Abstract
This paper examines the effect of children’s college expenses on household savings. The theoretical model introduces life-cycle savings into the quality–quantity model of fertility and derives predictions for the impact of expected expenses on parents’ savings. Using the actual amount of parents’ financial support reported in the Survey of Consumer Finances, the empirical model estimates the expected expenditures on children’s college education and investigates the effect of expected expenditures on parents’ savings. The results show that parents’ support for each of their children’s college expenses decreases with the number of children. The results are consistent with the predictions of the life-cycle theory of saving and consumption that households save in advance for expected expenses to smooth their consumption.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Net worth in each year is the total value of household’s assets minus its total liabilities. Total assets is the sum of financial assets and nonfinancial assets, where the former includes liquid assets (checking assets, money market deposit accounts, saving accounts, call accounts, certificates of deposit and saving accounts), stocks, bonds, mutual funds, individual retirement accounts, Keogh accounts, trusts, cash value of life insurance and the latter includes residential property, other real estate, business equity, vehicles and other real assets like art and precious metals. Total liabilities include mortgage debt, home equity loans, other loans for property, credit card debt, automobile loans, balances outstanding on lines of credit, and loans for consumer durables.
All dollar values are reported in 1986 dollars.
References
Babiarz, P., & Yilmazer, T. (2007). The impact of college financial aid rules on household portfolio choice. (Working Paper. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University). Retrieved November 12, 2007, from http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~yilmazer/financial_aid_and_portfolio_choice.pdf.
Becker, G. S., & Lewis, H. G. (1973). On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy, 81, S279–S288.
Browning, M., & Lusardi, A. (1996). Household saving: Micro theories and micro facts. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 1797–1855.
Cha, K. W., Weagley, R. O., & Reynolds, L. (2005). Parental borrowing for dependent children’s higher education. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 26, 299–321.
Choy, S. P., & Henke, R. R. (1992). Parental financial support for undergraduate education. National Postsecondary Student Aid Study, Research and Development Report. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved November 12, 2007, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/24/0b/5c.pdf.
Churaman, C. V. (1992). Financing of college education by single-parent and two-parent families. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 13, 95–112.
College Board. (2004). Trends in College Pricing 2004. New York: College Entrance Examination Board. Retrieved November 12, 2007, from http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/press/cost04/041264TrendsPricing2004_FINAL.pdf.
Dick, A. W., & Edlin, A. S. (1997). The implicit taxes from college financial aid. Journal of Public Economics, 65, 295–322.
Edlin, A. S. (1993). Is college financial aid equitable and efficient? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7, 143–158.
Feldstein, M. (1995). College scholarship rules and private saving. American Economic Review, 85, 552–566.
Finke, M. S., Huston, S. J., & Sharpe, D. L. (2006). Balance sheets of early boomers: Are they different from pre-boomers? Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27, 542–561.
Gale, W. G., & Scholz, J. K. (1994). Intergenerational transfers and the accumulation of wealth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 145–160.
Hatcher, C. B. (2002). Wealth, reservation wealth, and the decision to retire. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 23, 167–187.
Hong, G. S., & Kao, Y. E. (1997). Emergency fund adequacy of Asian Americans. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 18, 127–145.
Horioka, C. Y., & Watanabe, W. (1997). Why do people save? A micro-analysis of motives for household saving in Japan. Economic Journal, 107, 537–552.
Long, M. (2004). The impact of asset-tested college financial aid on household savings. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 63–88.
Ma, J. (2005). College savings options and the impact of savings on financial aid. TIAA-CREF Institute Research Dialogue, 83. Retrieved November 12, 2007 from http://www.tiaa-crefinstitute.org/research/dialogue/83.html.
Mauldin, T., Mimura, Y., & Lino, M. (2001). Parental expenditures on children’s education. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 22, 221–241.
Presley, J. B., & Clery, S. B. (2001). Middle income undergraduates: Where they enroll and how they pay for their education. (Statistical Analysis Report. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics). Retrieved November 12, 2007, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/19/34/76.pdf.
Souleles, N. S. (2000). College tuition and household savings and consumption. Journal of Public Economics, 77, 185–207.
Steelman, L. C., & Powell, B. (1989). Acquiring capital for college: The constraints of family configuration. American Sociological Review, 54, 844–855.
Tomes, N. (1981a). A model of fertility and children’s schooling. Economic Inquiry, 19, 209–234.
Tomes, N. (1981b). The family, inheritance and the intergenerational transmission of inequality. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 928–958.
