Social Sciences 8(6): 69–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.6.04.
    OpenUrl
  63. ↵
    1. Korver-Glenn, Elizabeth
    . 2018. “Compounding Inequalities: How Racial Stereotypes and Discrimination Accumulate Across the Stages of Housing Exchange.” American Sociological Review 83(4): 627–56.
    OpenUrl
  64. ↵
    1. Kraus, Michael W.,
    2. Stéphane Côté, and
    3. Dacher Keltner
    . 2010. “Social Class, Contextualism, and Empathic Accuracy.” Psychological Science 21(11): 1716–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  65. ↵
    1. Krendl, Anne C.,
    2. Jennifer A. Richeson,
    3. William M. Kelley, and
    4. Todd F. Heatherton
    . 2008. “The Negative Consequences of Threat: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of the Neural Mechanisms Underlying Women’s Underperformance in Math.” Psychological Science 19(2): 168–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  66. ↵
    1. Krysan, Maria,
    2. Mick P. Cooper,
    3. Reynolds Farley, and
    4. Tyrone Forman
    . 2009. “Does Race Matter in Neighborhood Preferences? Results from a Video Experiment.” American Journal of Sociology 115(2): 527–29.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Lareau, Annette
    . 2022. “Downplaying Themselves, Upholding Men’s Status: Women’s Deference to Men in Wealthy Families.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(7): 112–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.7.06.
    OpenUrl
    1. Leicht, Kevin T
    . 2022. “Inequality and the Status Window: Inequality, Conflict, and the Salience of Status Differences in Conflicts over Resources.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(6): 103–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.6.06.
    OpenUrl
  67. ↵
    1. Levine, Cynthia S.,
    2. Hazel R. Markus,
    3. Makeda K. Austin,
    4. Edith Chen, and
    5. Gregory E. Miller
    . 2019. “Students of Color Show Health Advantages When They Attend Schools That Emphasize the Value of Diversity.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116(13): 6013–18.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. ↵
    1. Liu, Songqui,
    2. Pei Liu,
    3. Mo Wang, and
    4. Baoshan Zhang
    . 2021. “Effectiveness of Stereotype Threat Interventions: A Meta-Analytic Review.” Journal of Applied Psychology 106(6): 921–49.
    OpenUrl
  69. ↵
    1. Livingston, Robert W.,
    2. Ashleigh S. Rosette, and
    3. Ella F. Washington
    . 2012. “Can an Agentic Black Woman Get Ahead? The Impact of Race and Interpersonal Dominance on Perceptions of Female Leaders.” Psychological Science 23(4): 354–58.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Lynn, Freda B.,
    2. Joel M. Podolny, and
    3. Lin Tao
    . 2009. “A Sociological (De)Construction of the Relationship between Status and Quality.” American Journal of Sociology 115(3): 755–804.
    OpenUrl
  71. ↵
    1. Magee, Joe C., and
    2. Adam Galinsky
    . 2008. “Social Hierarchy: The Self-Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status.” Academy of Management Annals 2(1): 351–98.
    OpenUrl
    1. Maloney, E. K.,
    2. Kimberly Rogers, and
    3. Lynn Smith-Lovin
    . 2022. “Status as Deference: Cultural Meaning as a Source of Occupational Behavior.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(7): 70–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.7.04.
    OpenUrl
    1. Manago, Bianca,
    2. Jane Sell, and
    3. Carla Goar
    . 2022. “Racial and Ethnic Status Distinctions and Discrimination: The Effects of Prior Contact and Group Interaction.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(7): 132–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.7.07.
    OpenUrl
  72. ↵
    1. Markus, Hazel R., and
    2. Shinobu Kitayama
    . 1994. “A Collective Fear of the Collective: Implications for Selves and Theories of Selves.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20(5): 568–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  73. ↵
    1. Marmot, M. G.,
    2. George D. Smith,
    3. Stephen Stansfield,
    4. Chandra Patel,
    5. Fiona North,
    6. Jenny Head,
    7. Ian White,
    8. Eric Brunner, and
    9. Amanda Feeney
    . 1991. “Health Inequalities Among British Civil Servants: The Whitehall II Study.” The Lancet 337(8754): 1387–93.
    OpenUrl
  74. ↵
    1. Melamed, David,
    2. Christopher W. Munn,
    3. Leanne Barry,
    4. Bradley Montgomery, and
    5. Oneya F. Okuwobi
    . 2019. “Status Characteristics, Implicit Bias, and the Production of Racial Inequality.” American Sociological Review 84(6): 1013–1036.
