Elsevier

Journal of Criminal Justice

Volume 40, Issue 5, September–October 2012, Pages 386-393
Journal of Criminal Justice

Incarceration and inmates’ self perceptions about returning home

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.06.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

This paper expands the emerging literature on offenders’ self-perceptions by exploring prisoners’ perceptions as they are preparing to leave prison and return to the community. Research on the impact of imprisonment on reoffending suggests the need to focus on possible individual-level mechanisms that impact prisoner perceptions of life after release from prison. In particular, a greater understanding of the role of prison experiences in offending patterns necessarily requires attention to the perceptions and lived experiences of individuals.

Methods

Data for this paper were derived from self report surveys and interviews of 800 men and women preparing to leave prison. Descriptive and regression analyses were utilized.

Results

Results indicate that family support, having children, and in-prison substance abuse treatment increase optimism, while negative family influences (incarceration or drug use of family members), longer incarceration times, and a history of serious drug use reduce optimism about life after incarceration.

Conclusions

This study suggests that correctional policies that facilitate family support and offer substance abuse treatment during confinement appear to be important in increasing optimism among men and women returning to the community after incarceration.

Introduction

In a recent review of the evidence concerning the impact of imprisonment on reoffending and desistance, Nagin, Cullen, and Jonson (2009) conclude that incarceration has a null or mildly criminogenic effect on future criminal behavior. Yet they acknowledge serious gaps in the accumulated evidence and have called for a research program in specific areas to illuminate our understanding of how prison experiences affect future behavior. Most importantly, and as a contrast to much of the extant research on the impact of imprisonment, research is sorely needed on the ‘black box’ of imprisonment, including inmate's perceptions of reoffending risk and how they perceive their life chances upon reentry.

Nagin's call for a greater understanding of the impact of the prison experience coincides with a flurry of attention in the past decade to the conceptualization of criminal desistance (Paternoster and Bushway, 2009, Giordano et al., 2007, Giordano et al., 2002, LeBel et al., 2008, Maruna, 2001, Laub and Sampson, 2001, Laub and Sampson, 2003). Emerging from the debate over desistance paradigms is a general recognition that individuals’ self-perceptions are an important component of the desistance process, albeit ones that have often been ignored or marginalized in theories of desistance. Unfortunately, most of the recent desistance theorists have not examined the self-perceptions of incarcerated men and women as they embark on the transition from prison to the community. An exception is a British study of recidivism that introduced the concept of hope and optimism among inmates preparing to leave prison (Burnett, 1992, Burnett, 1994, Burnett, 2004). The importance of this pre-release subjective state in the process of desistance was later demonstrated (see Burnett and Maruna, 2004, LeBel et al., 2008), and as will be discussed in the next section, is similar to concepts of identity and self-perception among desisting offenders introduced more recently.

A greater understanding of continuity and change in offending patterns, including the role of prison experiences, necessarily requires attention to the perceptions and lived experiences of individuals. In one sense, people in prison may not be much different than people in the general population. For example, individuals who perceive opportunities for advancement in their careers may take advantage of special training that will improve the quality of their work and lead to greater success. Similarly, how individuals feel and act while incarcerated may affect their attitudes and behavior after release.

There is also a need to identify the specific mechanisms that influence the impact of incarceration. Much of the research reviewed by Nagin and colleagues (2009) takes a ‘black box’ approach to understanding the impact of imprisonment on reoffending with few studies actually focusing on the underlying, individual-level mechanisms involved. These mechanisms may be quite diverse including personal characteristics, the nature of the environment, connections with the outside world, and daily activities such as engaging in rehabilitative programming. Older research on the process of adjusting to prison life (e.g., Adams, 1992, Toch, 1977) has studied mechanisms that contribute to inmate adjustment, including attributes of individuals and their environments. For example, a central point in Adams’ review is that individuals who are cut off from family support have more difficulty adjusting to prison life. Following Adams and other recent research on the role of family support, we explore the impact of family relationships on individuals’ self-perceptions as they prepare to leave prison and return to the community.

Finally, the data necessary to investigate these questions is inevitably different than that used in empirical models estimating the impact on reoffending of receiving a prison sentence or the length of sentence among those incarcerated. Not only are the methodological issues associated with these regression-based approaches substantial (Nagin et al., 2009), but Shadd Maruna argues that, “the fundamental humanity of the individual offender [has been] overlooked” in this research (Polizzi & Maruna, 2010: 184). Thus, it is not surprising that research on offenders’ self-perceptions is nascent and our understanding of continuity and change in criminal behavior remains embryonic. Paternoster and Bushway (2009) suggest intensive interviews with offenders as a way to understand the role of subjective perceptions in patterns of criminality, including desistance. This paper brings such data to bear on this important research question.

