Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Publications
    • rsf

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Publications
    • rsf
  • Log in
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Advanced Search

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Follow rsf on Twitter
  • Visit rsf on Facebook
  • Follow rsf on Google Plus
Research Article
Open Access

A Targeted Minimum Benefit Plan: A New Proposal to Reduce Poverty Among Older Social Security Recipients A Targeted Minimum Benefit Plan

Pamela Herd, Melissa Favreault, Madonna Harrington Meyer, Timothy M. Smeeding
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences February 2018, 4 (2) 74-90; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2018.4.2.04
Pamela Herd
aProfessor in the La Follette School of Public Affairs at the University of Wisconsin–Madison
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melissa Favreault
bSenior fellow in the Income and Benefits Policy Center at the Urban Institute
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Madonna Harrington Meyer
cProfessor of sociology and senior research associate at the Center for Policy Research at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy M. Smeeding
cProfessor in the La Follette School of Public Affairs at the University of Wisconsin–Madison
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    AARP. 2015. “Social Security Planning in 2015 and Beyond: Perspectives of Future Beneficiaries and Financial Planners.” Washington, D.C.: AARP.
  2. ↵
    1. Argento, Robert,
    2. Victoria Bryant, , and
    3. John Sabelhaus
    . 2015. “Early Withdrawals from Retirement Accounts During the Great Recession.” Contemporary Economic Policy 33(1): 1–16.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    Battle, Ken. 1997. “A New Old Age Pension.” In Reform of Retirement Income Policy, edited by Kalman Banting and R. Boadway. Kingston, Ontario: School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University.
  4. ↵
    Bianchi, Suzanne, John P. Robinson, and Melissa Milkie. 2006. Changing Rhythms of American Family Life. ASA Rose Series. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  5. ↵
    1. Budig, Michelle J., and
    2. Paula England
    . 2001. “The Wage Penalty for Motherhood.” American Sociological Review 66(2): 204–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2016. “Employment Characteristics of Families, 2015.” Economic News Release, USDL-17-0444. Accessed October 17, 2017. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/famee.nr0.htm.
  7. ↵
    Burkhauser, Richard V. 1982. “Earnings Sharing: Incremental and Fundamental Reform.” In A Challenge to Social Security: The Changing Roles of Women and Men in American Society, edited by Richard V. Burkhauser and Karen C. Holden. New York: Academic Press.
  8. ↵
    Burkhauser, Richard V., and Timothy Smeeding. 1994. “Social Security Reform: A Budget Neutral Approach to Older Women’s Disproportionate Risk of Poverty.” Center for Policy Research Policy Brief No. 2. Syracuse N.Y.: Syracuse University.
  9. Caswell, Kyle J., and Brett O’Hara. 2010. “Medical Out-of-Pocket Expenses, Poverty, and the Uninsured.” Working Paper no. 2010-17. Washington: U.S. Census Bureau. Accessed October 17, 2017. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2010/demo/SEHSD-WP2010-17.pdf,
  10. ↵
    Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. 2014. “Introduction to the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) Program.” Washington, D.C.: CBPP. Accessed October 17, 2017. http://www.cbpp.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/1-10-11socsec.pdf.
  11. ———. 2015. “Safety Net Against Poverty More Effective than Previously Reported.” Washington, D.C.: CBPP. Accessed October 17, 2017. http://www.cbpp.org/research/safety-net-more-effective-against-poverty-than-previously-thought.
  12. ↵
    Cohn, D’Vera, Gretchen Livingston, and Wendy Wang. 2014. “After Decades of Decline a Rise in Stay-at-Home Mothers.” Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center. Accessed October 17, 2017. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2014/04/Moms-At-Home_04-08-2014.pdf.
  13. ↵
    Congressional Budget Office. 1986. Earnings Sharing Options for the Social Security System. January. Washington: Government Printing Office. Accessed October 17, 2017. https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/99th-congress-1985-1986/reports/doc04b-entire_1.pdf.
  14. ———. 2015. “Federal Housing Assistance for Low-Income Households.” Washington: Government Printing Office. Accessed October 17, 2017. https://www.cbo.gov/publication/50782.
  15. ↵
    Congressional Research Service. 2014. “Social Security Reform: Current Issues and Legislation Dawn Nuschler Specialist in Income Security.” Congressional Research Service 7-5700 report no. RL33544. January 15.
  16. ↵
    Czajka, John L., and Gabrielle Denmead. 2008. “Income Data for Policy Analysis: A Comparative Assessment of Eight Surveys.” Mathematica no. 6302-601. Washington, D.C.: Mathematica Policy Research.