    OpenUrl
    1. Mendelberg, Tali
    . 2022. “Status, Symbols, and Politics: A Theory of Symbolic Status Politics.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation of the Social Sciences 8(6): 50–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.6.03.
    OpenUrl
  75. ↵
    1. Mendes, Wendy B.,
    2. Jim Blascovich,
    3. Brian Lickel, and
    4. Sarah Hunter
    . 2002. “Challenge and Threat During Social Interactions with White and Black Men.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28(7): 939–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  76. ↵
    1. Mutz, Diana C
    . 2018. “Status Threat, Not Economic Hardship, Explains the 2016 Presidential Vote.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115(19): E4330–39.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Nazar, Kevin,
    2. Roberta Spalter-Roth, and
    3. James C. Witte
    . 2022. “Who Gets Accepted and Who Gets Rejected? Status in the Production of Social Science.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(7): 192–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.7.10.
    OpenUrl
  77. ↵
    1. Phelan, Jo C., and
    2. Bruce G. Link
    . 2015. “Is Racism a Fundamental Cause of Inequalities in Health?”Annual Review of Sociology 41: 311–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Podolny, Joel M
    . 2005. Status Signals: A Sociological Study of Market Competition. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
    1. Portocarrero, Sandra, and
    2. James T. Carter
    . 2022. “‘But the Fellows Are Simply Diversity Hires!’ How Organizational Contexts Influence Status Beliefs.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(7): 172–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.7.09.
    OpenUrl
    1. Quadlin, Natasha
    . 2022. “Do Perceptions of Privilege Enhance—or Impede—Perceptions of Intelligence? Evidence from a National Survey Experiment.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(7): 48–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.7.03.
    OpenUrl
  78. ↵
    1. Rai, Tage. S., and
    2. Alan P. Fiske
    . 2011. “Moral Psychology Is Relationship Regulation: Moral Motives for Unity, Hierarchy, Equality, and Proportionality.” Psychological Review 118(1): 57–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Ridgeway, Cecilia L
    . 2011. Framed By Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World. New York: Oxford University Press.
  80. ↵
    1. Ridgeway, Cecilia L
    . 2014. “Why Status Matters for Inequality.” American Sociological Review 79(1): 1–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  81. ↵
    1. Ridgeway, Cecilia L
    . 2019. Status: Why Is It Everywhere? Why Does It Matter? New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  82. ↵
    1. Ridgeway, Cecilia L.,
    2. Kristen Backor,
    3. Yan E. Li,
    4. Justine E. Tinkler, and
    5. Kristan G. Erickson
    . 2009. “How Easily Does a Social Difference Become a Status Distinction? Gender Matters.” American Sociological Review 74(1): 44–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  83. ↵
    1. Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and
    2. Sandra Nakagawa
    . 2014. “Status.” In Handbook of the Social Psychology of Inequality, edited by Jane D. McLeod, Edward J. Lawler, and Michael Schwalbe. New York: Springer Publishers.
  84. ↵
    1. Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and
    2. Shelley J. Correll
    . 2004. “Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Cultural Beliefs and Social Relations.” Gender and Society 18(4): 510–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  85. ↵
    1. Ridgeway, Cecilia L
    . 2006. “Consensus and the Creation of Status Beliefs.” Social Forces 85(1): 431–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  86. ↵
    1. Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and
    2. David Diekema
    . 1989. “Dominance and Collective Hierarchy Formation in Male and Female Task Groups.” American Sociological Review 54(1): 79–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  87. ↵
    1. Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and
    2. Kristan Glasgow Erickson
    . 2000. “Creating and Spreading Status Beliefs.” American Journal of Sociology 106(3): 579–615.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  88. ↵
    1. Ridgeway, Cecilia L.,
    2. Kristen Backor,
    3. Yan E. Li,
    4. Justine E. Tinkler, and
    5. Kristan G. Erickson
    . 2009. “How Easily Does a Social Difference Become a Status Distinction? Gender Matters.” American Sociological Review 74(1): 44–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  89. ↵
    1. Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and
    2. Susan R. Fisk
    . 2012. “Class Rules, Status Dynamics, and Gateway Interactions.” In Facing Social Class: How Societal Rank Influences Interaction, edited by Susan T. Fiske and Hazel R. Markus. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  90. ↵
    1. Ridgeway, Cecilia L.,
    2. Cathryn Johnson, and
    3. David Diekema
    . 1994. “External Status, Legitimacy, and Compliance in Male and Female Groups.” Social Forces 72(4): 1051–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  91. ↵
