Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request Form for Authors to Request Permission from other Publishers
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
    • RSF Policy on the Use of AI
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Publications
    • rsf

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
  • Publications
    • rsf
  • Log in
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Advanced Search

  • Foundation Website
  • Journal Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Future Issues
  • For Authors and Editors
    • Overview of RSF & How to Propose an Issue
    • RSF Style and Submission Guidelines
    • Article Submission Checklist
    • Permission Request Form for Authors to Request Permission from other Publishers
    • Terms of Contributor Agreement Form and Transfer of Copyright
    • RSF Contributor Agreement Form
    • Issue Editors' Agreement Form
    • RSF Policy on the Use of AI
  • About the Journal
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Comments and Replies Policy
    • Journal Code of Ethics
    • Current Calls for Articles
    • Closed Calls for Articles
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright and ISSN Information
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Follow rsf on Twitter
  • Visit rsf on Facebook
  • Follow rsf on Google Plus
Research ArticleII. Gender, Family, and Marriage Penalties and Premiums
Open Access

The Role of Extended Family in Asian American Women’s Employment from 1990 to 2022

Sojung Lim, Wonjeong Jeong
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences June 2026, 12 (3) 124-144; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2026.12.3.06
Sojung Lim
aAssociate professor of sociology and criminology and Korea Foundation Professor of Korean Studies, State University of New York at Buffalo, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sojung Lim
Wonjeong Jeong
bPostdoctoral associate, Social Science Division, New York University Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Wonjeong Jeong
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Prevalence of Extended Family by Ethnicity, Immigrant Generation, and Period Source: 1990 Census; 2000 Census; ACS 2001–2022. Note: Extended family refers to a household that includes at least one parent or parent-in-law. In this figure, “2000s” refers to the ACS data from 2001 to 2009, “2010s” refers to the ACS data from 2010 to 2019, and “2020s” refers to the ACS data from 2020 to 2022. Statistics are weighted using individual weights. For US-born, non-Hispanic White women, immigrant generation is not differentiated. NH = non-Hispanic.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Prevalence of Extended Family by Ethnicity, Immigrant Generation, and Period

    Source: 1990 Census; 2000 Census; ACS 2001–2022.

    Note: Extended family refers to a household that includes at least one parent or parent-in-law. In this figure, “2000s” refers to the ACS data from 2001 to 2009, “2010s” refers to the ACS data from 2010 to 2019, and “2020s” refers to the ACS data from 2020 to 2022. Statistics are weighted using individual weights. For US-born, non-Hispanic White women, immigrant generation is not differentiated. NH = non-Hispanic.

  • Employment Rates by Ethnicity, Immigrant Generation, and Family Structure Source: 1990 Census; 2000 Census; ACS 2001–2022. Note: Extended family refers to a household that includes at least one parent or parent-in-law. In this figure, “2000s” refers to the ACS data from 2001 to 2009, “2010s” refers to the ACS data from 2010 to 2019, and “2020s” refers to the ACS data from 2020 to 2022. Statistics are weighted using individual weights. For US-born, non-Hispanic White women, immigrant generation is not differentiated. All group differences by family type are statistically significant at the 95 percent level unless noted as n.s., which stands for non-significant difference at the 95 percent confidence level. NH = non-Hispanic.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Employment Rates by Ethnicity, Immigrant Generation, and Family Structure

    Source: 1990 Census; 2000 Census; ACS 2001–2022.

    Note: Extended family refers to a household that includes at least one parent or parent-in-law. In this figure, “2000s” refers to the ACS data from 2001 to 2009, “2010s” refers to the ACS data from 2010 to 2019, and “2020s” refers to the ACS data from 2020 to 2022. Statistics are weighted using individual weights. For US-born, non-Hispanic White women, immigrant generation is not differentiated. All group differences by family type are statistically significant at the 95 percent level unless noted as n.s., which stands for non-significant difference at the 95 percent confidence level. NH = non-Hispanic.

