Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Publications
    • rsf

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Publications
    • rsf
  • Log in
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Advanced Search

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Follow rsf on Twitter
  • Visit rsf on Facebook
  • Follow rsf on Google Plus
Research Article
Open Access

U.S. Trends in Job Stability by Sex, Race, and Ethnicity from 1996 to 2020

Michael Lachanski
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences January 2025, 11 (1) 224-246; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2025.11.1.11
Michael Lachanski
aDoctoral candidate at the Population Studies Center at the University of Pennsylvania, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael Lachanski
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Additional
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Expected Job Tenure and Conditional Expected Job Tenure, U.S. Population, 1996–2020

    Source: Author’s calculations based on Flood et al. 2022.

    Note: Calculations relied on the IPUMS CPS JTS 1996–2020 for all nongovernment and non-self-employed workers and the Quarterly Workforce Indicators hiring series for workers working in privately owned firms age fourteen to ninety-nine from 1996 to 2019. The top panel graphs the computed expected job tenure for workers in each between survey period for the IPUMS CPS JTS: February 1996 through January 1998, February 1998 through January 2000, February 2000 through December 2001, January 2001 through December 2002, and so on until January 2019 through December 2020. I abbreviate this as “for each between survey period from 1996 to 2020” for all remaining figures. The top panel shows a slight trend in expected job tenure. Expected job tenures rose from 1.07 for the 1996 –1998 between survey period to 1.32 for the 2018 to 2020 between survey period. The population minimum (maximum) expected job tenure was 0.91 (1.59) from 2000 to 2002 (2010 to 2012). The bottom panel shows that the rise in workers’ expected job tenure advantage also exists at the one-year tenure mark. Conditional expected job tenures rose more than a year over the period, from 4.60 in the 1996 to 1998 between survey period to 5.65 in the 2018 to 2020 between survey period. The population minimum (maximum) conditional expected job tenure was 4.37 (6.29) during the 2000 to 2002 (2012 to 2014) between survey period.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Expected Job Tenure and Conditional Expected Job Tenure by Sex, 1996–2020

    Source: Author’s calculations based on Flood et al. 2022.

    Note: Calculations relied on the IPUMS CPS JTS 1996–2020 for all nongovernment and non-self-employed workers and the Quarterly Workforce Indicators hiring series for workers in privately owned firms age fourteen to ninety-nine from 1996 to 2019. The top panel graphs the computed expected job tenure for male and female workers for each between survey period for the IPUMS CPS JTS. The top panel shows an inconsistent expected job tenure advantage for male workers at the time of hiring of about two days. The bottom panel graphs the expected job tenure conditional on spending one year with an employer for male and female workers for each between survey period from 1996 to 2020. The bottom panel shows that male advantage grows to about 0.65 years of expected tenure after one year with an employer.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Expected Job Tenure and Conditional Expected Job tenure by Race, 1996–2020

    Source: Author’s calculations based on Flood et al. 2022.

    Note: Calculations relied on the IPUMS CPS JTS 1996–2020 for all nongovernment and non-self-employed workers and the Quarterly Workforce Indicators hiring series for black and white workers age fourteen to ninety-nine from 1996 to 2019. Shown are the computed expected job tenure for black and white workers for each between survey period from 1996 to 2020. The top panel shows a consistent expected job tenure advantage for white workers at the time of hiring. The mean period size of the expected duration advantage at hiring is 0.43 years or about five months. The bottom panel shows that white workers’ expected job tenure advantage becomes less consistent at the one-year tenure mark. Black workers have substantial advantages in expected job tenure conditional on making it to one year in 2011 and 2015. White workers’ mean period expected job tenure advantage at the one-year mark is about 0.22 years (smaller than the equivalent male advantage of 0.65 years).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Expected Job Tenure and Conditional Expected Job Tenure by Ethnicity, 1996–2020

    Source: Author’s calculations based on Flood et al. 2022.

    Note: Calculations relied on the IPUMS CPS JTS 1996–2020 for all nongovernment and non-self-employed workers and the Quarterly Workforce Indicators hiring series for black and white workers age fourteen to ninety-nine from 1996 to 2019. Shown are the computed expected job tenures for Hispanic and non-Hispanic workers for the between survey period from 1996 to 2020. Hispanics have an advantage in six of the between-survey periods investigated while non-Hispanics have an advantage in six of the between survey periods investigated. Nonetheless, averaging over all periods Hispanics have a slight expected tenure advantage of about 0.14 years or about twenty-one days at the time of hiring. The bottom panel shows that Hispanic workers’ expected job tenure advantage grows at the one-year tenure mark to about one year. Hispanic workers lose their advantage during the 2001 and 2009 recessions, which is unsurprising given the large employment penalties documented for immigrant workers in 2009 and the high proportion of Hispanics in this period who are immigrants (Farber 2010; Tamborini and Villareal 2021).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • Table
  • Table
  • Table

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Appendix

    Appendix

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Adobe PDF - Lachanski_Online_Appendix.pdf - Appendix
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: 11 (1)
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Vol. 11, Issue 1
1 Jan 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
U.S. Trends in Job Stability by Sex, Race, and Ethnicity from 1996 to 2020
(Your Name) has sent you a message from RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
U.S. Trends in Job Stability by Sex, Race, and Ethnicity from 1996 to 2020
Michael Lachanski
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Jan 2025, 11 (1) 224-246; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2025.11.1.11

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
U.S. Trends in Job Stability by Sex, Race, and Ethnicity from 1996 to 2020
Michael Lachanski
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Jan 2025, 11 (1) 224-246; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2025.11.1.11
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • BACKGROUND
    • METHOD
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • APPENDIX A: DETAILS OF THE TENURE TABLE PARAMETER ESTIMATION ALGORITHM
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Additional
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • labor markets
  • social inequality
  • job loss
  • job insecurity
  • employee tenure

© 2025 RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Powered by HighWire