Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Publications
    • rsf

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Publications
    • rsf
  • Log in
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Advanced Search

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Follow rsf on Twitter
  • Visit rsf on Facebook
  • Follow rsf on Google Plus
Research Article
Open Access

Sensemaking in the Legal System: A Comparative Case Study of Changes to Monetary Sanction Laws

Tyler Smith, Kristina J. Thompson, Michele Cadigan
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences January 2022, 8 (1) 63-81; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.1.03
Tyler Smith
aPh.D. students of sociology at the University of Washington, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kristina J. Thompson
aPh.D. students of sociology at the University of Washington, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michele Cadigan
bAssistant professor of Criminal Justice and Criminology at Georgia Southern University, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michele Cadigan
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Berger, Peter L., and
    2. Hansfried Kelner
    . 1981. Socially Interpreted: An Essay on Method and Vocations. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
  2. ↵
    1. Berger, Peter L., and
    2. Thomas Luckmann
    . 1967. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Doubleday.
  3. ↵
    1. Clair, Matthew
    . 2020. Privilege and Punishment: How Race and Class Matter in Criminal Court. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  4. ↵
    1. DiMaggio, Paul J., and
    2. Walter W. Powell
    . 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48(2): 147–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Dixon, Jo
    . 1995. “The Organizational Context of Criminal Sentencing.” American Journal of Sociology 100(5): 1157–198.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Eisenstein, James,
    2. Roy Flemming, and
    3. Peter Nardulli
    . 1988. The Contours of Justice: Communities and Their Courts. Boston, Mass.: Little Brown.
  7. ↵
    1. Emerson, Robert M,
    2. Rachel I. Fretz, and
    3. Linda L. Shaw
    . 2011. Writing Ethnographic Field Notes, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  8. ↵
    1. Engen, Rodney L., and
    2. Sara Steen
    . 2000. “The Power to Punish: Discretion and Sentencing Reform in the War on Drugs.” American Journal of Sociology 105(5): 1357–395.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Flemming, Roy,
    2. Peter Nardulli, and
    3. James Eisenstein
    . 1992. The Craft of Justice: Politics and Work in Criminal Court Communities. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  10. ↵
    1. Fligstein, Neil, and
    2. Douglas McAdam
    . 2011. “Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields.” Sociological Theory 29(1): 1–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Friedman, Brittany,
    2. Alexes Harris,
    3. Beth M. Huebner,
    4. Karin Martin,
    5. Pettit Becky,
    6. Sarah K.S. Shannon, and
    7. Bryan L. Sykes
    . 2022. “What Is Wrong with Monetary Sanctions? Directions for Policy, Practice, and Research.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(1): 221–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.1.10.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Harris, Alexes,
    2. Mary Pattillo, and
    3. Bryan L. Sykes
    . 2022. “Studying the System of Monetary Sanctions.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(1): 1–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.1.01.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Hester, Rhys
    . 2017. “Judicial Rotation as Centripetal Force: Sentencing in the Court Communities of South Carolina.” Criminology 55(1): 205–35.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Huebner, Beth M., and
    2. Andrea Giuffre
    . 2022. “Reinforcing the Web of Municipal Courts: Evidence and Implications Post-Ferguson.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(1): 108–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.1.05.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Johnson, Brian D.
    2005. “Contextual Disparities in Guidelines Departures.” Criminology 43(3): 761–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Kirk, Gabriela,
    2. Kristina J. Thompson,
    3. Beth M. Huebner,
    4. Christopher Uggen, and
    5. Sarah K.S. Shannon
    . 2022. “Justice by Geography: The Role of Monetary Sanctions Across Communities.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(1): 200–220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.1.09.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Martin, Karin D.,
    2. Kimberley Spencer-Suarez, and
    3. Gabriela Kirk
    . 2022. “Pay or Display: Monetary Sanctions and the Performance of Accountability and Procedural Integrity in New York and Illinois Courts.” RSF: Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(1): 128–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.1.04.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Meyer, John W., and
    2. Brian Rowan
    . 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83(2): 340–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Myers, Martha, and
    2. Susette Talarico
    . 1987. The Social Contexts of Criminal Sentencing. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  20. ↵
    1. Richards, Lyn
    . 2015. Handling Qualitative Data: A Practical Guide, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
  21. ↵
    1. Scott, W. Richard
    . 2008. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
  22. ↵
    1. Spohn, Cassia, and
    2. Robert Fornango
    . 2009. “US Attorneys and Substantial Assistance Departures: Testing for Interprosecutor Disparity.” Criminology 47(3): 813–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Stewart, Robert,
    2. Brieanna Watters,
    3. Veronica Horowitz,
    4. Ryan P. Larson,
    5. Brian Sargent, and
    6. Christopher Uggen
    . 2022. “Native Americans and Monetary Sanctions.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 8(2): 137–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.2.07.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Strauss, Anselm
    . 1993. Continual Permutations of Action. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  25. ↵
    1. Ulmer, Jeffery T.
    2005. “The Localized Uses of Federal Sentencing Guidelines in Four US District Courts: Evidence of Processual Order.” Symbolic Interaction 28(2): 255–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Ulmer, Jeffery T.
    2012. “Recent Developments and New Directions in Sentencing Research.” Justice Quarterly 29(1): 1–40.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Ulmer, Jeffery T.
    2019. “Criminal Courts as Inhabited Institutions: Making Sense of Difference and Similarity in Sentencing.” Crime and Justice 48 (February): 453–582.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Ulmer, Jeffery T., and
    2. Brian Johnson
    . 2004. “Sentencing in Context: A Multilevel Analysis.” Criminology 42(1): 137–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    1. Ulmer, Jeffery T., and
    2. Brian Johnson
    . 2017. “Organizational Conformity and Punishment: Federal Court Communities and Judge-Initiated Guideline Departures.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 107(2): 253–92.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Van Cleve, Nicole
    . 2020. Crook County: Racism and Injustice in America’s Largest Criminal Court. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
  31. ↵
    1. Zimring, Franklin E
    . 2020. The Insidious Momentum of American Mass Incarceration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: 8 (1)
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Vol. 8, Issue 1
1 Jan 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sensemaking in the Legal System: A Comparative Case Study of Changes to Monetary Sanction Laws
(Your Name) has sent you a message from RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Sensemaking in the Legal System: A Comparative Case Study of Changes to Monetary Sanction Laws
Tyler Smith, Kristina J. Thompson, Michele Cadigan
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Jan 2022, 8 (1) 63-81; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2022.8.1.03

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Sensemaking in the Legal System: A Comparative Case Study of Changes to Monetary Sanction Laws
Tyler Smith, Kristina J. Thompson, Michele Cadigan
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Jan 2022, 8 (1) 63-81; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2022.8.1.03
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • COURTS AS INHABITED INSTITUTIONS
    • SENSEMAKING AFTER LEGAL CHANGE
    • DATA AND METHODS
    • ANALYSIS
    • FINDINGS
    • DISCUSSION
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • legal change
  • monetary sanctions
  • courtroom communities

© 2025 RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Powered by HighWire