  • Differences in the Predicted Probability of Employment Between Asian and White Women Source: 1990 Census; 2000 Census; ACS 2001–2022. Note: Extended family refers to a household that includes at least one parent or parent-in-law. In this figure, “2000s” refers to the ACS data from 2001 to 2009, “2010s” refers to the ACS data from 2010 to 2019, and “2020s” refers to the ACS data from 2020 to 2022. The figure displays differences in predicted probabilities of employment between US-born, non-Hispanic White women (represented by the dashed horizontal line) and various Asian groups. Circled dots indicate statistically significant differences between a specific Asian group and White women at the 95 percent confidence level, while x-marks represent non-significant differences. Predicted values are calculated while holding all control variables, including age, census region, education, marital status, parenthood status, and household income, constant at their observed distributions.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Differences in the Predicted Probability of Employment Between Asian and White Women

    Source: 1990 Census; 2000 Census; ACS 2001–2022.

    Note: Extended family refers to a household that includes at least one parent or parent-in-law. In this figure, “2000s” refers to the ACS data from 2001 to 2009, “2010s” refers to the ACS data from 2010 to 2019, and “2020s” refers to the ACS data from 2020 to 2022. The figure displays differences in predicted probabilities of employment between US-born, non-Hispanic White women (represented by the dashed horizontal line) and various Asian groups. Circled dots indicate statistically significant differences between a specific Asian group and White women at the 95 percent confidence level, while x-marks represent non-significant differences. Predicted values are calculated while holding all control variables, including age, census region, education, marital status, parenthood status, and household income, constant at their observed distributions.

  • Differences in the Predicted Probability of Employment Among Women with Young Children Source: 1990 Census; 2000 Census; ACS 2001–2022. Note: Extended family refers to a household that includes at least one parent or parent-in-law. In this figure, “2000s” refers to the ACS data from 2001 to 2009, “2010s” refers to the ACS data from 2010 to 2019, and “2020s” refers to the ACS data from 2020 to 2022. The presence of young children is defined as having at least one child under the age of five. The figure displays differences in predicted probabilities of employment between US-born, non-Hispanic White women (represented by the dashed horizontal line) and various Asian groups. Circled dots indicate statistically significant difference between a specific Asian group and White women at the 95 percent confidence level, while x-marks represent non-significant differences. Predicted values are calculated while holding all control variables, including age, census region, education, marital status, parenthood status, and household income, constant at their observed distributions.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Differences in the Predicted Probability of Employment Among Women with Young Children

    Source: 1990 Census; 2000 Census; ACS 2001–2022.

    Note: Extended family refers to a household that includes at least one parent or parent-in-law. In this figure, “2000s” refers to the ACS data from 2001 to 2009, “2010s” refers to the ACS data from 2010 to 2019, and “2020s” refers to the ACS data from 2020 to 2022. The presence of young children is defined as having at least one child under the age of five. The figure displays differences in predicted probabilities of employment between US-born, non-Hispanic White women (represented by the dashed horizontal line) and various Asian groups. Circled dots indicate statistically significant difference between a specific Asian group and White women at the 95 percent confidence level, while x-marks represent non-significant differences. Predicted values are calculated while holding all control variables, including age, census region, education, marital status, parenthood status, and household income, constant at their observed distributions.

  • Differences in the Predicted Probability of Employment by Type of Extended Family Source: 1990 Census; 2000 Census; ACS 2001–2022. Note: Extended family refers to a household that includes at least one parent or parent-in-law. In this figure, “2000s” refers to the ACS data from 2001 to 2009, “2010s” refers to the ACS data from 2010 to 2019, and “2020s” refers to the ACS data from 2020 to 2022. The figure displays differences in predicted probabilities of employment between US-born, non-Hispanic White women (represented by the dashed horizontal line) and various Asian groups. Circled dots indicate statistically significant difference between a specific Asian group and White women at the 95 percent confidence level, while x-marks represent non-significant differences. Predicted values are calculated while holding all control variables, including age, census region, education, marital status, parenthood status, and household income, constant at their observed distributions.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Differences in the Predicted Probability of Employment by Type of Extended Family

    Source: 1990 Census; 2000 Census; ACS 2001–2022.

