Secondary Transfer Effect of Contact
Do Intergroup Contact Effects Spread to Noncontacted Outgroups?
Abstract
This paper reviews the evidence for a secondary transfer effect of intergroup contact. Following a contact’s typical primary reduction in prejudice toward the outgroup involved in the contact, this effect involves a further, secondary reduction in prejudice toward noninvolved outgroups. Employing longitudinal German probability samples, we found that significant secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact exist, but they were limited to specific outgroups that are similar to the contacted outgroup in perceived stereotypes, status or stigma. Since the contact-prejudice link is bidirectional, the effect is inflated when prior prejudice reducing contact is not controlled. The strongest evidence derives from experimental research. Both cognitive (dissonance) and affective (evaluative conditioning) explanations for the effect are offered.
References
(1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
(1946). Some roots of prejudice. Journal of Psychology, 22, 9–39.
(1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
(1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
(1997). Indirect minority influence: Evidence for leniency in source evaluation and counterargumentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 949–964.
(2007). Nationalismus und Patriotismus als Ursache von Fremdenfeindlichkeit [Nationalism and patriotism as explanations of hostility to foreigners]. In , Deutsche Zustände. Folge 5 [
The German situation, Part 5. ] (pp. 131–149). Frankfurt a. M., Germany: Suhrkamp Verlag.(in press). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
(2008). Deprovincialization: Social identity complexity and outgroup acceptance. In , Emerging research directions for improving intergroup relations – Building on the legacy of Thomas F. Pettigrew (pp. 160–176). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
(1978). The American soldier revisited: Race relations and the military. Social Science Quarterly, 59, 451–467.
(1975). Ambivalence toward integration: The sequence of response to six interracial situations. The Sociological Quarterly, 16, 16–32.
(1977). Interethnic contact: Attitudinal consequences. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 9, 205–215.
(1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.
(2007). A conceptual and theoretical analysis of evaluative conditioning. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 230–241.
(2001). Associative learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 853–869.
(2006). Effect of terrorism on attitudes and ideological orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 259–265.
(2004). Come together: Longitudinal comparisons of Pettigrew’s reformulated intergroup contact model and the common ingroup identity model in Anglo-French and Mexican-American contexts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 229–256.
(1994). Nationalism, patriotism, and aggression: A clarification of functional differences. In , Aggressive behavior: Current perspectives (pp. 275–291). New York: Plenum.
(2008). Multiracial friendship networks and public attitudes toward immigration in the U.S. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
(2002). Deutsche Zustände. Folge 1 [
The German situation, Part 1 ]. Frankfurt a. M., Germany: Suhrkamp.(2004). Deutsche Zustände. Folge 3 [
The German situation, Part 3 ]. Frankfurt a. M., Germany: Suhrkamp.(2008, August). Generalized effects of intergroup contact: Replications and extensions of Pettigrew (1997). Unpublished paper presented at the EASP-SPSSI Conference on Intergroup Contact, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
(2003). The effects of ingroup and outgroup friendships on ethnic attitudes in college: A longitudinal study. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 76–92.
(2008). Majority versus minority influence, message processing and attitude change: The source-context-elaboration model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 237–326.
(1960a). Cognitive consistency and attitude change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 345–353.
(1960b). A syllogistic analysis of cognitive relationships. In Attitude organization and change (pp. 65–111). New Haven: Yale University Press.
(2004). Saving the forsaken: Religious culture and the rescue of Jews in Nazi Europe. New Haven: Yale University Press.
(1988). The altruistic personality: Rescuers of Jews in Nazi Europe. New York: Free Press.
(1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 173–185.
(1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.
(2007). Social identity matters: Predicting prejudice and violence in Western Europe. In , Identity matters: How ethnic and sectarian allegiances both prevent and promote collective violence (pp. 34–48). New York: Berghahn Books.
(2008). Future directions for intergroup contact theory and research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 187–199.
(2008). How and why does authoritarianism predict prejudice? The mediators of a global phenomenon. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
(2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 1–33.
(2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922–934.
(1995). Interracial contact and Black racial attitudes: The contact hypothesis and selectivity bias. Social Forces, 74, 205–26.
(2006). Calculation for the Sobel test: An interaction calculation tool for mediation tests. Retrieved August 21, 2006 at www.people.ku.edu/ ~preacher.
(1976). Dramatic events and attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1004–1015.
(2004). Ethnic enclaves and the dynamics of social identity on the college campus: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 96–110.
(1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In , Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290–312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
(1989). Intergroup aggression: Its predictors and distinctness from in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 364–373.
(2004). Intergroup contact and the central role of affect in intergroup prejudice. In , Social life of emotion (pp. 246–269). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2005). Differential relationships between intergroup contact and affective and cognitive dimensions of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1145–1158.
(2004). The role of perceived importance in intergroup contact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 211–227.
(2008). Ingroup and outgroup contact: A longitudinal study of the effects of cross-ethnic friendships, dates, roommate relationships and participation in segregated organizations. In , Improving intergroup relations: Building on the legacy of Thomas F. Pettigrew (pp. 127–142). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
(2005). The effect of university roommate contact on ethnic attitudes and behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 329–345.
(2002). Guilt by mere association: Evaluative conditioning and the spreading attitude effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 919–934.
(1970). Logical relationships among beliefs and timing as factors in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 571–582.
(1996). Prejudice reduction or self-selection? A test of the contact hypothesis. Sociological Spectrum, 16, 43–60.
(1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323–345.
(2008). The syndrome of group-focused enmity: The interrelation of prejudices tested with multiple cross-sectional and panel data. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 363–383.
