Residential segregation in new Hispanic destinations: Cities, suburbs, and rural communities compared
Introduction
America’s Hispanic population is on the move. One-third of recent Mexican immigrants to the United States (i.e., between 1995 and 2000) settled outside of traditional gateway states in the Southwest (Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California). This represents a remarkable break from the past. During 1975–80 and 1985–90, only 9 and 13 percent of Hispanic immigrants, respectively, settled outside of traditional gateway states (Durand et al., 2005, Leach and Bean, 2008). Big cities like Atlanta and Washington, DC, as well as many smaller metropolitan cities (e.g., Winston-Salem or Reno), are now magnets for Hispanics and other immigrant populations (McConnell, 2008). But perhaps more significantly, 51 percent of Hispanic immigrants in new gateway states live in small suburban places, and 21 percent live in rural towns (Kandel and Parrado, 2005, Singer, 2004). To be sure, the rapid growth of Hispanics has transformed the social and economic fabric of many new destination communities, where they have come to live and work – often at low wages – in meat processing plants, agriculture, construction, landscaping, and the service industry (Hirschman and Massey, 2008).
In this paper, we ask a straightforward but heretofore unanswered question about the spatial assimilation or incorporation of Hispanic populations in new destinations. That is, has the growing racial and cultural diversity in new Hispanic destinations been accompanied by more racial segregation? Or, instead, has the new in-migration led to the emergence of racially integrated places, where Hispanics and whites live together in the same neighborhoods? Our study bridges a large residential segregation literature with new research on emerging Hispanic destinations and provides empirical evidence of changing ethnic relations between whites and America’s new immigrant groups. Here, we use data from the 1990 and 2000 decennial censuses to identify new Hispanic destinations, defined broadly to include metropolitan cities, suburban communities, and rural towns with unusually rapid growth in the Hispanic population. We then compare – for the first time – patterns of Hispanic–white segregation in new destinations with established places having sizeable and longstanding Hispanic populations (located mostly in the American Southwest). We also estimate several multivariate regression models, drawn from previous ecological studies of metropolitan segregation (e.g., Logan et al., 2004), that identify significant correlates of place-to-place variation in Hispanic–white segregation in new Hispanic destinations and established places. Our baseline estimates of segregation address longstanding questions about ongoing demographic processes of spatial assimilation or place stratification (e.g., Iceland and Nelson, 2008, Waters and Jiménez, 2005).
Section snippets
National estimates of Hispanic segregation
Neighborhood residential segregation has been used as an indirect measure of social distance between different racial and ethnic groups (Park, 1926, Taeuber and Taeuber, 1965). Recent studies provide a rather mixed view of changing relations between Hispanics and whites, despite the optimism implied by accelerated Hispanic suburbanization in the nation’s largest metropolitan areas during the 1980s and 1990s (Charles, 2003). Logan et al. (2004), for example, found that the 1990s brought
Data
Data come from the 100 percent items of the 1990 and 2000 decennial census summary files. We identify residential segregation patterns in rapidly growing Hispanic places rather than in metropolitan or micropolitan statistical areas.
A profile of new Hispanic destinations and established places
The results in Table 1 provide a sociodemographic profile of new Hispanic destinations in 2000. New destinations have much smaller populations on average in 2000 than established Hispanic communities. For example, the average population in new destinations was 16,800, compared with 40,588 and 27,990 in established and other places, respectively. Not surprisingly, new destinations also had much smaller Hispanic populations (1666) on average than established places (16,697).
By definition, new
Discussion and conclusion
The past decade has ushered in new patterns of population redistribution and growth among America’s Hispanic population (Massey and Capoferro, 2008, McConnell, 2008). Hispanics have become much less spatially concentrated in the Southwest and large metropolitan cities (Leach and Bean, 2008). Increasingly, Hispanics are relocating to nontraditional destinations, including suburban places and small towns in the Midwest and South (Donato et al., 2007, Singer, 2004). Whether indigenous populations
References (50)
- et al.
Does suburban residence mean better neighborhood conditions for all households? Assessing the influence of nativity status and race/ethnicity
Social Science Research
(2007) - et al.
Latinos, residential segregation, and spatial assimilation in micropolitan areas: exploring the American dilemma on a new frontier
Social Science Research
(2007) - et al.
Minority proximity to whites in suburbs: an individual-level analysis of segregation
American Journal of Sociology
(1993) - et al.
Immigrant groups in the suburbs: a reexamination of suburbanization and spatial assimilation
American Sociological Review
(1999) - et al.
Poverty: 1999. Census 2000 Report No. C2KBR-19
(2003) Toward a Theory of Minority-Group Relations
(1967)- et al.
Percent nonwhite and racial disparity in nonmetropolitan cities of the south
Social Science Quarterly
(1972) The dynamics of racial residential segregation
Annual Review of Sociology
(2003)Race, class, and space: outcomes of suburban access for Asians and Hispanics
Urban Geography
(2006)- et al.
Spatial dynamics of white flight: the effects of local and extralocal racial conditions on neighborhood out-migration
American Sociological Review
(2008)
Beyond gateway cities: economic restructuring and poverty among Mexican immigrant families and children
Family Relations
Are ghettos good or bad?
Quarterly Journal of Economics
Recent immigrant settlement in the nonmetro united states: evidence from internal census data
Rural Sociology
The new geography of Mexican immigration
Changes in the segregation of whites from blacks during the 1980s: small steps toward a more integrated society
American Sociological Review
Bifurcation, fragmentation, or integration? The racial, geographic structure of U.S. metropolitan segregation, 1990–2000
Urban Studies
Prejudice toward immigrants in the midwest
The relative importance of income, race in determining residential outcomes in U.S. urban areas, 1970–2000
Urban Affairs Review
Shifting geographies: examining the role of suburbanization in blacks’ declining segregation
Urban Affairs Review
Melting Pot Suburbs: A Census 2000 Study of Suburban Diversity
The possibility of a new racial hierarchy in the twenty-first-century United States
Rural industry and Mexican immigration and settlement in North Carolina
Places and peoples: the new American mosaic
Hispanic segregation in metro America: exploring the multiple forms of spatial assimilation
American Sociological Review
Immigrant residential segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas
Demography
Cited by (189)
Third places in rural America: Prevalence and disparities in use and meaningful use
2023, Journal of Rural StudiesSequential Polarization: The Development of the Rural-Urban Political Divide, 1976-2020
2023, Perspectives on PoliticsThe Limits of Preclearance
2023, Du Bois ReviewThe Effects of Residential Segregation on Black and White Mortality in the United States
2024, Review of Black Political Economy