Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Publications
    • rsf

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Publications
    • rsf
  • Log in
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Advanced Search

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Follow rsf on Twitter
  • Visit rsf on Facebook
  • Follow rsf on Google Plus
Research Article
Open Access

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Quest for Consumer Comprehension

Lauren E. Willis
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences January 2017, 3 (1) 74-93; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2017.3.1.04
Lauren E. Willis
aProfessor of law and Rains Senior Research Fellow at Loyola Law School, Los Angeles
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Abrams, Rachel and
    2. Jessica Silver-Greenberg
    . 2014. “Companies That Offer Help with Student Loans Are Often Predatory, Officials Say.” New York Times, July 13, 2014.
  2. ↵
    Adjerid, Idris, Alessandro Acquisti, Laura Brandimarte, and George Loewenstein. 2013. “Sleights of Privacy: Framing, Disclosures, and the Limits of Transparency.” Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS). Newcastle, United Kingdom (July 24–26, 2013).
  3. ↵
    1. Agnew, Julie R., and
    2. Lisa R. Szykman
    . 2005. “Asset Allocation and Information Overload: The Influence of Information Display, Asset Choice, and Investor Experience.” Journal of Behavioral Finance 6(2): 57–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    Akerlof, George A., and Robert J. Shiller. 2015. Phishing for Phools: The Economics of Manipulation and Deception. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  5. ↵
    1. Bar-Gill, Oren, and
    2. Ryan Bubb
    . 2012. “Credit Card Pricing: The Card Act and Beyond.” Cornell Law Review 97(5): 967, 997–99.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    Barr, Michael S., Sendhil Mullainathan, and Eldar Shafir. 2008. “Behaviorally Informed Financial Services Regulation.” Available at: www.newamerica.net/files/naf_behavioral_v5.pdf; accessed January 10, 2016.
  7. ↵
    1. Baumeister, Roy F.,
    2. Erin A. Sparks, ,
    3. Tyler F. Stillman, , and
    4. Kathleen D. Vohs
    . 2008. “Free Will in Consumer Behavior: Self-Control, Ego Depletion, and Choice.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 18(1): 4–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    Bernanke, Ben S. 2009. “Innovation and Consumer Protection, at the Federal Reserve System’s Sixth Biennial Community Affairs Research Conference, Washington, D.C.” Last modified April 17, 2009. Available at: www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20090417a.htm; accessed January 10, 2016.
  9. ↵
    1. Bertrand, Marianne,
    2. Dean Karlan, ,
    3. Sendhil Mullainathan, ,
    4. Eldar Shafir, , and
    5. Jonathan Zinman
    . 2010. “What’s Advertising Content Worth? Evidence from a Consumer Credit Marketing Field Experiment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 125(1): 263–306.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Bertrand, Marianne, and
    2. Adair Morse
    . 2011. “Information Disclosure, Cognitive Biases, and Payday Borrowing.” Journal of Finance 66(6): 1865–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    Brunner, Dieter. 2006. “The Mistakes Borrowers Make, and How to Avoid Them.” Last modified June 6, 2006. Available at: http://consumeraffairs.com/news04/2006/06/mortgage_geek.html; accessed January 10, 2016.
  12. ↵
    1. Calo, Ryan
    . 2014. “Digital Market Manipulation.” George Washington Law Review 82(4): 995–1051.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    Carney, Michael. 2013. “Mediabrix Enables Targeted Advertising During Moments of Positive and Negative Emotion in Social Games.” Available at: http://pando.com/2013/04/18/mediabrix-enables-targeted-advertising-during-moments-of-positive-and-negative-emotion-in-social-games/; accessed January 10, 2016.
  14. ↵
    1. Catlin, Jesse R.,
    2. Cornelia Pechmann, , and
    3. Eric P. Brass
    . 2011. “The Influence of Need for Cognition and Principal Display Panel Factors on Over-the-Counter Drug Facts Label Comprehension.” Health Communication 27(3): 264–73.
    OpenUrl
  15. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. n.d. “Information Collection Request–Supporting Statement, Credit Card Agreement Testing Survey.” Available at: www.reginfo.gov/public/do/DownloadDocument?objectID=34998102; accessed January 10, 2016.
  16. ↵
    Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. 2012. Supervision and Examination Manual—Version 2.0. Washington, D.C.: October. Available at: files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201210_cfpb_supervision-and-examination-manual-v2.pdf; accessed July 12, 2016.
  17. ↵
    1. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
