Abstract
Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, localities across the United States have been given unprecedented short-term rental assistance funding and considerable flexibility in its distribution. The emergency nature of these programs suggests that the administrative burden placed on participants should be lower than in typical rental assistance programs such as the housing choice voucher program. Yet there are several features unique to housing, such as the double take-up challenge of engaging both tenants and landlords, that persist. This article draws on national surveys of more than two hundred emergency rental assistance programs, surveys of thousands of tenant and landlord applicants, and interviews with ten program administrators to investigate the degree and sources of administrative burdens in these programs.
- © 2023 Russell Sage Foundation. Aiken, Claudia, Ingrid Gould Ellen, and Vincent Reina. 2023. “Administrative Burdens in Emergency Rental Assistance Programs.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 9(5): 100–121. DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2023.9.5.05. Vincent Reina’s contribution to this article occurred before he took on his position as the senior policy advisor for housing and urban policy in the White House Domestic Policy Council and reflects his personal views only. The authors acknowledge Isabel Harner and Jackie Bein, who provided research assistance. Direct correspondence to: Claudia Aiken, at claudia.aiken{at}nyu.edu, NYU Furman Center, Wilf Hall, 139 MacDougal St., 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10012, United States.
Open Access Policy: RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences is an open access journal. This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.