    Note: Extended family refers to a household that includes at least one parent or parent-in-law. In this figure, “2000s” refers to the ACS data from 2001 to 2009, “2010s” refers to the ACS data from 2010 to 2019, and “2020s” refers to the ACS data from 2020 to 2022. The figure displays differences in predicted probabilities of employment between US-born, non-Hispanic White women (represented by the dashed horizontal line) and various Asian groups. Circled dots indicate statistically significant difference between a specific Asian group and White women at the 95 percent confidence level, while x-marks represent non-significant differences. Predicted values are calculated while holding all control variables, including age, census region, education, marital status, parenthood status, and household income, constant at their observed distributions.

  • Differences in the Predicted Probability of Employment by Household Income Level Source: 1990 Census; 2000 Census; ACS 2001–2022. Note: Extended family refers to a household that includes at least one parent or parent-in-law. In this figure, “2000s” refers to the ACS data from 2001 to 2009, “2010s” refers to the ACS data from 2010 to 2019, and “2020s” refers to the ACS data from 2020 to 2022. The figure displays differences in predicted probabilities of employment between US-born, non-Hispanic White women (represented by the dashed horizontal line) and various Asian groups. Circled dots indicate statistically significant difference between a specific Asian group and White women at the 95 percent confidence level, while x-marks represent non-significant differences. Predicted values are calculated while holding all control variables, including age, census region, education, marital status, parenthood status, and household income, constant at their observed distributions.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Differences in the Predicted Probability of Employment by Household Income Level

    Source: 1990 Census; 2000 Census; ACS 2001–2022.

    Note: Extended family refers to a household that includes at least one parent or parent-in-law. In this figure, “2000s” refers to the ACS data from 2001 to 2009, “2010s” refers to the ACS data from 2010 to 2019, and “2020s” refers to the ACS data from 2020 to 2022. The figure displays differences in predicted probabilities of employment between US-born, non-Hispanic White women (represented by the dashed horizontal line) and various Asian groups. Circled dots indicate statistically significant difference between a specific Asian group and White women at the 95 percent confidence level, while x-marks represent non-significant differences. Predicted values are calculated while holding all control variables, including age, census region, education, marital status, parenthood status, and household income, constant at their observed distributions.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table
  • Table
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: 12 (3)
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Vol. 12, Issue 3
1 Jun 2026
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Role of Extended Family in Asian American Women’s Employment from 1990 to 2022
(Your Name) has sent you a message from RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Role of Extended Family in Asian American Women’s Employment from 1990 to 2022
Sojung Lim, Wonjeong Jeong
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Jun 2026, 12 (3) 124-144; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2026.12.3.06

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Role of Extended Family in Asian American Women’s Employment from 1990 to 2022
Sojung Lim, Wonjeong Jeong
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences Jun 2026, 12 (3) 124-144; DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2026.12.3.06
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • EXTENDED FAMILY STRUCTURE AND ASIAN AMERICAN WOMEN’S EMPLOYMENT
    • VARIATION BY ETHNICITY, IMMIGRANT GENERATION, AND TIME
    • DATA AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION
    • APPENDIX
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Narrowing the Gender Wage Gap Among Computer Science Professionals: What Differentiates the Earnings of Asian and White Workers?
  • Nonmarital Childbearing and Family Structure Among Asian Americans: The Role of Socioeconomic Status, Ethnicity, and Immigration
Show more II. Gender, Family, and Marriage Penalties and Premiums

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Asian American
  • women
  • employment
  • labor market attachment
  • extended family

© 2026 RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Powered by HighWire