This paper expands the emerging literature on offenders’ self-perceptions by exploring prisoners’ self-perceptions as they are preparing to leave prison and return to the community. Following LeBel and his colleagues, we examine self-reported thoughts surrounding this key transition including perceptions of difficulty in establishing a prosocial identity and lifestyle in the community after release, and extend LeBel's results by identifying individual and social factors related to optimism and hope about their return to the community. The following section reviews the pertinent research on offender self-perceptions, much of which has occurred in the context of theories of desistance. This study then utilizes survey data from a representative sample of individuals exiting prison in three states. Findings that describe the relationship between individual and social characteristics and pre-release attitudes are presented. Finally, the importance of considering pre-release self-perceptions in our understanding of successful reintegration will be discussed.

Section snippets

Literature Review

Nagin and his colleague's review of research on the impact of imprisonment on reoffending and proposed research agenda on possible individual-level mechanisms provided the impetus for the current study. Prison may be criminogenic or even beneficial in some instances, but what is missing from the research is an understanding of what mechanisms are involved in the prison experience that contributed to the outcome. In addition, a parallel literature on desistance offers insight into the role of

Participants and Procedures

The data for this analysis were collected as part of a larger longitudinal study of exiting prisoners in Illinois, Ohio, and Texas conducted by the Urban Institute in Washington, DC. The study targeted prisoners serving at least one year in state prison and returning to the city and county areas of Chicago, Cleveland, and Houston within 30–60 days. Potential respondents were identified either through compulsory pre-release programs where prisoners were already convened (Illinois and Texas) or

Discussion and Policy Implications

This study explored the individual, family, and situational factors that may be important in affecting a person's perception about how difficult life would be upon release from prison -- what we and other researchers (Burnett, 1994, LeBel et al., 2008) have called optimism. Based on theoretical suggestions that an individual's ability to change his or her behavior is partially dependent upon self-perceptions (Giordano et al., 2007, Paternoster and Bushway, 2009), and that these perceptions are

References (35)

  • K. Adams

    Adjusting to prison life

    Crime and Justice: A Review of Research

    (1992)
  • K. Anderson et al.

    Fatherhood: Evolution and human paternal behavior

    (2010)
  • R. Burnett

    The dynamics of recidivism

    (1992)
  • R. Burnett

    Recidivism and imprisonment

    Home Office Research Bulletin

    (1994)
  • R. Burnett

    To reoffend or not to reoffend?: The ambivalence of convicted property offenders

  • R. Burnett et al.

    So ‘prison works’, does it?: The criminal careers of 130 men released from prison

    The Howard Journal

    (2004)
  • CASA

    Behind bars II: Substance abuse and America's prison population

    (2010)
  • M. diZerega et al.

    Setting an Agenda for Family-Focused Justice Reform

    (2011)
  • B.R. Garner et al.

    Measuring offender attributes and engagement in treatment using the Client Evaluation of Self and Treatment

    Criminal Justice and Behavior

    (2007)
  • P.C. Giordano et al.

    Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation

    The American Journal of Sociology

    (2002)
  • P.C. Giordano et al.

    Emotions and crime over the life course: A neo-Meadian perspective on criminal continuity and change

    The American Journal of Sociology

    (2007)
  • J. Irwin

    The Felon

    (1970)
  • N. La Vigne et al.

    Texas prisoners’ reflections on returning home

    (2005)
  • P.A. Langan et al.

    Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994

    Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report No. NCJ 193427

    (2002)
  • J. Laub et al.

    Understanding desistance from crime

  • J. Laub et al.

    Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70

    (2003)
  • T.P. LeBel et al.

    The ‘chicken and egg’ of subjective and social factors in desistance from crime

    European Journal of Criminology

    (2008)
  • Cited by (88)

    • Visitation patterns and post-release offending: Exploring variations in the timing, rate, and consistency of prison visits

      2022, Journal of Criminal Justice
      Citation Excerpt :

      Visits near release may be useful for planning and organizing practical matters for an individuals' imminent reentry. These visits could also help individuals feel more optimistic about their return (Visher & O'Connell, 2012), reduce anxiety about their return (Mancini et al., 2015), and help remind individuals of their social roles within their outside networks (Cochran & Mears, 2013; LeBel, 2012). Contrarily, if individuals experience a decrease in visits over time then relationships have likely weakened, making it difficult to access these contacts upon release.

    • First weeks out: Social support stability and health among formerly incarcerated men

      2021, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Add to this the unpredictability of support from family and friends during the reintegration process and another stressor emerges. Indeed, people leaving prison and reentering society for the first time in years rely heavily on their loved ones (Fahmy and Wallace, 2019; Pettus-Davis, 2021; Visher & O'Connell, 2012). Having a stable support system during the decisive first months out of prison may affect physical and mental health, which in turn, can lead to positive reentry outcomes, including abstaining from crime (Link et al., 2019).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text