Wakita, S., Fitzsimmons, V. S., & Liao, T. F. (2000). Wealth: Determinants of savings net worth and housing net worth of pre-retired households. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 21, 387–418.
Willis, R. J. (1973). A new approach to the economic theory of fertility behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 81, S14–S64.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank two anonymous referees and the editor, Jing Jian Xiao, for their detailed and insightful comments. I would also like to thank Jacqueline Angel, Don Fullerton, Angela C. Lyons, Daniel T. Slesnick, Max Stinchcombe and Peter Wilcoxen for their helpful suggestions. Patryk Babiarz provided exceptional research assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A
Definition of variables
Name | Description |
---|---|
Number of children | Number of children of either the respondent or spouse |
Completed fertility | Predicted number of children when the household head is 55 years old |
College expenditures | Amount of parental support for college expenses of each child |
Expected college expenditures | Predicted amount of parents’ support for children’s college expenses |
Has a child in college | =1 if the household has a child attending college between 1983 and 86; =0 otherwise |
Savings_1 | (Net worth in 1986 minus net worth in 1983)/3 |
Savings_2 | (Net worth in 1986 excluding the capital gains on primary residence minus net worth in 1983)/3 |
Net worth | Household net worth in 1983 |
Permanent income | Exponential of predicted log of 1985 household income |
Transitory income | Difference between total household income in 1985 and permanent income |
Age | Age of the household head in 1983 |
Age2 | Age-squared of the household head in 1983 |
High school | =1 if the household head has a high school degree; =0 otherwise |
College | =1 if the household head has a college degree; =0 otherwise |
Black | =1 if the household head is African-American; =0 otherwise |
Couple | =1 if the household head has a partner; =0 otherwise |
Female | =1 if the household head is a single female; =0 otherwise |
All right to borrow for education | =1 if the household head thinks it is all right to borrow for education; =0 otherwise |
Windfall | =1 if the household received a windfall greater than $3,000 between 1983 and 86; =0 otherwise |
Risky | =1 if the household head is willing to undertake risky investments; =0 otherwise |
Non-SMSA | =1 if the place of residence is not in a SMSA; =0 otherwise |
# of children in college | The number of children attending college between 1983 and 86 |
High school_spouse | =1 if the female partner has a high school degree; =0 otherwise |
College_spouse | = 1 if the female partner has a college degree; =0 otherwise |
Work_spouse | = 1 if the female partner has a full-time job in 1983; =0 otherwise |
Retirement | =1 if retirement is the most important reason for saving; =0 otherwise |
Emergencies | =1 if emergencies is the most important reason for saving; =0 otherwise |
Children’s education | =1 if children’s education is the most important reason for saving; =0 otherwise |
Home purchase | =1 if saving to buy a home is the most important reason for saving; =0 otherwise |
Other saving motives | =1 if the household cited another reason as the most important reason to save; =0 otherwise |
Net worth_25 | =1 if the household is in the bottom 25 percentile of the wealth distribution in 1983; =0 otherwise |
Net worth_75 | =1 if the household is in the top 25 percentile of the wealth distribution in 1983; =0 otherwise |
Never married | =1 if the household head has never been married; =0 otherwise |
Widow | =1 if the household head is a widow or widower; =0 otherwise |
Divorced | =1 if the household head is divorced; =0 otherwise |
Education (years) | The number of years the household head attended school |
Appendix B
Estimates of OLS regression for the log of 1985 household income
Coeff | Std. Error | |
---|---|---|
Constant | 7.899 | 0.227** |
Age | 0.044 | 0.008** |
Age2 | 0.000 | 0.000** |
Black | −0.787 | 0.952 |
Black × Age | 0.019 | 0.043 |
Black × Age2 | −0.0002 | 0.000 |
Never married | −0.191 | 0.134 |
Widow | −0.101 | 0.149 |
Divorced | −0.090 | 0.129 |
Female | −0.190 | 0.093** |
High school | 0.111 | 0.070 |
College | 0.150 | 0.125 |
Education (years) | 0.086 | 0.015** |
High school_spouse | 0.280 | 0.079** |
College_spouse | 0.327 | 0.084** |
Work_spouse | 0.186 | 0.041** |
N | 1,699 | |
Mean of log of income | 10.132 | |
R 2 | 0.352 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yilmazer, T. Saving for Children’s College Education: An Empirical Analysis of the Trade-off Between the Quality and Quantity of Children. J Fam Econ Iss 29, 307–324 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-008-9105-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-008-9105-z