    1. Rivera, Lauren A
    . 2015. Pedigree: How Elite Students Get Elite Jobs. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  92. ↵
    1. Rosette, Ashleigh S., and
    2. Robert W. Livingston
    . 2012. “Failure Is Not an Option for Black Women: Effects of Organizational Performance on Leaders with Single Versus Dual-Subordinate Identities.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48(5): 1162–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  93. ↵
    1. Rudman, Laurie A.,
    2. Corinne A. Moss-Racusin,
    3. Julie E. Phelan, and
    4. Sanne Nauts
    . 2012. “Status Incongruity and Backlash Effects: Defending the Gender Hierarchy Motivates Prejudice Against Female Leaders.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48(1): 165–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  94. ↵
    1. Schmader, Toni, and
    2. William M. Hall
    . 2014. “Stereotype Threat in School and at Work: Putting Science Into Practice.” Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1(1): 30–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  95. ↵
    1. Seachrist, Gretchen B., and
    2. Charles Stangor
    . 2001. “Perceived Consensus Influences Intergroup Behavior and Stereotype Accessibility.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80(4): 645–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  96. ↵
    1. Sewell, William H
    . 1992. “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation.” American Journal of Sociology 98(1): 1–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  97. ↵
    1. Shih, Margaret,
    2. Todd L. Pittinsky, and
    3. Nalini Ambady
    . 1999. “Stereotype Susceptibility: Identity Salience and Shifts in Quantitative Performance.” Psychological Science 10(1): 80–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  98. ↵
    1. Steele, Claude M
    . 2010. Whistling Vivaldi: And Other Clues to How Stereotypes Affect Us. New York: W. W. Norton.
  99. ↵
    1. Stephens, Nicole M.,
    2. Stephanie A. Fryberg, and
    3. Hazel R. Markus
    . 2012. “It’s Your Choice: How the Middle Class Model of Independence Disadvantages Working Class Americans.” In Facing Social Class: How Societal Rank Influences Interaction, edited by Susan T. Fiske and Hazel R. Markus. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  100. ↵
    1. Stephens, Nicole M.,
    2. Tiffany N. Brannon,
    3. Hazel R. Markus, and
    4. Jessica E. Nelson
    . 2015. “Feeling at Home in College: Fortifying School-Relevant Selves to Reduce Social Class Disparities in Higher Education: The Importance of Fit and Empowerment.” Social Issues and Policy Review 9(1): 1–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  101. ↵
    1. Tajfel, Henri, and
    2. John C. Turner
    . 1986. “The Social Identity Theory of Inter-Group Behavior.” In Psychology of Inter-Group Relations, edited by Stephen Worchel and William G. Austin. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
  102. ↵
    1. Thomas, Catherine C.,
    2. Nicholas G. Otis,
    3. Justin R. Abraham,
    4. Hazel R. Markus, and
    5. Gregory M. Walton
    . 2020. “Toward a Science of Delivering Aid with Dignity: Experimental Evidence and Local Forecasts From Kenya.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 117(27): 15546–53.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  103. ↵
    1. Thomas, Kyle A.,
    2. Peter DeScioli,
    3. Omare Sultan Haque, and
    4. Steven Pinker
    . 2014. “The Psychology of Coordination and Common Knowledge.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 107(4): 657–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  104. ↵
    1. Thye, Shane R
    . 2000. “A Status Value Theory of Power in Exchange Relations.” American Sociological Review 65(3): 407–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  105. ↵
    1. Tilly, Charles
    . 1998. Durable Inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  106. ↵
    1. Triandis, Harry C
    . 1995. “The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts.” In The Culture and Psychology Reader, edited by Nancy R. Goldberger and Joanne B. Veroff. New York: New York University Press.
  107. ↵
    1. Troyer, Lisa, and
    2. C. Wesley Younts
    . 1997. “Whose Expectations Matter? The Relative Power of First- and Second-Order Expectations in Determining Social Influence.” American Journal of Sociology 103(3): 692–732.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  108. ↵
    1. Twenge, Jean M., and
    2. Jennifer Crocker
    . 2002. “Race and Self-Esteem: Meta-Analyses Comparing Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and American Indians and Comment on Gray-Little and Hafdahl (2000).” Psychological Bulletin 128(3): 371–408.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Valentino, Lauren
    . 2022. “Status Lenses: Mapping Hierarchy and Consensus in Status Beliefs.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(7): 89–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.7.05.
    OpenUrl
  109. ↵
    1. Van Kleef, Gerben A., and
    2. Joey T. Cheng
    . 2020. “Power, Status, and Hierarchy: Current Trends and Future Challenges.” Current Opinion in Psychology 33: v–xiv.
