Abstract
This study investigates discursive strategies through which prisoners seek dignity. In particular, it turns toward the role of penal labor in such pursuits. Drawing on eighty-two in-depth interviews and eighteen months of ethnographic fieldwork conducted within one U.S. men’s prison, it details the role of job status in prisoner dignity claims. In the scramble to the top of a shifting sandpile of dignity, prisoner appeals to legitimacy rely on downward-facing symbolic boundaries erected to distinguish from lower-status others. Participants in the highest-status work sites made moral claims against others by self-identifying as professionals rather than inmates. At the bottom reaches of the labor hierarchy, workers emphasized lateral distances from other low-status prisoners. These competitive processes serve to reify penal labor structures, inequity, and control.
- © 2020 Russell Sage Foundation. Gibson-Light, Michael. 2020. “Sandpiles of Dignity: Labor Status and Boundary-Making in the Contemporary American Prison.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 6(1): 198–216. DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2020.6.1.09. Special thanks to the prisoners and staffers of SSP and all who helped advance this work. Direct correspondence to: Michael Gibson-Light at michael.gibson-light{at}du.edu, 2000 E. Asbury Ave., Sturm Hall 446, Denver, CO 80208.
Open Access Policy: RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences is an open access journal. This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.