  17. ↵
    1. Ellwood, Marilyn R., and
    2. Leighton Ku
    . 1998. “Welfare and Immigration Reforms: Unintended Side Effects for Medicaid.” Health Affairs 17(3): 137–51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI). 2015. “Private- and Public-Sector Retirement Plan Trends.” In Databook on Employee Benefits. Washington, D.C.: EBRI. Accessed October 17, 2017. https://www.ebri.org/publications/books/index.cfm?fa=databook.
  19. ↵
    Engelhardt, Gary V., and Jonathan Gruber. 2004. Social Security and the Evolution of Elderly Poverty. NBER working paper no. 10466. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  20. ↵
    Favreault, Melissa. 2010. “Why Do Some Workers Have Low Social Security Benefits?” Retirement Policy Project discussion paper. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.
  21. ———. Forthcoming. “How Might Earnings Patterns and Interactions among Certain Provisions in OASDI Solvency Packages Affect Financing and Distributional Goals?” Boston, Mass.: Boston College Center for Retirement Research.
  22. ↵
    Favreault, Melissa, and Eugene Steuerle. 2007. “Social Security and Spouse and Survivor Benefits for the Modern Family.” Discussion Paper 07-01. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute. Accessed October 17, 2017. http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/311436_Social_Security.pdf.
  23. ↵
    Feinstein, Craig A. 2013. “Diminishing Effect of the Special Minimum PIA.” Actuarial Note no. 154. Baltimore, Md.: Social Security Administration Office of the Chief Actuary. Accessed October 17, 2017. https://www.ssa.gov/oact/NOTES/pdf_notes/note154.pdf.
  24. ↵
    1. Goldin, Claudia
    . 1977. “Female Labor Force Participation: The Origin of Black and White Differences, 1870 and 1880.” Journal of Economic History 37(1): 87–108.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Goldstein, J. R., and
    2. C. T. Kenney
    . 2001. “Marriage Delayed or Marriage Forgone? New Cohort Forecasts of First Marriage for U.S. Women.” American Sociological Review 66(4): 509–19.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    Gustman, Alan, Thomas Steinmeier, and Nahid Tabatabai. 2011. “The Effects of Changes in Women’s Labor Market Attachment on Redistribution under the Social Security Benefit Formula.” NBER working paper no. 17439. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  27. ↵
    Haider, Steven, Alan Jacknowitz, and Robert Schoeni. 2003. “The Economic Status of Elderly Women.” Michigan Retirement Research Center research paper no. WP 2003–046. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Accessed October 17, 2017. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1090901.
  28. ↵
    1. Harrington Meyer, Madonna
    . 1996. “Making Claims as Workers or Wives: The Distribution of Social Security Benefits.” American Sociological Review 61(3): 449–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    Harrington Meyer, Madonna, and Pamela Herd. 2007. Market Friendly or Family Friendly? The State and Gender Inequality in Old Age. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  30. ↵
    Harrington Meyer, Madonna, Doug Wolf, and Christine Himes. 2006. “Declining Eligibility for Social Security Spouse and Widow Benefits in the U.S.?” Research on Aging 28(2): 240–60.
  31. ↵
    1. Herd, Pamela
    . 2005a. “Ensuring a Minimum: Social Security Reform and Women.” The Gerontologist 45(1):12–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    1. Herd, Pamela
    . 2005b. “Reforming a Breadwinner Welfare State: Gender, Race, Class and Social Security Reform.” Social Forces 83(4): 1365–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    1. Herd, Pamela
    . 2006. “Crediting Care?: Gender, Race, Class and Social Security Reform.” The Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences 61B(1): S24–S34.
    OpenUrl
    1. Herd, Pamela
    . 2009. “Women, Public Pensions and Poverty: What Can the U.S. Learn from Other Countries?” Journal of Women, Politics and Policy 30(2-3): 301–44.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Herd, Pamela,
    2. Thomas DeLeire,
    3. Hope Harvey, and
    4. Donald P. Moynihan.
    2013. “Shifting Administrative Burden to the State: The Case of Medicaid Take-Up.” Public Administration Review 73(1):69–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. ↵
    1. Hubbard, Glenn,
    2. Jonathan Skinner, and
    3. Stephen P. Zeldes
    . 1995. “Precautionary Savings and Social Insurance.” Journal of Political Economy 103(2): 360–99.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    Hurd, Michael, and David Wise. 1997. “Changing Social Security Survivorship Benefits and the Poverty of Widows.” In The Economic Effects of Aging in the United States and Japan, edited by Michael D. Hurd and Naohiro Yashiro. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  37. ↵
    1. Iams, Howard,
    2. Gail Reznik, and
    3. Chris Tamborini
    . 2010. “Earnings Sharing in the U.S. Social Security System: A Microsimulation Analysis of Future Female Retirees.” Gerontologist 50(4): 495–508.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Institute for Women’s Policy Research (IWPR). 2016. “The Gender Wage Gap and Public Policy.” Briefing Paper no. D435. Washington, D.C.: IWPR. Accessed October 17, 2017. https://iwpr.org/publications/the-gender-wage-gap-and-public-policy/.
