Abstract
This study is an application of social identity theory to feminist consciousness and activism. For women, strong gender identifications may enhance support for equality struggles, whereas for men, they may contribute to backlashes against feminism. University students (N = 276), primarily Euroamerican, completed a measure of gender self-esteem (GSE, that part of one's self-concept derived from one's gender), and two measures of feminism. High GSE in women and low GSE in men were related to support for feminism. Consistent with past research, women were more supportive of feminism than men, and in both genders, support for feminist ideas was greater than self-identification as a feminist.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
REFERENCES
Abrams, D., Thomas, J., & Hogg, M. A. (1990). Numerical distinctiveness, social identity and gender salience. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 87–92.
Andersen, K., & Cook, E. A. (1984). Women, work, and political attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 606–625.
Banaszak, L. A., & Plutzer, E. (1993). Contextual determinants of feminist attitudes: National and subnational influences in Western Europe. American Political Science Review, 87, 147–157.
Basu, A. (1995). The challenge of local feminisms: Women's movements in global perspective.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Bat-Chava, Y. (1994). Group identification and self-esteem in deaf adults. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 87, 147–157.
Breinlinger, S., & Kelly, C. (1994). Women's responses to status inequality: A test of social identity theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 1–16.
Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482.
Burn, S. M. (1996). The social psychology of gender. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Burn, S. M. (2000). Women across cultures:Aglobal perspective. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
Buschman, J. K., & Lenart, S. (1996). “I am not a feminist, but...”: College women, feminism, and negative experiences. Political Psychology, 17, 59–75.
Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston: Irwin Hyman.
Cook, E. A. (1989). Measuring feminist consciousness. Women and Politics, 9, 71–88.
Crocker, J., & Luhtanen, R. (1990). Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 60–67.
Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608–630.
Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302–318.
Dion, K. L. (1986). Responses to perceived discrimination and relative deprivation. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison (pp. 159–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies.In W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 27–57). Chichester, England: Wiley.
Gurin, P., & Markus, H. (1989). Cognitive consequences of gender identity. In S. Skevington and D. Baker (Eds.), The social identity of women (pp. 152–172). London: Sage.
Gurin, P., Miller, A. H., & Gurin, G. (1980). Stratum identification and consciousness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 30–47.
Henderson-King, D. H., & Stewart, A. J. (1994). Women or feminists? Assessing women's group consciousness. Sex Roles, 31, 505–516.
Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1987). Intergroup behavior, self-stereotyping, and the salience of social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 325–340.
Jacobson, M. B. (1981). You say potato and I say potahto: Attitudes toward feminism as a function of its subject-selected label. Sex Roles, 7, 349–354.
Kemp, A., Madlala, N., Moodley, A., & Salo, E. (1995). The dawn of a new day: Redefining South African feminism. In A. Basu (Ed.), The challenge of local feminisms: Women's movements in global perspective (pp. 131–162). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Komarovsky, M. (1985). Women in college: Shaping new feminine identities. New York: Basic Books.
Morgan, B. L. (1996). Putting the feminism into feminism scales: Introduction of a Liberal Feminist Attitude and Ideology Scale (LFAIS). Sex Roles, 34, 359–390.
Pharr, S. (1988). Homophobia: A weapon of sexism. In S. Ruth (Ed.), Issues in feminism (3rd ed., pp. 253–263). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
Renzetti, C. (1987). New wave or second stage? Attitudes of college women towards feminism.Sex Roles, 16, 265–227.
Skevington, S., & Baker, D. (1989). Introduction. In S. Skevington and D. Baker (Eds.), The social identity of women (pp. 1–14). London: Sage.
Smith, H. J., & Tyler, T. R. (1997). Choosing the right pond: The impact of group membership on self-esteem and group-oriented behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 146–170.
Swan, S., & Wyer, R. S. (1997). Gender stereotypes and social identity: How being in the minority affects judgments of self and others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1265–1276.
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walker, I., & Mann, L. (1987). Unemployment, relative deprivation, and social protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 275–283.
Williams, J. A., & Giles, H. (1978). The changing status of women in society: An intergroup perspective. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
since graduated
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burn, S.M., Aboud, R. & Moyles, C. The Relationship Between Gender Social Identity and Support for Feminism. Sex Roles 42, 1081–1089 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007044802798
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007044802798