    OpenUrl
  110. ↵
    1. Van Vugt, Mark, and
    2. Joshua M. Tybur
    . 2016. “The Evolutionary Foundations of Hierarchy: Status, Dominance, Prestige, and Leadership.” In Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, 2nd ed., edited by David M. Buss. New York: Wiley.
  111. ↵
    1. Vance, J. D
    . 2016. Hillbilly Elegy: A Memoir of a Family and Culture in Crisis. New York: Harper Collins.
  112. ↵
    1. Veblen, Thorstein
    . (1899) 1953. The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: New American Library.
  113. ↵
    1. Vignoles, Vivian L.,
    2. Elinor Owe,
    3. Maja Becker,
    4. Peter B. Smith,
    5. Matthew J. Easterbrook,
    6. Rupert Brown,
    7. Roberto González,
    8. Nicolas Didier, et al
    . 2016. “Beyond the ‘East–West’ Dichotomy: Global Variation in Cultural Models of Selfhood.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 145(8): 966–1000.
    OpenUrl
  114. ↵
    1. Walton, Gregory M., and
    2. Geoffrey L. Cohen
    . 2011. “A Brief Social-belonging Intervention Improves Academic and Health Outcomes of Minority Students.” Science 331(6023): 1447–51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  115. ↵
    1. Walton, Gregory M., and
    2. Alia J. Crum
    . 2021. Handbook of Wise Interventions: How Social Psychology Can Help People Change. New York: Guilford Press.
  116. ↵
    1. Walton, Gregory M.,
    2. Christine Logel,
    3. Jennifer M. Peach,
    4. Steven J. Spencer, and
    5. Mark P. Zanna
    . 2015. “Two Brief Interventions to Mitigate a ‘Chilly Climate’ Transform Women’s Experience, Relationships, and Achievement in Engineering.” Journal of Educational Psychology 107(2): 468–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  117. ↵
    1. Walton, Gregory M., and
    2. Timothy D. Wilson
    . 2018. “Wise Interventions: Psychological Remedies for Social and Personal Problems.” Psychological Review 125(5): 617–55.
    OpenUrl
  118. ↵
    1. Weber, Max
    . (1918) 1968. Economy and Society. Edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Translated by Ephraim Frischoff. New York: Bedminster.
  119. ↵
    1. Webster, Murray, and
    2. James E. Driskell
    . 1978. “Status Generalization: A Review and Some New Data.” American Sociological Review 43(2): 220–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  120. ↵
    1. Wetts, Rachel, and
    2. Robb Willer
    . 2018. “Privilege on the Precipice: Perceived Racial Status Threats Lead White Americans to Oppose Welfare Programs.” Social Forces 97(2): 793–822.
    OpenUrl
  121. ↵
    1. Wilkinson, Richard G
    . 2000. Mind the Gap: Hierarchies, Health, and Human Evolution. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
  122. ↵
    1. Williams, Melissa J., and
    2. Larissa Z. Tiedens
    . 2016. “The Subtle Suspension of Backlash: A Meta-analysis of Penalties for Women’s Implicit and Explicit Dominance Behavior.” Psychological Bulletin 142(2): 165–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  123. ↵
    1. Wynn, Alison T., and
    2. Shelley J. Correll
    . 2018. “Puncturing the Pipeline: Do Technology Companies Alienate Women in Recruiting Sessions?” Social Studies of Science 48(1): 149–64.
    OpenUrl
  124. ↵
    1. Zelditch, Morris, Jr.
    . 2018. “Legitimacy Theory.” In Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, 2nd ed., edited by Peter J. Burke. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: 8 (6)
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Vol. 8, Issue 6
1 Nov 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Significance of Status: What It Is and How It Shapes Inequality
(Your Name) has sent you a message from RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Significance of Status: What It Is and How It Shapes Inequality
Cecilia L. Ridgeway, Hazel Rose Markus
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Nov 2022, 8 (6) 1-25; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2022.8.6.01

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Significance of Status: What It Is and How It Shapes Inequality
Cecilia L. Ridgeway, Hazel Rose Markus
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Nov 2022, 8 (6) 1-25; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2022.8.6.01
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • STATUS: WHAT IS IT?
    • THE MULTILEVEL AND SOCIOCULTURAL NATURE OF STATUS
    • SIGNIFICANCE OF STATUS FOR INEQUALITY BASED ON GROUP IDENTITY
    • FINAL THOUGHTS
    • A LOOK AHEAD TO THE ARTICLES
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • status
  • inequality
  • sociocultural schema
  • gender
  • race

© 2025 RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Powered by HighWire