Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T21:48:28.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legal Ambiguity in Managerial Assessments of Criminal Records

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Sarah Esther Lageson ,
Mike Vuolo  and
Christopher Uggen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In an age of widespread background checks, we ask how managers in different organizational contexts navigate legal ambiguity in assessing applicants' criminal history information, based on interview data obtained in a recent field experiment. The study builds on institutional analyses of the social sources of workplace legality to describe how employers consider applicants with criminal histories. We find that some organizations set explicit standards to guide hiring decisions, providing concrete policies on how to treat applicants with records. Where such procedural mandates are lacking, however, hiring managers turn to a micro‐rational decision process to evaluate potential risk and liability. These individualized approaches create inconsistencies in how the law is interpreted and applied across organizations, as evidenced by actual hiring behavior in the field experiment.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , Winter 2015 , pp. 175 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Blumstein, Alfred, and Nakamura, Kiminori 2009. Redemption in the Presence of Widespread Criminal Background Checks. Criminology 47 (2): 327–359.Google Scholar
Bushway, Shawn, Briggs, Shauna, Taxman, Faye, Tanner, Meredith, and Van Brakle, Mischelle 2007. Private Providers of Criminal History Records: Do You Get What You Pay For? In Barriers to Reentry?: The Labor Market for Released Prisoners in Post‐Industrial America, ed. Bushway, S., Stoll, M., and Weiman, D., 174–200. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Bushway, Shawn, Stoll, Michael, and Weiman, David 2007. Barriers to Reentry? The Labor Market for Released Prisoners in Post‐Industrial America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Bybee, Keith J. 2000. The Political Significance of Legal Ambiguity: The Case of Affirmative Action. Law & Society Review 34:263–290.Google Scholar
Clark, Leroy D. 2005. A Civil Rights Task: Removing Barriers to Employment of Ex‐Convicts. University of San Francisco Law Review 38:193–211.Google Scholar
Dobbin, Frank, Edelman, Lauren B., Meyer, John W., and Scott, W. Richard 1988. The Expansion of Due Process in Organizations. In Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, ed. Zucker, Lynne G., 71–100. Cambridge, MA: Ballanger.Google Scholar
Dobbin, Frank, Sutton, John R., Meyer, John W., and Scott, W. Richard 1993. Equal Opportunity Law and the Construction of Internal Labor Markets. American Journal of Sociology 99:396–427.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B. 1992. Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law. American Journal of Sociology 97:1531–1576.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Erlanger, Howard S., and Abraham, Steven E. 1992. Professional Construction of Law: The Inflated Threat of Wrongful Discharge. Law & Society Review 26:47–84.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Krieger, Linda H., Eliason, Scott R., Albiston, Catherine R., and Mellema, Virginia 2011. When Organizations Rule: Judicial Deference to Institutionalized Employment Structures. American Journal of Sociology 117:888–954.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., and Talesh, Shauhin A. 2011. To Comply or Not to Comply—That Isn't the Question: How Organizations Construct the Meaning of Compliance. In Examining Compliance: Business Responses to Regulation, ed. Parker, Christine and Nielsen, Vibeke Lehmann, 103–122. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Uggen, Christopher, and Erlanger, Howard S. 1999. The Endogeneity of Legal Regulation: Grievance Procedures as Rational Myth. American Journal of Sociology 105:406–454.Google Scholar
Ewald, Alec, and Uggen, Christopher 2012. The Collateral Effects of Imprisonment on Prisoners, Their Families, and Communities. In The Oxford Handbook on Sentencing and Corrections, ed. Petersilia, Joan and Reitz, Kevin, 83–103. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finlay, Keith 2008. Effect of Employer Access to Criminal History Data on the Labor Market Outcomes of Ex‐Offenders and Non‐Offenders. NBER Working Papers 13935. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Glaser, Barney G., and Strauss, Anselm L. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving 1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‐Hall.Google Scholar
Goode, Erica 2011. Internet Lets a Criminal Past Catch Up Quicker. New York Times, April 29, A–17.Google Scholar
Harliss, William 2013. “Ban the Box” Laws Make Criminal Pasts Off‐Limits. Wall Street Journal, August 3, A3.Google Scholar
Harris, Patricia M., and Keller, Kimberly S. 2005. Ex‐Offenders Need Not Apply: The Criminal Background Check in Hiring Decisions. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 21:6–30.Google Scholar
Holzer, Harry J., Raphael, Steven, and Stoll, Michael A. 2004. Will Employers Hire Former Offenders?: Employer Preferences, Background Checks, and Their Determinants. In Imprisoning America: The Social Effects of Mass Incarceration, ed. Patillo, Mary, Weiman, David F., and Western, Bruce, 205–243. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Holzer, Harry J., Raphael, Steven, and Stoll, Michael A. 2007. The Effect of an Applicant's Criminal History on Employer Hiring Decisions and Screening Practices: Evidence from Los Angeles. In Barriers to Reentry?: The Labor Market for Released Prisoners in Post‐Industrial America, ed. Bushway, Shawn, Stoll, Michael, and Weiman, David, 117–150. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hunt, James W., Bowers, James E., and Miller, Neal 1973. Laws, Licenses, and the Offender's Right to Work: A Study of State Laws Restricting the Occupational Licensing of Former Offenders. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse on Offender Employment Restrictions.Google Scholar