  39. ↵
    Jones, Maggie. 2014. “Changes in EITC Participation, 2005–2009.” CARRA Working Paper Series #2014–04. Washington: U.S. Census Bureau. Accessed October 17, 2017. https://www.census.gov/srd/carra/Changes_in_EITC_Eligibility_and_Participation_2005–2009.pdf.
  40. ↵
    Kaestner, Robert, Darren Lubotsky, and Javaeria Qureshi. 2016. “Mothers’ Employment by Child Age and Its Implications for Theory and Policy.” Working Paper. Chicago: Society of Labor Economists. Accessed October 17, 2017. http://www.sole-jole.org/16113.pdf.
    1. Kahn, Joan,
    2. Javier García-Manglano, and
    3. Suzanne Bianchi
    . 2014. “The Motherhood Penalty at Midlife: Long-Term Effects of Children on Women’s Careers.” Journal of Marriage and Family 76(1): 56–72.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    Kaiser Family Foundation. 2014. How Much Is Enough? Out-of-Pocket Spending Among Medicare Beneficiaries. Menlo Park, Calif: Kaiser Family Foundation. Accessed November 9, 2017. http://files.kff.org/attachment/how-much-is-enough-out-of-pocket-spending-among-medicare-beneficiaries-a-chartbook-report.
  42. ↵
    Katz, Larry, and Alan Krueger. 2016. “The Rise and Nature of Alternative Work Arrangements in the United States, 1995–2015.” NBER working paper no. 22667. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  43. Marchand, Joseph, and Timothy Smeeding. 2016. “Poverty and Aging.” In The Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, vol. 1B, edited by J. Piggott and A. Woodland. New York: Elsevier.
  44. ↵
    Marshall, Thomas H. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class, vol. 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  45. ↵
    McGarry, Kathleen. 2000. “Guaranteed Income: SSI and the Well-Being of the Elderly Poor.” NBER working paper no. 7574. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  46. ↵
    McGarry, Kathleen, and Robert Schoeni. 2015. “Understanding Participation in SSI.” Working Paper 2015–319. Ann Arbor: Michigan Retirement Research Center. Accessed November 17, 2017. http://www.mrrc.isr.umich.edu/publications/papers/pdf/wp319.pdf.
  47. ↵
    Meyer, Bruce D., and Nikolas Mittag. 2015. “ Using Linked Survey and Administrative Data to Better Measure Income: Implications for Poverty, Program Effectiveness and Holes in the Safety Net.” NBER working paper no. w21676. Boston, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  48. ↵
    Mortenson, Jacob A., James Cilke, Michael Udell, and Jonathon Zytnick. 2009. “Attaching the Left Tail: A New Profile of Income for Persons Who Do Not Appear on Federal Income Tax Returns.” Paper presented at the National Tax Association Proceedings, 102nd Annual Conference on Taxation, November 12–14, 2009, Denver, Colo.
  49. ↵
    1. Moynihan, Donald,
    2. Pamela Herd, and
    3. Hope Harvey
    . 2014. “Administrative Burden: Learning, Psychological, and Compliance Costs in Citizen-State Interactions.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25(1): 43–69.
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    Munnell, Alicia H., and Dina Bleckman. 2014. “Is Pension Coverage a Problem in the Private Sector?” Policy Brief no. 14–7. Boston, Mass.: Boston College Center for Retirement Research. Accessed November 17, 2017. http://crr.bc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/IB_14-7-508.pdf.
  51. ↵
    Myles, John. 2000. “The Maturation of Canada’s Retirement Income System: Income Levels, Income Inequality, and Low Income Among the Elderly.” Statistics Canada working paper no. 147. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.229486.
  52. ↵
    1. Neumark, David, and
    2. Elizabeth Powers
    . 1998. “The Effects of Means-Tested Income Support for the Elderly on Pre-Retirement Savings: Evidence from the SSI Program in the U.S.” Journal of Public Economics 68(2): 181–206.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  53. ↵
    1. Olsen, Kelly, and
    2. Don Hoffmeyer
    . 2002. “Social Security’s Special Minimum Benefit.” Social Security Bulletin 64(2): 1–15.
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    Powers, Elizabeth. 1998. “Does Means-Tested Discourage Savings? Evidence from a Change in AFDC Policy in the United States.” Journal of Public Economics 68(1): 33–53.
