Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“The Motherhood Wage Gap for Women in the United States: The Importance of College and Fertility Delay”

  • Published:
Review of Economics of the Household Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

One of the stylized facts from the past 30 years has been the declining rate of first births before age 30 for all women and the increase rate of first births after age 30 among women with four-year college degrees (Steven P. Martin, Demography, 37(4), 523–533, 2000). What are some of the factors behind women’s decision to postpone their childbearing? We hypothesize that the wage difference often observed between like-educated mothers and non-mothers (Jane Waldfogel, Journal of Labor Economics, 16, 505–545, 1998a; Journal of Economic Perspectives 12(1) 137–156, 1998b) may be affected by the postponement of childbearing until after careers are fully established. Hence, we focus on college-educated women because they are typically more career-oriented than their non-college educated counterparts and also the group most often observed postponing maternity. We use individual-level data on women from the 1979 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY79) in order to control for individual-level unobserved heterogeneity as well as human capital characteristics, such as actual work experience, in our empirical analysis. We estimate wage equations, first producing base-line results to compare to the existing literature. Then, we expand the basic wage equation model to address fundamental econometric issues and the education/fertility issue at hand. Our empirical findings are two-fold. First, we find that college-educated mothers do not experience a motherhood wage penalty at all. In fact, they enjoy a wage boost when compared to college-educated childless women. Second, fertility delay enhances this wage boost even further. Our results provide an explanation for the observed postponement of maternity for educated women. We argue that the wage boost experienced by college-educated mothers may be the result of their search for family–friendly work environments, which, in turn, yields job matches with more female-friendly firms offering greater opportunities for advancement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, Deborah J., Melissa Binder, and Kate Krause. (2002a). “The Motherhood Wage Penalty Revisited: Experience, Heterogeneity, Work Effort and Work-Schedule Flexibility”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review.

  • Deborah J. Anderson Melissa Binder Kate Krause (2002b) ArticleTitle“The Motherhood Wage Penalty: Which Mothers Pay It and Why?” American Economic Review papers & proceedings 92 IssueID2 354–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Patricia F. Apps Ray Rees (2004) ArticleTitle“Fertility, Female Labor Supply and Public Policy” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 106 IssueID4 745–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Gary S. Becker (1985) ArticleTitle“Human Capital, Effort, and the Sexual Division of Labor” Journal of Labor Economics 3(1 Pt. 2) S33–S58

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, Jere, Suzanne Duryea, and Miguel Szekely. (1999). “Decomposing Fertility Differences Across World Regions and Over Time: Is Improved Health More Important than Woman’s Schooling?” IDB-OCE Working Paper No. 406 (September).

  • Blackburn, McKinley L., David E. Bloom, and David Neumark. (1990). “Fertility Timing, Wages and Human Capital”. NBER Working Paper No. 3422, August.

  • Bruni, Frank. (2002). “Persistent Drop in Fertility Reshapes Europe’s Future”, New York Times, December 26, 2002.

  • Michelle J. Budig Paula England (2001) ArticleTitle“The Wage Penalty for Motherhood” American Sociological Review 66 204–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Elizabeth M. Caucutt Nezih Guner John Knowles (2002) ArticleTitle“Why do Women Wait Matching Wage Inequality and the Incentives for Fertility Delay” Review of Economic Dynamics 5 815–855

    Google Scholar 

  • T.D. Chandler Y. Kamo J.D. Werbel (1994) ArticleTitle“Do Delays in Marriage and Childbirth Affect Earnings?” Social Science Quarterly 74 IssueID4 838–853

    Google Scholar 

  • Renbao Chen S. Philip Morgan (1991) ArticleTitle“Recent Trends in the Timing of First Births in the United States” Demography 28 513–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiodo, Abbigail J. and Michael T. Owyang. (2003). “Marriage, Motherhood and Money”. The Regional Economist 5–9.

  • Ann Crittendon (2001) The Price of Motherhood: Why the Most Important Job in the World is Still the Least Valued Henry Holt and Company New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Drolet, Marie. (2002). “Wives, Mothers, and Wages: Does Timing Matter?” unpublished manuscript, Statistics Canada, No. 186.

  • Ellwood, David T. and Christopher Jencks. (2001). “The Growing Differences in Family Structure: What Do We Know? Where Do We Look for Answers?” Manuscript prepared for the New Inequality Program supported by the Russell Sage Foundation (August), 99 pgs.

  • Galor, Oded and David N. Weil. (1995). “The Gender Gap, Fertility and Growth”. Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) Discussion Paper No. 1157.