    . 2013a. “Policy to Encourage Trial Disclosure Programs.” Federal Register 78(209): 64389–94.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. 2013b. “Payday Loans and Deposit Advance Products: A White Paper of Initial Data Findings.” Washington, D.C.: April.
  19. ↵
    1. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
    . 2014. “Generic Information Collection Plan for Studies of Consumers Using Controlled Trials in Field and Economic Laboratory Settings.” Federal Register 79 (71): 20865–66.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. 2015a. Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: CFPB Annual Report 2015. Washington, D.C.: March.
  21. ↵
    Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. 2015b. Arbitration Study: Report to Congress Pursuant to Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act § 1028(a). Washington, D.C.: March.
  22. ↵
    Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. 2016. Payday, Vehicle Title, and Certain High-Cost Installment Loans. Docket No. CFPB-2016-0025, Proposed C.F.R. 91041.12, 1292.
  23. ↵
    Diamond, Shari Seidman. 2011. “Reference Guide on Survey Research.” In Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, edited by the Federal Judicial Center and the National Research Council. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
  24. ↵
    1. Drolet, Aimee,
    2. Mary Frances Luce, , and
    3. Itamar Simonson
    . 2009. “When Does Choice Reveal Preference? Moderators of Heuristic versus Goal-Based Choice.” Journal of Consumer Research 36(June): 137–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Duhigg, Charles
    . 2007. “Bilking the Elderly, with a Corporate Assist.” New York Times, May 20.
  26. ↵
    1. Epley, Nicholas, and
    2. Thomas Gilovich
    . 2006. “The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic: Why the Adjustments Are Insufficient.” Psychological Science 17(4): 311–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    Federal Trade Commission. 1980. “Policy Statement on Unfairness.” Appended to International Harvester Co., 104 FTC 949, 1070 (1984).
  28. ↵
    Federal Trade Commission. 1983. “Policy Statement on Deception.” Appended to In re Cliffdale Associates Inc., 103 FTC 110, 174 (1984).
  29. ↵
    1. Garrison, Loretta,
    2. Manoj Hastak, ,
    3. Jeanne M. Hogarth, ,
    4. Susan Kleimann, , and
    5. Alan S. Levy
    . 2012. “Designing Evidence-Based Disclosures: A Case Study of Financial Privacy Notices.” Journal of Consumer Affairs 46(2): 204–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    1. Hogarth, Jeanne M., and
    2. Ellen A. Merry
    . 2011. “Designing Disclosures to Inform Consumer Financial Decisionmaking: Lessons Learned from Consumer Testing.” Federal Reserve Bulletin 97(3): 1–27.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Kahn, Barbara E., and
    2. Jonathan Baron
    . 1995. “An Exploratory Study of Choice Rules Favored for High-Stakes Decisions.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 4(4): 305–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    1. Keller, Punam Anand,
    2. Issac M. Lipkus, , and
    3. Barbara K. Rimer
    . 2002. “Depressive Realism and Health Risk Accuracy: The Negative Consequences of Positive Mood.” Journal of Consumer Research 29(1): 57–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    Kleimann Communication Group. 2013. “Know Before You Owe: Quantitative Study of the Current and Integrated TILA-RESPA Disclosures.” Rockville, Md.: Kleimann Communication Group Inc.
  34. ↵
    1. Kramer, Adam D. I.,
    2. Jamie E. Guillory, , and
    3. Jeffrey T. Hancock
    . 2014. “Experimental Evidence of Massive-Scale Emotional Contagion Through Social Networks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(24): 8788–90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Kruger, Justin
    . 1999. “Lake Wobegon Be Gone! The ‘Below-Average Effect’ and the Egocentric Nature of Comparative Ability Judgments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77(2): 221–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    1. Kunda, Ziva
    . 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 108(3): 480–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    1. Leonard-Segal, Andrea,
    2. Laura E. Shay, ,
    3. Daiva Shetty, , and
    4. Joel Schiffenbauer
    . 2009. “Unique Role of Consumer Studies in Nonprescription Drug Development.” Journal of the American Pharmacists Association 49(5): 670–73.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Lewis, Randall A., and
    2. David H. Reiley
    . 2014. “Online Ads and Offline Sales: Measuring the Effects of Retail Advertising via a Controlled Experiment on Yahoo!” Quantitative Marketing Economics 12(3): 235–66.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Loewenstein, George,
    2. Cass R. Sunstein, , and
    3. Russell Golman
    . 2014. “Disclosure: Psychology Changes Everything.” Annual Review of Economics 6(1): 391–19.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Mann, Ronald J
