Race, space, and unemployment duration
References (25)
- et al.
Work, search, and travel among white and black youth
Journal of Urban Economics
(1994) - et al.
Spatial mismatch research in the 1990s: Progress and potential
Papers in Regional Science
(1999) The spatial mismatch hypothesis and black youth joblessness: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay area
Journal of Urban Economics
(1998)Job search and unemployment duration: Implications for the spatial mismatch hypothesis
Journal of Urban Economics
(1997)Racial differences in residential and job mobility: Evidence concerning the spatial mismatch hypothesis
Journal of Urban Economics
(1998)- et al.
The dynamics of youth employment
The spatial mismatch hypothesis: Are there teenage jobs missing in the ghetto?
- et al.
Does neighborhood matter? Assessing recent evidence
Housing Policy Debate
(1997) - et al.
Identifying neighborhood thresholds: An empirical exploration
Housing Policy Debate
(2000) Reservation wages and their labor market effects for black and white male youth
The Journal of Human Resources
(1986)
The spatial mismatch hypothesis: A review of recent studies and their implications for welfare reform
Housing Policy Debate
The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood
Cited by (59)
Understanding neighborhood disadvantage: A behavior genetic analysis
2021, Journal of Criminal JusticeCitation Excerpt :At present, however, there does not appear to be a clear understanding about the potential effect of self-selection on neighborhood effects. Some research did not find support for neighborhood effect once self-selection was accounted for (Oreopoulos, 2003), while other studies found that neighborhood effects remained significant after accounting for self-selection (Aaronson, 1998; Dawkins, Shen, & Sanchez, 2005; Galster, Marcotte, Mandell, Wolman, & Augustine, 2007). Thus, the evidence is quite mixed.
Do neighbors help finding a job? Social networks and labor market outcomes after plant closures
2020, Labour EconomicsCitation Excerpt :Burns et al., 2010 find that coming from a neighborhood with socio-economic characteristics that match the ones of the job seeker improves job-finding probabilities. Evidence that ethnic diversity has a negative effect on employment is provided by Hémet and Malgouyres (2018), and Dawkins et al. (2005) find that residential segregation affects racial differences in unemployment durations. Beaman (2012), Edin et al. (2003) and Damm (2009) document that the size and quality of the neighborhood affect employment and wages of refugees.
Spatial mismatch, enclave effects and employment outcomes for rural migrant workers: Empirical evidence from Yunnan Province, China
2019, Habitat InternationalCitation Excerpt :Overall, the findings on the impact of job accessibility on migrant employment are mixed. Although studies based on North America and Europe provide much positive evidence (e.g. Dawkins et al., 2005; Holzer, 1991; Mouw, 2000; Ong & Miller, 2005; Raphael, 1998), Lin, Chen, and Hsieh (2016) did not find any significant relationship between job accessibility and employment in their study on indigenous Taiwanese. In a study on female workers in Los Angeles, Parks (2004) also found that a significant relationship between job accessibility and employment only exists among some ethnic minority population groups (e.g. Mexican Americans and Vietnamese Americans), whilst the relationship is not significant for other ethnic groups.
Prejudice and racial matches in employment
2018, Labour EconomicsCitation Excerpt :Some of these differences can be attributed to persisting gaps in skill (Neal and Johnson, 1996). However, substantial differences in wages and employment remain even after accounting for observable differences in education and cognitive test scores (e.g., Bjerk, 2007; Black et al., 2006; Carneiro et al., 2005; Dawkins et al., 2005; DellaVigna and Paserman, 2005; Lang and Manove, 2011). At the same time, despite dramatic declines in measures of anti-black prejudice in national polls over the past fifty years, recent studies demonstrate the persistence of subtle and subconscious forms of prejudice and their impact on employer behavior (Bertrand et al., 2005; Rooth, 2010; Ziegert and Hanges, 2005).
Car access and long-term poverty exposure: Evidence from the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) experiment
2017, Journal of Transport GeographyCitation Excerpt :Particularly for single mothers, automobiles can enhance their ability to balance employment as well as other domestic responsibilities by more easily accommodating travel to multiple destinations on a single tour (Blumenberg, 2004). Given these advantages, it should come as no surprise that private automobiles are pivotal in improving outcomes for low-income and minority adults (Baum, 2009; Cervero et al., 2002; Dawkins et al., 2005; Gautier and Zenou, 2010; Gurley and Bruce, 2005; Lucas and Nicholson, 2003; Ong, 2002; Raphael and Stoll, 2001; Sandoval et al., 2011) including MTO participants (redacted) and enhance neighborhood satisfaction among households that lease-up in lower-poverty neighborhoods (Briggs et al., 2010a; Briggs et al., 2010b; Dawkins et al., 2015a). Among suburban movers, households without automobiles frequently cite the lack of an automobile as one of the reasons for returning to central cities in the long term (Varady and Walker, 2003).