Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of race and gender on bail outcomes: A test of an interactive model

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper responds to suggestions that researchers interested in the relationship between defendant race, defendant gender, and criminal justice outcomes broaden their focus to include pretrial decision making. We used data on defendants charged with violent felonies in Detroit Recorder’s Court to analyze the effect of race and gender on the amount of bail imposed by the judge and on the defendant’s pretrial status. We found that judges take gender, but not race, into account in determining the amount of bail for certain types of cases; more specifically, Black females faced lower bail than Black males in less serious cases. In contrast, we found that both race and gender affected the likelihood of pretrial release. White defendants were more likely than black defendants to be released pending trial and females were more likely than males to be released prior to trial. In fact, white females, white males, and black females all were more likely than black males to be released.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albonetti, C.A. (1989). Bail and judicial discretion in the District of Columbia.Sociology and Social Research, 74, 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albonetti, C.A. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion.Social Problems, 38, 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albonetti, C.A., Hauser, R.M., Hagan, J., & Nagel, I.H. (1989). Criminal justice decision making as a stratification process: The role of race and stratification resources in pretrial release.Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 5, 57–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldus, D.C., Woodworth, G., & Pulaski, C. (1985). Monitoring and evaluating contemporary death sentencing systems: Lessons from Georgia.U.C. Davis Law Review, 18, 1375–1407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamett, A. (1985). Some distribution patterns for the Georgia death sentence.U.C. Davis Law Review, 18, 1327–1374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bases, N. G., & McDonald, W.F. (1972).Preventive detention in the District of Columbia: The first ten months. Washington, DC: Georgetown Institute on Criminal Law and Procedure.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. (1976).The behavior of law. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1988).Pretrial release and detention: The Bail Reform Act of 1984. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bynum, T. (1982). Release on recognizance: Substantive or superficial reform?Criminology, 20, 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S.H., & Koch, G.G. (1976). The Influence of income and other factors on whether criminal defendants go to prison.Law and Society Review, 11, 57–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K. (1987). Discrimination in the criminal courts: Family, gender and the problem of equal treatment.Social Forces, 66, 152–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K. (1989). Neither conflict nor labeling nor paternalism will suffice: Intersections of race, ethnicity, gender, and family in criminal court decisions.Crime & Delinquency, 35, 136–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farnworth, M., & Horan, P. (1980). Separate justice: An analysis of race differences in court processes.Social Science Research, 9, 381–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, R.A., & Swigert, V.L. (1978). Prior offense record as a self-fulfilling prophecy.Law and Society Review, 12, 437–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeley, M.M. (1983).Court reform on trial: Why simple solutions fail. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote, C. (1954). Compelling appearance in court: Administration of bail in Philadelphia.University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 102, 1031–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, C.E., Bock, E.W., & Henretta, J.C. (1980). Pretrial release and bail decisions: The effects of legal, community, and personal variables.Criminology, 18, 162–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldkamp, J. S. (1985). Danger and detention: A second generation of bail reform.Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 76, 1–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldkamp, J.S., & Gottfredson, M. (1979). Bail decision making and pretrial detention: Surfacing judicial policy.Law and Human Behavior, 3, 227–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D. (1987). Beyond anomalies: Rethinking the conflict perspective on race and criminal punishment.Social Forces, 65, 719–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heumann, M., & Loftin, C. (1979). Mandatory sentencing and the abolition of plea bargaining.Law and Society Review, 13, 393–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalven, H., & Zeisel, H. (1966).The American jury. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruttschnitt, C. (1984). Sex and criminal court dispositions: The unresolved controversy.Research in Crime and Delinquency, 21, 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruttschnitt, G., & McCarthy, D. (1985). Familial social control and pretrial sanctions: Does sex really matter?Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 76, 151–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaFree, G.D. (1985). Official reactions to Hispanic defendants in the Southwest.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 213–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loftin, C., Heumann, M., & McDowall, D. (1983). Mandatory sentencing and firearm violence: Evaluating an alternative to gun control.Law and Society Review, 17, 287–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, C.R. (1993).Unequal justice: A question of color. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miethe, T.D., & Moore, C.A. (1986). Racial differences in criminal processing: The consequences of model selection on conclusions about different treatment.The Sociological Quarterly, 27, 217–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, I. H. (1983). The legal/extra-legal controversy: Judicial decisions in pretrial release.Law and Society Review, 17, 481–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, S. (1969).The legal process from a behavioral perspective. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Minority Advisory Council on Criminal Justice. (1980).The inequality of justice. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, E.B., & Lynch, M.J. (1991). Biases in formalized bail procedures. In M.J. Lynch & E.B. Paterson (Eds.),Race and criminal justice (pp. 36–53). New York: Harrow and Heston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J. (1983).Racial disparities in the criminal justice system. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, B.F., & Visher, C.A. (1986). The impacts of evidence and extralegal factors in jurors’ decisions.Law and Society Review, 20, 423–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, T.E. (1989). Pretrial detention under the Bail Reform Act of 1984: An empirical analysis.American Criminal Law Review, 27, 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, C. (1992). An analysis of the ‘jury trial penalty’ and its effect on Black and White defendants.The Justice Professional, 7, 93–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, C. (1994). Crime and the social control of Blacks: The effect of offender/ victim race on sentences for violent felonies. In G. Bridges & M. Myers (Eds.),Inequality, crime and social control. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, C. (1990). The sentencing decisions of Black and White judges: Expected and unexpected similarities.Law and Society Review, 24, 1197–1216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, C., & Cederblom, J. (1991). Race and disparities in sentencing: A test of the liberation hypothesis.Justice Quarterly, 8, 305–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, C., Welch, S., & Gruhl, J. (1985). Women defendants in court: The interaction between sex and race in convicting and sentencing.Social Science Quarterly, 66, 176–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, R., Nagel, I., & Hagan, J. (1983). Methodology issues in court research: Pretrial release decisions for federal defendants.Sociological Methods and Research, 11, 469–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, R.J., & Zingraff, M.T. (1981). Detecting sentencing disparity: Some problems and evidence.American Journal of Sociology, 86, 869–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unnever, J.D. (1982). Direct and organizational discrimination in the sentencing of drug offenders.Social Problems, 30, 212–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. (1993).Taming the system: The control of discretion in criminal justice, 1950–1990. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, A. (1987). The sexual stratification hypothesis and sexual assault in light of the changing conceptions of race.Criminology, 22, 147–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, G.R., & Wheeler, C.L. (1980). Reflections on legal representation of the economically disadvantage: Beyond assembly line justice.Crime & Delinquency, 26, 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zatz, M.S. (1987). The changing forms of racial/ethnic biases in sentencing.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 69–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katz, C.M., Spohn, C.C. The effect of race and gender on bail outcomes: A test of an interactive model. AJCJ 19, 161–184 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02885913

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02885913

Keywords

Navigation