    . 2013. “Assessing the Optimism of Payday Loan Borrowers.” Supreme Court Economic Review 21(1): 105–32.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Mather, Mara, and
    2. Nichole R. Lighthall
    . 2012. “Risk and Reward Are Processed Differently in Decisions Made Under Stress.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 21(2): 36–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Mullainathan, Sendhil, and Eldar Shafir. 2013. Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much. New York: Times Books.
  43. ↵
    Office of Oversight and Investigations Majority Staff, U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. 2013. “A Review of the Data Broker Industry: Collection, Use, and Sale of Consumer Data for Marketing Purposes.” Available at: www.commerce.senate.gov/public/?a=Files.Serve&File_id=0d2b3642-6221-4888-a631-08f2f255b577; accessed January 10, 2016.
  44. ↵
    Pew Charitable Trusts. 2013. “Payday Lending in America: How Borrowers Choose and Repay Payday Loans.” Washington, D.C.: Pew Charitable Trusts.
  45. ↵
    Pew Charitable Trusts. 2014. “Overdrawn: Persistent Confusion and Concern About Bank Overdraft Practices.” Washington, D.C.: Pew Charitable Trusts.
  46. ↵
    1. Shapiro, Stewart, and
    2. Deborah J. MacInnis
    . 2002. “Understanding Program-Induced Mood Effects.” Journal of Advertising 31(4): 15–26.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Sovern, Jeff
    . 2010. “Preventing Future Economic Crises through Consumer Protection Law or How the Truth in Lending Act Failed Subprime Borrowers.” Ohio State Law Journal 71(4): 761–844.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Stark, Debra Pogrund,
    2. Jessica M. Choplin, , and
    3. Mark A. LeBoeuff
    . 2013. “Ineffective in Any Form: How Confirmation Bias and Distractions Undermine Improved Home-Loan Disclosures.” Yale Law Journal Online 122(1): 377–400.
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    1. Tanner, Robin J., and
    2. Kurt A. Carlson
    . 2009. “Unrealistically Optimistic Consumers: A Selective Hypothesis Testing Account for Optimism in Predictions of Future Behavior.” Journal of Consumer Research 35(5): 810–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. ↵
    U.S. Government Accountability Office. 2008. Bank Fees: Federal Banking Regulators Could Better Ensure That Consumers Have Required Disclosure Documents Prior to Opening Checking or Savings Accounts. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  51. ↵
    U.S. Government Accountability Office. 2011. Information on Tall Smokestacks and Their Contribution to Interstate Transportation of Air Pollution. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  52. ↵
    1. Willis, Lauren E
    . 2006. “Decisionmaking and the Limits of Disclosure: The Problem of Predatory Lending: Price.” Maryland Law Review 65(3): 707–840.
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    1. Willis, Lauren E
    . 2013. “When Nudges Fail: Slippery Defaults.” University of Chicago Law Review 80(3): 1155–1229.
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    1. Willis, Lauren E
    . 2015. “Performance-Based Consumer Law.” University of Chicago Law Review 82(3): 1309–1409.
    OpenUrl
  55. ↵
    1. Wood, Leslie A., and
    2. David F. Poltrack
    . 2015. “Measuring the Long-Term Effects of Television Advertising.” Journal of Advertising Research 55(2): 123–31.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: 3 (1)
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Vol. 3, Issue 1
1 Jan 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Quest for Consumer Comprehension
(Your Name) has sent you a message from RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Quest for Consumer Comprehension
Lauren E. Willis
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Jan 2017, 3 (1) 74-93; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2017.3.1.04

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Quest for Consumer Comprehension
Lauren E. Willis
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Jan 2017, 3 (1) 74-93; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2017.3.1.04
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • THE FLAWS IN THE BUREAU’S CURRENT APPROACH TO CONSUMER COMPREHENSION
    • DOUBLING DOWN IN THE LAB: DISCLOSURE 2.0
    • MOVING TO THE FIELD: DISCLOSURE 2.5
    • BRINGING FIRMS INTO THE DISCLOSURE DESIGN PROCESS: PROJECT CATALYST
    • COMPREHENSION TESTING BY THE BUREAU TO INFORM DISCLOSURE AND PRODUCT DESIGN REGULATION
    • ADVANTAGES FIRMS HAVE IN ATTAINING COMPREHENSION
    • AUTHORITY FOR IMPOSING COMPREHENSION RULES
    • MECHANICS
    • COMPREHENSION OF PRICE
    • COMPREHENSION OF BENEFITS
    • COMPREHENSION OF LEGAL RIGHTS
    • BENEFITS OF COMPREHENSION RULES
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • consumer finance
  • performance standards
  • disclosures
  • deception
  • Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

© 2025 RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Powered by HighWire