  • Zvi Griliches (1979) ArticleTitle“Sibling Models and Data in Economics: Beginnings of a Survey Part 2: Education and Income Distribution” Journal of Political Economy 87 IssueID5 S37–S64

    Google Scholar 

  • Siv Gustafsson (2001) ArticleTitle“Optimal Age at Motherhood Theoretical and Empirical Considerations on Postponement of Maternity in Europe” Journal of Population Economics 14 225–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Susan Harkness Jane Waldfogel (2003) ArticleTitle“The Family Gap in Pay: Evidence from Seven Industrialized Countries” Journal of Labor Research 22 369–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett, Sylvia Ann. (2002). Creating a Life: Professional Women and the Quest for Children.

  • Martha Hill (1979) ArticleTitle“The Wage Effects of Marital Status and Children” Journal of Human Resources 14 579–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotz, V. Joseph, Susan Williams McElroy, and Seth Sanders. (2002). “Teenage Childbearing and its Life Cycle Consequences: Exploiting a Natural Experiment”, unpublished manuscript.

  • Murat F. Iyigun (2000) ArticleTitle“Timing of Childbearing and Economic Growth” Journal of Development Economics 61 IssueID1 255–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders Korenman David Neumark (1992) ArticleTitle“Marriage, Motherhood, and Wages” The Journal of Human Resources 27 IssueID2 233–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappegard, Trude. (2000). “New Fertility Trends in Norway.” Demographic Research, Vol. 2, Article 3 (March), http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol2/3.

  • Martin, Joyce A., Brady Hamilton, Stephanie Ventura, Fay Menacker, and Melissa Park. (2002). “Births: Final Data for 2000” (Errata: updated July 3, 2002), National Vital Statistics Reports Volume 50, Number 5 (February).

  • Steven P. Martin (2000) ArticleTitle“Diverging Fertility Among U.S Women Who Delay Childbearing Past Age 30” Demography 37 IssueID4 523–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Amalia R. (2003). “The Effects of Motherhood Timing on Career Path”. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, November.

  • Kevin Murphy Finis Welch (1990) ArticleTitle“Empirical Age-Earnings Profiles” Journal of Labor Economics 8 IssueID2 202–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullin, Charles H. and Ping Wang. (2002). “The Timing of Childbearing Among Heterogeneous Women in Dynamic General Equilibrium”, NBER Working Paper # 9231 (October).

  • National Center for Health Statistics. (2003). National Vital Statistics Reports, Volume 52, No. 10 (December 17), 114 pages.

  • Neal, Derek. (2004). “The Measured Black-White Wage Gap Among Women Is Too Small”, Journal of Political Economy 112 (February), S1–S28.

  • David Neumark Sanders Korenman (1992) ArticleTitle“Marriage, Motherhood, and Wages” Journal of Human Resources 27 IssueID2 233–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, Austin. (2003). “Fertility, Human Capital, and Wages”. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, October.

  • Population Council. (1999). “Demography: Birth Delays Skew Developing World’s Fertility Figures,” Population Briefs, Volume 5, Number 3 (September): http://www.popcouncil.org/publications/popbriefs;pb5(3)_2.html.

  • Ronald R. Rindfuss Philip S. Morgan Kate Offutt (1996) ArticleTitle“Education and the Changing Age Pattern of American Fertility: 1963–1989” Demography 33 IssueID3 277–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Lucie. (2002). “Murphy Brown Revisited: Human Capital, Search and Nonmarital Childbearing Among Educated Women”, unpublished manuscript (University of Michigan), March.

  • Hiromi Taniguchi (1999) ArticleTitle“The Timing of Childbearing and Women’s Wages” Journal of Marriage and the Family 61 1008–1019

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, Erin L. (2001). “Educational Attainment and Family Gaps in Women’s Wages: Evidence from Five Industrialized Countries”, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper No. 246.

  • Jane Waldfogel (1997) ArticleTitle“The Effects of Children on Women’s Wages” American Sociological Review 62 209–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Jane Waldfogel (1998a) ArticleTitle“The Family Gap for Young Women in the United States and Britain: Can Maternity Leave Make a Difference?” Journal of Labor Economics 16 505–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Jane Waldfogel (1998b) ArticleTitleUnderstanding the “Family Gap” in Pay for Women with Children The Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 IssueID1 137–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijsen, Cecile. and Clara Mulder. (2002). “Education, Motherhood Motivation and Child-timing Decision Making in the Netherlands” Unpublished manuscript, UvA, October.

  • Jeffrey M. Wooldridge (1995) ArticleTitle“Selection Corrections for Panel Data Models under Conditional Mean Independence Assumptions” Journal of Econometrics 68 115–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery M. Wooldridge (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data MIT Press Cambridge 752

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, Jeffery M. (2003). Introductory Econometrics. A Modern Approach. 2 e. Thomson South-Western.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catalina Amuedo-Dorantes.

Additional information

JEL Codes: J13 and J3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amuedo-Dorantes, C., Kimmel, J. “The Motherhood Wage Gap for Women in the United States: The Importance of College and Fertility Delay”. Rev Econ Household 3, 17–48 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-004-0978-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-004-0978-9

Keywords

Navigation