Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ex-offender employment programs and recidivism: A meta-analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Experimental Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One consequence of the tremendous growth in the number of persons under supervision of the criminal justice system, whether incarcerated, on parole, or on probation, is the effect of this criminal history on finding and keeping a job. Ex-offenders, especially those recently released from prison, face substantial barriers to many types of legal employment; nonetheless, stable employment is one of the best predictors of post-release success. Thus, policy-makers concerned about high recidivism rates face an obvious need to improve the employment prospects of ex-offenders. Over the last 25 years, many programs that were designed to increase employment (and, by so doing, reduce recidivism) among ex-offenders have been implemented and evaluated. [Wilson, D. B., Gallagher, C. A., Coggeshall, M. B. & MacKenzie, D. L. (1999). Corrections Management Quarterly 3(4), 8–18; Wilson, D. B., Gallagher, C. A. & MacKenzie, D. L. (2000). Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 37(4), 347–368] conducted a quantitative synthesis and meta-analysis of 33 evaluations of educational, vocational, and work programs for persons in correctional facilities. To date, however, the evaluation literature on employment programs for those with a criminal record who are not in custody has not been systematically reviewed. This paper presents the results of a quantitative meta-analysis of eight random assignment studies of such programs, using the Campbell Collaboration methodology. The results indicate that this group of community employment programs for ex-offenders did not reduce recidivism; however, the experimental design research on this question is small and does not include some of the promising community employment programs that have emerged in the last decade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, D. B. & Schumacker, R. E. (1986). Assessment of job training programs. Journal of Offender Counseling, Services, & Rehabilitation 10, 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R. A., Lenihan, K. J. & Rossi, P. H. (1980). Crime and poverty: Some experimental evidence from ex-offenders. American Sociological Review 45(3), 766–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, H. S., Orr, L. L., Cave, G., Bell, S. H., Doolittle, F. & Lin, W. (1994). The national JTPA study. Overview: Impacts, benefits, and costs of title II-A. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, M. L. (2000). Getting back to work: Employment programs for ex-offenders. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushway, S. D. (1998). The impact of an arrest on the job stability of young White American men. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 35(4), 454–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushway, S. & Reuter, P. (1997). Labor markets and crime risk factors. In L. W. Sherman, D. Gottfredson, D. MacKenzie, J. Eck, P. Reuter & S. Bushway (Eds.), Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushway, S. & Reuter, P. (2002). Labor markets and crime. In J. Q. Wilson & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Crime: Public policies for crime control. Oakland: Institute for Contemporary Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cave, G., Bos, H., Doolittle, F. & Toussaint, C. (1993). Jobstart: Final report on a program for school dropouts. New York, NY: Manpower Demonstration and Research Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clem, C. (1999, September). Annotated bibliography on offender job training and placement. 2nd Ed. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, P. (1998). Job placement for offenders in relation to recidivism. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 28, 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, M. A. & Willoughby, K. G. (1996). Employment outcomes of ex-offender Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) trainees. Evaluation Review 20, 67–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaes, G., Flanagan, T., Motiiuk, L. & Stewart, L. (1999). Adult correctional treatment. In M. Tonry & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Prisons (pp. 361–426). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J. & Dinovitzer, R. (1999). Collateral consequences of imprisonment for children, communities, and prisoners. In M. Tonry & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Prisons (pp. 121–162). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harer, M. D. (1994). Recidivism among federal prisoners released in 1987. Journal of Correctional Education 46(3), 98–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics 6, 107–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattessa, E. J. & Travis, L. F. (1991). Halfway house or probation: A comparison of alternative dispositions. Journal of Crime and Justice 14, 53–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W. & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. P. & Sabol, W. J. (2001). Prisoner reentry in perspective (Urban Institute Crime Policy Report). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallar, C. D. & Thornton, C. V. D. (1978). Transitional aid for released prisoners: Evidence for the LIFE experiment. Journal of Human Resources 13(2), 208–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. (Ed.) (1995). What works: Reducing reoffending. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, R., Blakely, C., Carmichael, D. & Silver, L. (1992). An evaluation of project RZO outcomes: An evaluative report. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University, Public Policy Resources Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piliavin, I. & Gartner, R. (1981). The impact of supported work on ex-offenders. Madison, WI: Institute for Research on Poverty and Mathematical Research, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P. H., Berk, R. A. & Lenihan, K. J. (1980). Money, work, and crime: Experimental evidence. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, S., Sridharan, S., Gouvis, C., Buck, J. & Morley, E. (1999). Impact of the opportunity to succeed (OPTS) aftercare program for substance-abusing felons: Comprehensive final report. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. & Laub, J. (1997). A life-course theory of cumulative disadvantage and the stability of delinquency. Advances in Criminological Theory 7, 133–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schochet, P. Z., Burghardt, J. & Glazerman, S. (2000). National job corps study: The short-term impacts on job corps participants’ employment and related outcomes. Final report. Princeton, NJ: Mathematics Policy Research, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schochet, P. Z., Burghardt, J. & Glazerman, S. (2001). National job corps study: The impacts on job corps participants’ employment and related outcomes. Princeton, NJ: Mathematics Policy Research, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, A., Johnson, K. D., Travis. J. & McBride, E.C. (2004). From prison to work: The employment dimensions of prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soothill, K. (1999). White-collars and black sheep. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 32, 303–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. & Petersilia, J. (1996). Work release in Washington: Effects on recidivism and corrections costs. The Prison Journal 76(2), 138–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uggen, C. (1999). Ex-offenders and the conformist alternative: A job quality model of work and crime. Social Problems 46(1), 127–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uggen, C. (2000). Work as a turning point in the life course of criminals: A duration model of age, employment, and recidivism. American Sociological Review 67, 529–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uggen, C. & Staff, J. (2001). Work as a turning point for criminal offenders. Corrections Management Quarterly 5, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uggen, C., Piliavin, I. & Matsueda, R. (2002). Jobs programs and criminal desistance. Paper commissioned by the Urban Institute, Washington, DC.

  • Webster, R., Hedderman, C., Turnbull, R. & May, T. (2001). Building bridges to employment for prisoners. Home Office Research Study 226. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, B., Kling, J. R. & Weiman, D. (2001). The labor market consequences of incarceration. Crime and Delinquency 47(3), 410–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. J. (1997). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. B., Gallagher, C. A., Coggeshall, M. B. & MacKenzie, D. L. (1999). A quantitative review and description of corrections-based education, vocation, and work programs. Corrections Management Quarterly 3(4), 8–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. B., Gallagher, C. A. & MacKenzie, D. L. (2000). A meta-analysis of corrections-based education, vocation, and work programs for adult offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 37(4), 347–368.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christy A. Visher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Visher, C.A., Winterfield, L. & Coggeshall, M.B. Ex-offender employment programs and recidivism: A meta-analysis. J Exp Criminol 1, 295–316 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-005-8127-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-005-8127-x

Key words

Navigation