Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Publications
    • rsf

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Publications
    • rsf
  • Log in
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Advanced Search

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Follow rsf on Twitter
  • Visit rsf on Facebook
  • Follow rsf on Google Plus
Research Article
Open Access

Do Employer-Sponsored Immigrants Fare Better in Labor Markets Than Family-Sponsored Immigrants?

Julia Gelatt
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences November 2020, 6 (3) 70-93; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2020.6.3.04
Julia Gelatt
aSenior policy analyst at the Migration Policy Institute, Washington, D.C., United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Batalova, Jeanne, and
    2. Michael Fix
    . 2008. Uneven Progress: The Employment Pathways of Skilled Immigrants in the United States. With Peter A. Creticos. Washington, D.C.: Migration Policy Institute. Accessed August 7, 2020. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/uneven-progress-employment-pathways-skilled-immigrants-united-states.
  2. ↵
    1. Batalova, Jeanne, and
    2. Michael Fix
    . 2017. “New Brain Gain: Rising Human Capital Among Recent Immigrants to the United States.” Washington, D.C.: Migration Policy Institute. Accessed August 7, 2020. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/new-brain-gain-rising-human-capital-among-recent-immigrants-united-states.
  3. ↵
    1. Batalova, Jeanne,
    2. Michael Fix, and
    3. James D. Bachmeier
    . 2016. “Untapped Talent: The Costs of Brain Waste Among Highly Skilled Immigrants in the United States.” Washington, D.C.: Migration Policy Institute.
  4. ↵
    1. Citizenship and Immigration Canada
    . 2014. Evaluation of the Family Reunification Program. Ottawa: Government of Canada. Accessed May 13, 2020. https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/ircc/migration/ircc/english/pdf/pub/e4-2013-frp.pdf.
  5. ↵
    1. Duleep, Harriet Orcutt, and
    2. Mark C. Regets
    . 1996. “Admission Criteria and Immigrant Earnings Profiles.” International Migration Review 30(2): 571–90. DOI: 10.2307/2547394.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Jasso, Guillermina,
    2. Douglas S. Massey,
    3. Mark R. Rosenzweig, and
    4. James P. Smith
    . 2006. “The New Immigrant Survey 2003 Round 1 (NIS-2003-1) Public Release Data.” March 2006. Accessed May 20, 2020. Funded by NIH HD33843, NSF, USCIS, ASPE & Pew. http://nis.princeton.edu.
  7. ↵
    1. Jasso, Guillermina,
    2. Douglas S. Massey,
    3. Mark R. Rosenzweig, and
    4. James P. Smith
    . 2014. “The New Immigrant Survey 2003 Round 2 (NIS-2003-2) Public Release Data.” Accessed May 20, 2020. Funded by NIH HD33843, NSF, USCIS, ASPE & Pew. http://nis.princeton.edu.
  8. ↵
    1. Jasso, Guillermina, and
    2. Mark R. Rosenzweig
    . 1995. “Do Immigrants Screened for Skills Do Better Than Family Reunification Immigrants?” International Migration Review 29(1): 85–111. DOI: 10.2307/2546998.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Massey, Douglas S
    . 2011. “The New Immigrant Survey and Research on American Stratification.” Social Science Research 40(5): 1287–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.06.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Massey, Douglas S.,
    2. Guillermina Jasso, and
    3. Monica Espinoza
    . 2017. “Weighting for Nonresponse on Round Two of the New Immigrant Survey.” Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University.
  11. ↵
    1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
    . 2017. The Economic and Fiscal Consequences of Immigration. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/23550.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Office of Immigration Statistics (OIS)
    . 2004. Yearbook of Immigration Statistics 2003. Washington: U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
  13. ↵
    1. Office of Immigration Statistics (OIS)
    . 2019. Yearbook of Immigration Statistics 2018. Washington: U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Accessed May 20, 2020. https://www.dhs.gov/immigration-statistics/yearbook/2018.
  14. ↵
    1. Schwabish, Jonathan A
    . 2009. “Identifying Rates of Emigration in the United States Using Administrative Earnings Records.” CBO working paper no 2009-01. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Budget Office. Accessed May 20, 2020. https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/111th-congress-2009-2010/workingpaper/2009-01_1.pdf.
  15. ↵
    1. Stoops, Nicole
    . 2004. “Educational Attainment in the United States: 2003.” Suitland, Md.: U.S. Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2004/demo/p20-550.pdf.
  16. ↵
    1. Treas, Judith, and
    2. Shampa Mazumdar
    . 2004. “Kinkeeping and Caregiving: Contributions of Older People in Immigrant Families.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies 35(1): 105–22.
    OpenUrl
    1. U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration
    . 2020. “Job Zone Reference.” O-NET Resource Center. Accessed May 20, 2020, https://www.onetcenter.org/dictionary/21.3/excel/job_zone_reference.html.
  17. ↵
    1. Vincenza Desiderio, Maria, and
    2. Kate Hooper
    . 2016. “The Canadian Expression of Interest System: A Model to Manage Skilled Migration to the European Union?” Washington, D.C.: Migration Policy Institute Europe. Accessed May 13, 2020. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/canadian-expression-interest-system-model-manage-skilled-migration-european-union.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: 6 (3)
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Vol. 6, Issue 3
1 Nov 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Do Employer-Sponsored Immigrants Fare Better in Labor Markets Than Family-Sponsored Immigrants?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 10 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Do Employer-Sponsored Immigrants Fare Better in Labor Markets Than Family-Sponsored Immigrants?
Julia Gelatt
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Nov 2020, 6 (3) 70-93; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2020.6.3.04

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Do Employer-Sponsored Immigrants Fare Better in Labor Markets Than Family-Sponsored Immigrants?
Julia Gelatt
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Nov 2020, 6 (3) 70-93; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2020.6.3.04
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CLASS OF ENTRY, SKILL, AND LABOR-MARKET OUTCOMES
    • LITERATURE
    • RESEARCH QUESTIONS
    • DATA: NEW IMMIGRANT SURVEY
    • METHODS
    • FINDINGS
    • CONCLUSION
    • Appendix
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Geographic variation in COVID-19 vulnerability by legal immigration status in California: a prepandemic cross-sectional study
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • immigration
  • immigration policy
  • visas
  • employment
  • occupations

© 2025 RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Powered by HighWire