Skip to main content
Log in

Indicators of child well-being through a neighborhood lens

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adverse child outcomes tend to be concentrated in neighborhoods with constellations of adverse conditions and risk factors. This paper examines the challenges of developing meaningful and useful indicators of child well-being at the level of the neighborhood. Recent technological advances have made it more feasible for communities to develop neighborhood indicators, but there are a number of practical, conceptual and methodological challenges that are involved in this work. In this article, we discuss the potential usefulness of neighborhood indicators, several of the conceptual and methodological challenges and offer some illustrations of neighborhood indicators that are pertinent to the well-being of children. In addition to administrative data, we discuss indicators of child well-being rooted in both child and adult perceptions of neighborhood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allard, S., Rosen, D., & Tolman, R. (2003). Access to mental health and substance abuse services among women receiving welfare in Detroit. Urban Affairs Review, 38, 787–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, J., Katz, I., Korbin, J. E., & O’Brien, M. (2006). Children and families in communities: Theory, research, policy and practice. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A. (2005a). Is the study of the “state of our children” changing? re-visiting after 5 years. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(7), 799–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A. (2005). Where are the children? Children’s role in measuring and monitoring their well-being. Social Indicators Research, 74, 573–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks-Gunn, J., Aber, L., & Duncan, G. (Eds.). (1997). Neighborhood poverty: Context and consequences for children. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, R., & Ellison, N. (2004). Sorting places out? Towards a social politics of neighbourhood informatisation. Information, Communication and Society, 7, 321–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S95–S120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulton, C. J., Korbin, J. E., Chan, T., & Su, M. (2001). Mapping residents’ perceptions of neighborhood boundaries: a methodological note. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2), 371–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulton, C. J., Korbin, J. E., & Su, M. (1996). Measuring neighborhood context for young children in an urban area. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24(1), 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulton, C. J., Korbin, J. E., Su, M., & Chow, J. (1995). Community level factors and child maltreatment rates. Child Development, 66, 1262–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, I., & Turner, M. (1997). Does neighborhood matter? Assessing recent evidence. Housing Policy and Debate, 8, 833–866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwisle, B. (1991). Micro-macro theoretical linkages in social demography: A commentary. In J. Huber (Ed.), Macro-micro linkages in sociology (pp. 280–286). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goerge, R., Van Voorhis, J., & Lee, B. J. (1994). Illinois longitudinal and relational child and family research database. Social Science Computer Review, 12, 351–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grannis, R. (1998). The importance of trivial streets: Residential streets and residential segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 1530–1564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, D. I., Cornelius, S., & Carver, S. (1998). Introduction to geographical information systems. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korbin, J. E., Coulton, C. J., Chard, S., Platt-Houston, C., & Su, M. (1998). Impoverishment and child maltreatment in African American and European American neighborhoods. Development and Psychopathology, 10, 215–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemeshow, S., Hosmer, D. W., Klar, J., & Lwanga, S. K. (1990). Adequacy of sample size in health studies. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 309–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J.R., & Alba, R. D. (1993). Locational returns to human capital: Minority access to suburban community resources. Demography, 30, 243–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S. (2004). Segregation and stratification: A biosocial perspective. DuBois Review: Social Science Research and Race, 1, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G., & Berry, F. (Eds.). (1994). Protecting children from abuse and neglect: Foundations for a new national strategy. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, M., Wright, G., Smith, G., & Dibben, C. (2006). Measuring multiple deprivation at the small area level. Environment and Planning, 38, 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, R. M. (1990). Estimating the reliability of aggregate-level variables based on individual-level characteristics. Sociological Methods and Research, 18, 473–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, K. L. S., Kingsley, G. T., & Coulton, C. J. (2003). Neighborhoods and health: Building evidence for local policy. Washington D.C.: The Urban Institute. http://www2.urban.org/nnip/health03.html.

  • Sabol, W., Coulton, C. J., & Polousky, E. (2004). Measuring child maltreatment risk in communities: A life table approach. Child Abuse and Neglect, 28, 967–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 227, 918–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. K., & Cody, S. (1994). Evaluating the housing unit method. American Psychological Journal, 60, 209–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spilsbury, J. (2005). “We don’t really get to go out in the front yard” – children’s home range and neighborhood violence. Children’s Geographies, 3(1), 79–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spilsbury, J., & Korbin, J. E. (2004). Negotiating the dance: Social capital from the perspective of neighborhood children and adults. In P. Pufall & R. Unsworth (Eds.), Rethinking childhood (pp. 191–206). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. .

  • United Nations Human Settlements Program. (2006). http://www.unhabitat.org/programmes/guo/guo_indicators.asp.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia J. Coulton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coulton, C.J., Korbin, J.E. Indicators of child well-being through a neighborhood lens. Soc Indic Res 84, 349–361 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9119-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9119-1

Keywords

Navigation