Kurlycheck, Megan C., Brame, Robert, and Bushway, Shawn 2006. Scarlet Letters and Recidivism: Does an Old Criminal Record Predict Future Offending? Criminology & Public Policy 5:1101–1122.Google Scholar
Legal Action Center. 2009. Standards for Hiring People with Criminal Records. http://www.lac.org/toolkits/standards/standards.htm#summary (accessed April 25, 2010).Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart 1963. Non‐Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study. American Sociological Review 28:55–67.Google Scholar
May, Bruce E. 1995. The Character Component of Occupational Licensing Laws: A Continuing Barrier to the Ex‐Felon's Employment Opportunity. North Dakota Law Review 71:187–206.Google Scholar
Myrick, Amy 2013. Facing Your Criminal Record: Expungement and the Collateral Problem of Wrongfully Represented Self. Law & Society Review 47:73–104.Google Scholar
National Employment Law Project. 2013. Criminal Records Bulletin. July. New York: NELP.Google Scholar
Pager, Devah 2003. The Mark of a Criminal Record. American Journal of Sociology 108:937–975.Google Scholar
Pager, Devah 2007. Marked: Race, Crime, and Finding Work in an Era of Mass Incarceration. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pager, Devah, and Quillian, Lincoln 2005. Walking the Talk? What Employers Say Versus What They Do. American Sociological Review 70:355–380.Google Scholar
Pager, Devah, Western, Bruce, and Bonikowski, Bart 2009. Discrimination in a Low‐Wage Market: A Field Experiment. American Sociological Review 74:777–799.Google Scholar
Raphael, Steven 2011. Improving Employment Prospects for Former Prison Inmates: Challenges and Policy. In Controlling Crime: Strategies and Tradeoffs, ed. Cook, Philip J., Ludwig, Jens, and McCrary, Justin, 521–565. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
SEARCH Group. 2001. Use and Management of Criminal History Record Information: A Comprehensive Report, 2001. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip 1969. Law, Society, and Industrial Justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Society for Human Resources Management. 2012. Background Checking—The Use of Criminal Background Checks in Hiring Decisions. http://www.shrm.org/Research/SurveyFindings/Articles/Pages/CriminalBackgroundCheck.aspx (accessed 28 February 2013).Google Scholar
Stoll, Michael, and Bushway, Shawn 2007. The Effect of Criminal Background Checks on Hiring Ex‐Offenders. UCLA School of Public Affairs, Department of Public Policy, Working Paper No. 07‐01. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Press.Google Scholar
Suchman, Mark C., and Edelman, Lauren 1996. Legal‐Rational Myths: The New Institutionalism and the Law and Society Tradition. Law & Social Inquiry 21:903–941.Google Scholar
Sutton, John R., and Dobbin, Frank 1996. The Two Faces of Governance: Responses to Legal Uncertainty in American Firms, 1955–1985. American Sociological Review 61:794–811.Google Scholar
Sutton, John R., Dobbin, Frank, Meyer, John W., and Scott, W. Richard 1994. The Legalization of the Workplace. American Journal of Sociology 99:944–971.Google Scholar
Uggen, Christopher, Manza, Jeff, and Thompson, Melissa 2006. Citizenship, Democracy, and the Civic Reintegration of Criminal Offenders. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 605:281–310.Google Scholar
Uggen, Christopher, Vuolo, Mike, Ruhland, Ebony, Whitham, Hilary, and Lageson, Sarah 2009. An Experimental Audit of the Effects of Low‐Level Criminal Records on Employment. Paper presented at the 2009 American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
US Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. 2011. Crime in the United States, 2010. http://www.fbi.gov/about‐us/cjis/ucr/crime‐in‐the‐u.s/2010/crime‐in‐the‐u.s.‐2010/persons‐arrested (accessed August 6, 2013).Google Scholar
US Equal Employment Opportunities Commission (EEOC). 2012a. Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records in Employment Decisions Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/arrest_conviction.cfm (accessed January 30, 2013).Google Scholar
US Equal Employment Opportunities Commission (EEOC). 2012b. Questions and Answers About the EEOC's Enforcement Guidance on the Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records in Employment Decisions Under Title VII. http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/qa_arrest_conviction.cfm (accessed January 30, 2013).Google Scholar
US Equal Employment Opportunities Commission (EEOC). 2013. EEOC Files Suit Against Two Employers for Use of Criminal Background Checks. http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/6‐11‐13.cfm (accessed July 15, 2013).Google Scholar
Wakefield, Sara, and Uggen, Christopher 2004. The Declining Significance of Race in Federal Civil Rights Law: The Social Structure of Employment Discrimination Claims. Sociological Inquiry 74:128–157.Google Scholar
Watstein, Ryan D. 2009. Out of Jail and Out of Luck: The Effect of Negligent Hiring Liability and the Criminal Record Revolution on an Ex‐Offender's Employment Prospects. Florida Law Review 61:581–610.Google Scholar
Western, Bruce 2006. Punishment and Inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
El v. Southeastern Penn. Transp. Auth., 3d Cir., No. 05‐3857 (March 19, 2007).Google Scholar
Public Employment; Consideration of Criminal Records. M.S. § 364.021.Google Scholar
Unfair Discrimination Practices Relating to Employment or Unfair Employment Practice. M.S. § 363A.08.Google Scholar
El v. Southeastern Penn. Transp. Auth., 3d Cir., No. 05‐3857 (March 19, 2007).Google Scholar
Public Employment; Consideration of Criminal Records. M.S. § 364.021.Google Scholar
Unfair Discrimination Practices Relating to Employment or Unfair Employment Practice. M.S. § 363A.08.Google Scholar