  55. ↵
    Proctor, Bernadette, Jessica Semega, and Melissa Kollar. 2016. “Income and Poverty in the United States: 2015.” Current Population Report, series P60, no. 256. Washington: U.S. Census Bureau.
  56. ↵
    1. Quadagno, Jill.
    . 1984. “Welfare Capitalism and the Social Security Act of 1935.” American Sociological Review 49(5): 632–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  57. ↵
    Renwick, Trudi, and Liana Fox. 2016. “The Supplemental Poverty Measure: 2015.” Current Population Report, series P60, no. 258. Washington: U.S. Census Bureau.
  58. ↵
    Sass, Stephen. 2016. “How Work & Marriage Trends Affect Social Security’s Family Benefits.” Issue Brief no. 16-9. Boston, Mass.: Center for Retirement Research.
  59. ↵
    Smeeding, Timothy. 1999. “Social Security Reform: Improving Benefit Adequacy and Economic Security for Women.” Center for Policy Research Policy Series paper no.16. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University.
  60. ↵
    Smeeding, Timothy, Carroll Estes, and Lou Glasse. 1999. “Social Security Reform and Older Women: Improving the System.” Center for Policy Research Policy Series paper no. 22. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University.
  61. ↵
    Social Security Administration. 2015. “Social Security Administrative Statistical Supplement.” Tables 5.A14 and 5.A15. Washington: Government Printing Office.
  62. ↵
    U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). 2007. Retirement Security: Women Face Challenges in Ensuring Financial Security in Retirement. GAO-08-105. Washington: Government Printing Office. Accessed October 11, 2017. http://www.investmentnews.com/assets/docs/CI305391018.PDF.
  63. ↵
    U.S. House Ways and Means Committee. 2004. Green Book. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  64. ↵
    1. van Dalen,
    2. Melissa, Jacqueline Suijker,
    3. Janet, MacNeil-Vroomen,
    4. Marjon Van
    5. Rijn, Eric Moll van
    6. Charante, Sophia de Rooij , and
    7. Bianca Buurman
    . 2014. “Self-Report of Healthcare Utilization Among Community-Dwelling Older Persons: A Prospective Cohort Study.” PLoS ONE 9(4): e93372.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Kevin Whitman,
    2. Gayle Reznik, and
    3. David Shoffner
    . 2011. “Who Never Receives Social Security?” Social Security Bulletin 71(2): 17–24.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Winslow-Bowe, Sarah
    . 2009. “Husbands’ and Wives’ Relative Earnings: Exploring Variation by Race, Human Capital, Labor Supply, and Life Stage.” Journal of Family Issues 30(10): 1405–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  67. ↵
    1. Zajacova, Anna,
    2. Jennifer Montez, and
    3. Pamela Herd
    . 2014. “Socioeconomic Disparities in Health Among Older Adults: Implications for the Retirement Age Debate.” Journals of Gerontology 69(6): 973–78.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: 4 (2)
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Vol. 4, Issue 2
1 Feb 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Targeted Minimum Benefit Plan: A New Proposal to Reduce Poverty Among Older Social Security Recipients A Targeted Minimum Benefit Plan
(Your Name) has sent you a message from RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
A Targeted Minimum Benefit Plan: A New Proposal to Reduce Poverty Among Older Social Security Recipients A Targeted Minimum Benefit Plan
Pamela Herd, Melissa Favreault, Madonna Harrington Meyer, Timothy M. Smeeding
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Feb 2018, 4 (2) 74-90; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2018.4.2.04

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A Targeted Minimum Benefit Plan: A New Proposal to Reduce Poverty Among Older Social Security Recipients A Targeted Minimum Benefit Plan
Pamela Herd, Melissa Favreault, Madonna Harrington Meyer, Timothy M. Smeeding
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Feb 2018, 4 (2) 74-90; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2018.4.2.04
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • THE RISK FOR POVERTY AND ECONOMIC SECURITY AMONG THE AGED
    • CURRENT OLD AGE SOCIAL INSURANCE PROGRAM ANTI-POVERTY ISSUES
    • ADDRESSING THE POLICY PROBLEM
    • WHY CURRENT MINIMUM BENEFITS ARE FAILING OLDER AMERICANS
    • A NEW OPTION FOR THE UNITED STATES: A MINIMUM BENEFIT PLAN
    • SIMULATING THE BENEFIT COSTS AND DISTRIBUTION OF WHO BENEFITS
    • Conclusion
    • APPENDIX
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • elderly
  • poverty
  • social security
  • income guarantee

© 2025 RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Powered by HighWire